Déj vu A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning

Language Teaching

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-37

  Vanderplank, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249102569     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444809990267     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Arteaga, D. L. (2000). Articulatory phonetics in the first-year Spanish classroom. The Modern Language Journal 84.3, 339-354.
2. Baltova, I. (1999). Multisensory language teaching in a multidimensional curriculum: the use of authentic bimodal video in core French. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 56.1, 31-48.
3. Barge, M. (2009). Teaching techniques for multimedia language labs: Final report. http://www.cemll.ulster.ac. uk/admin/documents/docs/Queen-MaryCEMLL- Final%20Report.pdf .
4. Barr, D., J. Leakey & A. Ranchoux (2005). TOLD like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project. Language Learning & Technology 9.3, 55-78.
5. Bean, R. M. & R. M. Wilson (1989). Using closed captioned television to teach reading to adults. Reading Research and Instruction 28.4, 27-37.
6. Bianchi, F. & T. Ciabattoni (2008). Captions and subtitles in EFL learning: An investigative study in a comprehensive computer environment. In A. Baldry, M. Pavesi & C. Taylor Torsello (eds.), From didactas to ecolingua. Trieste: Edizioni Universit̀a di Trieste, 69-80.
7. Bird, S. (2005). Language learning edutainment: Mixing motives in digital resources. RELC Journal 36.3, 311-339.
8. Bird, S. A. & J. N. Williams (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics 23.4, 509- 533.
9. Brett, P. [A.] (1997). A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension. System 25.1, 39-53.
10. Brett, P. [A.] (1998). Using multimedia: A descriptive investigation of incidental language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 11.2, 179-200.
11. Brett, P. A. (2001). Too many media in my multimedia A study of the effects of combinations of media on a recall task. In P. A. Brett (ed.), CALL in the 21st century: Proceedings of the ESADE/IATEFL conference, June/July 2000, Barcelona. Whitstable, Kent: IATEFL, section 3.1, 1-20.
12. Bufe,W. & V. Viallon (2001). Rencontre de la didactique et de la communication: la video sur le terrain. Video et mediation interculturelle dans lÆapprentissage des langues. Dialogues et cultures 44, 145- 157.
13. Bush, M. D. (2000). Digital Versatile Disc (DVD): The new medium for interactive video. CALICO Journal 17.3, 453-474.
14. Caimi, A. (2006). Audiovisual translation and language learning: The promotion of intralingual subtitles. The Journal of Specialised Translation 6, 85-98. Chang, S. (not dated). The interaction between schemata and subtitles. www.ntut.edu.tw/wwwoaa/ journal/39-1/39-1-14p.pdf.
15. Chapple, L. & A. Curtis (2000). Content-based instruction in Hong Kong: Student responses to film. System 28.3, 419-433.
16. Chen, L. & J. W. Oller, Jr. (2005). Indexical relations and sound motion pictures in L2 curricula: The dynamic role of the teacher. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 62.2, 263-284.
17. Chung, J-M. (1999). The effects of using video text supported with advance organizers and captions on Chinese college studentsÆ listening comprehension: An empirical study. Foreign Language Annals 32.3, 295-308.
18. Chung, J-M. (2002). The effects of using two advance organizers with video texts for the teaching of listening in English. Foreign Language Annals 35.2, 231-241.
19. Coniam, D. (2001). The use of audio or video comprehension as an assessment instrument in the certification of English language teachers: A case study. System 29.1, 1-14.
20. Cooper, R., M. Lavery & M. Rinvolucri (1991). Video. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research 13.2, 151-176.
22. Danaher, M. & P. Danaher (1998). The benefits of language laboratories for learning Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning Journal 18.1, 50-55.
23. Danan, M. (1995). Reversed subtitling and dual coding theory: New directions for foreign language instruction. In B. Harley (ed.), Lexical issues in language learning. Ann Arbor, MI: Language Learning/John Benjamins, 253-282.
24. Danan, M. (2004). Captioning and subtitling: Undervalued language learning strategies. Meta 49.1, 67-77. http://www.erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/ v49/n1/009021ar.html.
25. dÆYdewalle, G. & U. Pavakanun (1996). Le sous-titrage ̀a la television facilite-t-il lÆapprentissage des langues In Y. Gambier (ed.), Les transferts linguistiques dans les medias audiovisuels. Paris: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 217-223.
