Mitochondrial Dynamics at the Interface of Immune Cell Metabolism and Function

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 6-18

  Rambold, Angelika S ^a,b   Pearce, Erika L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND EPIGENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL FUNCTION; CELL FUSION; CELL METABOLISM; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION; MACROPHAGE; MACROPHAGE FUNCTION; MITOCHONDRIAL BIOGENESIS; MITOCHONDRIAL DYNAMICS; MITOCHONDRIAL FISSION; MITOCHONDRIAL FRAGMENTATION; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T LYMPHOCYTE; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; CELLULAR IMMUNITY; ENERGY METABOLISM; IMMUNE SYSTEM; METABOLISM; MITOCHONDRION; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; ENERGY METABOLISM; HUMANS; IMMUNE SYSTEM; IMMUNITY, CELLULAR; MITOCHONDRIA; MITOCHONDRIAL DYNAMICS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION;

EID: 85028845514     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2017.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. Pearce, E.L., Pearce, E.J., Metabolic pathways in immune cell activation and quiescence. Immunity 38 (2013), 633–643.
2. Mehta, M.M., et al. Mitochondrial control of immunity: beyond ATP. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2017, 10.1038/nri.2017.66 Published online July 3, 2017.
3. Phong, B., et al. Murine mast cells rapidly modulate metabolic pathways essential for distinct effector functions. J. Immunol. 198 (2017), 640–644.
4. Mills, E.L., et al. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of immunity. Nat. Immunol. 18 (2017), 488–498.
5. Mookerjee, S.A., Brand, M.D., Measurement and analysis of extracellular acid production to determine glycolytic rate. J. Vis. Exp., 2015, 2015 e53464.
6. Wellen, K.E., Thompson, C.B., A two-way street: reciprocal regulation of metabolism and signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13 (2012), 270–276.
7. Kaelin, W.G. Jr., McKnight, S.L., Influence of metabolism on epigenetics and disease. Cell 153 (2013), 56–69.
8. Vafai, S.B., Mootha, V.K., Mitochondrial disorders as windows into an ancient organelle. Nature 491 (2012), 374–383.
9. Mitra, K., et al. A hyperfused mitochondrial state achieved at G1–S regulates cyclin E buildup and entry into S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009), 11960–11965.
10. Rossignol, R., et al. Energy substrate modulates mitochondrial structure and oxidative capacity in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 64 (2004), 985–993.
11. Tondera, D., et al. SLP-2 is required for stress-induced mitochondrial hyperfusion. EMBO J. 28 (2009), 1589–1600.
12. Gomes, L.C., et al. During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability. Nat. Cell Biol. 13 (2011), 589–598.
13. Rambold, A.S., et al. Fatty acid trafficking in starved cells: regulation by lipid droplet lipolysis, autophagy, and mitochondrial fusion dynamics. Dev. Cell 32 (2015), 678–692.
14. Rambold, A.S., et al. Tubular network formation protects mitochondria from autophagosomal degradation during nutrient starvation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (2011), 10190–10195.
15. Molina, A.J., et al. Mitochondrial networking protects beta-cells from nutrient-induced apoptosis. Diabetes 58 (2009), 2303–2315.
16. Jheng, H.F., et al. Mitochondrial fission contributes to mitochondrial dysfunction and insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. Mol. Cell Biol. 32 (2012), 309–319.
17. Youle, R.J., van der Bliek, A.M., Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 337 (2012), 1062–1065.
18. Friedman, J.R., et al. ER tubules mark sites of mitochondrial division. Science 334 (2011), 358–362.
19. Korobova, F., et al. An actin-dependent step in mitochondrial fission mediated by the ER-associated formin INF2. Science 339 (2013), 464–467.
20. Manor, U., et al. A mitochondria-anchored isoform of the actin-nucleating spire protein regulates mitochondrial division. Elife, 4, 2015 e08828.
21. Lee, J.E., et al. Multiple dynamin family members collaborate to drive mitochondrial division. Nature 540 (2016), 139–143.
22. Labbe, K., et al. Determinants and functions of mitochondrial behavior. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30 (2014), 357–391.
23. Burte, F., et al. Disturbed mitochondrial dynamics and neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 11 (2015), 11–24.
24. Suen, D.F., et al. Mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis. Genes. Dev. 22 (2008), 1577–1590.
25. Koch, A., et al. Dynamin-like protein 1 is involved in peroxisomal fission. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003), 8597–8605.
