Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 411-420

  Butler, Andrew ^a,b   Hoffman, Paul ^a   Smibert, Peter ^a   Papalexi, Efthymia ^a,b   Satija, Rahul ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK GENOME CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; POPULATION STATISTICS;

ANALYTICAL STRATEGY; CELLULAR PHENOTYPES; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE DATA SETS; PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELLS; PROFILING TECHNOLOGY; STATISTICAL POWER;

DATA INTEGRATION;

BETA INTERFERON; SMALL CYTOPLASMIC RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOCYTE; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL DENSITY; CELL SUBPOPULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOKINE RESPONSE; DENDRITIC CELL; EFFECTOR CELL; ERYTHROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; MEGAKARYOCYTE; MEMORY T LYMPHOCYTE; MONOCYTE; MOUSE; NATURAL KILLER CELL; NONHUMAN; PANCREAS ISLET CELL; PANCREAS TISSUE; PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL; PLASMACYTOID DENDRITIC CELL; POPULATION DENSITY; PRE B LYMPHOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY T LYMPHOCYTE; RNA SEQUENCE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR COMPUTER; MONONUCLEAR CELL; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTERS, MOLECULAR; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; LEUKOCYTES, MONONUCLEAR; MICE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85046298440     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4096     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Klein, A.M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187-1201 (2015).
2. Zilionis, R. et al. Single-cell barcoding and sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Nat. Protoc. 12, 44-73 (2017).
3. Macosko, E.Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202-1214 (2015).
4. Zheng, G.X.Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).
5. Shekhar, K. et al. Comprehensive classification of retinal bipolar neurons by singlecell transcriptomics. Cell 166, 1308-1323.e30 (2016).
6. Villani, A.-C. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science 356, eaah4573 (2017).
7. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381-386 (2014).
8. Welch, J.D., Hartemink, A.J. & Prins, J.F. SLICER: inferring branched, nonlinear cellular trajectories from single cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 17, 106 (2016).
9. Satija, R., Farrell, J.A., Gennert, D., Schier, A.F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495-502 (2015).
10. Achim, K. et al. High-throughput spatial mapping of single-cell RNA-seq data to tissue of origin. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 503-509 (2015).
11. DeLaughter, D.M. et al. Single-cell resolution of temporal gene expression during heart development. Dev. Cell 39, 480-490 (2016).
12. Bendall, S.C. et al. Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression and regulatory coordination in human B cell development. Cell 157, 714-725 (2014).
13. Blakeley, P. et al. Defining the three cell lineages of the human blastocyst by single-cell RNA-seq. Development 142, 3613 (2015).
14. Johnson, M.B. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals transcriptional heterogeneity of neural progenitors in human cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1-30 (2015).
15. Regev, A. et al. The Human Cell Atlas. Elife 6, 1-30 (2017).
16. Kharchenko, P.V., Silberstein, L. & Scadden, D.T. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 11, 740-742 (2014).
17. Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).
18. Wang, B., Zhu, J., Pierson, E., Ramazzotti, D. & Batzoglou, S. Visualization and analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning. Nat. Methods 14, 414-416 (2017).
19. Kiselev, V.Y. et al. SC3: consensus clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Methods 14, 483-486 (2017).
20. Lin, P., Troup, M. & Ho, J.W.K. CIDR: Ultrafast and accurate clustering through imputation for single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 18, 59 (2017).
21. Prabhakaran, S., Azizi, E. & Pe'er, D. Dirichlet process mixture model for correcting technical variation in single-cell gene expression data. Proc. 33rd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 48, 1070-1079 (2016).
22. Ntranos, V., Kamath, G.M., Zhang, J.M., Pachter, L. & Tse, D.N. Fast and accurate single-cell RNA-seq analysis by clustering of transcript-compatibility counts. Genome Biol. 17, 112 (2016).
23. Xu, C. & Su, Z. Identification of cell types from single-cell transcriptomes using a novel clustering method. Bioinformatics 31, 1974-1980 (2015).
24. Lei, Z., Bai, Q., He, R. & Li, S.Z. Face shape recovery from a single image using CCA mapping between tensor spaces. 26th IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognition, CVPR doi:10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587341 (2008).
25. Zhou, F. & Torre, F. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22; NIPS 2009 (eds. Y. Bengio, Y., Schuurmans, D., Lafferty, J.D., Williams, C.K.I. & Culotta, A.) https://papers.nips.cc/paper/3728-canonical-time-warping-foralignment-of-human-behavior (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc., 2009).
26. Wang, C. & Mahadevan, S. in Proc. Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (ed. Walsh, T.) 1541-1546 (AAAI, 2011).
27. Huang, H., He, H., Fan, X. & Zhang, J. Super-resolution of human face image using canonical correlation analysis. Pattern Recognit. 43, 2532-2543 (2010).
28. Hotelling, H. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 28, 321-377 (1936).
