Erratum: Feature selection and dimension reduction for single-cell RNA-Seq based on a multinomial model (Genome Biology (2019) 20 (295) DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1861-6);Feature selection and dimension reduction for single-cell RNA-Seq based on a multinomial model

Genome Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2019, Pages

  Townes, F William ^a,b   Hicks, Stephanie C ^c   Aryee, Martin J ^a,d,e   Irizarry, Rafael A ^a,f  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Princeton University   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dimension reduction; Gene expression; GLM PCA; Principal component analysis; RNA Seq; Single cell; Variable genes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEATURE SELECTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

MODELS, STATISTICAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85077004431     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02109-w     Document Type: Erratum

References (62)

1. Kalisky T, Oriel S, Bar-Lev TH, Ben-Haim N, Trink A, Wineberg Y, Kanter I, Gilad S, Pyne S. A brief review of single-cell transcriptomic technologies. Brief Funct Genom. 2018; 17(1):64-76. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elx019.
2. Svensson V, Vento-Tormo R, Teichmann SA. Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq in the past decade. Nat Protoc. 2018; 13(4):599-604. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.149.
3. Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, Nemesh J, Shekhar K, Goldman M, Tirosh I, Bialas A. R, Kamitaki N, Martersteck EM, Trombetta JJ, Weitz DA, Sanes JR, Shalek AK, Regev A, McCarroll SA. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells Using nanoliter droplets. Cell. 2015; 161(5):1202-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002.
4. Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, Tallapragada N, Veres A, Li V, Peshkin L, Weitz DA, Kirschner MW. Droplet aarcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2015; 161(5):1187-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044.
5. Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P, Ryvkin P, Bent ZW, Wilson R, Ziraldo SB, Wheeler TD, McDermott GP, Zhu J, Gregory MT, Shuga J, Montesclaros L, Underwood JG, Masquelier DA, Nishimura SY, Schnall-Levin M, Wyatt PW, Hindson CM, Bharadwaj R, Wong A, Ness KD, Beppu LW, Deeg HJ, McFarland C, Loeb KR, Valente WJ, Ericson NG, Stevens EA, Radich JP, Mikkelsen TS, Hindson BJ, Bielas JH. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:14049. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049.
6. Dal Molin A, Di Camillo B. How to design a single-cell RNA-sequencing experiment: Pitfalls, challenges and perspectives. Brief Bioinform. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bby007.
7. Qiu X, Hill A, Packer J, Lin D, Ma Y-A, Trapnell C. Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(3):309-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4150.
8. Picelli S, Björklund ÅK, Faridani OR, Sagasser S, Winberg G, Sandberg R. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(11):1096-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2639.
9. Kolodziejczyk AA, Kim JK, Svensson V, Marioni JC, Teichmann SA. The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing. Mol Cell. 2015; 58(4):610-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.005.
10. Islam S, Zeisel A, Joost S, La Manno G, Zajac P, Kasper M, Lönnerberg P, Linnarsson S. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(2):163-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2772.
11. Grün D, Kester L, van Oudenaarden A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(6):637-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2930.
12. Lun ATL, McCarthy DJ, Marioni JC. A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor. F1000Research. 2016; 5:2122. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9501.2.
13. McCarthy DJ, Campbell KR, Lun ATL, Wills QF. Scater: Pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R. Bioinformatics. 2017; 33(8):1179-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777.
14. Andrews TS, Hemberg M. Identifying cell populations with scRNASeq. Mol Asp Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2017.07.002.
15. Duò A, Robinson MD, Soneson C. A systematic performance evaluation of clustering methods for single-cell RNA-seq data. F1000Research. 2018; 7:1141. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15666.1.
16. Brennecke P, Anders S, Kim JK, Kołodziejczyk AA, Zhang X, Proserpio V, Baying B, Benes V, Teichmann SA, Marioni JC, Heisler MG. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(11):1093-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2645.
17. Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4096.
18. Andrews TS, Hemberg M. M3Drop: Dropout-based feature selection for scRNASeq. Bioinformatics. 2019; 35(16):2865-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1044.
19. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol. 1933; 24(6):417-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071325.
20. Lun AT, Bach K, Marioni JC. Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biol. 2016; 17:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0947-7.
21. Lun A. Overcoming systematic errors caused by log-transformation of normalized single-cell RNA sequencing data. bioRxiv. 2018:404962. https://doi.org/10.1101/404962.
22. Warton DI. Why you cannot transform your way out of trouble for small counts. Biometrics. 2018; 74(1):362-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12728.
23. Vallejos CA, Risso D, Scialdone A, Dudoit S, Marioni JC. Normalizing single-cell RNA sequencing data: Challenges and opportunities. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(6):565-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4292.
24. Finak G, McDavid A, Yajima M, Deng J, Gersuk V, Shalek AK, Slichter CK, Miller HW, McElrath MJ, Prlic M, Linsley PS, Gottardo R. MAST: A flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0844-5.
25. Pierson E, Yau C. ZIFA: Dimensionality reduction for zero-inflated single-cell gene expression analysis. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0805-z.
26. Liu S, Trapnell C. Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: Recent advances and remaining challenges. F1000Research. 2016; 5:182. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7223.1.
27. Lin P, Troup M, Ho JWK. CIDR: Ultrafast and accurate clustering through imputation for single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2017; 18:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1188-0.
