Protein structural motif prediction in multidimensional φ-ψ space leads to improved secondary structure prediction

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1489-1502

  Mooney, Catherine ^a   Vullo, Alessandro ^a   Pollastri, Gianluca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Neural networks; Protein structure prediction; Secondary structure; Structural motifs

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 39049179145     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.1489     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., and Schaffer, A.A. 1997. Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.
2. Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Frasconi, P., et al. 1999. Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 15, 937-946.
3. Baldi, P., and Pollastri, G. 2003. The principled design of large-scale recursive neural network architectures - dag-rnns and the protein structure prediction problem. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4, 575-602.
4. Baldi, P., Pollastri, G., Andersen, C.A.F., et al. 2000. Matching protein β-sheet partners by feedforward and recurrent neural networks. Proc. 2000 Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. (ISMB00) 25-36.
5. Bystroff, C., and Baker, D. 1998. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J. Mol. Biol. 281, 565-577.
6. Bystroff, C., Thorsson, V., and Baker, D. 2000. Hmmstr: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 301, 173-190.
7. Crooks, G.E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.M., et al. 2004. Weblogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188-1190.
8. de Brevern, A.G., Etchebest, C., and Hazout, S. 2000. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 41, 271-287.
9. de Brevern, A.G., Etchebest, C., and Hazout, S. 2004. Local backbone structure prediction of proteins. In Silico Biol. 4, 31.
10. Frasconi, P., Gori, M., and Sperduti, A. 1998. A general framework for adaptive processing of data structures. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 9, 768-786.
11. Hobohm, U., Schard, M., Schneider, R., et al. 1992. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. Protein Science 1, 409-417.
12. Jones, D.T. 1999. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrix. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 195-202.
13. Kabsch, W., and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577-2637.
14. Karchin, R., Cline, M., Mandel-Gutfreund, Y., et al. 2003. Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: alphabets of backbone geometry. Proteins 51, 504-514.
15. Lesk, A.M., Lo Conte, L., and Hubbard, T.J.P. 2001. Assessment of novel fold targets in CASP4: predictions of three-dimensional structures, secondary structures, function and genetics. Proteins S5, 98-118.
16. Moult, J., Fidelis, K., Zemla, A., et al. 2003. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (casp)-round v. Proteins 53, 334-339.
17. Pedersen, T.N., Lundegaard, C., Nielsen, M., et al. 2000. Prediction of protein secondary structure at 80% accuracy. Proteins 41, 17-20.
18. Pollastri, G., and Baldi, P. 2002. Prediction of contact maps by recurrent neural network architectures and hidden context propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 18, S62-S70.
19. Pollastri, G., Baldi, P., Fariselli, P., et al. 2002. Improved prediction of solvent accessibility and number of residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 47, 142-153.
20. Pollastri, G., and McLysaght, A. 2005. Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 21, 1719-1720.
21. Pollastri, G., Przybylski, D., Rost, B., et al. 2002. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 47, 228-235.
22. Richardson, C.J., and Barlow, D.J. 1999. The bottom line for prediction of residue solvent accessibility. Protein Eng. 12, 1051-1054.
23. Riis, S.K., and Krogh, A. 1996. Improving prediction of protein secondary structure using structured neural networks and multiple sequence alignments. J. Comput. Biol. 3, 163-183.
24. Rost, B., and Eyrich, V.A. 2001. EVA: large-scale analysis of secondary structure prediction. Proteins S5, 192-199.
25. Rost, B., and Sander, C. 1994. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 19, 55-72.
26. Sims, G.E., Choi, I., and Kim, S. 2005. Protein conformational space in higher order ψ-φ maps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 18, 618-621.
27. Vullo, A., Walsh, I., and Pollastri, G. 2006. A two-stage approach for improved prediction of residue contact maps. BMC Bioinform. 7, 180.
28. Wood, M.J., and Hirst, J.D. 2005. Protein secondary structure prediction with dihedral angles. Proteins 59, 476-481.
29. Yang, A., and Wang, L. 2003. Local structure prediction with local structure-based sequence profiles. Bioinformatics 19, 1267-1274.