Do you have an opportunity or an obligation to score well? The influence of regulatory focus on academic test performance

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 45, Issue , 2016, Pages 114-127

  Rosenzweig, Emily Q ^a   Miele, David B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic testing; Achievement motivation; Regulatory focus; Standardized testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953426368     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: 18733425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ashcraft M.H., Kirk E.P. The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130(2):224-237.
2. Avnet T., Sellier A.L. Clock time vs. event time: Temporal culture or self-regulation?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011, 47(3):665-667.
3. Baas M., De Dreu C.K.W., Nijstad B.A. A meta-analysis of 25years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134(6):779-806.
4. Baas M., De Dreu C.K.W., Nijstad B.A. When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100(5):794-809.
5. Beilock S.L., Carr T.H. On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130(4):701.
6. Beilock S.L., Carr T.H. When high-powered people fail. Psychological Science 2005, 16(2):101-105.
7. Best College Rankings U.S. News & World Report 2013, Retrieved from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges.
8. Bohns V.K., Lucas G.M., Molden D.C., Finkel E.J., Coolsen M.K., Kumashiro M., Higgins E.T. Opposites fit: Regulatory focus complementarity and relationship well-being. Social Cognition 2013, 31(1):1-14.
9. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. Volume 1: Attachment 1969, Basic Books, New York.
10. Bridgeman B., Trapani C., Curley E. Impact of fewer questions per section on SAT I scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 2004, 41(4):291-310.
11. Bronson P., Merryman A. Why can some kids handle pressure while others fall apart?. The New York Times 2013, February 6.
12. Cassady J.C. Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation 2001, 7(12):1-6.
13. Cesario J., Grant H., Higgins E.T. Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from "feeling right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86(3):388-404.
14. Cook C., Heath F., Thompson R.L., Thompson B. Score reliability in web or internet-based surveys: Unnumbered graphic rating scales versus Likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2001, 61:697-706.
15. Crowe E., Higgins E.T. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997, 69(2):117-132.
16. Eitam B., Miele D.B., Higgins E.T. Motivated remembering: Remembering as accessibility and accessibility as motivational relevance. The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition 2013, 463-475. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. D.E. Carlston (Ed.).
17. Elliot A.J. Integrating the "classic" and "contemporary" approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Advances in motivation and achievement 1997, 143-179. JAI, Greenwich, CT. M.L. Maehr, P.R. Pintrich (Eds.).
18. Eysenck M.W., Calvo M.G. Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion 1992, 6(6):409-434.
19. Förster J., Higgins E.T. How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science 2005, 16(8):631-636.
20. Förster J., Grant H., Idson L.C., Higgins E.T. Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2001, 37(3):253-260.
21. Förster J., Higgins E.T., Bianco A.T. Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2003, 90(1):148-164.
22. Freitas A.L., Liberman N., Higgins E.T. Regulatory fit and resisting temptation during goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002, 38:291-298.
23. Friedman R.S., Förster J. The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81(6):1001-1013.
24. Gardner W., Mulvey E.P., Shaw E.C. Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 118:392-404.
25. Grimm L.R., Markman A.B., Maddox W.T. End-of-semester syndrome: How situational regulatory fit affects test performance over an academic semester. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2012, 34:376-385.
26. Haws K., Dholakia U., Bearden W.O. An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVII 2010, 967-982.
27. Higgins E.T. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 1987, 94(3):319-340.
28. Higgins E.T. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist 1997, 52(12):1280-1300.
29. Higgins E.T. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology 1998, 30:1-46. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
30. Higgins E.T. Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist 2000, 55(11):1217-1230.
31. Higgins E.T. Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2005, 14(4):209-213.
32. Higgins E.T. Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review 2006, 113(3):439-460.
33. Higgins E.T., Friedman R.S., Harlow R.E., Idson L.C., Ayduk O.N., Taylor A. Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 31(1):3-23.
34. Hong J., Lee A.Y. Be fit and be strong: Mastering self-regulation through regulatory fit. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 34(5):682-695.
35. Idson L.C., Liberman N., Higgins E.T. Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2000, 36(3):252-274.
36. Keller J., Bless H. Regulatory fit and cognitive performance: The interactive effect of chronic and situationally induced self-regulatory mechanisms on test performance. European Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 36(3):393-405.
