The nonmutagenic repair of broken replication forks via recombination

Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Volumn 510, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 107-120

  Cox, Michael M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Recombination; Repair; Replication

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ENZYME; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CELL ENZYME; DNA POLYMERASE;

BACTERIUM; CELL FUNCTION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA;

EID: 0037196076     PISSN: 00275107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0027-5107(02)00256-7     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. Bridges B.A. DNA repair: polymerases for passing lesions. Curr. Biol. 9:1999;R475-R477.
2. Goodman M.F., Tippin B. The expanding polymerase universe. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1:2000;101-109.
3. Woodgate R. A plethora of lesion-replicating DNA polymerases. Genes Dev. 13:1999;2191-2195.
4. Friedberg E.C., Wagner R., Radman M. Specialized DNA polymerases, cellular survival, and the genesis of mutations. Science. 296:2002;1627-1630.
5. Ohmori H., Friedberg E.C., Fuchs R.P., Goodman M.F., Hanaoka F., Hinkle D., Kunkel T.A., Lawrence C.W., Livneh Z., Nohmi T., Prakash L., Prakash S., Todo T., Walker G.C., Wang Z., Woodgate R. The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol. Cell. 8:2001;7-8.
6. Cox M.M. Recombinational DNA repair of damaged replication forks in Escherichia coli: questions. Ann. Rev. Genet. 35:2001;53-82.
7. Cox M.M. Historical overview: searching for replication help in all of the rec places. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8173-8180.
8. Cox M.M., Goodman M.F., Kreuzer K.N., Sherratt D.J., Sandler S.J., Marians K.J. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature. 404:2000;37-41.
9. Kuzminov A. Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:1999;751-813.
10. Kuzminov A. DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8461-8468.
11. Lusetti S.L., Cox M.M. The bacterial RecA protein and the recombinational DNA repair of stalled replication forks. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 71:2002;71-100.
12. Marians K.J. PriA-directed replication fork restart in Escherichia coli. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;185-189.
13. Marians K.J. Replication and recombination intersect. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:2000;151-156.
14. Michel B., Flores M.J., Viguera E., Grompone G., Seigneur M., Bidnenko V. Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8181-8188.
15. Campbell A. Types of recombination: common problems and common strategies. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 49:1984;839-844.
16. Hanawalt P.C. The UV sensitivity of bacteria: its relation to the DNA replication cycle. Photochem. Photobiol. 5:1966;1-12.
17. A. Skalka, A replicator's view of recombination (and repair), in: R.F. Grell (Ed.), Mechanisms in Recombination, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1974, pp. 421-432.
18. Bridges B.A. Evidence for a further dark repair process in bacteria. Nat. New Biol. 240:1972;52-53.
19. Kogoma T. Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:1997;212-238.
20. Szostak J.W., Orr W.T.L., Rothstein R.J., Stahl F.W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 33:1983;25-35.
21. Cromie G.A., Connelly J.C., Leach D.R.F. Recombination at double-strand breaks and DNA ends: conserved mechanisms from phage to humans. Mol. Cell. 8:2001;1163-1174.
22. Meselson M., Weigle J.J. Chromosome breakage accompanying genetic recombination in bacteriophage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 47:1961;857-868.
23. Kreuzer K.N. Recombination-dependent DNA replication in phage T4. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;165-173.
24. Haber J.E. DNA recombination: the replication connection. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:1999;271-275.
25. Kraus E., Leung W.Y., Haber J.E. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8255-8262.
26. Radding C.M. Molecular mechanisms in genetic recombination. Ann. Rev. Genet. 7:1973;87-111.
27. Lee C.S., Davis R.W., Davidson N. A physical study by electron microscopy of the terminally repetitious, circularly permuted DNA from the coliphage particles of Escherichia coli 15. J. Mol. Biol. 48:1970;1-22.
28. Higgins N.P., Kato K., Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 101:1976;417-425.
29. Postow L., Ullsperger C., Keller R.W., Bustamante C., Vologodskii A.V., Cozzarelli N.R. Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 267:2001;2790-2796.
30. Cox M.M. Recombinational crossroads - eukaryotic enzymes and the limits of bacterial precedents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:1997;11764-11766.
31. Cox M.M. A broadening view of recombinational DNA repair in bacteria. Genes Cells. 3:1998;65-78.
32. Cox M.M. Recombinational DNA repair in bacteria and the RecA protein. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 63:1999;310-366.