28. Risso D, Perraudeau F, Gribkova S, Dudoit S, Vert J-P. A general and flexible method for signal extraction from single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02554-5.
29. Svensson V. Droplet scRNA-seq is not zero-inflated. bioRxiv. 2019:582064. https://doi.org/10.1101/582064.
30. Hicks SC, Townes FW, Teng M, Irizarry RA. Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Biostatistics. 2018; 19(4):562-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxx053.
31. Collins M, Dasgupta S, Schapire RE. A generalization of principal components analysis to the exponential family In: Dietterich TG, Becker S, Ghahramani Z, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. Cambridge: MIT Press: 2002. p. 617-24.
32. Tung P-Y, Blischak JD, Hsiao CJ, Knowles DA, Burnett JE, Pritchard JK, Gilad Y. Batch effects and the effective design of single-cell gene expression studies. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:39921. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39921.
33. Haber AL, Biton M, Rogel N, Herbst RH, Shekhar K, Smillie C, Burgin G, Delorey TM, Howitt MR, Katz Y, Tirosh I, Beyaz S, Dionne D, Zhang M, Raychowdhury R, Garrett WS, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Shi HN, Yilmaz O, Xavier RJ, Regev A. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature. 2017; 551(7680):333-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24489.
34. Muraro MJ, Dharmadhikari G, Grün D, Groen N, Dielen T, Jansen E, van Gurp L, Engelse MA, Carlotti F, de Koning EJP, van Oudenaarden A. A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the human pancreas. Cell Syst. 2016; 3(4):385-3943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2016.09.002.
35. Ellefson JW, Gollihar J, Shroff R, Shivram H, Iyer VR, Ellington AD. Synthetic evolutionary origin of a proofreading reverse transcriptase. Science. 2016; 352(6293):1590-3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5409.
36. Shapiro E, Biezuner T, Linnarsson S. Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14(9):618-30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3542.
37. Silverman JD, Roche K, Mukherjee S, David LA. Naught all zeros in sequence count data are the same. bioRxiv. 2018:477794. https://doi.org/10.1101/477794.
38. Pachter L. Models for transcript quantification from RNA-Seq. arXiv:1104.3889 [q-bio, stat]. 2011. http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3889.
39. Wagner F, Yan Y, Yanai I. K-nearest neighbor smoothing for high-throughput single-cell RNA-Seq data. bioRxiv. 2018:217737. https://doi.org/10.1101/217737.
40. Van den Berge K, Perraudeau F, Soneson C, Love MI, Risso D, Vert J-P, Robinson MD, Dudoit S, Clement L. Observation weights unlock bulk RNA-seq tools for zero inflation and single-cell applications. Genome Biol. 2018; 19:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1406-4.
41. Witten DM. Classification and clustering of sequencing data using a Poisson model. Ann Appl Stat. 2011; 5(4):2493-518. https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS493.
42. McInnes L, Healy J, Melville J. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv:1802.03426 [cs, stat]. 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426.
43. Hubert L, Arabie P. Comparing partitions. J Classif. 1985; 2(1):193-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908075.
44. Trapnell C, Cacchiarelli D, Grimsby J, Pokharel P, Li S, Morse M, Lennon NJ, Livak KJ, Mikkelsen TS, Rinn JL. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(4):381-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2859.
45. Soneson C, Robinson MD. Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat Methods. 2018; 15(4):255-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4612.
46. Svensson V, Teichmann SA, Stegle O. SpatialDE: Identification of spatially variable genes. Nat Methods. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4636.
47. Lopez R, Regier J, Cole MB, Jordan MI, Yosef N. Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Methods. 2018; 15(12):1053-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2.
48. Verma A, Engelhardt B. A robust nonlinear low-dimensional manifold for single cell RNA-seq data. bioRxiv. 2018:443044. https://doi.org/10.1101/443044.
49. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Mateu-Figueras G, Barceló-Vidal C. Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math Geol. 2003; 35(3):279-300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023818214614.
50. McDonald DR. On the poisson approximation to the multinomial distribution. Can J Stat/La Rev Can Stat. 1980; 8(1):115-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3314676.
51. Baker SG. The Multinomial-Poisson transformation. J R Stat Soc Ser D (Stat). 1994; 43(4):495-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2348134.
52. Gopalan P, Hofman JM, Blei DM. Scalable recommendation with Poisson factorization. arXiv:1311.1704 [cs, stat]. 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.1704.
53. Taddy M. Distributed multinomial regression. Ann Appl Stat. 2015; 9(3):1394-414. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-AOAS831.
54. Biswas S. The latent logarithm. arXiv:1605.06064 [stat]. 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06064.
55. Townes FW. Generalized principal component analysis. arXiv:1907.02647 [cs, stat]. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02647.
56. Agresti A. Foundations of linear and generalized linear models. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015.
57. Landgraf AJ. Generalized principal component analysis: Dimensionality reduction through the projection of natural parameters. 2015. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.
58. Li G, Gaynanova I. A general framework for association analysis of heterogeneous data. Ann Appl Stat. 2018; 12(3):1700-26. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOAS1127.
59. Kim J, He Y, Park H. Algorithms for nonnegative matrix and tensor factorizations: A unified view based on block coordinate descent framework. J Glob Optim. 2014; 58(2):285-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-013-0035-4.
60. Hafemeister C, Satija R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. bioRxiv. 2019:576827. https://doi.org/10.1101/576827.
61. Hartigan JA, Wong MA. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat). 1979; 28(1):100-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830.
62. Townes W, Pita-Juarez Y. Willtownes/Scrna2019: Genome Biology Publication. Zenodo. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3475535.