Arrested replication fork processing: Interplay between checkpoints and recombination

DNA Repair

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1042-1061

  Lambert, Sarah ^a   Froget, Benoît ^a   Carr, Antony M ^b  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Replication fork arrest; Replication restart; RFB; RTS1

Indexed keywords

DNA; NUCLEASE; RECQ HELICASE; RIBOSOME DNA;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRUCTURE; DNA SYNTHESIS; EUKARYOTE; GENETIC REGULATION; GENETIC STABILITY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTIC CELL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REPLICATION FORK; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; YEAST;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; HUMANS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; S PHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 34249944668     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (177)

1. Michel B., Grompone G., Flores M.J., and Bidnenko V. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 12783-12788
2. Kogoma T. Recombination by replication. Cell 85 (1996) 625-627
3. Kogoma T. Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61 (1997) 212-238
4. Kuzminov A. Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 16 (1995) 373-384
5. Sandler S.J., and Marians K.J. Role of PriA in replication fork reactivation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 182 (2000) 9-13
6. Courcelle J., and Hanawalt P.C. RecA-dependent recovery of arrested DNA replication forks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37 (2003) 611-646
7. Liu J., and Marians K.J. PriA-directed assembly of a primosome on D loop DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 274 (1999) 25033-25041
8. Xu L., and Marians K.J. PriA mediates DNA replication pathway choice at recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 817-826
9. Masai H., Asai T., Kubota Y., Arai K., and Kogoma T. Escherichia coli PriA protein is essential for inducible and constitutive stable DNA replication. EMBO J. 13 (1994) 5338-5345
10. Cox M.M. The nonmutagenic repair of broken replication forks via recombination. Mutat. Res. 510 (2002) 107-120
11. Lusetti S.L., and Cox M.M. The bacterial RecA protein and the recombinational DNA repair of stalled replication forks. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71 (2002) 71-100
12. Higgins N.P., Kato K., and Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 101 (1976) 417-425
13. Michel B., Ehrlich S.D., and Uzest M. DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest. EMBO J. 16 (1997) 430-438
14. Seigneur M., Bidnenko V., Ehrlich S.D., and Michel B. RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell 95 (1998) 419-430
15. Baharoglu Z., Petranovic M., Flores M.J., and Michel B. RuvAB is essential for replication forks reversal in certain replication mutants. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 596-604
16. Flores M.J., Bidnenko V., and Michel B. The DNA repair helicase UvrD is essential for replication fork reversal in replication mutants. EMBO Rep. 5 (2004) 983-988
17. Robu M.E., Inman R.B., and Cox M.M. RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 8211-8218
18. Seigneur M., Ehrlich S.D., and Michel B. RuvABC-dependent double-strand breaks in dnaBts mutants require recA. Mol. Microbiol. 38 (2000) 565-574
19. McGlynn P., and Lloyd R.G. Genome stability and the processing of damaged replication forks by RecG. Trends Genet. 18 (2002) 413-419
20. McGlynn P., Lloyd R.G., and Marians K.J. Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 8235-8240
21. Flores M.J., Bierne H., Ehrlich S.D., and Michel B. Impairment of lagging strand synthesis triggers the formation of a RuvABC substrate at replication forks. EMBO J. 20 (2001) 619-629
22. Lambert S., and Carr A.M. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie 87 (2005) 591-602
23. Desany B.A., Alcasabas A.A., Bachant J.B., and Elledge S.J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2956-2970
24. Enoch T., Carr A.M., and Nurse P. Fission yeast genes involved in coupling mitosis to completion of DNA replication. Genes Dev. 6 (1992) 2035-2046
25. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., and Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 1323-1336
26. Lindsay H.D., Griffiths D.J., Edwards R.J., Christensen P.U., Murray J.M., Osman F., Walworth N., and Carr A.M. S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 382-395
27. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., and Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412 (2001) 557-561
28. Meister P., Taddei A., Vernis L., Poidevin M., Gasser S.M., and Baldacci G. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 168 (2005) 537-544
29. Noguchi E., Noguchi C., Du L.L., and Russell P. Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 7861-7874