26. Waterham, H.R., et al. A lethal defect of mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission. N. Engl. J. Med. 356 (2007), 1736–1741.
27. Vanstone, J.R., et al. DNM1L-related mitochondrial fission defect presenting as refractory epilepsy. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24 (2016), 1084–1088.
28. Shamseldin, H.E., et al. Genomic analysis of mitochondrial diseases in a consanguineous population reveals novel candidate disease genes. J. Med. Genet. 49 (2012), 234–241.
29. Chen, H., Chan, D.C., Emerging functions of mammalian mitochondrial fusion and fission. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14 (2005), R283–R289.
30. Chen, H., et al. Disruption of fusion results in mitochondrial heterogeneity and dysfunction. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005), 26185–26192.
31. Chen, H., et al. Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J. Cell Biol. 160 (2003), 189–200.
32. Koshiba, T., et al. Structural basis of mitochondrial tethering by mitofusin complexes. Science 305 (2004), 858–862.
33. de Brito, O.M., Scorrano, L., Mitofusin 2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Nature 456 (2008), 605–610.
34. Boutant, M., et al. Mfn2 is critical for brown adipose tissue thermogenic function. EMBO J., 2017.
35. Cipolat, S., et al. OPA1 requires mitofusin 1 to promote mitochondrial fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004), 15927–15932.
36. MacVicar, T., Langer, T., OPA1 processing in cell death and disease – the long and short of it. J. Cell Sci. 129 (2016), 2297–2306.
37. Anand, R., et al. The i-AAA protease YME1L and OMA1 cleave OPA1 to balance mitochondrial fusion and fission. J. Cell Biol. 204 (2014), 919–929.
38. Cogliati, S., et al. Mitochondrial cristae shape determines respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly and respiratory efficiency. Cell 155 (2013), 160–171.
39. Strack, S., et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases regulate splice-specific targeting of dynamin-related protein 1 to microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 201 (2013), 1037–1051.
40. Buck, M.D., et al. Mitochondrial dynamics controls T cell fate through metabolic programming. Cell 166 (2016), 63–76.
41. Zhang, B., et al. Human mast cell degranulation and preformed TNF secretion require mitochondrial translocation to exocytosis sites: relevance to atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 127, 2011 1522–1531.e8.
42. Zhou, R., et al. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature 469 (2011), 221–225.
43. + T cells use cell-intrinsic lipolysis to support the metabolic programming necessary for development. Immunity 41 (2014), 75–88.
44. + T cell memory development. Immunity 36 (2012), 68–78.
45. Benard, G., et al. Mitochondrial bioenergetics and structural network organization. J. Cell Sci. 120:Pt 5 (2007), 838–848.
46. Sinclair, L.V., et al. Control of amino-acid transport by antigen receptors coordinates the metabolic reprogramming essential for T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 14 (2013), 500–508.
47. van der Windt, G.J., et al. Metabolic switching and fuel choice during T-cell differentiation and memory development. Immunol. Rev. 249 (2012), 27–42.
48. Baixauli, F., et al. The mitochondrial fission factor dynamin-related protein 1 modulates T-cell receptor signalling at the immune synapse. EMBO J. 30 (2011), 1238–1250.
49. Quintana, A., Hoth, M., Mitochondrial dynamics and their impact on T cell function. Cell Calcium 52 (2012), 57–63.
50. Campello, S., et al. Orchestration of lymphocyte chemotaxis by mitochondrial dynamics. J. Exp. Med. 203 (2006), 2879–2886.
51. O'Neill, L.A., Pearce, E.J., Immunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function. J. Exp. Med. 213 (2016), 15–23.
52. Jha, A.K., et al. Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization. Immunity 42 (2015), 419–430.
53. Huang, S.C., et al. Metabolic reprogramming mediated by the mTORC2–IRF4 signaling axis is essential for macrophage alternative activation. Immunity 45 (2016), 817–830.
54. Bordt, E.A., et al. The putative Drp1 inhibitor mdivi-1 is a reversible mitochondrial complex I inhibitor that modulates reactive oxygen species. Dev. Cell, 40, 2017 583–594.e6.
55. West, A.P., et al. Mitochondria in innate immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11 (2011), 389–402.
56. Hou, F., et al. MAVS forms functional prion-like aggregates to activate and propagate antiviral innate immune response. Cell 146 (2011), 448–461.
