Consequences of new product development speed: A meta-analysis

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 465-486

  Cankurtaran, Pinar ^a   Langerak, Fred ^b   Griffin, Abbie ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; DEVELOPMENT COSTS; EMPIRICAL GENERALIZATIONS; FINANCIAL SUCCESS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; NEW PRODUCT SUCCESS; TECHNICAL PRODUCTS;

SPEED;

EID: 84876717883     PISSN: 07376782     EISSN: 15405885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12011     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Adams-Bigelow, M., and, A. Griffin,. 2005. Product development cycle time and success: New results from PDMA's comparative performance assessment study. Proceedings of the Product Development & Management Association International Conference, San Diego, CA, October.
2. Aguinis, H., and, C. A. Pierce,. 1998. Testing moderator variable hypotheses meta-analytically. Journal of Management 24 (5): 577-592.
3. Ali, A., 2000. The impact of innovativeness and development time on new product performance for small firms. Marketing Letters 11 (2): 151-163.
4. Ali, A., R. Krapfel Jr., and, D. Labahn,. 1995. Product innovativeness and entry strategy: Impact on cycle time and break-even time. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12 (1): 54-69.
5. Ancona, D. G., and, D. F. Caldwell,. 1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science 3 (3): 321-341.
6. Aronson, Z. H., R. R. Reilly, and, G. S. Lynn,. 2006. The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 23 (3): 221-247.
7. Atuahene-Gima, K., 2003. The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter? Academy of Management Journal 46 (3): 359-373.
8. Balkundi, P., and, D. A. Harrison,. 2006. Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal 49 (1): 49-68.
9. Bayus, B. L., 1997. Speed-to-market and new product performance trade-offs. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (6): 485-487.
10. Bayus, B. L., S. Jain, and, A. G. Rao,. 1997. Too little, too early: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (1): 50-63.
11. Boer, M., and, R. Logendran,. 1999. A methodology for quantifying the effects of product development on cost and time. IIE Transactions 31 (4): 365-378.
12. Brown, S. L., and, K. M. Eisenhardt,. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 343-378.
13. Brown, S. P., and, R. A. Peterson,. 1993. Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction: Meta-analysis and assessment of causal effects. Journal of Marketing Research 30 (1): 63-77.
14. Calantone, R. J., and, C. A. Di Benedetto,. 2000. Performance and time to market: Accelerating cycle time with overlapping stages. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47 (2): 232-244.
15. Calantone, R. J., S. K. Vickery, and, C. Dröge,. 1995. Business performance and strategic new product development activities: An empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12 (3): 214-223.
16. Carbonell, P., and, A. I. Rodriguez-Escudero,. 2006. The impact of market characteristics and innovation speed on perceptions of positional advantage and new product performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing 23 (1): 1-12.
17. Chen, J., F. Damanpour, and, R. R. Reilly,. 2010. Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis. Journal of Operations Management 28 (1): 17-33.
18. Chen, J., R. R. Reilly, and, G. S. Lynn,. 2005. The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: The moderating effects of uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52 (2): 199-212.
19. Clark, K., and, T. Fujimoto,. 1991. Product development performance: Strategy organization and management in the world auto industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Cohen, J., 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155-159.
21. Cohen, J., and, P. Cohen,. 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Cohen, M. A., J. Eliashberg, and, T. H. Ho,. 1996. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Science 42 (2): 173-186.
23. Cooper, R. G., and, E. J. Kleinschmidt,. 1987. Success factors in product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 16 (3): 215-223.
24. Cordero, R., 1991. Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques. Journal of Product Innovation Management 8 (4): 283-294.
25. Crawford, M., 1992. The hidden costs of accelerated product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9 (3): 188-199.
26. Crosno, J. L., and, R. Dahlstrom,. 2008. A meta-analytic review of opportunism in exchange relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36 (2): 191-201.
27. Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34 (3): 555-590.
