The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins

Protein Science

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1955-1963

  Kihara, Daisuke ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

B strand formation; Long range interaction; Residue contact order; Secondary structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; COMPLEX FORMATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS;

AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 23644456329     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.051479505     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
2. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N., and Bourne, P.E. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 235-242.
3. Boeckmann, B., Bairoch, A., Apweiler, R., Blatter, M.C., Estreicher, A., Gasteiger, E., Martin, M.J., Michoud, K., O'Donovan, C., Phan, I., et al. 2003. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 365-370.
4. Chikenji, G., Fujitsuka, W., and Takada, S. 2004. Protein folding mechanisms and energy landscape of src SH3 domain studied by a structure prediction toolbox. Chem. Phys. 307: 157-162.
5. Chou, P.Y. and Fasman, G.D. 1978a. Empirical predictions of protein conformation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47: 251-276.
6. _. 1978b. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 47: 45-148.
7. Crooks, G.E. and Brenner, S.E. 2004. Protein secondary structure: Entropy, correlations and prediction. Bioinformatics 20: 1603-1611.
8. Cuff, J.A. and Barton, G.J. 2000. Application of multiple sequence alignment profiles to improve protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins 40: 502-511.
9. Delano, W.L. 2002. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. http://www.pymol.org.
10. Fiser, A., Dosztanyi, Z., and Simon, I. 1997. The role of long-range interactions in defining the secondary structure of proteins is overestimated. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 297-301.
11. Frishman, D. and Argos, P. 1995. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 23: 566-579.
12. _. 1996. Incorporation of non-local interactions in protein secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence. Protein Eng. 9: 133-142.
13. Garnier, J., Osguthorpe, D.J., and Robson, B. 1978. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 120: 97-120.
14. Guo, J., Chen, H., Sun, Z., and Lin, Y. 2004. A novel method for protein secondary structure prediction using dual-layer SVM and profiles. Proteins 54: 738-743.
15. Hua, S. and Sun, Z. 2001. A novel method of protein secondary structure prediction with high segment overlap measure: Support vector machine approach. J. Mol. Biol. 308: 397-407.
16. Ikeda, K. and Higo, J. 2003. Free-energy landscape of a chameleon sequence in explicit water and its inherent α/β bifacial property. Protein Sci. 12: 2542-2548.
17. Ito, M., Matsuo, Y., and Nishikawa, K. 1997. Prediction of protein secondary structure using the 3D-1D compatibility algorithm. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 415-424.
18. Ivankov, D.N., Garbuzynskiy, S.O., Alm, E., Plaxco, K.W., Baker, D., and Finkelstein, A.V. 2003. Contact order revisited: Influence of protein size on the folding rate. Protein Sci. 12: 2057-2062.
19. Jacoboni, I., Martelli, P.L., Fariselli, P., Compiani, M., and Casadio, R. 2000. Predictions of protein segments with the same amino acid sequence and different secondary structure: A benchmark for predictive methods. Proteins 41: 535-544.
20. Jones, D.T. 1999. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292: 195-202.
21. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
22. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Kawashima, S., Okuno, Y., and Hattori, M. 2004. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 Database issue: D277-D280.
23. Karchin, R., Cline, M., Mandel-Gutfreund, Y., and Karplus, K. 2003. Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: Alphabets of backbone geometry. Proteins 51: 504-514.
24. Karplus, K., Barrett, C., and Hughey, R. 1998. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14: 846-856.
25. Kihara, D., Lu, H., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2001. TOUCHSTONE: An ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threadingbased tertiary restraints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 10125-10130.
