The Role of Metamotivational Monitoring in Motivation Regulation

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 1-21

  Miele, David B ^a   Scholer, Abigail A ^b  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031411436     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1371601     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Acee, T. W., Kim, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, J.-I., Chu, H.-N. R., Kim, M., … The Boredom Research Group. (2010). Academic boredom in under- and over-challenging situations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.002
2. Ach, N., (2006). On volition (T., Herz, Trans.). Retrieved from https://cms.uni-konstanz.de/psychologie/forschung/kognitive-psychologie/various/narziss-ach. (Original work published 1910)
3. Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P., (2008). Implementation intentions and shielding goal striving from unwanted thoughts and feelings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311201
4. Appelt, K. C., Zou, X., & Higgins, E. T., (2010). Feeling right or being right: When strong assessment yields strong correction. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9171-z
5. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A., (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022981
6. Bain, A., (1859). The emotions and the will. London, UK: Parker and Son. https://doi.org/10.1037/10617-000
7. Bandura, A., (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
8. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H., (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
9. Boekaerts, M., (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_4
10. Boekaerts, M., & Rozendaal, J. S., (2010). Using multiple calibration indices in order to capture the complex picture of what affects students' accuracy of feeling of confidence. Learning and Instruction, 20, 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.03.002
11. Bosch, N., & D'Mello, S., (2017). The affective experience of novice computer programmers. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27(1), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0069-5
12. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H., (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
13. Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S., (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 809–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027652
14. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F., (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
15. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F., (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174794
16. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T., (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
17. Clore, G. L., (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In L. L., Martin & A., Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (Vol. 10, pp. 133–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203772874
18. Cooper, C. A., & Corpus, J. H., (2009). Learners' developing knowledge of strategies for regulating motivation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 525–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.032
19. Corno, L., (1986). The metacognitive control components of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90029-9
20. Corno, L., (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J., Zimmerman & D. H., Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 111–141). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_5
21. Corno, L., (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x022002014
22. Corno, L., (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J., Zimmerman & D. H., Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd.ed., pp. 191–226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601032
23. Daschmann, E. C., Goetz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H., (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X526038
24. Davis, W. E., Kelley, N. J., Kim, J., Tang, D., & Hicks, J. A., (2016). Motivating the academic mind: High-level construal of academic goals enhances goal meaningfulness, motivation, and self-concordance. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9522-x
25. de Jesus, S. N., Rus, C. L., Lens, W., & Imaginário, S., (2013). Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: A meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752235
26. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M., (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
27. D'Mello, S., Dieterle, E., & Duckworth, A., (2017). Advanced, analytic, qutomated (AAA) measurement of engagement during learning. Educational Psychologist, 52, 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1281747
28. D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A., (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001
29. Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J., (2014). Self-control in school-age children. Educational Psychologist, 49(3), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.926225
30. Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. J., (2014). Self-control and grit related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414541462
31. Duckworth, A. L., White, R. E., Matteucci, A. J., Shearer, A., & Gross, J. J., (2016). A stitch in time: Strategic self-control in high school and college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000062
32. Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M., (2015). What if I can't? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0
33. Eccles, J. S., (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J., Elliot & C. S., Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford.
34. Eccles-Parsons, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C., (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T., Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
35. Efklides, A., (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
36. Efklides, A., (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
37. Elliot, A. J., (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J., Elliot & C. S., Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38. Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W., (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In J. Y., Shah & W. L., Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 235–250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39. Engelschalk, T., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M., (2016). Effectiveness of motivational regulation: Dependence on specific motivational problems. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.011
40. Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E., (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002
41. Flavell, J. H., (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906
42. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., Nett, U. E., Pekrun, R., & Lipnevich, A. A., (2014). Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9385-y
43. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M., (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890
44. Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S., (2016). Effects of using motivational regulation strategies on students' academic procrastination, academic performance, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.008
45. Gurland, S. T., & Glowacky, V. C., (2011). Children's theories of motivation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.03.013
46. Heckhausen, H., (1991). Motivation and action (P. K., Leppmann, Trans.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75961-1
47. Higgins, E. T., (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280
48. Higgins, E. T., (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.11.1217
49. Higgins, E. T., (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oSo/9780199765829.001.0001
50. Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R., (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515
51. Hilgard, E. R., (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y
52. Hofer, M., & Fries, S., (2016). A multiple goals perspective on academic motivation. In K. R., Wentzel & D. B., Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 440–458). New York, NY: Routledge.
53. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F., (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x
54. Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M., (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
55. James, W., (1892). The stream of consciousness. In Psychology: Briefer course (pp. 151–175). New York, NY: Holt. https://doi.org/10.1037/11630-011.
56. Koriat, A., (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0433
57. Koriat, A., Nussinson, R., Bless, H., & Shaked, N., (2008). Information-based and experience-based metacognitive judgments: Evidence from subjective confidence. In J., Dunlosky & R. A., Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metamemory (pp. 117–136). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805503.ch7
58. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D., (2002). A theory of goal systems. In M. P., Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 331–378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80008-9
59. Kuhl, J., (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A., Maher & W. B., Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99–171). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-541413-5.50007-3
60. Kuhl, J., (2000). The volitional basis of personality systems interaction theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00045-8
61. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J., (1985). Historical perspectives in the study of action control. In J., Kuhl & J., Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 89–100). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_5
62. Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K., (1989). Self-regulation and metamotivation: Computational mechanisms, development, and assessment. In R., Kanfer P. L., Ackerman & R., Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, motivation and methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on Learning and Individual Differences (pp. 343–374). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203762905
63. McCann, E. J., & Garcia, T., (1999). Maintaining motivation and regulating emotion: Measuring individual differences in academic volitional strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1041-6080(99)80003-x
64. McGraw, K. O., & McCullers, J. C., (1979). Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(79)90039-8
65. Menon, G., & Raghubir, P., (2003). Ease-of-retrieval as an automatic input in judgments: A mere-accessibility framework? Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1086/376804
66. Miele, D. B., & Scholer, A. A., (2016). Self-Regulation of Motivation. In K. R., Wentzel & D. B., Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 363–384). New York, NY: Routledge.
67. Miele, D. B., & Wigfield, A., (2014). Quantitative and qualitative relations between motivation and critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9282-2
68. Molden, D. C., & Miele, D. B., (2008). The origins and influences of promotion-focused and prevention-focused achievement motivations. In M. L., Maehr, S. A., Karabenick, & T. C., Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Social psychological perspectives (Vol. 15, pp. 81–118). Bingley, UK: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-7423(08)15003-8
69. Molden, D. C., & Rosenzweig, E. Q., (2016). The origins and educational implications of promotion-focused and prevention-focused achievement motivations. In K. R., Wentzel & D. B., Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 477–503). New York, NY: Routledge.
70. Murayama, K., Kitagami, S., Tanaka, A., & Raw, J. A., (2016). People's naiveté about how extrinsic rewards influence intrinsic motivation. Motivation Science, 2, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000040
71. Murayama, K., Kuratomi, K., Johnsen, L., Kitagami, S., & Hatano, A., (2017). People underestimate our capability to motivate ourselves without extrinsic incentives. Manuscript submitted for publication.
72. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L., (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H., Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60053-5
73. Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Daniels, L. M., (2010). What to do when feeling bored?: Students' strategies for coping with boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.004
74. Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C., (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.0003
75. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D., (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
76. Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N., (1986). Defensive pessimism: Harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1208–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1208
77. Norman, E., Price, M. C., & Duff, S. C., (2010). Fringe consciousness: A useful framework for clarifying the nature of experience-based metacognitive feelings. In A., Efklides & P., Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 63–80). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_4
78. Pekrun, R., (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
79. Pekrun, R., (2016). Academic emotions. In K. R., Wentzel & D. B., Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 120–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
80. Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P., (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A., Schutz & R., Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13–36). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
81. Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A., (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034027
82. Pintrich, P. R., (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
83. Pintrich, P. R., (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
84. Reder, L. M., (1996). Different research programs on metacognition: Are the boundaries imaginary? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90024-2
85. Reder, L. M., & Schunn, C. D., (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M., Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806136
86. Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Miele, D. B., (2016). Do you have an opportunity or an obligation to score well? The influence of regulatory focus on academic test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.005
87. Sansone, C., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & MacNamara, A., (2012). Regulating interest when learning online: Potential motivation and performance trade-offs. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.004
88. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B., (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175
89. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B., (2006). Maintaining activity engagement: Individual differences in the process of self-regulating motivation. Journal of Personality, 74, 1697–1720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00425.x
90. Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C., (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.379
91. Sansone, C., Wiebe, D. J., & Morgan, C., (1999). Self-regulating interest: The moderating role of hardiness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality, 67, 701–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00070
92. Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T., (2012). Too much of a good thing? Trade-offs in promotion and prevention focus. In R. M., Ryan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of motivation (pp. 64–85). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0005
93. Scholer, A. A., & Miele, D. B., (2016). The role of metamotivation in creating task-motivation fit. Motivation Science, 2, 171–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/mot0000043
94. Scholer, A. A., Ozaki, Y., & Higgins, E. T., (2014). Inflating and deflating the self: Sustaining motivational concerns through self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.008
95. Schwarz, N., (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2
96. Schwinger, M., & Otterpohl, N., (2017). Which one works best? Considering the relative importance of motivational regulation strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.12.003
97. Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B., (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.006
98. Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B., (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome—Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006
99. Schwinger, M., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., (2012). Effects of motivational regulation on effort and achievement: A mediation model. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.07.005
100. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S., (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
101. Smit, K., de Brabander, C. J., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. L., (2017). The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.006
102. Smith, J. L., Wagaman, J., & Handley, I. M., (2009). Keeping it dull or making it fun: Task variation as a function of promotion versus prevention focus. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9118-9
103. Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E. T., (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.180
104. Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q., (2009). Choosing to be afraid_ Preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit. Emotion, 9, 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015882
105. Tze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M., (2016). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y
106. van Tilburg, W. A., & Igou, E. R., (2012). On boredom: Lack of challenge and meaning as distinct boredom experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9234-9
107. Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W., (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015083
108. Vaughn, L. A., (2017). Foundational tests of the need-support model: A framework for bridging regulatory focus theory and self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216684132
109. Veenman, M. V., (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. E., Mayer & P. A., Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 197–218). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839089.ch10
110. Webster, E. A., & Hadwin, A. F., (2015). Emotions and emotion regulation in undergraduate studying: Examining students' reports from a self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology, 35, 794–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.895292
111. Wentzel, K. R., & Miele, D. B. (Eds.)., (2016). Handbook of motivation at school (2nd.ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
112. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., & Klauda, S. L., (2016). Expectancy-value theory. In K. R., Wentzel & D. B., Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd.ed., pp. 55–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
113. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F., (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J., Hacker, J., Dunlosky, & A. C., Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602350
114. Wolters, C. A., (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224
115. Wolters, C. A., (1999). The relation between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1041-6080(99)80004-1
116. Wolters, C., (2001, August). Motivational problems experienced by college students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
117. Wolters, C. A., (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3804_1
118. Wolters, C. A., (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113, 265–283.
119. Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B., (2013). Assessing and predicting college students' use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
120. Wolters, C. A., & Hussain, M., (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students' self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9
121. Wolters, C. A., & Rosenthal, H., (2000). The relation between students' motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(00)00051-3
122. Xu, J., & Corno, L., (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1086/499737
123. Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D'Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L., (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037637