28. Davis, P. S., C. C. Dibrell, and, B. D. Janz,. 2002. The impact of time on the strategy-performance relationship implications for managers. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (4): 339-347.
29. Dröge, C., J. Jayaram, and, S. K. Vickery,. 2000. The ability to minimize the timing of new product development and introduction: An examination of antecedent factors in the North American automobile supplier industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17 (1): 24-40.
30. Eisenhardt, K., and, B. N. Tabrizi,. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 84-110.
31. Emmanuelides, P. A., 1993. Towards an integrative framework of performance in product development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 10 (4): 363-392.
32. Flint, D. J., 2002. Compressing new product success-to-success cycle time: Deep customer value understanding and idea generation. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (4): 305-315.
33. Franke, G. R., and, J. Park,. 2006. Salesperson adaptive selling behavior and customer orientation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (4): 693-702.
34. Garcia, N., M. J. Sanzo, and, J. A. Trespalacios,. 2008. New product internal performance and market performance: Evidence from Spanish firms regarding the role of trust, interfunctional integration, and innovation type. Technovation 28 (11): 713-725.
35. Gerwin, D., and, N. J. Barrowman,. 2002. An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Science 48 (7): 938-953.
36. Geyskens, I., J. Steenkamp, and, N. Kumar,. 1998. Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing 15 (3): 223-248.
37. Geyskens, I., J. E. M. Steenkamp, and, N. Kumar,. 2006. Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 49 (3): 519-543.
38. Gleser, L. J., and, I. Olkin,. 1994. Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In The handbook of research synthesis, ed., H. Cooper, and, L. V. Hedges, 339-355. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39. González, F. J. M., and, T. M. B. Palacios,. 2002. The effect of new product development techniques on new product success in Spanish firms. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (3): 261-271.
40. Griffin, A., 1993. Metrics for measuring product development cycles times. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (2): 112-125.
41. Griffin, A., 1997. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (1): 24-35.
42. Griffin, A., 2002. Product development cycle time for business-to-business products. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (4): 291-304.
43. Griffin, A., and, A. L. Page,. 1993. An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (4): 291-308.
44. Griffin, A., and, A. L. Page,. 1996. PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 (6): 478-496.
45. Gupta, A. K., K. Brockhoff, and, U. Weisenfeld,. 1992. Making trade-offs in the new product development process: A German/US comparison. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9 (1): 11-18.
46. Hart, S. J., 1993. Dimensions of success in new product development: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Marketing Management 9 (1): 23-41.
47. Harter, D. E., M. S. Krishnan, and, S. A. Slaughter,. 2000. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Science 46 (4): 451-466.
48. Hedges, L. V., and, I. Olkin,. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
49. Henard, D. H., and, D. M. Szymanski,. 2001. Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (3): 362-375.
50. Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and, R. D. Nixon,. 1993. A mid-range theory of interfunctional integration, its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 10 (1-2): 161-185.
51. Hoegl, M., K. Weinkauf, and, H. G. Gemünden,. 2004. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science 15 (1): 38-55.
52. Huang, X., G. N. Soutar, and, A. Brown,. 2004. Measuring new product success: An empirical investigation of Australian SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management 33 (2): 117-123.
53. Hultink, E. J., and, H. S. J. Robben,. 1995. Measuring new product success: The difference that time perspective makes. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12 (5): 392-405.
54. Hunter, J. E., and, F. L. Schmidt,. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. New York: Academic Press.
55. Hunter, J. E., and, F. L. Schmidt,. 2000. Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 8 (4): 275-292.
56. Ittner, C. D., and, D. F. Larcker,. 1997. Product development cycle time and organizational performance. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (1): 13-23.
57. Jayaram, J., and, R. Narasimhan,. 2007. The influence of new product development competitive capabilities on project performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54 (2): 241-256.
58. Johnson, W. H. A., Z. Piccolotto, and, R. Filippini,. 2009. The impacts of time performance on market knowledge competence on new product success: An international study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 56 (2): 219-228.