29. Hardoon, D.R., Szedmak, S. & Shawe-Taylor, J. Canonical correlation analysis: an overview with application to learning methods. Neural Comput. 16, 2639-2664 (2004).
30. Witten, D.M., Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, T. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 10, 515-534 (2009).
31. Lê Cao, K.-A., Martin, P.G., Robert-Granié, C. & Besse, P. Sparse canonical methods for biological data integration: application to a cross-platform study. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 34 (2009).
32. Waaijenborg, S., Verselewel de Witt Hamer, P.C. & Zwinderman, A.H. Quantifying the association between gene expressions and DNA-markers by penalized canonical correlation analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 7, e3 (2008).
33. Kettenring, J. Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika 58, 433-451 (1971).
34. Nielsen, A.A. Multiset canonical correlations analysis and multispectral, truly multitemporal remote sensing data. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 11, 293-305 (2002).
35. Berndt, D. & Clifford, J. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. Work. Knowl. Knowl. Discov. Databases 398, 359-370 (1994).
36. Kang, H.M. et al. Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 89-94 (2018).
37. Nestorowa, S. et al. A single-cell resolution map of mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation. Blood 128, e20-e31 (2016).
38. Paul, F. et al. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell 163, 1663-1677 (2015).
39. Adolfsson, J. et al. Identification of Flt3+ lympho-myeloid stem cells lacking erythromegakaryocytic potential a revised road map for adult blood lineage commitment. Cell 121, 295-306 (2005).
40. Lacar, B. et al. Corrigendum: nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15047 (2017).
41. Poli, A. et al. CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset. Immunology 126, 458-465 (2009).
42. Baron, M. et al. A single-cell transcriptomic map of the human and mouse pancreas reveals inter-and intra-cell population structure. Cell Syst. 3, 346-360.e4 (2016).
43. Scheuner, D. & Kaufman, R.J. The unfolded protein response: a pathway that links insulin demand with-cell failure and diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 29, 317-333 (2008).
44. Walter, W., Sánchez-Cabo, F. & Ricote, M. GOplot: an R package for visually combining expression data with functional analysis. Bioinformatics 31, 2912-2914 (2015).
45. Jiang, H.-Y. et al. Activating transcription factor 3 is integral to the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 kinase stress response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 1365-1377 (2004).
46. Papa, F.R. Endoplasmic reticulum stress, pancreatic-cell degeneration, and diabetes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a007666 (2012).
47. Conesa, A. et al. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol. 17, 13 (2016).
48. Johnson, W.E., Li, C. & Rabinovic, A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics 8, 118-127 (2007).
49. Ritchie, M.E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNAsequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
50. Lake, B.B. et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 352, 1586-1590 (2016).
51. Ziegenhain, C. et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Mol. Cell 65, 631-643.e4 (2017).
52. Svensson, V. et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 14, 381-387 (2017).
53. Junker, J.P. et al. Genome-wide RNA tomography in the zebrafish embryo. Cell 159, 662-675 (2014).
54. Lee, J.H. et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science 343, 1360-1363 (2014).
55. Sthl, P.L. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78-82 (2016).
56. Scialdone, A. et al. Resolving early mesoderm diversification through single-cell expression profiling. Nature 535, 289-293 (2016).
57. Tirosh, I. et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352, 189-196 (2016).
58. Ilicic, T. et al. Classification of low quality cells from single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 17, 29 (2016).
59. Dudoit, S., Fridlyans, J. & Speed, T.P. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97, 77-87 (2002).
60. Tibshirani, R., Hastie, T., Narasimhan, B. & Chu, G. Class prediction by nearest shrunken centroids, with applications to DNA microarrays. Stat. Sci. 18, 104-117 (2003).
61. Baglama, J. & Reichel, L. Augmented implicitly restarted lanczos bidiagonalization methods. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (2005).
62. Giorgino, T. Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: the dtw package. J. Stat. Softw. 31, 1-24 (2009).
63. Waltman, L. & Van Eck, N.J. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. Eur. Phys. J. B 86, 1-33 (2013).
64. Van Der Maaten, L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1-21 (2014).
65. Richards, J. diffusionMap: diffusion map. (2014) at https://cran.r-project.org/package=diffusionMap.
66. Hastie, T. & Stuetzle, W. Principal curves. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84, 502 (1989).
67. S original by Trevor Hastie R port by Andreas Weingessel. princurve: Fits a Principal Curve in Arbitrary Dimension. https://cran.r-project.org/package=princurve (2013).
68. Tseng, G.C., Ghosh, D. & Feingold, E. Comprehensive literature review and statistical considerations for microarray meta-analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 3785-3799 (2012).
69. Kuleshov, M.V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90-W97 (2016).
70. Mayer, C. et al. Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons. Nature 555, 457-462 (2018).
71. Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171-181 (2014).