57. Koshiba, T., et al. Mitochondrial membrane potential is required for MAVS-mediated antiviral signaling. Sci. Signal., 4, 2011 ra7.
58. Castanier, C., et al. Mitochondrial dynamics regulate the RIG-I-like receptor antiviral pathway. EMBO Rep. 11 (2010), 133–138.
59. Iyer, S.S., et al. Mitochondrial cardiolipin is required for Nlrp3 inflammasome activation. Immunity 39 (2013), 311–323.
60. Ichinohe, T., et al. Mitochondrial protein mitofusin 2 is required for NLRP3 inflammasome activation after RNA virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 17963–17968.
61. Park, S., et al. Defective mitochondrial fission augments NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Sci. Rep., 5, 2015, 15489.
62. Wang, X., et al. RNA viruses promote activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome through a RIP1–RIP3–DRP1 signaling pathway. Nat. Immunol. 15 (2014), 1126–1133.
63. Soubannier, V., McBride, H.M., Positioning mitochondrial plasticity within cellular signaling cascades. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793 (2009), 154–170.
64. Mishra, P., Chan, D.C., Metabolic regulation of mitochondrial dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 212 (2016), 379–387.
65. Wai, T., Langer, T., Mitochondrial dynamics and metabolic regulation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 27 (2016), 105–117.
66. Chang, C.R., Blackstone, C., Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation of Drp1 regulates its GTPase activity and mitochondrial morphology. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007), 21583–21587.
67. Li, J., et al. Pharmacological activation of AMPK prevents Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission and alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated endothelial dysfunction. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 86 (2015), 62–74.
68. Lee, J.Y., et al. MFN1 deacetylation activates adaptive mitochondrial fusion and protects metabolically challenged mitochondria. J. Cell Sci. 127:Pt 22 (2014), 4954–4963.
69. Pearce, E.L., et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature 460 (2009), 103–107.
70. Sag, D., et al. Adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase promotes macrophage polarization to an anti-inflammatory functional phenotype. J. Immunol. 181 (2008), 8633–8641.
71. Xu, X., et al. mTOR, linking metabolism and immunity. Semin. Immunol. 24 (2012), 429–435.
72. Cribbs, J.T., Strack, S., Reversible phosphorylation of Drp1 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and calcineurin regulates mitochondrial fission and cell death. EMBO Rep. 8 (2007), 939–944.
73. Taguchi, N., et al. Mitotic phosphorylation of dynamin-related GTPase Drp1 participates in mitochondrial fission. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007), 11521–11529.
74. Kashatus, J.A., et al. Erk2 phosphorylation of Drp1 promotes mitochondrial fission and MAPK-driven tumor growth. Mol. Cell 57 (2015), 537–551.
75. Prieto, J., et al. Early ERK1/2 activation promotes DRP1-dependent mitochondrial fission necessary for cell reprogramming. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016, 11124.
76. Gawlowski, T., et al. Modulation of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) function by increased O-linked-beta-N-acetylglucosamine modification (O-GlcNAc) in cardiac myocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (2012), 30024–30034.
77. Bond, M.R., Hanover, J.A., A little sugar goes a long way: the cell biology of O-GlcNAc. J. Cell Biol. 208 (2015), 869–880.
78. Swamy, M., et al. Glucose and glutamine fuel protein O-GlcNAcylation to control T cell self-renewal and malignancy. Nat. Immunol. 17 (2016), 712–720.
79. Toyama, E.Q., et al. AMP-activated protein kinase mediates mitochondrial fission in response to energy stress. Science 351 (2016), 275–281.
80. Shutt, T., et al. The intracellular redox state is a core determinant of mitochondrial fusion. EMBO Rep. 13 (2012), 909–915.
81. Willems, P.H., et al. Redox homeostasis and mitochondrial dynamics. Cell Metab. 22 (2015), 207–218.
82. Pekkurnaz, G., et al. Glucose regulates mitochondrial motility via Milton modification by O-GlcNAc transferase. Cell 158 (2014), 54–68.
83. 2+-dependent regulation of kinesin-mediated mitochondrial motility. Cell 136 (2009), 163–174.
84. Bianchi, K., et al. Calcium and mitochondria: mechanisms and functions of a troubled relationship. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1742 (2004), 119–131.
85. 2+ signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1763 (2006), 442–449.
86. Pidoux, G., et al. Optic atrophy 1 is an A-kinase anchoring protein on lipid droplets that mediates adrenergic control of lipolysis. EMBO J. 30 (2011), 4371–4386.
