The effect of authentic video on communicative competence

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 339-349

  Weyers, Joseph R ^a  

^a Department of Teacher Education and Department of Sociology and Anthropology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748017257     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00026     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ACTFL (1997). Standards for foreign language learning [On-line]. Available Internet: www.actfl.org/ htdocs/standards/standards.htm
2. Altman, R. (1989). The video connection: Integrating video into language teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Bacon, S., & Finnemann, M. (1990). A study of the attitudes, motives, and strategies of university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and written input. Modern Language Journal, 74, 459-473.
4. Baltova, I. (1994). The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 507-531.
5. Beeching, K. (1982). Authentic material 1. British Journal of Language Teaching, 20, 17-20.
6. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
7. Chung, J. (1996). The effects of using advance organizers and captions to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 14, 61-65.
8. Dulay, H., Krashen, S., & Burt, M. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Gruba, P. (1997). The role of video media in listening assessment. System, 25, 335-345.
10. Jones, R. (1985). Some basic considerations in testing oral proficiency. In Y. Lee, A. Fok, R. Lord, & G. Low (Eds.), New Directions in Language Testing (pp. 74-84). New York: Pergamon Press.
11. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
12. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
13. Krashen, S. (1991). The input hypothesis: An update. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991. Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp. 409-431). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
14. Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Alemany Press.
15. Liontas, J. (1992). From the living room to the classroom: Working with authentic Spanish language videos. Hispania, 75, 1315-1320.
16. Madsen, H., & Jones, R. (1981). Classification of oral proficiency tests. In A. Palmer, P. Groot, & G. Trosper (Eds.), The construct validation of tests of communicative competence (pp. 15-30). Washington, DC: TESOL.
17. Omaggio Hadley, A. (1993). Teaching language in context (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle.
18. Pimstein, V. (Producer), & Sheridan, B. (Director). (1992). María Mercedes. Mexico City: Televisa.
19. Progosh, D. (1996). Using video for listening assessment: Opinions of test-takers. TESL Canada Journal, 14, 34-44.
20. Richardson, C., & Scinicariello, S. (1989). Televised technology in the foreign language classroom. In W. Smith (Ed.), Modern technology in foreign language education: Applications and projects (pp. 43-74). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
21. Sato, E., & Jacobs, B. (1992). From input to intake: Towards a brain-based perspective of selective attention. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 3, 267-292.
22. Secules, T., Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 76, 480-490.
23. Snyder, H., & Colon, I. (1988). Foreign language acquisition and audio-visual aids. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 343-348.
24. Swaffar, J., & Vlatten, A. (1997). A sequential model for video viewing in the foreign language curriculum. Modern Language Journal, 81, 175-188.
25. Taira, T. (1993). Episodes on the computer. In J. Oller (Ed.), Methods that work: Ideas for literacy and language teachers (2nd ed., pp. 309-319). Boston: Heinle.
26. Terrell, T. (1993). Comprehensible input for intermediate foreign language students via video. IALL Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 26, 17-23.
27. Terrell, T., Andrade, M., Egasse, J., & Muñoz, E. (1990). Dos mundos: A communicative approach (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Wen, C. (1989). Student attitudes during a course with and without TV in the language laboratory. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 26, 238-250.
29. Weyers, J. (1998). Telenovelas as a tool for teaching. IALL Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 30, 15-26.