Towards improved genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions: Unification, transcript specificity and beyond

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1060-1069

  Pfau, Thomas ^a   Pacheco, Maria Pires ^a   Sauter, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Gene protein reaction association; Metabolic network reconstruction; Unification

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; METABOLITE; MODEL; NEGLECT; NOMENCLATURE; NONHUMAN; PIPELINE; PROKARYOTE; STRESS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; METABOLISM;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENOME; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85009801543     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv100     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Kim TY, Sohn SB, Kim YB, et al. Recent advances in reconstruction and applications of genome-scale metabolic models. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012;23:617-23.
2. Reed JL, Vo TD, Schilling CH, et al. An expanded genomescale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (JR904 GSM/GPR). Genome Biol 2003;4:R54.
3. Orth JD, Conrad TM, Na J, et al. A comprehensive genomescale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism-2011. Mol Syst Biol 2011;7:535.
4. Keseler IM, Mackie A, Peralta-Gil M, et al. EcoCyc: fusing model organism databases with systems biology. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D605-12.
5. Förster J, Famili I, Fu P, et al. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 2003;13:244-53.
6. Aung HW, Henry SA, Walker LP. Revising the representation of fatty acid, glycerolipid, and glycerophospholipid metabolism in the consensus model of yeast metabolism. Industrial Biotechnol 2013;9:215-28.
7. Poolman MG, Miguet L, Sweetlove LJ, et al. A genome-scale metabolic model of Arabidopsis and some of its properties. Plant Physiol 2009;151:1570-81.
8. de Oliveira Dal'Molin CG, Quek LE, Palfreyman RW, et al. AraGEM, a genome-scale reconstruction of the primary metabolic network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2010;152:579-89.
9. Mintz-Oron S, Meir S, Malitsky S, et al. Reconstruction of Arabidopsis metabolic network models accounting for subcellular compartmentalization and tissue-specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:339-44.
10. Duarte NC, Becker SA, Jamshidi N, et al. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:1777-82.
11. Ma H, Sorokin A, Mazein A, et al. The Edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:135.
12. Thiele I, Swainston N, Fleming RMT, et al. A communitydriven global reconstruction of human metabolism. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:419-25.
13. Thiele I, Palsson BØ. A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat Protoc 2010;5:93-121.
14. Monk J, Nogales J, Palsson BØ. Optimizing genome-scale network reconstructions. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32:447-52.
15. Kumar A, Suthers PF, Maranas CD. MetRxn: a knowledgebase of metabolites and reactions spanning metabolic models and databases. BMC Bioinf 2012;13:6.
16. Overbeek R, Begley T, Butler RM, et al. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:5691-702.
17. Agren R, Liu L, Shoaie S, et al. The RAVEN toolbox and its use for generating a genome-scale metabolic model for Penicillium chrysogenum. PLoS Comput Biol 2013;9:e1002980.
18. Wang Y, Eddy JA, Price ND. Reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for 126 human tissues using mCADRE. BMC Sys Biol 2012;6:153.
19. Vlassis N, Pacheco MP and Sauter T. Fast reconstruction of compact context-specific metabolic network models. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:e1003424.
20. Ganter M, Bernard T, Moretti S, et al. MetaNetX.org: a website and repository for accessing, analysing and manipulating metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 2013;29:815-16.
21. Cheung CYM, Williams TCR, Poolman MG, et al. A method for accounting for maintenance costs in flux balance analysis improves the prediction of plant cell metabolic phenotypes under stress conditions. Plant J 2013;76:1050-61.
22. Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming RMT, et al. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc 2011;6:1290-307.
23. Schellenberger J, Lewis NE, Palsson BØ. Elimination of thermodynamically infeasible loops in steady-state metabolic models. Biophys J 2011;100:544-53.
24. Caspi R, Altman T, Billington R, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D459-71.
25. Mardinoglu A, Agren R, Kampf C, et al. Genome-scale metabolic modelling of hepatocytes reveals serine deficiency in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Commun 2014;5:3083.
26. Olivier BG, Bergmann FT. Flux Balance Constraints. Version 2 Release 1. Available from COMBINE http://identifiers.org/ combine.specifications/sbml.level-3.version-2.fbc.version-1. release-1. 2015.
27. Poolman MG. ScrumPy: metabolic modelling with Python. Syst Biol 2006;153:375-8.
28. Sigurdsson MI, Jamshidi N, Steingrimsson E, et al. A detailed genome-wide reconstruction of mouse metabolism based on human Recon 1. BMC Syst Biol 2010;4:140.