33. Michel B., Recchia G.D., Penel-Colin M., Ehrlich S.D., Sherratt D.J. Resolution of Holliday junctions by RuvABC prevents dimer formation in rep mutants and UV-irradiated cells. Mol. Microbiol. 37:2000;180-191.
34. Barre F.X., Aroyo M., Colloms S.D., Helfrich A., Cornet F., Sherratt D.J. FtsK functions in the processing of a Holliday junction intermediate during bacterial chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 14:2000;2976-2988.
35. Steiner W.W., Kuempel P.L. Sister chromatid exchange frequencies in Escherichia coli analyzed by recombination at the dif resolvase site. J. Bacteriol. 180:1998;6269-6275.
36. Barre F.X., Soballe B., Michel B., Aroyo M., Robertson M., Sherratt D. Circles: the replication-recombination-chromosome segregation connection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8189-8195.
37. Kaguni J.M., Kornberg A. Replication initiated at the origin (oriC) of the E. coli chromosome reconstituted with purified enzymes. Cell. 38:1984;183-190.
38. van der Ende A., Baker T.A., Ogawa T., Kornberg A. Initiation of enzymatic replication at the origin of the Escherichia coli chromosome: primase as the sole priming enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:1985;3954-3958.
39. Lee E.H., Kornberg A. Replication deficiencies in priA mutants of Escherichia coli lacking the primosomal replication n′ protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88:1991;3029-3032.
40. Nurse P., Zavitz K.H., Marians K.J. Inactivation of the Escherichia coli PriA DNA replication protein induces the SOS response. J. Bacteriol. 173:1991;6686-6693.
41. Zavitz K.H., Marians K.J. Dissecting the functional role of PriA protein-catalysed primosome assembly in Escherichia coli DNA replication. Mol. Microbiol. 5:1991;2869-2873.
42. Sassanfar M., Roberts J.W. Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication. J. Mol. Biol. 212:1990;79-96.
43. Seufert W., Messer W. Initiation of Escherichia coli minichromosome replication at oriC and at protein n′ recognition sites. Two modes for initiating DNA synthesis in vitro. EMBO J. 5:1986;3401-3406.
44. Marians K.J. Prokaryotic DNA replication. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 61:1992;673-719.
45. Sandler S.J., Marians K.J. Role of PriA in replication fork reactivation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 182:2000;9-13.
46. Goodman M.F. Coping with replication train wrecks in Escherichia coli using Pol V, Pol II, and RecA proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;189-195.
47. Tang M., Pham P., Shen X., Taylor J.S., O'Donnell M., Woodgate R., Goodman M.F. Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis. Nature. 404:2000;1014-1018.
48. Bull H.J., Lombardo M.J., Rosenberg S.M. Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8334-8341.
49. Michel B., Ehrlich S.D., Uzest M. DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest. EMBO J. 16:1997;430-438.
50. Cordeiro-Stone M., Makhov A.M., Zaritskaya L.S., Griffith J.D. Analysis of DNA replication forks encountering a pyrimidine dimer in the template to the leading strand. J. Mol. Biol. 289:1999;1207-1218.
51. Klein H.L., Kreuzer K.N. Replication, recombination, and repair: going for the gold. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;471-480.
52. Seigneur M., Bidnenko V., Ehrlich S.D., Michel B. RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell. 95:1998;419-430.
53. Seigneur M., Ehrlich S.D., Michel B. RuvABC-dependent double-strand breaks in dnaBts mutants require RecA. Mol. Microbiol. 38:2000;565-574.
54. Grompone G., Seigneur M., Ehrlich S.D., Michel B. Replication fork reversal in DNA polymerase III mutants of Escherichia coli: a role for the beta clamp. Mol. Microbiol. 44:2002;1331-1339.
55. Rothstein R., Michel B., Gangloff S. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break" Genes Dev. 14:2000;1-10.
56. Robu M.E., Inman R.B., Cox M.M. RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8211-8218.
57. McGlynn P., Lloyd R.G. Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8227-8234.
58. Gregg A.V., McGlynn P., Jaktaji R.P., Lloyd R.G. Direct rescue of stalled DNA replication forks via the combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;241-251.
59. Bork J.M., Cox M.M., Inman R.B. The RecOR proteins modulate RecA protein function at 5′ ends of single-stranded DNA. EMBO J. 20:2001;7313-7322.
60. Shan Q., Bork J.M., Webb B.L., Inman R.B., Cox M.M. RecA protein filaments: end-dependent dissociation from ssDNA and stabilization by RecO and RecR proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 265:1997;519-540.
61. Umezu K., Kolodner R.D. Protein interactions in genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. Interactions involving RecO and RecR overcome the inhibition of RecA by single-stranded DNA-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;30005-30013.