26. dÆYdewalle, G. & U. Pavakanun (1997). Could enjoying a movie lead to language acquisition In P. Winterhoff-Spurk & T. Van der Voort (eds.), New horizons in media psychology. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher- Verlag, 145-155.
27. Van De Poel, DÆydewalle G. (Multi) Media Translation: Concepts, Practices, and Research. 2001 259-273.
28. dÆYdewalle, G. & J. Van Rensbergen (1989). Developmental studies of text-picture interactions in the perception of animated cartoons with text. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 233-248.
29. Fallahkhair, S., J. Masthoff & L. Pemberton (2004). Learning languages from interactive television: Language learners reflect on techniques and technologies. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 4336-4343. http://www.editlib.org/p/11700.
30. Feak, C. B. & J. Salehzadeh (2001). Challenges and issues in developing an EAP video listening placement assessment: A view from one programme. English for Specific Purposes 20.5, 477-493.
31. Gallagher, M. (1978). Good television and good teaching: Some tensions in educational practice. Educational Broadcasting International 11.4, 203-206.
32. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 1.1. http://www.icaap.org/ iuicode149.1.1.2.
33. Goldman,M. & S. Goldman (1988). Reading with closedcaptioned TV. Journal of Reading, 31.5, 458.
34. Grgurovic, M. & V. Hegelheimer (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: StudentsÆ use of subtitles and the transcript. Language Learning & Technology 11.1, 45-66.
35. Gruba, P. (2004). Understanding digitized second language videotext. Computer Assisted Language Learning 17.1, 51-82.
36. Gruba, P. (2006). Playing the videotext: A media literacy perspective on video-mediated L2 listening. Language Learning & Technology 10.2, 77-92.
37. Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Herbert, M. (2004). The use of DVD in foreign language learning: Strategies used by learners for meaning focused and form focused tasks. Final year project, Trinity College, Dublin. https://www.cs.tcd.ie/courses/csll/ projects4.html.
39. Herron, C., S. P. Cole, H. York & P. Linden (1998). A comparison study of student retention of foreign language video: declarative versus interrogative advance organiser. TheModern Language Journal 82.2, 237-247.
40. Herron, C., S. P. Cole, C. Corrie & S. Dubreil (1999a). The effectiveness of a video-based curriculum in teaching culture. The Modern Language Journal 84.4, 518-533.
41. Herron, C., C. Corrie, S. P. Cole & P. Henderson (1999b). Do prequestioning techniques facilitate comprehension of French video The French Review 72.6, 1076-1090.
42. Herron, C., S. Dubreuil, S. P. Cole & C. Corrie (2000). Using instructional video to teach culture to beginning foreign language students. CALICO Journal 17.3, 395- 429.
43. Herron, C., S. Dubreil, C. Corrie & S. P. Cole (2002). A classroom investigation: Can video improve intermediate-level French language studentsÆ ability to learn about a foreign culture The Modern Language Journal 86.1, 36-53.
44. Herron, C., H. York, C. Corrie & S. P. Cole (2006). A comparison study of the effects of a storybased video instructional package versus a text-based instructional package in the intermediate-level foreign language classroom. CALICO Journal 23.2, 281-307.
45. Holobow, N.,W. E. Lambert & L. Sayegh (1984). Pairing script and dialogue: Combinations that show promise for second or foreign language acquisition. Language Learning 34.4, 59-74.
46. Hoven, D. (1999). A model for listening and viewing comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning and Technology 3.1, 88-103.
47. Huang, H - C. & D. E. Eskey (1999-2000). The effects of closed-captioned television on the listening comprehension of intermediate English as a foreign language (ESL) students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 28.1, 75-96.
48. Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning 16.5, 413-425.
49. Hurd, S., T. Beaven & A.Ortega (2001).Developing autonomy in a distance language learning context: Issues and dilemmas for course writers. System 29.3, 341-355.
50. Koolstra, C. M. & J. W. J. Beentjes (1999). ChildrenÆs vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language through watching subtitled television programs at home. Educational Technology Research & Development 47.1, 51-60.
51. Kothari, B. (1999). Same language subtitling: Integrating post literacy development and popular culture on television. Media and Technology for Human Resource Development 11.3, 111-117.