26. Kinjo, A.R. and Nishikawa, K. 2005. Recoverable one-dimensional encoding of three-dimensional protein structures. Bioinformatics 21: 2167-2170.
27. Kuang, R., Leslie, C.S., and Yang, A.S. 2004. Protein backbone angle prediction with machine learning approaches. Bioinformatics 20: 1612-1621.
28. Levin, J.M. 1997. Exploring the limits of nearest neighbour secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng. 10: 771-776.
29. Lim, V.I. 1974. Structural principles of the globular organization of protein chains. A stereochemical theory of globular protein secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 88: 857-872.
30. Lin, K., Simossis, V.A., Taylor, W.R., and Heringa, J. 2005. A simple and fast secondary structure prediction method using hidden neural networks. Bioinformatics 21: 152-159.
31. Liwo, A., Khalili, M., and Scheraga, H.A. 2005. Ab initio simulations of protein-folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the unitedresidue model of polypeptide chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 2362-2367.
32. Matthews, B.W. 1975. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 405: 442-451.
33. McGuffin, L.J. and Jones, D.T. 2003. Benchmarking secondary structure prediction for fold recognition. Proteins 52: 166-175.
34. Meiler, J. and Baker, D. 2003. Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 12105-12110.
35. Minor Jr., D.L. and Kim, P.S. 1996. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature 380: 730-734.
36. Munoz, V., Cronet, P., Lopez-Hernandez, E., and Serrano, L. 1996. Analysis of the effect of local interactions on protein stability. Fold. Des. 1: 167-178.
37. Nishikawa, K. and Ooi, T. 1980. Prediction of the surface-interior diagram of globular proteins by an empirical method. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 16: 19-32.
38. Pan, X.M., Niu, W.D., and Wang, Z.X. 1999. What is the minimum number of residues to determine the secondary structural state? J. Protein Chem. 18: 579-584.
39. Pearson, W.R. and Lipman, D.J. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 2444-2448.
40. Petersen, T.N., Lundegaard, C., Nielsen, M., Bohr, H., Bohr, J., Brunak, S., Gippert, G.P., and Lund, O. 2000. Prediction of protein secondary structure at 80% accuracy. Proteins 41: 17-20.
41. Plaxco, K.W., Simons, K.T., and Baker, D. 1998. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 277: 985-994.
42. Przybylski, D. and Rost, B. 2002. Alignments grow, secondary structure prediction improves. Proteins 46: 197-205.
43. Rost, B. 2001. Review: Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol. 134: 204-218.
44. Rost, B. and Eyrich, V.A. 2001. EVA: Large-scale analysis of secondary structure prediction. Proteins (Suppl.) 5: 192-199.
45. Rost, B. and Sander, C. 1994. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 19: 55-72.
46. _. 2000. Third generation prediction of secondary structure. In Protein structure prediction (ed. B. Webster), pp 71-95. Humana Press, Clifton, NJ.
47. Schulz, G.E. and Shirmer, R.H. 1979. Principles of protein structure. Springer-Verlag, New York.
48. Shiraki, K., Nishikawa, K., and Goto, Y. 1995. Trifluoroethanol-induced stabilization of the α-helical structure of b-lactoglobulin: Implication for non-hierarchical protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 245: 180-194.
49. Skolnick, J. 2005. Putting the pathway back into protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 2265-2266.
50. Skolnick, J. and Kihara, D. 2001. Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR-A new approach to threading. Proteins 42: 319-331.
51. Skolnick, J., Kihara, D., and Zhang, Y. 2004. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR 3.0 threading algorithm. Proteins 56: 502-518.
52. Ward, J.J., McGuffin, L.J., Buxton, B.F., and Jones, D.T. 2003. Secondary structure prediction with support vector machines. Bioinformatics 19: 1650-1655.
53. Young, M., Kirshenbaum, K., Dill, K.A., and Highsmith, S. 1999. Predicting conformational switches in proteins. Protein Sci. 8: 1752-1764.
54. Zemla, A., Venclovas, C., Fidelis, K., and Rost, B. 1999. A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins 34: 220-223.
55. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y. 2002. Folding rate prediction using total contact distance. Biophys. J. 82: 458-463.
56. Zhou, X., Alber, F., Folkers, G., Gonnet, G.H., and Chelvanayagam, G. 2000. An analysis of the helix-to-strand transition between peptides with identical sequence. Proteins 41: 248-256.