30. Noguchi E., Noguchi C., McDonald W.H., Yates III J.R., and Russell P. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 8342-8355
31. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., and Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297 (2002) 599-602
32. Gruber M., Wellinger R.E., and Sogo J.M. Architecture of the replication fork stalled at the 3′end of yeast ribosomal genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 5777-5787
33. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Liberi G., and Foiani M. Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 1499-1510
34. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., and Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 17 (2005) 153-159
35. Liberi G., Maffioletti G., Lucca C., Chiolo I., Baryshnikova A., Cotta-Ramusino C., Lopes M., Pellicioli A., Haber J.E., and Foiani M. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 339-350
36. Chow K.H., and Courcelle J. RecO acts with RecF and RecR to protect and maintain replication forks blocked by UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli. J Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 3492-3496
37. Brush G.S., and Kelly T.J. Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 3725-3732
38. Brush G.S., Morrow D.M., Hieter P., and Kelly T.J. The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 15075-15080
39. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., Plevani P., Romano A., Di Fiore P.P., and Foiani M. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18 (1999) 6561-6572
40. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., and Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 4325-4336
41. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., and Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 3055-3069
42. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., and Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23 (2004) 1206-1213
43. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424 (2003) 1078-1083
44. Nitani N., Nakamura K., Nakagawa C., Masukata H., and Nakagawa T. Regulation of DNA replication machinery by Mrc1 in fission yeast. Genetics 174 (2006) 155-165
45. Tourriere H., Versini G., Cordon-Preciado V., Alabert C., and Pasero P. Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol. Cell 19 (2005) 699-706
46. Szyjka S.J., Viggiani C.J., and Aparicio O.M. Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 19 (2005) 691-697
47. Nyberg K.A., Michelson R.J., Putnam C.W., and Weinert T.A. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36 (2002) 617-656
48. Murakami H., and Okayama H. A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase. Nature 374 (1995) 817-819
49. Furuya K., Poitelea M., Guo L., Caspari T., and Carr A.M. Chk1 activation requires Rad9 S/TQ-site phosphorylation to promote association with C-terminal BRCT domains of Rad4TOPBP1. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 1154-1164
50. Marini F., Pellicioli A., Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Stern D.F., and Foiani M. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J. 16 (1997) 639-650
51. Navas T.A., Zhou Z., and Elledge S.J. DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. Cell 80 (1995) 29-39
52. Duncker B.P., and Brown G.W. Cdc7 kinases (DDKs) and checkpoint responses: Lessons from two yeasts. Mutat. Res. 532 (2003) 21-27
53. Kihara M., Nakai W., Asano S., Suzuki A., Kitada K., Kawasaki Y., Johnston L.H., and Sugino A. Characterization of the yeast Cdc7p/Dbf4p complex purified from insect cells. Its protein kinase activity is regulated by Rad53p. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 35051-35062
54. Lei M., Kawasaki Y., Young M.R., Kihara M., Sugino A., and Tye B.K. Mcm2 is a target of regulation by Cdc7-Dbf4 during the initiation of DNA synthesis. Genes Dev. 11 (1997) 3365-3374
55. Takeda T., Ogino K., Matsui E., Cho M.K., Kumagai H., Miyake T., Arai K., and Masai H. A fission yeast gene, him1(+)/dfp1(+), encoding a regulatory subunit for Hsk1 kinase, plays essential roles in S-phase initiation as well as in S-phase checkpoint control and recovery from DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19 (1999) 5535-5547
56. Snaith H.A., Brown G.W., and Forsburg S.L. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hsk1p is a potential cds1p target required for genome integrity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 7922-7932
57. Takeda T., Ogino K., Tatebayashi K., Ikeda H., Arai K., and Masai H. Regulation of initiation of S phase, replication checkpoint signaling, and maintenance of mitotic chromosome structures during S phase by Hsk1 kinase in the fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12 (2001) 1257-1274
58. Weinreich M., and Stillman B. Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway. EMBO J. 18 (1999) 5334-5346
59. Matsumoto S., Ogino K., Noguchi E., Russell P., and Masai H. Hsk1-Dfp1/Him 1, the Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, associates with Swi1, a component of the replication fork protection complex. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 42536-42542
