DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 4393-4404

  Bashkirov, Vladimir I ^a,b,c   King, Jeff S ^a,d   Bashkirova, Elena V ^c   Schmuckli Maurer, Jacqueline ^a   Heyer, Wolf Dietrich ^a,c  

^a CH 3012   (Switzerland)

^b INSTITUTE OF GENE BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d ROSETTA INPHARMATICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; PROTEIN RAD55; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GAMMA RADIATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOTOXICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; PHOSPHORYLATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 0034119315     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.12.4393-4404.2000     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Aboussekhra, A., J. E. Vialard, D. E. Morrison, M. A. Delatorreruiz, L. Cernakova, F. Fabre, and N. F. Lowndes. 1996. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J. 15:3912-3922.
2. Al-Khodairy, F., and A. M. Carr. 1992. DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosacchammyces pombe. EMBO J. 11:1343-1350.
3. Allen, J. B., Z. Zhou, W. Siede, E. C. Friedberg, and S. J. Elledge. 1994. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev 8:2401-2415.
4. Baumann, P., and S. C. West. 1998. Role of the human RAD51 protein in homologous recombination and double-stranded break repair. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:247-251.
5. Bentley, N. J., D. A. Holtzman, G. Flaggs, K. S. Keegan, A. DeMaggio, J. C. Ford, M. Hoekstra, and A. M. Carr. 1996. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 15:6641-6651.
6. Bergerat, A., B. deMassy, D. Gadelle, P. C. Varoutas, A. Nicolas, and P. Forterre. 1997. An atypical topoisomerase II from archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386:414-417.
7. Bosco, G., and J. E. Haber. 1998. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics 150:1037-1047.
8. Brush, G. S., D. M. Morrow, P. Hieter, and T. J. Kelly. 1996. The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:15075-15080.
9. Carpenter, A. T. C. 1979. Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-deficient females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 75:259-292.
10. Chen, G., S. S. F. Yuan, W. Liu, Y. Xu, K. Trujillo, B. W. Song, F. Cong, S. P. Guff, Y. Wu, R. Arlinghaus, D. Baltimore, P. J. Gasser, M. S. Park, P. Sung, and E. Lee. 1999. Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl. J. Biol. Chem. 274:12748-12752.
11. Chua, P., and S. J. Robertson. 1991. Segregation of recombinant chromatids following mitotic crossing over in yeast. Genetics 129:359-369.
12. Cohen-Fix, O., and D. Koshland. 1997. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14361-14366.
13. Cole, G. M., and R. K. Mortimer. 1989. Failure to induce a DNA repair gene, RAD54, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not affect DNA repair or recombination phenotypes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:3314-3322.
14. Connolly, B., C. I. White, and J. E. Haber. 1988. Physical monitoring of mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:2342-2349.
15. Cox, R., W. K. Masson, R. R. Weichselbaum, J. Nove, and J. B. Little. 1981. The repair of potentially lethal damage in X-irradiated cultures of normal and ataxia-telangiectasia human fibroblasts. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 39:357-365.
16. Dernburg, A. F., K. McDonald, G. Moulder, R. Barstead, M. Dresser, and A. M. Villeneuve. 1998. Meiotic recombination in C-elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94:387-398.
17. D'Urso, G., and P. Nurse. 1995. Checkpoints in the cell cycle of fission yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:12-16.
18. Elledge, S. J. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274:1664-1672.
19. Emili, A. 1998. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2:183-189.
20. Fasullo, M., T. Bennett, P. AhChing, and J. Koudelik. 1998. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1190-1200.
21. Fasullo, M., J. Koudelik, P. AhChing, P. Giallanza, and C. Cera. 1999. Radiosensitive and mitotic recombination phenotypes of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae dun1 mutant defective in DNA damage-inducible gene expression. Genetics 152:909-919.
22. Friedberg, E. C., G. C. Walker, and W. Siede. 1995. DNA repair and mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
23. Game, J. C. 1993. DNA double-strand breaks and the RAD50-RAD57 genes in Saccharomyces. Semin. Cancer Biol. 4:73-83.
24. Gardner, R., C. W. Putnam, and T. Weinert. 1999. RAD53, DUN1, and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J. 11:3173-3185.
25. Grushcow, J. M., T. M. Holzen, K. J. Park, T. Weinert, M. Lichten, and D. K. Bishop. 1999. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics 153:607-620.
26. Haber, J. E. 1995. In vivo biochemistry: physical monitoring of recombination induced by site-specific endonucleases. Bioessays 17:609-620.
27. Hari, K. L., A. Santerre, J. J. Sekelsky, K. S. McKim, J. B. Boyd, and R. S. Hawley. 1995. The mei-41 gene of D. melanogaster is a structural and functional homolog of the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82:815-821.