62. Webb B.L., Cox M.M., Inman R.B. Recombinational DNA repair - the RecF and RecR proteins limit the extension of RecA filaments beyond single-strand DNA gaps. Cell. 91:1997;347-356.
63. Clark A.J., Sandler S.J. Homologous genetic recombination: the pieces begin to fall into place. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 20:1994;125-142.
64. Churchill J.J., Anderson D.G., Kowalczykowski S.C. The RecBC enzyme loads RecA protein onto ssDNA asymmetrically and independently of chi, resulting in constitutive recombination activation. Genes Dev. 13:1999;901-911.
65. Arnold D.A., Kowalczykowski S.C. Facilitated loading of RecA protein is essential to recombination by RecBCD enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2000;12261-12265.
66. Churchill J.J., Kowalczykowski S.C. Identification of the RecA protein-loading domain of RecBCD enzyme. J. Mol. Biol. 297:2000;537-542.
67. Blattner F.R., Plunkett G.R., Bloch C.A., Perna N.T., Burland V., Riley M., Collado V.J., Glasner J.D., Rode C.K., Mayhew G.F., Gregor J., Davis N.W., Kirkpatrick H.A., Goeden M.A., Rose D.J., Mau B., Shao Y. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 277:1997;1453-1474.
68. Kuzminov A., Schabtach E., Stahl F.W. Chi sites in combination with RecA protein increase the survival of linear DNA in Escherichia coli by inactivating exoV activity of RecBCD nuclease. EMBO J. 13:1994;2764-2776.
69. Xu L.W., Marians K.J. A dynamic RecA filament permits DNA polymerase-catalyzed extension of the invading strand in recombination intermediates. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;14321-14328.
70. Lemon K.P., Grossman A.D. Localization of bacterial DNA polymerase: evidence for a factory model of replication. Science. 282:1998;1516-1519.
71. Lemon K.P., Grossman A.D. Movement of replicating DNA through a stationary replisome. Mol. Cell. 6:2000;1321-1330.
72. Connelly J.C., Kirkham L.A., Leach D.R.F. The SbcCD nuclease of Escherichia coli is a structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family protein that cleaves hairpin DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:1998;7969-7974.
73. Gruss A., Michel B. The replication-recombination connection: insights from genomics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4:2001;595-601.
74. Makarova K.S., Aravind L., Grishin N.V., Rogozin I.B., Koonin E.V. A DNA repair system specific for thermophilic Archaea and bacteria predicted by genomic context analysis. Nuc. Acids Res. 30:2002;482-496.
75. Li Z.Q., Xiao W., McCormick J.J., Maher V.M. Identification of a protein essential for a major pathway used by human cells to avoid UV-induced DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;4459-4464.
76. Morrow D.M., Connelly C., Hieter P. "Break copy" duplication: a model for chromosome fragment formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 147:1997;371-382.
77. Voelkel-Meiman K., Roeder G.S. Gene conversion tracts stimulated by HOT1-promoted transcription are long and continuous. Genetics. 126:1990;851-867.
78. Golin J.E., Esposito M.S. Coincident gene conversion during mitosis in Saccharomyces. Genetics. 107:1984;355-365.
79. Esposito M.S. Evidence that spontaneous mitotic recombination occurs at the two-strand stage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:1978;4436-4440.
80. Bosco G., Haber J.E. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to non-reciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics. 150:1998;1037-1047.
81. Dunn B., Szauter P., Pardue M.L., Szostak J.W. Transfer of yeast telomeres to linear plasmids by recombination. Cell. 39:1984;191-201.
82. Foiani M., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Lucca C., Ferrari M., Liberi G., Muzi Falconi M., Plevani P. DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication controls in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451:2000;187-196.
83. Gardner R.D., Burke D.J. The spindle checkpoint: two transitions, two pathways. Trends Cell Biol. 10:2000;154-158.
84. Weinert T.A., Hartwell L.H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 241:1988;317-322.
85. Kolodner R.D., Putnam C.D., Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 297:2002;552-557.
86. Myung K.J., Datta A., Kolodner R.D. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 104:2001;397-408.
87. Myung K., Kolodner R.D. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;4500-4507.
88. Santocanale C., Sharma K., Diffley J.F.X. Activation of dormant origins of DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13:1999;2360-2364.