52. Kothari, B., A. Pandey & A. Chudgar (2004). Reading out of the æidiot boxÆ: Same-language subtitling on television in India. Information Technologies and International Development 1.3, 23-44.
53. Kothari, B., J. Takeda, A. Joshi & A. Pandey (2002). Same language subtitling: A butterfly for literacy International Journal of Lifelong Education 21.1, 55-66.
54. Kramsch, C. & R. W. Andersen (1999). Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning & Technology 2.2, 31-42.
55. Lam, Y. (2000). Technophobia or technophilia A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 56.3, 389- 420.
56. Lambert, W. E. & N. E. Holobow (1984). Combinations of printed script and spoken dialogues that show promise for beginning students of a foreign language. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 16.1, 1-11.
57. Laurillard, D. (1991). Mediating the message: Programme design and studentsÆ understanding. Instructional Science 20.1, 3-24.
58. Mackey, M. (2002). Literacies across media: Playing the text. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
59. MacKnight, F. (1983). Video in English language teaching in Britain. In J. McGovern (ed.), Video applications in English language teaching.Oxford: Pergamon Press & the British Council (ELTDocuments 114), 1-16.
60. Markham, P. (1989). The effects of captioned videotapes on the listening comprehension of beginning, intermediate, and advanced ESL students. Educational Technology 29.10, 38-41.
61. Markham, P. [L.] (1999). Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals 32.3, 321-328.
62. Markham, P. [L.] (2000-2001). The influence of culture-specific background knowledge and captions on second language comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 29.4, 331-343.
63. Markham, P. [L.] & L. Peter (2003). The influence of English language and Spanish language captions on foreign language listening/reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 31.3, 331-341.
64. Markham, P. L., L. A. Peter & T. J.McCarthy (2001). The effects of native language vs. target language captions on foreign language studentsÆ DVD video comprehension. Foreign Language Annals 34.5, 439-445.
65. Meinhof, U. H. (1998). Language learning in the age of satellite television. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Mills, N., C. Herron & S. Cole (2004). Teacher-assisted versus individual viewing of foreign language video: Relation to comprehension, self-efficacy, and engagement. CALICO Journal 21.2, 291- 316.
67. Moore, Z. (2006). Technology and teaching culture: What Spanish teachers do. Foreign Language Annals 39.4, 579-594.
68. Neuman, S. B. & P. S. Koskinen (1990). Using captioned television to improve the reading proficiency of language minority students. Falls Church, VA: National Captioning Institute.
69. Okan, Z. (2008).Computing laboratory classes as language learning environments. Learning Environments Research 11.1, 31-48.
70. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Patterson, J. L. (2002). Relationship of expressive vocabulary to frequency of reading and television experience among bilingual toddlers. Applied Psycholinguistics 23.4, 493-508.
72. Pavakanun, U. & G. dÆYdewalle (1992). Watching foreign television programs and language learning. In F. L. Engel, D. G. Bouwhuis, T. B}osser & G. dÆYdewalle (eds.), Cognitive modelling and interactive environments in language learning. Berlin & New York: Springer, 193-198.
73. Pemberton, L., S. Fallahkhair & J. Masthoff, J. (2005). Learner-centred development of a mobile and iTV language learning support system. Educational Technology & Society 8.4, 52-63.
74. Perez-Paredes, P. (2002). From rooms to environments: Techno-short-sightedness and language laboratories. International Journal of English Studies 3.1, 59-80.
75. Price, K. (1983). Closed-captioned TV: An untapped resource. MATESOL Newsletter 12, 1-8.
76. Pujola, J.-T. (2002). CALLing for help: Researching language learning strategies using help facilities in a web-based multimedia program. ReCALL 14.2, 235-262.
77. Robinson, J. P. & M. R. Levy (1986). The main source. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
78. Roby, W. B. (2004). Technology in the service of foreign language teaching: The case of the language laboratory. In D. H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd edn.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 523-541.
79. Rybak, S. (1980). Learning languages from the BBC: Research into courses for adults. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.
80. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal 85.1, 39-56.
81. Salomon, G. & T. Leigh (1984). Predispositions about learning from print and television. Journal of Communication 34.2, 119-135.
82. Savignon, S. J. (1972). Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.
83. Shea, P. (2000). Leveling the playing field: A study of captioned interactive video for second language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 22.3, 243-263.