59. Joshi, A., and, H. Roh,. 2009. The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal 52 (3): 599-627.
60. Kessler, E. H., and, P. E. Bierly III,. 2002. Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (1): 2-12.
61. Kessler, E. H., and, A. K. Chakrabarti,. 1996. Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Review 21 (4): 1143-1191.
62. Kessler, E. H., and, A. K. Chakrabarti,. 1999. Speeding up the pace of new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (3): 231-247.
63. Kirca, A. H., S. Jayachandran, and, W. O. Bearden,. 2005. Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing 69 (2): 24-41.
64. Kusunoki, K., I. Nonaka, and, A. Nagata,. 1998. Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organization Science 9 (6): 699-718.
65. Langerak, F., and, E. J. Hultink,. 2005. The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52 (1): 30-42.
66. Langerak, F., and, E. J. Hultink,. 2006. The impact of product innovativeness on the link between development speed and new product profitability. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (3): 203-214.
67. Langerak, F., E. J. Hultink, and, A. Griffin,. 2008. Exploring mediating and moderating influences on the links among cycle time, proficiency in entry timing, and new product profitability. Journal of Product Innovation Management 25 (4): 370-385.
68. Langerak, F., S. A. Rijsdijk, and, K. Dittrich,. 2009. Development time and new product sales: A contingency analysis of product innovativeness. Marketing Letters 20 (4): 339-413.
69. Larson, E. W., and, D. H. Gobeli,. 1989. Significance of project management structure on development success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 36 (2): 119-125.
70. Lee, H., K. G. Smith, M. Grimm, and, A. Schomburg,. 2000. Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation. Strategic Management Journal 21 (1): 23-30.
71. Li, T., and, R. J. Calantone,. 1998. The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing 62 (4): 13-29.
72. Lieberman, M. B., and, D. B. Montgomery,. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal 9 (1): 41-58.
73. Lilien, G. L., and, E. Yoon,. 1989. Determinants of new industrial product performance: A strategic reexamination of the empirical literature. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 36 (1): 3-10.
74. Lipovetsky, S., A. Tishler, D. Dvir, and, A. Shenhar,. 1997. The relative importance of project success dimensions. R&D Management 27 (2): 97-106.
75. Lipsey, M. W., and, D. B. Wilson,. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
76. Loch, C. H., and, C. Terwiesch,. 1998. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Science 44 (8): 1032-1048.
77. Lukas, B. A., and, A. Menon,. 2004. New product quality: Intended and unintended consequences of new product development speed. Journal of Business Research 57 (11): 1258-1264.
78. Lynn, G. S., K. D. Abel, W. S. Valentine, and, R. C. Wright,. 1999. Key factors in increasing speed to market and improving new product success rates. Industrial Marketing Management 28 (4): 319-326.
79. Mallick, D. N., and, R. G. Schroeder,. 2005. An integrated framework for measuring product development performance in high technology industries. Production and Operations Management 14 (2): 142-158.
80. Mansfield, E., 1988. The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: External vs. internal technology. Management Science 34 (10): 1157-1168.
81. Meyer, C., 1993. Fast cycle time: How to align purpose, strategy, and structure for SPEED. New York: Free Press.
82. Meyer, M. H., and, J. M. Utterback,. 1995. Product development cycle time and commercial success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42 (4): 297-304.
83. Millson, M., S. P. Raj, and, D. Wilemon,. 1992. A survey of major approaches for accelerating new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9 (1): 53-69.
84. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., and, R. Calantone,. 1994. Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11 (5): 397-417.
85. Moorman, C., and, A. S. Miner,. 1998. The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing 62 (3): 1-20.
86. Morgan, L. O., R. M. Morgan, and, W. L. Moore,. 2001. Quality and time-to-market trade-offs when there are multiple product generations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 3 (2): 89.
87. Murmann, P. A., 1994. Expected development time reductions in the German mechanical engineering industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11 (3): 236-252.
88. Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt, and, S. L. Rynes,. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24 (3): 403-441.