60. Sommariva E., Pellny T.K., Karahan N., Kumar S., Huberman J.A., and Dalgaard J.Z. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi1, Swi3, and Hsk1 are components of a novel S-phase response pathway to alkylation damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 2770-2784
61. Calzada A., Hodgson B., Kanemaki M., Bueno A., and Labib K. Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 1905-1919
62. Lambert S., Watson A., Sheedy D.M., Martin B., and Carr A.M. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121 (2005) 689-702
63. Giot L., Chanet R., Simon M., Facca C., and Faye G. Involvement of the yeast DNA polymerase delta in DNA repair in vivo. Genetics 146 (1997) 1239-1251
64. Merrill B.J., and Holm C. The RAD52 recombinational repair pathway is essential in pol30 (PCNA) mutants that accumulate small single-stranded DNA fragments during DNA synthesis. Genetics 148 (1998) 611-624
65. Montelone B.A., Prakash S., and Prakash L. Spontaneous mitotic recombination in mms8-1, an allele of the CDC9 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 147 (1981) 517-525
66. Muris D.F., Vreeken K., Carr A.M., Murray J.M., Smit C., Lohman P.H., and Pastink A. Isolation of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe RAD54 homologue, rhp54+, a gene involved in the repair of radiation damage and replication fidelity. J. Cell Sci. 109 Pt 1 (1996) 73-81
67. Murray J.M., Tavassoli M., al-Harithy R., Sheldrick K.S., Lehmann A.R., Carr A.M., and Watts F.Z. Structural and functional conservation of the human homolog of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad2 gene, which is required for chromosome segregation and recovery from DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 4878-4888
68. Symington L.S. Homologous recombination is required for the viability of rad27 mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 26 (1998) 5589-5595
69. Benard M., Marie C., and Pierron G. DNA replication-dependent formation of joint DNA molecules in Physarum polycephalum. Mol. Cell 7 (2001) 971-980
70. Segurado M., Gomez M., and Antequera F. Increased recombination intermediates and homologous integration hot spots at DNA replication origins. Mol. Cell 10 (2002) 907-916
71. Zou H., and Rothstein R. Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell 90 (1997) 87-96
72. Hyrien O. Mechanisms and consequences of replication fork arrest. Biochimie 82 (2000) 5-17
73. Rothstein R., Michel B., and Gangloff S. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 1-10
74. Brewer B.J., and Fangman W.L. A replication fork barrier at the 3′end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 55 (1988) 637-643
75. Brewer B.J., Lockshon D., and Fangman W.L. The arrest of replication forks in the rDNA of yeast occurs independently of transcription. Cell 71 (1992) 267-276
76. Kobayashi T., and Horiuchi T. A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1 (1996) 465-474
77. Keil R.L., and Roeder G.S. Cis-acting, recombination-stimulating activity in a fragment of the ribosomal DNA of S. cerevisiae. Cell 39 (1984) 377-386
78. Voelkel-Meiman K., Keil R.L., and Roeder G.S. Recombination-stimulating sequences in yeast ribosomal DNA correspond to sequences regulating transcription by RNA polymerase I. Cell 48 (1987) 1071-1079
79. Defossez P.A., Prusty R., Kaeberlein M., Lin S.J., Ferrigno P., Silver P.A., Keil R.L., and Guarente L. Elimination of replication block protein Fob1 extends the life span of yeast mother cells. Mol. Cell 3 (1999) 447-455
80. Kobayashi T., Heck D.J., Nomura M., and Horiuchi T. Expansion and contraction of ribosomal DNA repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: requirement of replication fork blocking (Fob1) protein and the role of RNA polymerase I. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 3821-3830
81. Johzuka K., and Horiuchi T. Replication fork block protein, Fob1, acts as an rDNA region specific recombinator in S. cerevisiae. Genes Cells 7 (2002) 99-113
82. Huang G.S., and Keil R.L. Requirements for activity of the yeast mitotic recombination hotspot HOT1: RNA polymerase I and multiple cis-acting sequences. Genetics 141 (1995) 845-855
83. Burkhalter M.D., and Sogo J.M. rDNA enhancer affects replication initiation and mitotic recombination: Fob1 mediates nucleolytic processing independently of replication. Mol. Cell 15 (2004) 409-421
84. Weitao T., Budd M., Hoopes L.L., and Campbell J.L. Dna2 helicase/nuclease causes replicative fork stalling and double-strand breaks in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 22513-22522
85. Ward T.R., Hoang M.L., Prusty R., Lau C.K., Keil R.L., Fangman W.L., and Brewer B.J. Ribosomal DNA replication fork barrier and HOT1 recombination hot spot: shared sequences but independent activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 4948-4957