37. Kuncel N.R., Credé M., Thomas L.L. The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research 2005, 75(1):63-82.
38. Levesque P., Welner K. Is testing students the answer to America's education woes?. The New York Times 2015, Retrieved from, May 4. http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate.
39. Liberman N., Idson L.C., Higgins E.T. Predicting the intensity of losses vs. non-gains and non-losses vs. gains in judging fairness and value: A test of the loss aversion explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41(5):527-534.
40. Liberman N., Molden D.C., Idson L.C., Higgins E.T. Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80(1):5-18.
41. Lisjak M., Molden D.C., Lee A.Y. Primed interference: The cognitive and behavioral costs of an incongruity between chronic and primed motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2012, 102(5):889-909.
42. Maddox W.T., Baldwin G.C., Markman A.B. A test of the regulatory fit hypothesis in perceptual classification learning. Memory and Cognition 2006, 34(7):1377-1397.
43. Maehr M.L., Zusho A. Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. Handbook of motivation at school 2009, Routledge, New York. K.R. Wentzel, A. Wigfield (Eds.).
44. Manian N., Papadakis A.A., Strauman T.J., Essex M.J. The development of children's ideal and ought self-guides: Parenting, temperament, and individual differences in guide strength. Journal of Personality 2006, 74(6):1619-1646.
45. Markman A.B., Baldwin G.C., Maddox W.T. The interaction of payoff structure and regulatory focus in classification. Psychological Science 2005, 16(11):852-855.
46. Maslow Deficiency motivation and growth motivation. Nebraska symposium on motivation 1955, 1-30. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. M.R. Jones (Ed.).
47. Miele D.B., Molden D.C., Gardner W.L. Motivated comprehension regulation: Vigilant versus eager metacognitive control. Memory and Cognition 2009, 37(6):779-795.
48. Molden D.C., Miele D.B. The origins and influences of promotion-focused and prevention-focused achievement motivation. Advances in Motivation and Achievement 2008, 15:81-118.
49. Molden D.C., Lee A.Y., Higgins E.T. Motivations for promotion and prevention. Handbook of motivation science 2008, Guilford Press, New York. J. Shah, W. Gardner (Eds.).
50. Molden D.C., Rosenzweig E.Q. The origins and educational implications of promotion-focused and prevention-focused achievement motivations. Handbook of motivation at school. 2015, Routledge, New York, in press. D. Miele, K. Wentzel (Eds.).
51. Moller A.C., Elliot A.J. The 2×2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. Focus on educational psychology 2006, 307-326. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY. A.V. Mittel (Ed.).
52. Moretti M.M., Higgins E.T. Own versus other standpoints in self-regulation: Developmental antecedents and functional consequences. Review of General Psychology 1999, 3(3):188-223.
53. Morris L.W. Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology 1981, 73(4):541-555.
54. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40(3):879-891.
55. Sarason I.G. Stress, anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46(4):929-938.
56. Scholer A., Higgins E.T. Too much of a good thing? Trade-offs in promotion and prevention focus. The Oxford handbook of human motivation 2012, 65-84. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. R.M. Ryan (Ed.).
57. Scholer A.A., Ozaki Y., Higgins E.T. Inflating and deflating the self: Sustaining motivational concerns through self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2014, 51:60-73.
58. Seibt B., Förster J. Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 87(1):38-56.
59. Semin G.R., Higgins T., de Montes L.G., Estourget Y., Valencia J.F. Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89(1):36-45.
60. Shah J., Higgins E.T. Expectancy×value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73(3):447-458.
61. Shah J., Higgins E.T., Friedman R.S. Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74(2):285-295.
62. Shrout P.E., Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 2002, 7(4):422-445.
63. Steele C., Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69(5):797-811.
64. Summerville A., Roese N.J. Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note. Journal of Research in Personality 2008, 42(1):247-254.
65. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54(6):1063-1070.
66. Wentzel K., Miele D.B.A Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed.) 2015, Routledge, New York, in press.
67. Yeh T.K., Chang C.Y., Hu C.Y., Yeh T.C., Lin M.Y. Association of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) polymorphism and academic achievement in a Chinese cohort. Brain and Cognition 2009, 71(3):300-305.