87. Murley, A., Nunnari, J., The emerging network of mitochondria–organelle contacts. Mol. Cell 61 (2016), 648–653.
88. Sebastian, D., et al. Mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) links mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum function with insulin signaling and is essential for normal glucose homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 5523–5528.
89. Munoz, J.P., et al. Mfn2 modulates the UPR and mitochondrial function via repression of PERK. EMBO J. 32 (2013), 2348–2361.
90. Theurey, P., Rieusset, J., Mitochondria-associated membranes response to nutrient availability and role in metabolic diseases. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 28 (2017), 32–45.
91. Wang, L., et al. Disruption of mitochondrial fission in the liver protects mice from diet-induced obesity and metabolic deterioration. Diabetologia 58 (2015), 2371–2380.
92. von Holstein-Rathlou, S., et al. FGF21 mediates endocrine control of simple sugar intake and sweet taste preference by the liver. Cell Metab. 23 (2016), 335–343.
93. Zorzano, A., Claret, M., Implications of mitochondrial dynamics on neurodegeneration and on hypothalamic dysfunction. Front. Aging Neurosci., 7, 2015, 101.
94. Schneeberger, M., et al. Mitofusin 2 in POMC neurons connects ER stress with leptin resistance and energy imbalance. Cell 155 (2013), 172–187.
95. Santoro, A., et al. DRP1 suppresses leptin and glucose sensing of POMC neurons. Cell Metab. 25 (2017), 647–660.
96. Monaghan, R.M., Whitmarsh, A.J., Mitochondrial proteins moonlighting in the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40 (2015), 728–735.
97. Thimmulappa, R.K., et al. Nrf2 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and survival during experimental sepsis. J. Clin. Invest. 116 (2006), 984–995.
98. Haynes, C.M., et al. Evaluating and responding to mitochondrial dysfunction: the mitochondrial unfolded-protein response and beyond. Trends Cell. Biol. 23 (2013), 311–318.
99. Zhao, Q., et al. A mitochondrial specific stress response in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 21 (2002), 4411–4419.
100. Nargund, A.M., et al. Mitochondrial and nuclear accumulation of the transcription factor ATFS-1 promotes OXPHOS recovery during the UPR(mt). Mol. Cell 58 (2015), 123–133.
101. Pellegrino, M.W., et al. Mitochondrial UPR-regulated innate immunity provides resistance to pathogen infection. Nature 516 (2014), 414–417.
102. Fiorese, C.J., et al. The transcription factor ATF5 mediates a mammalian mitochondrial UPR. Curr. Biol. 26 (2016), 2037–2043.
103. Papa, L., Germain, D., SirT3 regulates the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. Mol. Cell Biol. 34 (2014), 699–710.
104. Meier, J.A., Larner, A.C., Toward a new STATe: the role of STATs in mitochondrial function. Semin. Immunol. 26 (2014), 20–28.
105. Twig, G., Shirihai, O.S., The interplay between mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14 (2011), 1939–1951.
106. Elbaz-Alon, Y., et al. A dynamic interface between vacuoles and mitochondria in yeast. Dev. Cell 30 (2014), 95–102.
107. Honscher, C., et al. Cellular metabolism regulates contact sites between vacuoles and mitochondria. Dev. Cell 30 (2014), 86–94.
108. Kornmann, B., Walter, P., ERMES-mediated ER–mitochondria contacts: molecular hubs for the regulation of mitochondrial biology. J. Cell Sci. 123:Pt 9 (2010), 1389–1393.
109. Wang, H., et al. Perilipin 5, a lipid droplet-associated protein, provides physical and metabolic linkage to mitochondria. J. Lipid Res. 52 (2011), 2159–2168.
110. Tubbs, E., Rieusset, J., Metabolic signaling functions of ER–mitochondria contact sites: role in metabolic diseases. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 58 (2017), R87–R106.
111. Hughes, A.L., Gottschling, D.E., An early age increase in vacuolar pH limits mitochondrial function and lifespan in yeast. Nature 492 (2012), 261–265.
112. Hughes, A.L., et al. Selective sorting and destruction of mitochondrial membrane proteins in aged yeast. Elife, 5, 2016, e13943.
113. Baixauli, F., et al. Mitochondrial respiration controls lysosomal function during inflammatory T cell responses. Cell Metab. 22 (2015), 485–498.