86. Takeuchi Y., Horiuchi T., and Kobayashi T. Transcription-dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1497-1506
87. Kraus E., Leung W.Y., and Haber J.E. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 8255-8262
88. Paques F., and Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63 (1999) 349-404
89. Esposito M.S. Evidence that spontaneous mitotic recombination occurs at the two-strand stage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75 (1978) 4436-4440
90. Golin J.E., and Esposito M.S. Coincident gene conversion during mitosis in saccharomyces. Genetics 107 (1984) 355-365
91. Bosco G., and Haber J.E. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics 150 (1998) 1037-1047
92. Malkova A., Ivanov E.L., and Haber J.E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 7131-7136
93. Holmes A.M., and Haber J.E. Double-strand break repair in yeast requires both leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases. Cell 96 (1999) 415-424
94. Wang X., Ira G., Tercero J.A., Holmes A.M., Diffley J.F., and Haber J.E. Role of DNA replication proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 6891-6899
95. Egel R. Fission yeast mating-type switching: programmed damage and repair. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4 (2005) 525-536
96. Holmes A.M., Kaykov A., and Arcangioli B. Molecular and cellular dissection of mating-type switching steps in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 303-311
97. Klar A.J. Differentiated parental DNA strands confer developmental asymmetry on daughter cells in fission yeast. Nature 326 (1987) 466-470
98. Klar A.J. The developmental fate of fission yeast cells is determined by the pattern of inheritance of parental and grandparental DNA strands. EMBO J. 9 (1990) 1407-1415
99. Arcangioli B. A site- and strand-specific DNA break confers asymmetric switching potential in fission yeast. EMBO J. 17 (1998) 4503-4510
100. Kaykov A., and Arcangioli B. A programmed strand-specific and modified nick in S. pombe constitutes a novel type of chromosomal imprint. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 1924-1928
101. Kaykov A., Holmes A.M., and Arcangioli B. Formation, maintenance and consequences of the imprint at the mating-type locus in fission yeast. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 930-938
102. Vengrova S., and Dalgaard J.Z. RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 794-804
103. Vengrova S., and Dalgaard J.Z. The wild-type Schizosaccharomyces pombe mat1 imprint consists of two ribonucleotides. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 59-65
104. Egel R. DNA replication: stalling a fork for imprinting and switching. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) R915-R917
105. Dalgaard J.Z., and Klar A.J. swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe. Cell 102 (2000) 745-751
106. Egel R., Beach D.H., and Klar A.J. Genes required for initiation and resolution steps of mating-type switching in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81 (1984) 3481-3485
107. Arcangioli B. Fate of mat1 DNA strands during mating-type switching in fission yeast. EMBO Rep. 1 (2000) 145-150
108. Dalgaard J.Z., and Klar A.J. A DNA replication-arrest site RTS1 regulates imprinting by determining the direction of replication at mat1 in S. pombe. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 2060-2068
109. Ahn J.S., Osman F., and Whitby M.C. Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 2011-2023
110. Courcelle J., and Hanawalt P.C. RecQ and RecJ process blocked replication forks prior to the resumption of replication in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262 (1999) 543-551
111. Game J.C., and Mortimer R.K. A genetic study of X-ray sensitive mutants in yeast. Mutat. Res. 24 (1974) 281-292
112. Lehmann A.R., Carr A.M., Watts F.Z., and Murray J.M. DNA repair in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mutat. Res. 250 (1991) 205-210
113. Doe C.L., Osman F., Dixon J., and Whitby M.C. DNA repair by a Rad22-Mus81- dependent pathway that is independent of Rhp51. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 5570-5581
114. Petukhova G., Stratton S., and Sung P. Catalysis of homologous DNA pairing by yeast Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. Nature 393 (1998) 91-94
115. Shinohara A., and Ogawa T. Stimulation by Rad52 of yeast Rad51-mediated recombination. Nature 391 (1998) 404-407
116. Sung P. Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997) 28194-28197
117. Aboussekhra A., Chanet R., Adjiri A., and Fabre F. Semidominant suppressors of Srs2 helicase mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae map in the RAD51 gene, whose sequence predicts a protein with similarities to procaryotic RecA proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12 (1992) 3224-3234
