Are they watching? Test-taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 67-86

  Wagner, Elvis ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846827337     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alderson, J., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Allan, M. (1984). Viewing comprehension in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 38, 21-26.
3. Altman, R. (1990). Toward a new video pedagogy: The role of schema theory and discourse analysis. IALL Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 23, 9-16.
4. Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Baltova, I. (1994). The impact of video on comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 507-531.
7. Bejar, I., Douglas, D., Jamieson, J., Nissan, S., & Turner, J. (2000). TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 19). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8. Berne, J. (1995). How does varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? Hispania, 78, 316-329.
9. Brett, P. (1997). A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension. System, 25, 39-53.
10. Brown, G. (1995). Dimensions of difficulty in listening comprehension. In D. Mendelshon & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 59-73). San Diego: Dominie Press.
11. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Burgoon, J. (1994). Non-verbal signals. In M. Knapp & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 344-393). London: Routledge.
13. Cervantes, R., & Gainer G. (1992). The effects of syntactic simplification and repetition on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 767-770.
14. Chiang, C., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 345-374.
15. Chang, A., & Read, J. (2006). The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 375-397.
16. Dunkel, P. (1991). Computerized testing of nonparticipatory L2 listening comprehension proficiency: An ESL prototype development effort. Modern Language Journal, 75, 64-73.
17. Gruba, P. (1993). A comparison study of audio and video in language testing. JALT Journal, 15, 85-88.
18. Gruba, P. (1994). Design and development of a video-mediated test of communicative proficiency. JALT Journal, 16, 25-40.
19. Gruba, P. (1997). The role of video media in listening assessment. System, 25, 335-345.
20. Hasan, A. (2000). Learners' perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13, 137-153.
21. Kellerman, S. (1990). Lip service: The contribution of the visual modality to speech perception and its relevance to the teaching and testing of foreign language listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 11, 272-280.
22. Kellerman, S. (1992). 'I see what you mean': The role of kinesic behaviour in listening and implications for foreign and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 13, 239-258.
23. Lynch, T. (1998). Theoretical perspective on listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 3-19.
24. MacWilliam, I. (1986). Video and language comprehension. ELT Journal, 40, 131-135.
25. Nunan, D. (2005). From the special issues editor. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 2-3. Retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/pdf/speced.pdf.
26. Nissan, S., Devnicenzi, F., & Tang, K. (1996). An analysis of factors affecting the difficulty of dialogue items in TOEFL listening comprehension (TOEFL Research Report No. 51). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
27. Parry, T., & Meredith, R. (1984). Videotape vs. audiotape for listening comprehension tests: An experiment. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services ED 254 107).
28. Progosh, D. (1996). Using video for listening assessment opinions of test-takers. TESL Canada Journal, 14, 34-43.
29. Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. New York: Longman.
30. Samuels, S. (1984). Factors influencing listening: Inside and outside the head. Theory into Practice, 23, 183-189.
31. Samuels, S. (1987). Factors that influence listening and reading comprehension. In R. Horowitz & S. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 183-189). San Diego: Academic Press.
32. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 4, 179-191.
33. Shin, D. (1998). Using video-taped lectures for testing academic language. International Journal of Listening, 12, 56-79.
34. Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29, 331-342.
35. Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
36. VanPatten, B. (1996). Can learners attend to form and content while processing input? Hispania, 72, 409-417.
37. von Raffler-Engel, W. (1980). Kinesics and paralinguistics: A neglected factor in second language research and teaching. Canadian Modern Language Review, 36, 225-237.
38. Wagner, E. (2002). Video listening tests: A pilot study. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2(1), Retrieved March 31, 2006, from http://www.tc.edu/ tesolalwebjournal.
39. Wagner, M. (2006). Utilizing the visual channel: An investigation of the use of video texts on tests of second language listening ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.