Progress and prospects in plant genome editing

Nature Plants

Volumn 3, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Yin, Kangquan ^a   Gao, Caixia ^a   Qiu, Jin Long ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; FORECASTING; GENE EDITING; PLANT GENOME; TRENDS;

CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; FORECASTING; GENE EDITING; GENOME, PLANT;

EID: 85026626079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20550278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2017.107     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Bortesi, L. & Fischer, R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 41-52 (2015).
2. Brazelton, V. A. Jr et al. A quick guide to CRISPR sgRNA design tools. GM Crops Food 6, 266-276 (2015).
3. Lowe, K. et al. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell 28, 1998-2015 (2016).
4. Zhang, Y. et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat. Commun. 7, 12617 (2016).
5. Kim, S., Kim, D., Cho, S. W., Kim, J. & Kim, J. S. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 24, 1012-1019 (2014).
6. Sprink, T., Eriksson, D., Schiemann, J. & Hartung, F. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 1493-1506 (2016).
7. Woo, J. W. et al. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1162-1164 (2015).
8. Svitashev, S. et al. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Commun. 7, 13274 (2016).
9. Liang, Z. et al. Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Commun. 8, 14261 (2017).
10. Latorre, A., Latorre, A. & Somoza, Á. Modified RNAs in CRISPR/Cas9: an old trick works again. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 3548-3550 (2016).
11. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
12. Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822-826 (2013).
13. Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827-832 (2013).
14. Salvi, S., Druka, A., Milner, S. G. & Gruszka, D. in Biotechnological Approaches to Barley Improvement (eds Kumlehn, J. & Stein, N.) 287-310 (Springer, 2014).
15. Zhang, D., Li, Z. & Li, J. F. Targeted gene manipulation in plants using the CRISPR/Cas technology. J. Genet. Genomics 43, 251-262 (2016).
16. Zhang, H. et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 797-807 (2014).
17. Crosetto, N. et al. Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 361-365 (2013).
18. Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187-197 (2015).
19. Frock, R. L. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 179-186 (2015).
20. Kim, D. et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat. Methods 12, 237-243 (2015).
21. Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262-1278 (2014).
22. Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J. 80, 1139-1150 (2014).
23. Slaymaker, I. M. et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351, 84-88 (2016).
24. Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529, 490-495 (2016).
25. Chylinski, K., Le Rhun, A. & Charpentier, E. The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems. RNA Biol. 10, 726-737 (2013).
26. Esvelt K. M. et al. Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat. Methods 10, 1116-1121 (2013).
27. Hou, Z. et al. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15644-15649 (2013).
28. Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481-485 (2015).
29. Ran, F. A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186-191 (2015).
30. Hu, X. et al. Expanding the range of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in rice. Mol. Plant 9, 943-945 (2016).
31. Karvelis, T. et al. Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol. 16, 253 (2015).
32. Steinert, J., Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 84, 1295-1305 (2015).
33. Kaya, H. et al. Highly specific targeted mutagenesis in plants using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Sci. Rep. 6, 26871 (2016).
34. Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163, 759-771 (2015).
35. Maresca, M., Lin, V. G., Guo, N. & Yang, Y. Obligate ligation-gated recombination (ObLiGaRe): custom-designed nuclease-mediated targeted integration through nonhomologous end joining. Genome Res. 23, 539-546 (2013).
36. Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686-688 (2013).
37. Xu, R. et al. Generation of targeted mutant rice using a CRISPR-Cpf1 system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 713-717 (2017).
38. Hu, X., Wang, C., Liu, Q., Fu, Y. & Wang, K. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cpf1 system. J. Genet. Genomics 44, 71-73 (2017).
39. Kim, H. et al. CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing. Nat. Commun. 8, 14406 (2017).
40. Tang, X. et al. A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nat. Plants 3, 17018 (2017).
41. Zhang, H. Y. et al. MISSA 2.0: an updated synthetic biology toolbox for assembly of orthogonal CRISPR/Cas systems. Sci. Rep. 7, 41993 (2017).
42. Rouet, P., Smih, F. & Jasin, M. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8096-8106 (1994).
43. Puchta, H., Dujon, B. & Hohn, B. Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5055-5060 (1996).
44. Puchta, H. & Fauser, F. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. Plant J. 78, 727-741 (2014).
45. Voytas, D. F. & Gao, C. Precision genome engineering and agriculture: opportunities and regulatory challenges. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001877 (2014).
46. Svitashev, S. et al. Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiol. 169, 931-945 (2015).
47. Endo, M., Mikami, M. & Toki, S. Biallelic gene targeting in rice. Plant Physiol. 170, 667-677 (2016).
48. Baltes, N. J., Gil-Humanes, J., Cermak, T., Atkins, P. A. & Voytas D. F. DNA replicons for plant genome engineering. Plant Cell 26, 151-163 (2014).