118. Basile G., Aker M., and Mortimer R.K. Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional regulation of the yeast recombinational repair gene RAD51. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12 (1992) 3235-3246
119. Muris D.F., Vreeken K., Carr A.M., Broughton B.C., Lehmann A.R., Lohman P.H., and Pastink A. Cloning the RAD51 homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 21 (1993) 4586-4591
120. Shinohara A., Ogawa H., Matsuda Y., Ushio N., Ikeo K., and Ogawa T. Cloning of human, mouse and fission yeast recombination genes homologous to RAD51 and recA. Nat. Genet. 4 (1993) 239-243
121. Shinohara A., Ogawa H., and Ogawa T. Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 69 (1992) 457-470
122. Sung P. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11 (1997) 1111-1121
123. Gasior S.L., Olivares H., Ear U., Hari D.M., Weichselbaum R., and Bishop D.K. Assembly of RecA-like recombinases: distinct roles for mediator proteins in mitosis and meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 8411-8418
124. Heyer W.D., Li X., Rolfsmeier M., and Zhang X.P. Rad54: the Swiss Army knife of homologous recombination?. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) 4115-4125
125. D'Amours D., and Jackson S.P. The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3 (2002) 317-327
126. Lisby M., Rothstein R., and Mortensen U.H. Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 8276-8282
127. Meister P., Poidevin M., Francesconi S., Tratner I., Zarzov P., and Baldacci G. Nuclear factories for signalling and repairing DNA double strand breaks in living fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003) 5064-5073
128. Torres J.Z., Schnakenberg S.L., and Zakian V.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 3198-3212
129. Malkova A., Naylor M.L., Yamaguchi M., Ira G., and Haber J.E. RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 933-944
130. Signon L., Malkova A., Naylor M.L., Klein H., and Haber J.E. Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 2048-2056
131. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
132. Amor-Gueret M. Bloom syndrome, genomic instability and cancer: The SOS-like hypothesis. Cancer Lett. 236 (2006) 1-12
133. Oakley T.J., and Hickson I.D. Defending genome integrity during S-phase: putative roles for RecQ helicases and topoisomerase III. DNA Repair (Amst) 1 (2002) 175-207
134. Bjergbaek L., Cobb J.A., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., and Gasser S.M. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 405-417
135. Frei C., and Gasser S.M. The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci. Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 81-96
136. Ahmad F., and Stewart E. The N-terminal region of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe RecQ helicase, Rqh1p, physically interacts with Topoisomerase III and is required for Rqhlp function. Mol. Genet. Genomics 273 (2005) 102-114
137. Carr A.M. DNA structure dependent checkpoints as regulators of DNA repair. DNA Repair (Amst.) 1 (2002) 983-994
138. Caspari T., Murray J.M., and Carr A.M. Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 1195-1208
139. Gangloff S., McDonald J.P., Bendixen C., Arthur L., and Rothstein R. The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 8391-8398
140. Goodwin A., Wang S.W., Toda T., Norbury C., and Hickson I.D. Topoisomerase III is essential for accurate nuclear division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 27 (1999) 4050-4058
141. Wu L., and Hickson I.D. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426 (2003) 870-874
142. Ira G., Malkova A., Liberi G., Foiani M., and Haber J.E. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115 (2003) 401-411
143. Robert T., Dervins D., Fabre F., and Gangloff S. Mrc1 and Srs2 are major actors in the regulation of spontaneous crossover. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 2837-2846
144. Gangloff S., Soustelle C., and Fabre F. Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases. Nat. Genet. 25 (2000) 192-194
145. Maftahi M., Hope J.C., Delgado-Cruzata L., Han C.S., and Freyer G.A. The severe slow growth of Deltasrs2 Deltarqh1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is suppressed by loss of recombination and checkpoint genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002) 4781-4792
146. Stewart E., Chapman C.R., Al-Khodairy F., Carr A.M., and Enoch T. rqh1+, a fission yeast gene related to the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for reversible S phase arrest. EMBO J. 16 (1997) 2682-2692
147. Win T.Z., Mankouri H.W., Hickson I.D., and Wang S.W. A role for the fission yeast Rqh1 helicase in chromosome segregation. J. Cell Sci. 118 (2005) 5777-5784
148. Versini G., Comet I., Wu M., Hoopes L., Schwob E., and Pasero P. The yeast Sgs1 helicase is differentially required for genomic and ribosomal DNA replication. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 1939-1949