28. Hartwell, L. H., R. K. Mortimer, J. Culotti, and M. Culotti. 1973. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. V. genetic analysis of cdc mutants. Genetics 74:267-286.
29. Hartwell, L. H., and T. A. Weinert. 1989. Checkpoints: controls that ensure order of cell cycle events. Science 246:629-634.
30. Hawley, R. S., and S. H. Friend. 1996. Strange bedfellows in even stranger places: the role of ATM in meiotic cells, lymphocytes, tumors, and its functional links to p53. Genes Dev. 10:2383-2388.
31. Hays, S. L., A. A. Firmenich, and P. Berg. 1995. Complex formation in yeast double-strand break repair: participation of Rad51, Rad52, Rad55, and Rad57 proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6925-6929.
32. Holmes, A. M., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Double-strand break repair in yeast requires both leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases. Cell 96:415-424.
33. Jeggo, P. A., A. M. Carr, and A. R. Lehmann. 1998. Splitting the ATM: distinct repair and checkpoint defects in ataxia-telangiectasia. Trends Genet. 14:312-316.
34. Johnson, R. D., and L. S. Symington. 1995. Functional differences and interactions among the putative RecA homologs RAD51, RAD55, and RAD57. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4843-4850.
35. Kadyk, L. C., and L. H. Hartwell. 1992. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:387-402.
36. Kanaar, R., J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, and D. C. van Gent. 1998. Molecular mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol. 8:483-489.
37. Kato, R., and H. Ogawa. 1994. An essential gene, ESR1, is required for mitotic cell growth, DNA repair and meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3104-3112.
38. Keeney, S., C. N. Giroux, and N. Kleckner. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375-384.
39. Kiser, G. L., and T. A. Weinert. 1996. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:703-718.
40. Kleckner, N. 1996. Meiosis: how could it work? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8167-8174.
41. Kowalczykowski, S. C., D. A. Dixon, A. K. Eggleston, S. D. Lauder, and W. M. Rehrauer. 1994. Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 58:401-465.
42. Le, S., J. K. Moore, J. E. Haber, and C. W. Greider. 1999. RAD50 and RAD51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. Genetics 152:143-152.
43. Lew, D. J., T. Weinert, and J. R. Pringle. 1997. Cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p. 507-695. In J. R. Pringle, J. R. Broach, and E. W. Jones (ed.), The molecular and cellular Biology of the yeast Saccahromyces. Cell cycle and cell Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
44. Little, J. W., S. H. Edmiston, L. Z. Pacelli, and D. W. Mount. 1980. Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease. Prac. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:3225-3229.
45. Longhese, M. P., H. Neecke, V. Paciotti, G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1996. The 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A is required for the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:3533-3537.
46. Lovett, S. T., and R. K. Mortimer. 1987. Characterization of null mutants of the RAD55 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of temperature, osmotic strength and mating type. Genetics 116:547-553.
47. Lydall, D., and T. Weinert. 1995. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 270:1488-1491.
48. Malkova, A., E. L. Ivanov, and J. E. Haber. 1996. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7131-7136.
49. Marini, F., A. Pellicioli, V. Paciotti, G. Lucchini, P. Plevani, D. F. Stern, and M. Foiani. 1997. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J. 16:639-650.
50. Martin, S. G., T. Laroche, N. Suka, M. Grunstein, and S. M. Gasser. 1999. Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast. Cell 97:621-633.
51. McKim, K. S., and A. H. Hagihara. 1998. mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved. Genes Dev. 12:2932-2942.
52. Mills, K. D., D. A. Sinclair, and L. Guarente. 1999. MEC1-dependent redistribution of the Sir3 silencing protein from telomeres to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 97:609-620.
53. Milne, G. T., S. F. Jin, K. B. Shannon, and D. T. Weaver. 1996. Mutations in two Ku homologs define a DNA end-joining repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4189-4198.
54. Morrison, C., E. Sonoda, N. Takao, A. Shinohara, K. Yamamoto, and S. Takeda. 2000. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. EMBO J. 19:463-471.
55. Morrow, D. M., C. Connelly, and P. Hieter. 1997. "Break copy" duplication: a model for chromosome fragment formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147:371-382.
56. + gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tethers cell division to cell size and is a cyclin homolog. EMBO J. 20:4335-4346.
57. Navas, T. A., Y. Sanchez, and S. J. Elledge. 1996. RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 10:2632-2643.
58. Navas, T. A., Z. Zhou, and S. J. Elledge. 1995. DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. Cell 80:29-39.