89. Pattikawa, L. H., E. Verwaal, and, H. R. Commandeur,. 2006. Understanding new product project performance. European Journal of Marketing 40 (11/12): 1178-1193.
90. Rabino, S., and, A. Wright,. 1993. Accelerated product introductions and emerging managerial accounting perspectives: Implications for marketing managers in the technology sector. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (2): 126-135.
91. Rindfleisch, A., and, C. Moorman,. 2001. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing 65 (2): 1-18.
92. Rochford, L. A., and, W. R. Rudelius,. 1992. How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product process. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9 (4): 287-299.
93. Rodriguez-Cano, C., F. A. Carrillat, and, F. Jaramillo,. 2004. A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: Evidence from five continents. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21 (2): 179-200.
94. Rosenthal, S. R., 1992. Effective product design and development: How to cut lead time and increase customer satisfaction. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
95. Rosenthal, S. R., and, M. V. Tatikonda,. 1993. Time management in new product development: Case study findings. IEEE Engineering Management Review 21 (3): 13-20.
96. Rusinko, C. A., 1999. Exploring the use of design-manufacturing integration (DMI) to facilitate product development: A test of some practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 46 (1): 56-71.
97. Salomo, S., J. Weise, and, H. G. Gemünden,. 2007. NPD planning activities and innovation performance: The mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24 (4): 285-302.
98. Schulze, A., and, M. Hoegl,. 2006. Knowledge creation in new product development projects. Journal of Management 32 (2): 210-236.
99. Sethi, R., 2000. New product quality and product development teams. Journal of Marketing 64 (2): 1-14.
100. Smith, P. G., and, D. G. Reinertsen,. 1991. Developing new products in half the time. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
101. Song, X. M., M. M. Montoya-Weiss, and, J. B. Schmidt,. 1997. Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (1): 35-47.
102. Stalk, G., 1988. Time-the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review 66 (4): 41-51.
103. Stalk, G., and, T. M. Hout,. 1990. Competing against time: How time-based competition is reshaping global markets. New York: Free Press.
104. Stock, W. A., 1994. Systematic coding for research synthesis. In The handbook of research synthesis, ed., H. Cooper, and, L. V. Hedges, 231-244. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
105. Swink, M., and, X. M. Song,. 2007. Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage. Journal of Operations Management 25 (1): 203-217.
106. Swink, M., S. Talluri, and, T. Pandejpong,. 2006. Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management 24 (5): 542-562.
107. Tatikonda, M. V., and, M. M. Montoya-Weiss,. 2001. Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science 47 (1): 151-172.
108. Tatikonda, M. V., and, S. R. Rosenthal,. 2000. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: A deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47 (1): 74-87.
109. Terwiesch, C., and, C. H. Loch,. 1999. Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Science 45 (4): 455-465.
110. Troy, L. C., T. Hirunyawipada, and, A. K. Paswan,. 2008. Cross-functional integration and new product success: An empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing 72 (6): 132-146.
111. Ulrich, K., D. Sartorius, S. Pearson, and, M. Jakiela,. 1993. Including the value of time in design-for-manufacturing decision making. Management Science 39 (4): 429-447.
112. Vandenbosch, M., and, T. Clift,. 2002. Dramatically reducing cycle times through flash development. Long Range Planning 35 (6): 567-589.
113. Venkatraman, N., and, V. Ramanujam,. 1986. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 801-814.
114. Vesey, J. T., 1992. Time-to-market: Put speed in product development. Industrial Marketing Management 21 (2): 151-158.
115. Viswesvaran, C., and, D. Ones,. 1995. Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology 48 (4): 865-885.
116. Von Braun, C. F., 1990. The acceleration trap. Sloan Management Review 32 (1): 49-58.
117. Zirger, B. J., and, J. L. Hartley,. 1994. A conceptual model of product development cycle time. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 11 (3-4): 229-251.
118. Zirger, B. J., and, M. A. Maidique,. 1990. A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science 36 (7): 867-883.