29. Gille C, Bölling C, Hoppe A, et al. HepatoNet1: a comprehensive metabolic reconstruction of the human hepatocyte for the analysis of liver physiology. Mol Syst Biol 2010;6:411.
30. Oh YK, Palsson BO, Park SM, et al. Genome-scale reconstruction of metabolic network in Bacillus subtilis based on highthroughput phenotyping and gene essentiality data. J Biol Chem 2007;282:28791-9.
31. Jamshidi N, Palsson BØ. Investigating the metabolic capabilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv using the in silico strain iNJ661 and proposing alternative drug targets. BMC Syst Biol 2007;1:26.
32. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003;19:524-31.
33. Lakshmanan M, Koh G, Chung BKS, et al. Software applications for flux balance analysis. Brief Bioinform 2014;15:108-22.
34. Dandekar T, Fieselmann A, Majeed S, et al. Software applications toward quantitative metabolic flux analysis and modeling. Brief Bioinform 2014;15:91-107.
35. Schatschneider S, Persicke M, Watt SA, et al. Establishment, in silico analysis, and experimental verification of a largescale metabolic network of the xanthan producing Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris strain B100. J Biotechnol 2013;167:123-34.
36. Dias O, Pereira R, Gombert AK, et al. iOD907, the first genome-scale metabolic model for the milk yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. Biotechnol J 2014;9:776-90.
37. Larocque M, Chénard T, Najmanovich R. A curated C. difficile strain 630 metabolic network: prediction of essential targets and inhibitors. BMC Syst Biol 2014;8:117.
38. Karp PD, Paley SM, Krummenacker M, et al. Pathway tools version 13.0: integrated software for pathway/genome informatics and systems biology. Brief Bioinform2010;11:40-79.
39. Becker SA, Palsson BØ. Context-specific metabolic networks are consistent with experiments. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000082.
40. Jerby L, Shlomi T, Ruppin E. Computational reconstruction of tissue-specific metabolic models: application to human liver metabolism. Mol Syst Biol 2010;6:401.
41. Agren R, Bordel S, Mardinoglu A, et al. Reconstruction of genome-scale active metabolic networks for 69 human cell types and 16 cancer types using INIT. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002518.
42. Yizhak K, Gaude E, Le Dévédec S, et al. Phenotype-based cellspecific metabolic modeling reveals metabolic liabilities of cancer. eLife 2014;3.e03641.
43. Li C, Courtot M, Le Novère N, et al. BioModels.net Web Services, a free and integrated toolkit for computational modelling software. Brief Bioinform 2010;11:270-7.
44. Olivier BG, Bergmann FT. Flux Balance Constraints. Version 1 Release 1. Available from COMBINE http://identifiers.org/ combine.specifications/sbml.level-3.version-1.fbc.version-1. release-1. 2013.
45. Feist AM, Henry CS, Reed JL, et al. A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:121.
46. Flahaut NAL, Wiersma A, van de Bunt B, et al. Genome-scale metabolic model for Lactococcus lactis MG1363 and its application to the analysis of flavor formation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013;97:8729-39.
47. Le Novère N, Finney A, Hucka M, et al. Minimuminformation requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM). Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:1509-15.
48. Hastings J, de Matos P, Dekker A, et al. The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D456-63.
49. Bolton EE, Wang Y, Thiessen PA, et al. Chapter 12: PubChem: integrated platform of small molecules and biological activities. In: RA Wheeler, DC Spellmeyer (Eds). Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 4. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2008, 217-41.
50. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, et al. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D199-205.
51. Schomburg I, Chang A, Placzek S, et al. BRENDA in 2013: integrated reactions, kinetic data, enzyme function data, improved disease classification: new options and contents in BRENDA. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D764-72.
52. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;25:25-9.
53. The UniProt Consortium. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D191-8.
54. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-42.
55. Bairoch A. The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:304-5.
56. Maglott D, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, et al. Entrez Gene: genecentered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D54-8.
57. Logan-Klumpler FJ, De Silva N, Boehme U, et al. GeneDB-an annotation database for pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D98-108.
58. Safran M, Dalah I, Alexander J, et al. GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. Database (Oxford) 2010;2010:baq020.
59. Ladd AN, Cooper TA. Finding signals that regulate alternative splicing in the post-genomic era. Genome Biol 2002;3:1-16.
60. Buck K, Vanek M, Groner B, et al. Multiple forms of prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid are specifically expressed and regulated in murine tissues and the mammary cell line HC11. Endocrinol 1992;130:1108-14.
