SQ/TQ cluster domains: Concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins

BioEssays

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 397-407

  Traven, Ana ^a   Heierhorst, Jörg ^a,b  

^a ST VINCENT'S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DNA; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA; BREAST CARCINOMA; COMPLEX FORMATION; DNA DAMAGE; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; FAMILIAL CANCER; FANCONI ANEMIA; GENE CLUSTER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NIJMEGEN BREAKAGE SYNDROME; NONHUMAN; OVARY CARCINOMA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SECKEL SYNDROME; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 17844372453     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20204     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Zhou BB, Elledge SJ. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408:433-439.
2. Abraham RT. 2001. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev 15:2177-2196.
3. Nyberg KA, Michelson RJ, Putnam CW, Weinert TA. 2002. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 36:617-656.
4. Shiloh Y. 2003. ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat Rev Cancer 3:155-168.
5. O'Driscoll M, Ruiz-Perez VL, Woods CG, Jeggo PA. Goodship JA. 2003. A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome. Nat Genet 33:497-501.
6. Scully R, Livingston DM. 2000. In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nature 408:429-432.
7. Bell DW, Varley JM, Szydlo TE, Kang DH, Wahrer DC, et al. 1999. Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science 286:2528-2531.
8. Carney JP, Maser RS, Olivares H, Davis EM, Le Beau M, et al. 1998. The hMre1 1/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 93:477-486.
9. D'Andrea AD. Grompe M. 2003. The Fanconi anaemia/BRCA pathway. Nat Rev Cancer 3:23-34.
10. Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB. 1999. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J Biol Chem 274:37538-37543.
11. O'Neill T, Dwyer AJ, Ziv Y, Chan DW, Lees-Miller SP, et al. 2000. Utilization of oriented peptide libraries to identify substrate motifs selected by ATM. J Biol Chem 275:22719-22727.
12. Yu X, Chini CC, He M, Mer G, Chen J. 2003. The BRCT domain is a phospho-protein binding domain. Science 302:639-642.
13. Manke IA, Lowery DM, Nguyen A, Yaffe MB. 2003. BRCT repeats as phosphopeptide-binding modules involved in protein targeting. Science 302:636-639.
14. Durocher D, Jackson SP. 2002. The FHA domain. FEBS Lett 513:58-66.
15. Hammet A, Pike BL, McNees CJ, Conlan LA, Tenis N, et al. 2003. FHA domains as phospho-threonine binding modules in cell signaling. IUBMB Life 55:23-27.
16. Cortez D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ. 1999. Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. Science 286:1162-1166.
17. Matsuoka S, Huang M, Elledge SJ. 1998. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282:1893-1897.
18. Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Sun Z, Morrow JS, Pradhan D, etal. 2002. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell 9:1055-1065.
19. Matsuoka S, Rotman G, Ogawa A, Shiloh Y, Tamai K, et al. 2000. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10389-10394.
20. Melchionna R, Chen XB, Blasina A, McGowan CH. 2000. Threonine 68 is required for radiation-induced phosphorylation and activation of Cds1. Nat Cell Biol 2:762-765.
21. Ahn J-Y, Li X, Davis HL, Canman CE. 2002. Phosphorylation of threonine 68 promotes oligomerization and autophosphorylation of the Chk2 protein kinase via the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain. J Biol Chem 277:19389-19395.
22. Xu X, Tsvetkov LM, Stern DF. 2002. Chk2 activation and phosphorylation-dependent oligomerization. Mol Cell Biol 22:4419-4432.
23. Lou Z, Minter-Dykhouse K, Wu X, Chen J. 2003. MDC1 is coupled to activated CHK2 in mammalian DNA damage response pathways. Nature 421:957-961.
24. Lee SJ, Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Stern DF. 2003. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Mol Cell Biol 23:6300-6314.
25. Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. 2001. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol Cell 8:129-136.
26. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, et al. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357-360.
27. Pike BL, Yongkiettrakul S, Tsai MD, Heierhorst J. 2003. Diverse but overlapping functions of the two forkhead-associated (FHA) domains in Rad53 checkpoint kinase activation. J Biol Chem 278:30421-30424.
28. Bashkirov VI, Bashkirova EV, Haghnazari E, Heyer WD. 2003. Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol Cell Biol 23:1441-1452.
29. Tanaka K, Boddy MN, Chen XB, McGowan CH, Russell P. 2001. Threonine-11, phosphorylated by Rad3 and atm in vitro, is required for activation of fission yeast checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol Cell Biol 21:3398-3404.
30. Tanaka K, Russell P. 2004. Cds1 phosphorylation by Rad3-Rad26 kinase is mediated by forkhead-associated domain interaction with Mrc1. J Biol Chem 279:32079-32086.
31. Guo Z, Kumagai A, Wang SX, Dunphy WG. 2000. Requirement for Atr in phosphorylation of Chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev 14:2745-2756.
32. Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, et al. 2000. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev 14:1448-1459.
