Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 636-645

  Liu, Song ^a,d   Zhang, Chi ^a,b,c   Liang, Shide ^a,b,c   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b Indiana University   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Remote homolog; Solvent accessibility; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SOLVENTS;

EID: 34447506573     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21459     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Goldsmith-Fischman S, Honig B. Structural genomics: computational methods for structure analysis. Protein Sci. 2003;12:1813-1821.
2. Friedberg I, Jaroszewski L, Ye Y, Godzik A. The interplay of fold recognition and experimental structure determination in structural genomics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:307-312.
3. Kihara D, Skolnick J. The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures. J Mol Biol 2003;334:793-802.
4. Zhang Y, Hubner IA, Arakaki AK, Shakhnovich E, Skolnick J. On the origin and completeness of single domain structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:2605-2610.
5. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
6. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998;14:846-856.
7. Koretke KK, Russell RB, Lupas AN. Fold recognition from sequence comparisons. Proteins 2001;5(Suppl):68-75.
8. Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 2000;9:232-241.
9. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002;315:1257-1275.
10. Pei J, Sadreyev R, Grishin N. PCMA: fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment based on profile consistency. Bioinformatics 2003;19:427-428.
11. Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan M, Sali A. Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles. Protein Sci 2004;13:1071-1087.
12. Edgar RC, Sjolander K. COACH: profile-profile alignment of protein families using hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1309-1318.
13. Soding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005;21:951-960.
14. Wistrand M, Sonnhammer E. Improved profile HMM performance by assessment of critical algorithmic features in SAM and HMMER. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:99.
15. Tan YH, Huang H, Kihara D. Statistical potential-based amino acid similarity matrices for aligning distantly related protein sequences. Proteins 2006;64:587-600.
16. Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rice DW, Le Grand SM, Eisenberg D. A study of combined structure/sequence profiles. Fold Des 1996;1:451-461.
17. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJE. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J Mol Biol 2000;299:499-520.
18. Jones DT. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999;287:797-815.
19. Panchenko AR, Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition. J Mol Biol 2000;296:1319-1331.
20. Shan YB, Wang GL, Zhou HX. Fold recognition and accurate query-template alignment by a combination of PSI-BLAST and threading. Proteins 2001;42:23-37.
21. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
22. Xu J, Li M, Lin G, Kim D, Xu Y. Protein structure prediction by linear programming. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003;8:264-275.
23. Tang CL, Xie L, Koh IY, Posy S, Alexov E, Honig B. On the role of structural information in remote homology detection and sequence alignment: new methods using hybrid sequence profiles. J Mol Biol 2003;334:1043-1062.
24. Kim D, Xu D, Guo J, Ellrott K, Xu Y. PROSPECT II: Protein structure prediction program for the genome-scale. Protein Eng 2003;16:641-650.
25. Torda AE, Procter JB, Huber T. Wurst: a protein threading server with a structural scoring function, sequence profiles and optimized substitution matrices. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W532-W535.
26. Skolnick J, Kihara D, Zhang Y. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR 3.0 threading algorithm. Proteins 2004;56:502-518.
27. Cheng J, Baldi P. A machine learning information retrieval approach to protein fold recognition. Bioinformatics 2006;22:1456-1463.
28. Meller J, Elber R. Protein recognition by sequence-to-structure fit-ness: bridging efficiency and capacity of threading models. Adv Chem Phys 2002;120:77-130.
29. Godzik A. Fold recognition methods. Methods Biochem Anal 2003;44:525-546.
30. Kinch L, Wrabl J, Krishna S, Majumdar I, Sadreyev R, Qi Y, Pei J, Cheng H, Grishin N. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins 2003;6 (Suppl):395-409.
31. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Scoring profile-profile sequence alignments. Protein Sci 2004;13:1612-1626.
32. Edgar RC, Sjolander K. A comparison of scoring functions for protein sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1301-1308.
33. Petrey D, Honig B. Protein structure prediction: inroads to biology. Mol Cell 2005;20:811-819.
34. Dunbrack RL, Jr. Sequence comparison and protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:374-384.
35. Bujnicki J, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. Structure prediction meta server. Bioinformatics 2001;21:750-751.
36. Juan D, Grana O, Pazos F, Fariselli P, Casadio R, Valencia A. A neural network approach to evaluate fold recognition results. Proteins 2003;50:600-608.
37. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;22:1015-1018.