59. Nurse, P. 1994. Ordering S phase and M phase in the cell cycle. Cell 80:547-550.
60. Ogawa, T., X. Yu, A. Shinohara, and E. H. Egelman. 1993. Similarity of the yeast RAD51 filament to the bacterial RecA filament. Science 259:1896-1899.
61. Paques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:349-404.
62. Paulovich, A. G., and L. H. Hartwell. 1995. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S-cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 82:841-847.
63. Paulovich, A. G., R. U. Margulies, B. M. Garvik, and L. H. Hartwell. 1997. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics 145:45-62.
64. Petes, T. D., R. E. Malone, and L. S. Symington. 1991. Recombination in yeast, p. 407-521. In J. R. Broach, E. Jones, and J. Pringle (ed.). The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: genome dynamics, protein synthesis and energetics, vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
65. Prakash, L., and S. Prakash. 1977. Isolation and characterization of MMS-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 86:33-55.
66. Roeder, G. S. 1997. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 11:2600-2621.
67. Rowley, R., S. Subramani, and P. G. Young. 1992. Checkpoint controls in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: rad1. EMBO J. 11:1335-1342.
68. Sanchez, Y., J. Bachant, H. Wang, F. H. Hu, D. Liu, M. Tetzlaff, and S. J. Elledge. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166-1171.
69. Sanchez, Y., B. A. Desany, W. J. Jones, Q. H. Liu, B. Wang, and S. J. Elledge. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357-360.
70. Santos Rosa, H., B. Clever, W. D. Heyer, and A. Aguilera. 1996. The yeast HRS1 gene encodes a polyglutamine-rich nuclear protein required for spontaneous and hpr1-induced deletions between direct repeats. Genetics 142: 705-716.
71. Shiloh, Y. 1997. Ataxia-Telangiectasia and the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome: related disorders but genes apart. Annu. Rev. Genet. 31:635-662.
72. Shiloh, Y., E. Tabor, and Y. Becker. 1983. Repair of potentially lethal and sublethal damage induced by neocarcinostatin in normal and ataxia-telangiectasia skin fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 110:483-490.
73. Siede, W., A. S. Friedberg, I. Dianova, and E. C. Friedberg. 1994. Characterization of G(1) checkpoint control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae following exposure to DNA-damaging agents. Genetics 138:271-281.
74. Siede, W., A. S. Friedberg, and E. C. Friedberg. 1993. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7985-7989.
75. Snow, R., and C. T. Korch. 1970. Alkylation induced gene conversion in yeast: use in fine structure mapping. Mol. Gen. Genet. 107:201-208.
76. Sun, Z. X., D. S. Fay, F. Marini, M. Foiani, and D. F. Stern. 1996. Spk1/ Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev. 10:395-406.
77. Sun, Z. X., J. Hsiao, D. S. Fay, and D. F. Stern. 1998. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281:272-274.
78. Sung, P. 1994. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 265:1241-1243.
79. Sung, P. 1997. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11:1111-1121.
80. Takao, N., H. Kato, R. Mori, C. Morrison, E. Sonada, X. Sun, H. Shimizy, K. Yoshioka, S. Takeda, and K.-I. Yamamoto. 1999. Disruption of ATM in p53-null cells causes multiple functional abnormalities in cellular response to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 18:7002-7009.
81. Thompson, D. A., and F. W. Stahl. 1999. Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis: isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. Genetics 153:621-641.
82. 1 cyclins and DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4291-4302.
83. Vialard, J. E., C. S. Gilbert, C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Te11-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17:5679-5688.
84. Wach, A., A. Brachat, R. Pohlmann, and P. Philippsen. 1994. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793-1808.
85. Wang, J. Y. J. 1998. Cellular responses to DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10:240-247.
86. Weichselbaum, R. R., J. Nove, and J. B. Little. 1978. Deficient recovery from potentially lethal radiation damage in ataxia telangiectasia and xeroderma pigmentosum. Nature 271:261-262.
87. Weinert, T. 1998. DNA damage and checkpoint pathways: molecular anatomy and interactions with repair. Cell 94:555-558.
88. Weinert, T. 1998. DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8:185-193.
89. Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241: 317-322.
90. Weinert, T. A., G. L. Kiser, and L. H. Hartwell. 1994. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 8:652-665.
91. Xu, Y., T. Ashley, E. E. Brainerd, R. T. Bronson, M. S. Meyn, and D. Baltimore. 1996. Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes Dev. 10:2411-2422.
92. Yuan, Z. M., Y. Y. Huang, T. Ishiko, S. Nakada, T. Utsugisawa, S. Kharbanda, R. Wang, P. Sung, A. Shinohara, R. Weichselbaum, and D. Kufe. 1998. Regulation of Rad51 function by c-Ab1 in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 273:3799-3802.
93. Zhou, Z., and S. J. Elledge. 1993. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell 75:1119-1127.