33. Zhao H, Piwnica-Worms H. 2001. ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1. Mol Cell Biol 21:4129-4139.
34. Lopez-Girona A, Tanaka K, Chen XB, Baber BA, McGowan CH, et al. 2001. Serine-345 is required for Rad3-dependent phosphorylation and function of checkpoint kinase Chk1 in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11289-11294.
35. Gatei M, Sloper K, Sorensen C, Syljuasen R, Falck J, et al. 2003. Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and NBS1-dependent phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser-317 in response to ionizing radiation. J Biol Chem 278:14806-14811.
36. Ng CP, Lee HC, Ho CW, Arooz T, Siu WY, et al. 2004. Differential mode of regulation of the checkpoint kinases CHK1 and CHK2 by their regulatory domains. J Biol Chem 279:8808-8819.
37. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, et al. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166-1171.
38. Naiki T, Wakayama T, Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. 2004. Association of Rad9 with double-strand breaks through a Mec1-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 24:3277-3285.
39. Tibbetts RS, Cortez D, Brumbaugh KM, Scully R, Livingston D, et al. 2000. Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes Dev 14:2989-3002.
40. Gatei M, Zhou BB, Hobson K, Scott S, Young D, et al. 2001. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase and ATM and Rad3 related kinase mediate phosphorylation of Brca1 at distinct and overlapping sites. In vivo assessment using phospho-specific antibodies. J Biol Chem 276:17276-17280.
41. Xu B, O'Donnell AH, Kim ST, Kastan MB. 2002. Phosphorylation of serine 1387 in Brca1 is specifically required for the Atm-mediated S-phase checkpoint after ionizing irradiation. Cancer Res 62:4588-4591.
42. Kitagawa R, Bakkenist CJ, McKinnon PJ, Kastan MB. 2004. Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway. Genes Dev 18:1423-1438.
43. Anderson L, Henderson C, Adachi Y. 2001. Phosphorylation and rapid relocalization of 53BP1 to nuclear foci upon DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 21:1719-1729.
44. Stewart GS,Wang B, Bignell CR, Taylor AM, Elledge SJ. 2003. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421:961-966.
45. Goldberg M, Stucki M, Falck J, D'Amours D, Rahman D, et al. 2003. MDC1 is required for the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421:952-956.
46. Rappold I, Iwabuchi K, Date T, Chen J. 2001. Tumor suppressor p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is involved in DNA damage-signaling pathways. J Cell Biol 153:613-620.
47. Ward IM, Minn K, Jorda KG, Chen J. 2003. Accumulation of checkpoint protein 53BP1 at DNA breaks involves its binding to phosphorylated histone H2AX. J Biol Chem 278:19579-19582.
48. Iwabuchi K, Basu BP, Kysela B, Kurihara T, Shibata M, et al. 2003. Potential role for 53BP1 in DNA end-joining repair through direct interaction with DNA. J Biol Chem 278:36487-36495.
49. Xu X, Stern DF. 2003. NFBD1/MDC1 regulates ionizing radiation-induced focus formation by DNA checkpoint signaling and repair factors. Faseb J 17:1842-1848.
50. Buscemi G, Savio C, Zannini L, Micciche F, Masnada D, et al. 2001. Chk2 activation dependence on Nbs1 after DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 21:5214-52122.
51. Lee JH, Paull TT. 2004. Direct activation of the ATM protein kinase by the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex. Science 304:93-96.
52. Tauchi H, Kobayashi J, Morishima K, van Gent DC, Shiraishi T, et al. 2002. Nbs1 is essential for DNA repair by homologous recombination in higher vertebrate cells. Nature 420:93-98.
53. Gatei M, Young D, Cerosaletti KM, Desai-Mehta A, Spring K, et al. 2000. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of nibrin in response to radiation exposure. Nat Genet 25:115-119.
54. Lim DS, Kim ST, Xu B, Maser RS, Lin J, et al. 2000. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404:613-617.
55. Wu X, Ranganathan V, Weisman DS, Heine WF, Ciccone DN, et al. 2000. ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response. Nature 405:477-482.
56. Zhao S, Weng YC, Yuan SS, Lin YT, Hsu HC, et al. 2000. Functional link between ataxia-telangiectasia and Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene products. Nature 405:473-477.
57. Zhao H, Tanaka K, Nogochi E, Nogochi C, Russell P. 2003. Replication checkpoint protein Mrc1 is regulated by Rad3 and Tel1 in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 23:8395-8403.
58. Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJ, et al. 2001. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nature Cell Biol 3:958-965.
59. Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 17:1755-1767.
60. Pike BL, Tenis N, Heierhorst J. 2004. Rad53 kinase activation-independent replication checkpoint function of the N-terminal forkhead-associated (FHA1) domain. J. BioL Chem 279:39636-39644.
61. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. 2000. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell 6:839-849.
62. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. 2003. Repeated phosphopeptide motifs in Claspin mediate the regulated binding of Chk1. Nat Cell Biol 5:161-165.
