Highly specific targeted mutagenesis in plants using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Kaya, Hidetaka ^a   Mikami, Masafumi ^a,b   Endo, Akira ^a   Endo, Masaki ^a   Toki, Seiichi ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; ENDONUCLEASE; GUIDE RNA; PLANT PROTEIN;

ARABIDOPSIS; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTAGENESIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORYZA; PLANT GENOME; PROMOTER REGION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TOBACCO; TRANSGENIC PLANT; VIRUS GENE;

ARABIDOPSIS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BASE SEQUENCE; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; ENDONUCLEASES; GENE EXPRESSION; GENES, VIRAL; GENOME, PLANT; MUTAGENESIS; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; ORYZA; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; RNA, GUIDE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TOBACCO;

EID: 84971254394     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep26871     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bhaya, D., Davison, M., Barrangou, R. CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu Rev Genet 45, 273-297, doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132430 (2011).
2. Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A. CRISPR-Cas: New Tools for Genetic Manipulations from Bacterial Immunity Systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 69, 209-228, doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104441 (2015).
3. Doudna, J. A., Charpentier, E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096, doi: 10.1126/science.1258096 (2014).
4. Carroll, D. Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. Annu Rev Biochem 83, 409-439, doi: 10.1146/annurevbiochem-060713-035418 (2014).
5. Belhaj, K., Chaparro-Garcia, A., Kamoun, S., Patron, N. J., Nekrasov, V. Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr Opin Biotechnol 32, 76-84, doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.007 (2015).
6. Osakabe, Y., Osakabe, K. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 56, 389-400, doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu170 (2015).
7. Baltes, N. J., Voytas, D. F. Enabling plant synthetic biology through genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 33, 120-131, doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.11.008 (2015).
8. Schaeffer, S. M., Nakata, P. A. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: Transitioning from lab to field. Plant Sci 240, 130-142, doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.011 (2015).
9. Bortesi, L., Fischer, R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv 33, 41-52, doi: 10.1016/j. biotechadv.2014.12.006 (2015).
10. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823, doi: 10.1126/science.1231143 (2013).
11. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826, doi: 10.1126/science.1232033 (2013).
12. Deltcheva, E. et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471, 602-607, doi: 10.1038/nature09886 (2011).
13. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821, doi: 10.1126/science.1225829 (2012).
14. Sternberg, S. H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E. C., Doudna, J. A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62-67, doi: 10.1038/nature13011 (2014).
15. Mojica, F. J., Diez-Villasenor, C., Garcia-Martinez, J., Almendros, C. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology 155, 733-740, doi: 10.1099/mic.0.023960-0 (2009).
16. Fonfara, I. et al. Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 42, 2577-2590, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1074 (2014).
17. Ran, F. A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186-191, doi: 10.1038/nature14299 (2015).
18. Steinert, J., Schiml, S., Fauser, F., Puchta, H. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J, doi: 10.1111/tpj.13078 (2015).
19. Fauser, F., Schiml, S., Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 79, 348-359, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12554 (2014).
20. Li, X., Jiang, D. H., Yong, K. L., Zhang, D. B. Varied transcriptional efficiencies of multiple Arabidopsis U6 small nuclear RNA genes. J Integr Plant Biol 49, 222-229, doi: 10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00393.x (2007).
21. Busch, M., Seuter, A., Hain, R. Functional analysis of the early steps of carotenoid biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Physiol 128, 439-453, doi: 10.1104/pp.010573 (2002).
22. Harig, L. et al. Proteins from the FLOWERING LOCUS T-like subclade of the PEBP family act antagonistically to regulate floral initiation in tobacco. Plant J 72, 908-921, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05125.x (2012).
23. Qin, G. et al. Disruption of phytoene desaturase gene results in albino and dwarf phenotypes in Arabidopsis by impairing chlorophyll, carotenoid, and gibberellin biosynthesis. Cell Res 17, 471-482, doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.40 (2007).
24. Endo, M., Mikami, M., Toki, S. Multigene Knockout Utilizing Off-Target Mutations of the CRISPR/Cas9 System in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol 56, 41-47, doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu154 (2015).
25. Mikami, M., Toki, S., Endo, M. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Mol Biol 88, 561-572, doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0342-x (2015).
26. Feng, Z. Y. et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23, 1229-1232, doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.114 (2013).
27. Yamaguchi, T. et al. The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell 16, 500-509, doi: 10.1105/tpc.018044 (2004).
28. Nagasawa, N. et al. SUPERWOMAN1 and DROOPING LEAF genes control floral organ identity in rice. Development 130, 705-718 (2003).
29. Ota, S. et al. Efficient identification of TALEN-mediated genome modifications using heteroduplex mobility assays. Genes Cells 18, 450-458, doi: 10.1111/gtc.12050 (2013).
30. Ansai, S., Kinoshita, M. Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas system in medaka. Biol Open 3, 362-371, doi: 10.1242/bio.20148177 (2014).
31. Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481-485, doi: 10.1038/nature14592 (2015).
32. Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 31, 822-826, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2623 (2013).
33. Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31, 827-832, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647 (2013).
34. Pattanayak, V. et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol 31, 839-843, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2673 (2013).
35. Friedland, A. E. et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9: a smaller Cas9 for all-in-one adeno-associated virus delivery and paired nickase applications. Genome Biol 16, 257, doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0817-8 (2015).
36. Toki, S. Rapid and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15, 16-21, doi: 10.1007/Bf02772109 (1997).
37. Toki, S. et al. Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. Plant Journal 47, 969-976, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02836.x (2006).
38. Taoka, K. et al. Identification of three kinds of mutually related composite elements conferring S phase-specific transcriptional activation. Plant Journal 18, 611-623, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00486.x (1999).