49. Cermák, T., Baltes, N. J., Cegan, R., Zhang, Y. & Voytas, D. F. High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome. Genome Biol. 16, 232 (2015).
50. Butler, N. M., Baltes, N. J., Voytas, D. F. & Douches, D. S. Geminivirus-mediated genome editing in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using sequence-specific nucleases. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1045 (2016).
51. Gil-Humanes, J. et al. High-efficiency gene targeting in hexaploid wheat using DNA replicons and CRISPR/Cas9. Plant J. 89, 1251-1262 (2017).
52. Wang, M. et al. Gene targeting by homology-directed repair in rice using a geminivirus-based CRISPR/Cas9 System. Mol. Plant 10, 1007-1010 (2017).
53. Weinthal, D. M., Taylor, R. A. & Tzfira, T. Nonhomologous end joining-mediated gene replacement in plant cells. Plant Physiol. 162, 390-400 (2013).
54. Li, J. et al. Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Plants 2, 16139 (2016).
55. Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420-424 (2016).
56. Nishida, K. et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science 353, aaf8729 (2016).
57. Ma, Y. et al. Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 13, 1029-1035 (2016).
58. Hess, G. et al. Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 13, 1036-1042 (2016).
59. Yang, L. et al. Engineering and optimising deaminase fusions for genome editing. Nat. Commun. 7, 13330 (2016).
60. Li, J., Sun, Y., Du, J., Zhao, Y. & Xia, L. Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol. Plant 10, 526-529 (2017).
61. Lu, Y. & Zhu, J. K. Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 System. Mol. Plant 10, 523-525 (2017).
62. Zong, Y. et al. Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 438-440 (2017).
63. Ren, B. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for efficient targeted base editing to induce genetic variations in rice. Sci. China Life Sci. 60, 516-519 (2017).
64. Shimatani, Z. et al. Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 441-443 (2017).
65. Kim, Y. B. et al. Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 371-376 (2017).
66. Carlson, J. C., Badran, A. H., Guggiana-Nilo, D. A. & Liu, D. R. Negative selection and stringency modulation in phage-assisted continuous evolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 216-222 (2014).
67. Piatek, A. et al. RNA-guided transcriptional regulation in planta via synthetic dCas9-based transcription factors. Plant Biotechnol. J. 13, 578-589 (2015).
68. Lowder, L. G. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 169, 971-985 (2015).
69. Chen, B. et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155, 1479-1491 (2013).
70. Tanenbaum, M. E., Gilbert, L. A., Qi, L. S., Weissman, J. S. & Vale, R. D. A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell 159, 635-646 (2014).
71. Deng, W., Shi, X., Tjian, R., Lionnet, T. & Singer, R. H. CASFISH: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated in situ labeling of genomic loci in fixed cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11870-11875 (2015).
72. Ma, H. et al. Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3002-3007 (2015).
73. Ochiai, H., Sugawara, T. & Yamamoto, T. Simultaneous live imaging of the transcription and nuclear position of specific genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e127 (2015).
74. Hilton, I. B. et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 510-517 (2015).
75. Thakore, P. I. et al. Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements. Nat. Methods 12, 1143-1149 (2015).
76. Vojta, A. et al. Repurposing the CRISPR-Cas9 system for targeted DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 5615-5628 (2016).
77. Tak, Y. G. & Farnham, P. J. Making sense of GWAS: using epigenomics and genome engineering to understand the functional relevance of SNPs in non-coding regions of the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 8, 57 (2015).
78. Sadhu, M. J., Bloom, J. S., Day, L. & Kruglyak, L. CRISPR-directed mitotic recombination enables genetic mapping without crosses. Science 352, 1113-1116 (2016).
79. Østerberg, J. T. et al. Accelerating the domestication of new crops: feasibility and approaches. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 373-384 (2017).
80. Ali, Z. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants. Genome Biol. 16, 238 (2015).
81. Baltes, N. J. et al. Conferring resistance to geminiviruses with the CRISPR-Cas prokaryotic immune system. Nat. Plants 1, 15145 (2015).
82. Ji, X. et al. Establishing a CRISPR-Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nat. Plants 1, 15144 (2015).
83. Miao, J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1233 (2013).
84. Xu, R. et al. Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice. Rice 7, 5 (2014).
85. Wang, Y. et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 947-951 (2014).
86. Ito, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 467, 76-82 (2015).
87. de Toledo Thomazella, D. P., Brail, Q., Dahlbeck, D. & Staskawicz, B. J. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutagenesis of a DMR6 ortholog in tomato confers broad-spectrum disease resistance. Preprint at http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/07/20/064824 (2016).
88. Wang, F. et al. Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922. PLoS ONE 11, e0154027 (2016).
89. Shi, J. et al. ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 207-216 (2016).
90. Sun, Y. et al. Generation of high-amylose rice through CRISPR/Cas9- mediated targeted mutagenesis of starch branching enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00298 (2017).