61. Pan Q, Shai O, Lee LJ, et al. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by highthroughput sequencing. Nat Genet 2008;40:1413-15.
62. Djerbi M, Darreh-Shori T, Zhivotovsky B, et al. Characterization of the human FLICE-inhibitory protein locus and comparison of the anti-apoptotic activity of four different flip isoforms. Scand J Immunol 2001;54:180-9.
63. Vaz FM, Houtkooper RH, Valianpour F, et al. Only one splice variant of the human TAZ gene encodes a functional protein with a role in cardiolipin metabolism. J Biol Chem 2003;278:43089-94.
64. Girard H, Lévesque E, Bellemare J, et al. Genetic diversity at the UGT1 locus is amplified by a novel 3' alternative splicing mechanism leading to nine additional UGT1A proteins that act as regulators of glucuronidation activity. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2007;17:1077-89.
65. Bellemare J, Rouleau M, Harvey M, et al. Modulation of the human glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A pathway by splice isoform polypeptides is mediated through protein-protein interactions. J Biol Chem 2010;285:3600-7.
66. Rodriguez JM, Maietta P, Ezkurdia I, et al. APPRIS: annotation of principal and alternative splice isoforms. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D110-17.
67. Lewis NE, Hixson KK, Conrad TM, et al. Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models. Mol Syst Biol 2010;6:390.
68. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 2010:28:511-15.
69. Gonzàlez-Porta M, Frankish A, Rung J, et al. Transcriptome analysis of human tissues and cell lines reveals one dominant transcript per gene. Genome Biol 2013:14:R70.
70. Yao S, Ireland S, Bee A, et al. Splice variant PRKC-f-PrC is a novel biomarker of human prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2012;107:388-99.
71. Liu Z, Wang Y, Wang S, et al. Nek2C functions as a tumor promoter in human breast tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Med 2012;30:775.
72. Wielenga VJ, Heider KH, Johan G, et al. Expression of CD44 variant proteins in human colorectal cancer is related to tumor progression. Cancer Res 1993;53:4754-6.
73. Tazi J, Bakkour N, Stamm S. Alternative splicing and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1792:14-26.
74. Nissim-Rafinia M, Kerem B. Splicing regulation as a potential genetic modifier. Trends Genet 2002;18:123-7.
75. Mazurek S, Boschek CB, Hugo F, et al. Pyruvate kinase type M2 and its role in tumor growth and spreading, Semin Cancer Biol 2005;15(4):300-8.
76. Calarco JA, Zhen M, Blencowe BJ. Networking in a global world: establishing functional connections between neural splicing regulators and their target transcripts. RNA 2011;17:775-91.
77. Kalsotra A, Cooper TA. Functional consequences of developmentally regulated alternative splicing. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:715-29.
78. Licatalosi DD, Darnell RB. RNA processing and its regulation: global insights into biological networks. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:75-87.
79. Ellis JD, Barrios-Rodiles M, Olak R, et al. Tissue-specific alternative splicing remodels protein-protein interaction networks. Mol Cell 2012;46:884-92.
80. Xu Q, Modrek B, Lee C. Genome-wide detection of tissuespecific alternative splicing in the human transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:3754-66.
81. Pal S, Gupta R, Davuluri RV. Alternative transcription and alternative splicing in cancer. Pharmacol Ther 2012;136:283-94.
82. Chen J, Weiss W. Alternative splicing in cancer: implications for biology and therapy. Oncogene 2015;34:1-14.
83. Mills JD, Janitz M. Alternative splicing of mRNA in the molecular pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Aging 2012;33:1012.e11-24.
84. Alarcón MA, Medina MA, Hu Q, et al. A novel functional lowdensity lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 gene alternative splice variant is associated with Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2013;34:1709-e9.
85. Beyer K, Ariza A. Alpha-synuclein posttranslational modification and alternative splicing as a trigger for neurodegeneration. Mol Neurobiol 2013;47:509-24.
86. Ishunina TA, Swaab DF. Decreased alternative splicing of estrogen receptor-a mRNA in the Alzheimer's disease brain. Neurobiol Aging 2012;33:286-96.
87. Kim N, Alekseyenko AV, Roy M, et al. The ASAP II database: analysis and comparative genomics of alternative splicing in 15 animal species. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D93-8.
88. Lee Y, Lee Y, Kim B, et al. ECgene: an alternative splicing database update. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D99-103.
89. Koscielny G, Le Texier V, Gopalakrishnan C, et al. ASTD: the alternative splicing and transcript diversity database. Genomics 2009;93:213-20.