89. Diffley J.F.X. Replication control - choreographing replication origins. Curr. Biol. 8:1998;R 771-R 773.
90. Santocanale C., Diffley J.F.X. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature. 395:1998;615-618.
91. Shirahige K., Hori Y., Shiraishi K., Yamashita M., Takahashi K., Obuse C., Tsurimoto T., Yoshikawa H. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature. 395:1998;618-621.
92. Paulovich A.G., Toczyski D.P., Hartwell L.H. When checkpoints fail. Cell. 88:1997;315-321.
93. Lowndes N.F., Murguia J.R. Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:2000;17-25.
94. Paulovich A.G., Hartwell L.H. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell. 82:1995;841-847.
95. Marchetti M.A., Kumar S., Hartsuiker E., Maftahi M., Carr A.M., Freyer G.A., Burhans W.C., Huberman J.A. A single unbranched S-phase DNA damage and replication fork blockage checkpoint pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;7472-7477.
96. Tercero J.A., Diffley J.F.X. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature. 412:2001;553-557.
97. Cha R.S., Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science. 297:2002;602-606.
98. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature. 412:2001;557-561.
99. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science. 297:2002;599-602.
100. Nakayama H., Nakayama K., Nakayama R., Irino N., Nakayama Y., Hanawalt P.C. Isolation and genetic characterization of a thymineless death-resistant mutant of Escherichia coli K12: identification of a new mutation (recQ1) that blocks the RecF recombination pathway. Mol. Gen. Genet. 195:1984;474-480.
101. +, a fission yeast gene related to the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for reversible S phase arrest. EMBO J. 16:1997;2682-2692.
102. Yan H., Chen C.Y., Kobayashi R., Newport J. Replication focus-forming activity 1 and the Werner syndrome gene product. Nat. Genet. 19:1998;375-378.
103. Kamath-Loeb A.S., Johansson E., Burgers P.M., Loeb L.A. Functional interaction between the Werner syndrome protein and DNA polymerase delta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:2000;4603-4608.
104. Brosh R.M. Jr., Orren D.K., Nehlin J.O., Ravn P.H., Kenny M.K., Machwe A., Bohr V.A. Functional and physical interaction between WRN helicase and human replication protein A. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1999;18341-18350.
105. Shen J.C., Gray M.D., Oshima J., Loeb L.A. Characterization of Werner syndrome protein DNA helicase activity: directionality, substrate dependence and stimulation by replication protein A. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1998;2879-2885.
106. n trinucleotide repeat sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;16439-16446.
107. Pichierri P., Franchitto A., Mosesso P., Palitti F. Werner's syndrome protein is required for correct recovery after replication arrest and DNA damage induced in S-phase of cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:2001;2412-2421.
108. Watt P.M., Louis E.J., Borts R.H., Hickson I.D. Sgs1: a eukaryotic homolog of E. coli RecQ that interacts with topoisomerase II in vivo and is required for faithful chromosome segregation. Cell. 81:1995;253-260.
109. Gangloff S., McDonald J.P., Bendixen C., Arthur L., Rothstein R. The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1994;8391-8398.
110. Frei C., Gasser S.M. The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci. Genes Dev. 14:2000;81-96.
111. Yamagata K., Kato J., Shimamoto A., Goto M., Furuichi Y., Ikeda H. Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes suppress hyperrecombination in yeast sgs1 mutant: implication for genomic instability in human diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:1998;8733-8738.
112. + regulates cell cycle checkpoint control and is homologous to the Bloom's syndrome disease gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1998;2721-2728.
113. Myung K., Datta A., Chen C., Kolodner R.D. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 27:2001;113-116.
114. Kuzminov A. Instability of inhibited replication forks in E. coli. BioEssays. 17:1995;733-741.
115. Chakraverty R.K., Hickson I.D. Defending genome integrity during DNA replication: a proposed role for RecQ family helicases. BioEssays. 21:1999;286-294.
116. Michel B. Replication fork arrest and DNA recombination. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;173-178.
117. Shen J.C., Loeb L.A. The Werner syndrome gene: the molecular basis of RecQ helicase-deficiency diseases. Trends Genet. 16:2000;213-220.
118. Paques F., Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. (Washington, DC). 63:1999;349-404.
119. Petrini J.H.J. The mammalian Mre11-Rad50-Mbs1 protein complex: integration of functions in the cellular DNA-damage response. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64:1999;1264-1269.
120. Petrini J.H.J. The Mre11 complex and ATM: collaborating to navigate S phase. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:2000;293-296.
121. Hartsuiker E., Vaessen E., Carr A.M., Kohli J. Fission yeast Rad50 stimulates sister chromatid recombination and links cohesion with repair. EMBO J. 20:2001;6660-6671.