149. Doe C.L., Dixon J., Osman F., and Whitby M.C. Partial suppression of the fission yeast rqh1(-) phenotype by expression of a bacterial Holliday junction resolvase. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 2751-2762
150. Wu L., Davies S.L., Levitt N.C., and Hickson I.D. Potential role for the BLM helicase in recombinational repair via a conserved interaction with RAD51. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 19375-19381
151. Boddy M.N., Lopez-Girona A., Shanahan P., Interthal H., Heyer W.D., and Russell P. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 8758-8766
152. Interthal H., and Heyer W.D. MUS81 encodes a novel helix-hairpin-helix protein involved in the response to UV- and methylation-induced DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263 (2000) 812-827
153. Doe C.L., Ahn J.S., Dixon J., and Whitby M.C. Mus81-Eme1 and Rqh1 involvement in processing stalled and collapsed replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 32753-32759
154. Fabre F., Chan A., Heyer W.D., and Gangloff S. Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002) 16887-16892
155. Boddy M.N., Gaillard P.H., McDonald W.H., Shanahan P., Yates III J.R., and Russell P. Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase. Cell 107 (2001) 537-548
156. Gaillard P.H., Noguchi E., Shanahan P., and Russell P. The endogenous Mus81-Eme1 complex resolves Holliday junctions by a nick and counternick mechanism. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 747-759
157. Kaliraman V., Mullen J.R., Fricke W.M., Bastin-Shanower S.A., and Brill S.J. Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 2730-2740
158. Whitby M.C., Osman F., and Dixon J. Cleavage of model replication forks by fission yeast Mus81-Emel and budding yeast Mus81-Mms4. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 6928-6935
159. Raveendranathan M., Chattopadhyay S., Bolon Y.T., Haworth J., Clarke D.J., and Bielinsky A.K. Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 3627-3639
160. Lehmann A.R., Walicka M., Griffiths D.J., Murray J.M., Watts F.Z., McCready S., and Carr A.M. The rad18 gene of Shizosaccharomyces pombe defines a new subgroup of the SMC superfamily involved in DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 (1995) 7067-7080
161. Ampatzidou E., Irmisch A., O'Connell J., and Murray M.J.M. Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 9387-9401
162. Branzei D., Sollier J., Liberi G., Zhao X., Maeda D., Seki M., Enomoto T., Ohta K., and Foiani M. Ubc9- and Mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127 (2006) 509-522
163. Miyabe I., Morishita T., Hishida T., Yonei S., and Shinagawa H. Rhp51-dependent recombination intermediates that do not generate checkpoint signal are accumulated in Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad60 and smc5/6 mutants after release from replication arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 343-353
164. Boddy M.N., Shanahan P., McDonald W.H., Lopez-Girona A., Noguchi E., Yates I.J., and Russell P. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 5939-5946
165. Morishita T., Tsutsui Y., Iwasaki H., and Shinagawa H. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad60 gene is essential for repairing double-strand DNA breaks spontaneously occurring during replication and induced by DNA-damaging agents. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002) 3537-3548
166. Kai M., Boddy M.N., Russell P., and Wang T.S. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 919-932
167. Bashkirov V.I., Bashkirova E.V., Haghnazari E., and Heyer W.D. Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 1441-1452
168. D'Amours D., and Jackson S.P. The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 2238-2249
169. Liberi G., Chiolo I., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., and Foiani M. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 5027-5038
170. Herzberg K., Bashkirov V.I., Rolfsmeier M., Haghnazari E., McDonald W.H., Anderson S., Bashkirova E.V., Yates III J.R., and Heyer W.D. Phosphorylation of rad55 on serines 2, 8 and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 8396-8409
171. Rupp W.D., and Howard-Flanders P. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J. Mol. Biol. 31 (1968) 291-304
172. Rupp W.D., Wilde III C.E., Reno D.L., and Howard-Flanders P. Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 61 (1971) 25-44
173. Smith K.C. Recombinational DNA repair: the ignored repair systems. Bioessays 26 (2004) 1322-1326
174. West S.C., Cassuto E., and Howard-Flanders P. Homologous pairing can occur before DNA strand separation in general genetic recombination. Nature 290 (1981) 29-33
175. Lopes M., Foiani M., and Sogo J.M. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 15-27
176. Pages V., and Fuchs R.P. Uncoupling of leading- and lagging-strand DNA replication during lesion bypass in vivo. Science 300 (2003) 1300-1303
177. Heller R.C., and Marians K.J. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand. Nature 439 (2006) 557-562