Association of Rad9 with Double-Strand Breaks through a Mec1-Dependent Mechanism

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 3277-3285

  Naiki, Takahiro ^a   Wakayama, Tatsushi ^a   Nakada, Daisuke ^a   Matsumoto, Kunihiro ^a   Sugimoto, Katsunori ^a,b  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DNA; PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN MEC1; PROTEIN RAD9; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELISM; ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE DELETION; GENE MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; YEAST;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; GENES, CDC; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EUKARYOTA; FUNGI; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 1842453035     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3277-3285.2004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abraham, R. T. 2001. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15:2177-2196.
2. Cortez, D., S. Guntuku, J. Qin, and S. J. Elledge. 2001. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294:1713-1716.
3. Du, L. L., T. M. Nakamura, B. A. Moser, and P. Russell. 2003. Retention but not recruitment of Crb2 at double-strand breaks requires Rad1 and Rad3 complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6150-6158.
4. Durocher, D., J. Henckel, A. R. Fersht, and S. P. Jackson. 1999. The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. Mol. Cell 4:387-394.
5. Edwards, R. J., N. J. Bentley, and A. M. Carr. 1999. A Rad3-Rad26 complex responds to DNA damage independently of other checkpoint proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:393-398.
6. Elledge, S. J. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274:1664-1672.
7. Emili, A. 1998. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2:183-189.
8. Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527-534.
9. Gilbert, C. S., C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 2001. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell 8:129-136.
10. Green, C. M., H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and N. F. Lowndes. 2000. A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C. Curr. Biol. 10:39-42.
11. Katou, Y., Y. Kanoh, M. Bando, H. Noguchi, H. Tanaka, T. Ashikari, K. Sugimoto, and K. Shirahige. 2003. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424:1073-1083.
12. Kondo, T., K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 1999. Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1136-1143.
13. Kondo, T., T. Wakayama, T. Naiki, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 2001. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 5543:867-870.
14. Longhese, M. P., M. Folani, M. Muzi-Falconi, G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1998. DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J. 17:5525-5528.
15. Mallory, J. C., and T. D. Petes. 2000. Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13749-13754.
16. Melo, J. A., J. Cohen, and D. P. Toczyski. 2001. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 21:2809-2821.
17. Morrow, D. M., D. A. Tagle, Y. Shiloh, F. S. Collins, and P. Hieter. 1995. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 82:831-840.
18. Naiki, T., T. Shimomura, T. Kondo, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 2000. Rfc5, in cooperation with Rad24, controls DNA damage checkpoints throughout the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5888-5896.
19. Nakada, D., K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 2003. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17:1957-1962.
20. Nakada, D., T. Shimomura, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 2003. The ATM-related Tel1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae controls a checkpoint response following phleomycin treatment. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:1715-1724.
21. Paciotti, V., M. Clericl, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2000. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 14:2046-2059.
22. 2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 7:293-300.
23. Reid, R. J., I. Sunjevaric, M. Keddache, and R. Rothstein. 2002. Efficient PCR-based gene disruption in Saccharomyces strains using intergenic primers. Yeast 19:319-328.
24. Rouse, J., and S. P. Jackson. 2000. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19:5793-5800.
25. Rouse, J., and S. P. Jackson. 2002. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell 9:857-869.
26. Saka, Y., F. Esashi, T. Matsusaka, S. Mochida, and M. Yanagida. 1997. Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Genes Dev. 11:3387-3400.
27. Sanchez, Y., J. Bachant, H. Wang, F. Hu, D. Liu, M. Tetzlaff, and S. J. Elledge. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166-1171.
28. Sanchez, Y., B. A. Desany, W. J. Jones, Q. Liu, B. Wang, and S. J. Elledge. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinase MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357-360.
29. Schwartz, M. F., J. K. Duong, Z. Sun, J. S. Morrow, D. Pradhan, and D. F. Stern. 2002. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9:1055-1065.
30. Sugimoto, K., S. Ando, T. Shimomura, and K. Matsumoto. 1997. Rfc5, replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5905-5914.
31. Sun, Z., D. S. Fay, F. Marini, M. Foiani, and D. F. Stern. 1996. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev 10:395-406.
32. Sun, Z., J. Hsiao, D. S. Fay, and D. F. Stern. 1998. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281:272-274.
33. Toczyski, D. P., D. J. Galgoczy, and L. H. Hartwell. 1997. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90:1097-1106.
34. Vialard, J. E., C. S. Gilbert, C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17:5679-5688.
35. Wakayama, T., T. Kondo, S. Ando, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 2001. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:755-764.
36. Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241:317-322.
37. White, C. I., and J. E. Haher. 1990. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9:663-673.
38. Zhao, X., E. G. D. Muller, and R. Rothstein. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pool. Mol. Cell 2:329-340.
39. Zhou, B.-B. S., and S. J. Elledge. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408:433-439.
40. Zou, L., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542-1548.