38. Chivian D, Kim D, Malmstrom L, Bradley P, Robertson T, Murphy P, Strauss C, Bonneau R, Rohl AC, Baker D. Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server. Proteins 2003;53:524-533.
39. Wallner B, Fang H, Elofsson A. Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Pcons, ProQ, and Pmodeller. Proteins 2003;53:534-541.
40. Fischer D. Servers for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:178-182.
41. n and Cyber servers. Bioinformatics 2003;19:795-795.
42. Lee B, Richards F. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
43. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
44. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Single-body knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins 2004;55:1005-1013.
45. Rost B, Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 1994;20:216-226.
46. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression. Proteins 2004;56:753-767.
47. Rost B, Sander C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol 1997;270:471-480.
48. McGuffin LJ, Jones DT. Benchmarking secondary structure prediction for fold recognition. Proteins 2003;52:166-175.
49. Ginalski K, Pas J, Wyrwicz LS, vonGrotthuss M, Bujnicki JM, Rychlewski L. ORFeus: detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3804-3807.
50. Rost B. Topits: threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. In: Rawlings C, Clark D, Altman R, Hunter L, Lengauer T, Wodak S, editors. Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. Cambridge, England: AAAI Press; 1995. pp 314-321.
51. Karchin R, Cline M, Karplus K. Evaluation of local structure alphabets based on residue burial. Proteins 2004;55:508-518.
52. Przybylski D, Rost B. Improving fold recognition without folds. J Mol Biol 2004;341:255-269.
53. Qiu J, Elber R. SSALN: an alignment algorithm using structure-dependent substitution matrices and gap penalties learned from structurally aligned protein pairs. Proteins 2006;62:881-891.
54. Pedersen T, Sigurskjold B, Andersen K, Kjaer M, Poulsen F, Dobson C, Redfield C. A nuclear magnetic resonance study of the hydrogen-exchange behaviour of lysozyme in crystals and solution. J Mol Biol 1991;218:413-426.
55. Chakravarty S, Varadarajan R. Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Struct Fold Des 1999;15:723-732.
56. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 2005;58:321-328.
57. 3 servers in CASP6. Proteins 2005;7 (Suppl):152-156.
58. Tress M, Ezkurdia I, Grana O, Lopez G, Valencia A. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP6 comparative modeling category. Proteins 2005;7 (Suppl):27-45.
59. Pintar A, Carugo O, Pongor S. Atom depth as a descriptor of the protein interior. Biophys J 2003;84:2553-2561.
60. Pintar A, Carugo O, Pongor S. Atom depth in protein structure and function. Trends Biochem Sci 2003;28:593-597.
61. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589-1591.
62. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
63. Kraulis P. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1991;24:946-950.
64. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
65. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2005;59: 467-475.
66. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol 1976;105:1-12.
67. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981;147:195-197.
68. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. Maxsub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000;16:776-785.
69. Domingues FS, Lackner P, Andreeva A, Sippl MJ. Structure-based evaluation of sequence comparison and fold recognition alignment accuracy. J Mol Biol 2000;297:1003-1013.
70. Lindahl E, Elofsson A. Identification of related proteins on family, superfamily and fold level. J Mol Biol 2000;295:613-625.
71. Rychlewski L, Fischer D. LiveBench-8: the large-scale, continuous assessment of automated protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2005;14:240-245.
72. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:2302-2309.
73. Shindyalov IN, Bourne P. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998;11:739-747.
74. Kolodny R, Koehl P, Levitt M. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. J Mol Biol 2005;346:1173-1188.
75. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
76. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
77. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2002;47:142-153.
78. Chen HL, Zhou HX. Prediction of solvent accessibility and sites of deleterious mutations from protein sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:3193-3199.
79. Dor O, Zhou Y. Achieving 80% ten-fold cross-validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large-scale training. Proteins 2007;66:838-845.
80. Garg A, Kaur H, Raghava G. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility in proteins using multiple sequence alignment and secondary structure. Proteins 2005;61:318-324.
81. Xu Z, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. QBES: predicting real values of solvent accessibility from sequences by efficient, constrained energy optimization. Proteins 2006;63:961-966.
82. Dor O, Zhou Y. Real-SPINE: an integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties. Proteins, in press.
83. Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A. The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1243-1249.
84. Zhou H, Zhou Y. SPEM: improving multiple sequence alignment with sequence profiles and predicted secondary structures. Bioinformatics 2006;21:3615-3621.
85. Thompson J, Higgins D, Gibson T. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4690.