90. Holste D, Huo G, Tung V, et al. HOLLYWOOD: a comparative relational database of alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D56-62.
91. Takeda JI, Suzuki Y, Nakao M, et al. H-DBAS: alternative splicing database of completely sequenced and manually annotated full-length cDNAs based on H-Invitational. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D104-9.
92. De La Grange P, Dutertre M, Martin N, et al. FAST DB: a website resource for the study of the expression regulation of human gene products. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:4276-84.
93. Maeda N, Kasukawa T, Oyama R, et al. Transcript annotation in FANTOM3: mouse gene catalog based on physical cDNAs. PLoS Genet 2006;2:e62.
94. Hubbard T, Barker D, Birney E, et al. The Ensembl genome database project. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:38-41.
95. Flicek P, Ahmed I, Amode MR, et al. Ensembl 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D48-55.
96. Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:276-80.
97. Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D281-8.
98. Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Wu CH, et al. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D154-9.
99. Kelemen O, Convertini P, Zhang Z, et al. Function of alternative splicing. Gene 2013;514:1-30.
100. Taneri B, Gaasterland T. Genome and Transcriptome Sequence Databases for Discovery, Storage, and Representation of Alternative Splicing Events. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA 2013, 1-34.
101. Bilofsky HS, Burks C. The GenBank genetic sequence data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:1861-3.
102. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, et al. GenBank: update. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D23-6.
103. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27-30.
104. Schnoes AM, Brown SD, Dodevski I, et al. Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5:e1000605
105. Salzberg SL. Genome re-annotation: a wiki solution? Genome Biol 2007;8:102.
106. Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res 2012;22:1760-74
107. The ENCODE Project Consortium and others. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia of DNA elements) project. Science 2004;306:636-40.
108. Wilming LG, Gilbert JG, Howe K, et al. The Vertebrate Genome Annotation (Vega) database. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D753-D760.
109. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium and others. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 2010;467:1061-73
110. Martelli PL, D'Antonio M, Bonizzoni P, et al. ASPicDB: a database of annotated transcript and protein variants generated by alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;39:D80-5.
111. Bonizzoni P, Mauri G, Pesole G, et al. Detecting alternative gene structures from spliced ESTs: a computational approach. J Comput Biol 2009;16:43-66.
112. Takeda JI, Suzuki Y, Sakate R, et al. H-DBAS: humantranscriptome database for alternative splicing: update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:D86-90
113. Zhang F, Drabier R. SASD: the Synthetic Alternative Splicing Database for identifying novel isoform from proteomics. BMC Bioinf 2013;14:S13.
114. Wang BB, Brendel V. Genomewide comparative analysis of alternative splicing in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:7175-80
115. Radrich K, Tsuruoka Y, Dobson P, et al. Integration of metabolic databases for the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks. BMC Sys Biol 2010;4:114. 116.Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, et al. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:977-82. 117.Remize F, Andrieu E, Dequin S. Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the cytosolic Mg2+ and mitochondrial K+ acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000;66:3151-9. 118.De Martino D, Capuani F, Mori M, et al. Counting and correcting thermodynamically infeasible flux cycles in genomescale metabolic networks. Metabolites 2013;3:946-66.
116. Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, et al. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:977-82.
117. Remize F, Andrieu E, Dequin S. Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the cytosolic Mg2+ and mitochondrial K+ acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000;66:3151-9.
118. De Martino D, Capuani F, Mori M, et al. Counting and correcting thermodynamically infeasible flux cycles in genomescale metabolic networks. Metabolites 2013;3:946-66
119. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008;9:75.
120. Bernard T, Bridge A, Morgat A, et al. Reconciliation of metabolites and biochemical reactions for metabolic networks. Brief Bioinform 2014;15:123-35.
121. Abelö A, Andersson TB, Antonsson M, et al. Stereoselective metabolism of omeprazole by human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos 2000;28:966-72.
122. Förster J, Famili I, Palsson BØ, et al. Large-scale evaluation of in silico gene deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. OMICS 2003;7:193-202.
123. Duarte NC, Herrgård MJ, Palsson BØ. Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Res 2004;14:1298-309
124. Kuepfer L, Sauer U, Blank LM. Metabolic functions of duplicate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res 2005;15:1421-30.
125. Herrgård MJ, Swainston N, Dobson P, et al. A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:1155-60.
126. Romero P, Wagg J, Green ML, et al. Computational prediction of human metabolic pathways from the complete human genome. Genome Biol 2005;6:R2