84. Seels, B., K. Fullerton, L. Berry & L. J. Horn (2004). Research on learning from television. In D. H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 249-334.
85. Smith, J. J. (1990). Closed captioned television and adult students of English as a second language. Arlington, VA: Arlington Refugee Education and Employment Program.
86. Stewart, M. A. & I. Pertusa (2004). Gains to language learners from viewing target language closedcaptioned films. Foreign Language Annals 37.1, 438-447.
87. Taylor, G. (2005). Perceived processing strategies of students watching captioned video. Foreign Language Annals 38.3, 422-427.
88. Thompson, G. (1979). Television as text: Open University case study programmes. In M. Barrett, P. Corrigan, A. Kuhn & J.Wolff (eds.), Ideology and cultural production. London: Croom Helm, 160- 197.
89. Toner, G., D. Barr, S. Carvalho Martins & V.Wright (2008). Multimedia language learning in higher education in the UK. http://www.arts.ulster.ac.uk/ lanlit/cetl/news/survey/index.html.
90. Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: The role of digital video. Computer Assisted Language Learning 14.3 & 4, 305-319.
91. Uchikoshi, Y. (2006). English vocabulary development in bilingual kindergarteners: An individual growth modeling approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9.1, 33-49.
92. Umino, T. (1999). The use of self-instructional broadcast materials for second language learning: An investigation in the Japanese context. System 27.3, 309-327.
93. Van Lommel, S., A. Laenen & G. dÆYdewalle (2006). Foreign-grammar acquisition while watching subtitled television programmes. British Journal of Educational Psychology 76.2, 243-258.
94. Vanderplank, R. (1985). Evaluating the language laboratory in practice. In V. Kohonen, H. von Essen & C. Klein-Braley (eds.), Practice and problems in language testing 8 (AFinLA Series No. 40). Tampere, Finland: AFinLA, 167-178.
95. Vanderplank, R. (1988). The value of teletext subtitles in language learning, ELT Journal 42.4, 272-281.
96. Vanderplank, R. (1990). Paying attention to the words: Practical and theoretical problems in watching television programmes with uni-lingual (CEEFAX) subtitles. System 18.2, 221-234.
97. Vanderplank, R. (1993). A very verbal medium: Language learning through closed captions. TESOL Journal 3.1, 10-14.
98. Vanderplank, R. (1994). Resolving inherent conflicts: Autonomous language learning from popular broadcast television. InH. Jung & R. Vanderplank (eds.), Barriers and bridges:Media technology in language learning. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 119-134.
99. Vanderplank, R. (1999). Global medium - global resource Perspectives and paradoxes in using authentic broadcast material for teaching and learning English. In C. Gnutzmann (ed.), Teaching and learning English as a global language: Native and non-native perspectives. Tubingen: Stauffenberg, 253-266.
100. Vanderplank, R. (forthcoming). Language laboratory use in higher education in the UK: A short survey.
101. Vanderplank, R. & P. Dyson (1999). Who is in The Learning Zone Evaluating the impact of Italia 2000. In G. Hogan-Brun & U. O. H. Jung (eds.), Media multimedia omnimedia. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 125-138.
102. Wagener,D. (2006). Promoting independent learning skills using video on digital language laboratories. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19.4 & 5, 279-286.
103. Wagner, E. (2007). Are they watching An investigation of test-taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test. Language Learning and Technology 11.1, 67-86.
104. Webb, S. & M. P. H. Rodgers (2009a). The lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics, 1-21. http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/ abstract/amp010v1.
105. Webb, S. & M. P. H. Rodgers (2009b). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning 59.2, 335-366.
106. Wesche, M. & T. S. Paribakht (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 53.1, 13-40.
107. Weyers, J. R. (1999). The effect of authentic video on communicative competence. TheModern Language Journal 83.3, 339-349.
108. White, C. (1999). Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language learners. System 27.4, 443-457.
109. White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Williams, H. & D. Thorne (2000). The value of teletext subtitling as a medium for language learning. System 28.2, 217-228.
111. Yuksel,D. & B. Tanriverdi (2009). Effects of watching captionedmovie clip on vocabulary development. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET 8.2, 48-54.
112. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal 21.1, 7-27.