63. Yoo HY, Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG. 2004. Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase. Cell 117:575-588.
64. Lin SY, Li K, Stewart GS, Elledge SJ. 2004. Human Claspin works with BRCA1 to both positively and negatively regulate cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6484-6489.
65. Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421: 499-506.
66. Cortez D, Guntuku S, Qin J, Elledge SJ. 2001. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294:1713-1716.
67. Rouse J, Jackson SP. 2002. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell 9:857-869.
68. Edwards RJ, Bentley NJ, Carr AM. 1999. A Rad3-Rad26 complex responds to DNA damage independently of other checkpoint proteins. Nat Cell Biol 1:393-398.
69. Bao S, Tibbetts RS, Brumbaugh KM, Fang Y, Richardson DA, et al. 2001. ATR/ATM-mediated phosphorylation of human Rad17 is required for genotoxic stress responses. Nature 411:969-974.
70. Post S, Weng YC, Cimprich K, Chen LB, Xu Y, et at. 2001. Phosphorylation of serines 635 and 645 of human Rad17 is cell cycle regulated and is required for G(1)/S checkpoint activation in response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13102-13107.
71. Andreassen PR, D'Andrea AD, Taniguchi T. 2004. ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. Genes Dev 18:1958-1963.
72. Taniguchi T, Garcia-Higuera I, Xu B, Andreassen PR, Gregory RC, et al. 2002. Convergence of the fanconi anemia and ataxia telangiectasia signaling pathways. Cell 109:459-472.
73. Nakanishi K, Taniguchi T, Ranganathan V, New HV, Moreau LA, et al. 2002. Interaction of FANCD2 and NBS1 in the DNA damage response. Nat Cell Biol 4:913-920.
74. Kim ST, Xu B, Kastan MB. 2002. Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. Genes Dev 16:560-570.
75. Yazdi PT, Wang Y, Zhao S, Patel N, Lee EY, et al. 2002. SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev 16:571-582.
76. Nagao K, Adachi Y, Yanagida M. 2004. Separase-mediated cleavage of cohesin at interphase is required for DNA repair. Nature 430:1044-1048.
77. Pichierri P, Rosselli F, Franchitto A. 2003. Werner's syndrome protein is phosphorylated in an ATR/ATM-dependent manner following replication arrest and DNA damage induced during the S phase of the cell cycle. Oncogene 22:1491-1500.
78. Blander G, Zalle N, Daniely Y, Taplick J, Gray MD, et al. 2002. DNA damage-induced translocation of the Werner helicase is regulated by acetylation. J Biol Chem 277:50934-50940.
79. Maya R, Balass M, Kim ST, Shkedy D, Leal JF, et al. 2001. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage. Genes Dev 15:1067-1077.
80. Dumaz N, Meek DW. 1999. Serine15 phosphorylation stimulates p53 transactivation but does not directly influence interaction with HDM2. Embo J 18:7002-7010.
81. Li S, Ting NS, Zheng L, Chen PL, Ziv Y, et al. 2000. Functional link of BRCA1 and ataxia telangiectasia gene product in DNA damage response. Nature 406:210-215.
82. Yamashita A, Ohnishi T, Kashima I, Taya Y, Ohno S. 2001. Human SMG-1, a novel phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinase, associates with components of the mRNA surveillance complex and is involved in the regulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev 15:2215-2228.
83. Brumbaugh KM, Otterness DM, Geisen C, Oliveira V, Brognard J, et al. 2004. The mRNA surveillance protein hSMG-1 functions in genotoxic stress response pathways in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 14:585-598.
84. Rouse J. 2004. Esc4p, a new target of Mec1p (ATR), promotes resumption of DNA synthesis after DNA damage. Embo J 23:1188-1197.
85. Pike BL, Yongkiettrakul S, Tsai MD, Heierhorst J. 2004. Mdt1, a novel Rad53 FHA1 domain-interacting protein, modulates DNA damage tolerance and G2/M cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 24:2779-2788.
86. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Li X, Garner EC, Brown CJ, et al. 2001. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins 42:38-48.
87. Liao H, Yuan C, Su MI, Yongkiettrakul S, Qin D, et al. 2000. Structure of the FHA1 domain of yeast Rad53 and identification of binding sites for both FHA1 and its target protein Rad9. J Mol Biol 304:941-951.
88. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. 2002. Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12:54-60.
89. Wright PE, Dyson HJ. 1999. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: reassessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 293:321-331.
90. Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM, Obradovic Z. 2002. Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 41:6573-6582.
91. Iakoucheva LM, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, O'Connor TR, Sikes JG, et al. 2004. The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1037-1049.
92. Furuya K, Poitelea M, Guo L, Caspari T, Carr AM. 2004. Chk1 activation requires Rad9 S/TQ-site phosphorylation to promote association with C-terminal BRCT domains of Rad4TOPBP1. Genes Dev 18:1154-1164.
93. Nash P, Tang X, Orlicky S, Chen Q, Gertler FB, et al. 2001. Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature 414:514-521.