Rapid and efficient analysis of gene function using CRISPR-Cas9 in Xenopus tropicalis founders

Genes to Cells

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 755-771

  Shigeta, Mitsuki ^a   Sakane, Yuto ^a   Iida, Midori ^b   Suzuki, Miyuki ^a   Kashiwagi, Keiko ^c   Kashiwagi, Akihiko ^c   Fujii, Satoshi ^b   Yamamoto, Takashi ^a   Suzuki, Ken ichi T ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; NUCLEASE; PROTEIN CAS9; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMPLICON; ARTICLE; CAS9 GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; EMBRYO; GENE; GENE DISRUPTION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HETERODUPLEX ANALYSIS; LTK GENE; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PIGMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SLC45A2; SOMATIC MUTATION; TOXICITY; XENOPUS TROPICALIS;

EID: 84977634685     PISSN: 13569597     EISSN: 13652443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12379     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ansai, S. & Kinoshita, M. (2014) Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas system in medaka. Biol. Open 3, 362–371.
2. Bae, S., Kweon, J., Kim, H.S. & Kim, J.-S. (2014a) Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat. Methods 11, 705–706.
3. Bae, S., Park, J. & Kim, J.S. (2014b) Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473–1475.
4. Bell, C.C., Magor, G.W., Gillinder, K.R. & Perkins, A.C. (2014) A high-throughput screening strategy for detecting CRISPR-Cas9 induced mutations using next-generation sequencing. BMC Genomics 15, 1002.
5. Bhattacharya, D., Marfo, C.A., Li, D., Lane, M. & Khokha, M.K. (2015) CRISPR/Cas9: An inexpensive, efficient loss of function tool to screen human disease genes in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 408, 196–204.
6. Blitz, I.L., Biesinger, J., Xie, X.H. & Cho, K.W.Y. (2013) Biallelic genome modification in F-0 Xenopus tropicalis embryos using the CRISPR/Cas system. Genesis 51, 827–834.
7. Cong, L., Ran, F.A., Cox, D., Lin, S.L., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P.D., Wu, X.B., Jiang, W.Y., Marraffini, L.A. & Zhang, F. (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823.
8. Crosetto, N., Mitra, A., Silva, M.J., Bienko, M., Dojer, N., Wang, Q., Karaca, E., Chiarle, R., Skrzypczak, M., Ginalski, K., Pasero, P., Rowicka, M. & Dikic, I. (2013) Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 361–365.
9. Dooley, C.M., Schwarz, H., Mueller, K.P., Mongera, A., Konantz, M., Neuhauss, S.C.F., Nusslein-Volhard, C. & Geisler, R. (2013) Slc45a2 and V-ATPase are regulators of melanosomal pH homeostasis in zebrafish, providing a mechanism for human pigment evolution and disease. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 26, 205–217.
10. Doudna, J.A. & Charpentier, E. (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096.
11. Fu, Y.F., Foden, J.A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M.L., Reyon, D., Joung, J.K. & Sander, J.D. (2013) High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822–826.
12. Guo, X.G., Zhang, T.J., Hu, Z., Zhang, Y.Q., Shi, Z.Y., Wang, Q.H., Cui, Y., Wang, F.Q., Zhao, H. & Chen, Y.L. (2014) Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Development 141, 707–714.
13. Harland, R.M. & Grainger, R.M. (2011) Xenopus research: metamorphosed by genetics and genomics. Trends Genet. 27, 507–515.
14. Hellsten, U., Harland, R.M., Gilchrist, M.J. et al. (2010) The genome of the Western Clawed Frog Xenopus tropicalis. Science 328, 633–636.
15. Hwang, W.Y., Fu, Y.F., Reyon, D., Maeder, M.L., Tsai, S.Q., Sander, J.D., Peterson, R.T., Yeh, J.R.J. & Joung, J.K. (2013) Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 227–229.
16. Ishibashi, S., Cliffe, R. & Amaya, E. (2012) Highly efficient bi-allelic mutation rates using TALENs in Xenopus tropicalis. Biol. Open 1, 1273–1276.
17. James-Zorn, C., Ponferrada, V.G., Burns, K.A., Fortriede, J.D., Lotay, V.S., Liu, Y., Karpinka, J.B., Karimi, K., Zorn, A.M. & Vize, P.D. (2015) Xenbase: core features, data acquisition, and data processing. Genesis 53, 486–497.
18. Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J.A. & Charpentier, E. (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821.
19. Khokha, M.K. (2012) Xenopus white papers and resources: folding functional genomics and genetics into the frog. Genesis 50, 133–142.
20. Kim, D., Bae, S., Park, J., Kim, E., Kim, S., Yu, H.R., Hwang, J., Kim, J.I. & Kim, J.S. (2015) Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat. Methods 12, 237–243.
21. Kim, H.J., Lee, H.J., Kim, H., Cho, S.W. & Kim, J.-S. (2009) Targeted genome editing in human cells with zinc finger nucleases constructed via modular assembly. Genome Res. 19, 1279–1288.
22. Kim, J.M., Kim, D., Kim, S. & Kim, J.S. (2014a) Genotyping with CRISPR-Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases. Nat. Commun. 5, 3157.
23. Kim, S., Kim, D., Cho, S.W., Kim, J. & Kim, J.S. (2014b) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 24, 1012–1019.
24. Kistler, K.E., Vosshall, L.B. & Matthews, B.J. (2015) Genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Cell Rep. 11, 51–60.
25. Kotani, H., Taimatsu, K., Ohga, R., Ota, S. & Kawahara, A. (2015) Efficient multiple genome modifications induced by the crRNAs, tracrRNA and Cas9 protein complex in zebrafish. PLoS One 10, e0128319.
26. Kroll, K.L. & Amaya, E. (1996) Transgenic Xenopus embryos from sperm nuclear transplantations reveal FGF signaling requirements during gastrulation. Development 122, 3173–3183.
27. Kuscu, C., Arslan, S., Singh, R., Thorpe, J. & Adli, M. (2014) Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 677–683.
28. Lee, J.-S., Kwak, S.-J., Kim, J., Kim, A.-K., Noh, H.M., Kim, J.-S. & Yu, K. (2014) RNA-guided genome editing in Drosophila with the purified Cas9 protein. G3 4, 1291–1295.
29. Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R. & Genome Project Data, P. (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079.
30. Lopes, S.S., Yang, X., Mueller, J., Carney, T.J., McAdow, A.R., Rauch, G.-J., Jacoby, A.S., Hurst, L.D., Delfino-Machin, M., Haffter, P., Geisler, R., Johnson, S.L., Ward, A. & Kelsh, R.N. (2008) Leukocyte tyrosine kinase functions in pigment cell development. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000026.
31. Mali, P., Yang, L.H., Esvelt, K.M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J.E., Norville, J.E. & Church, G.M. (2013) RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826.
32. McVey, M. & Lee, S.E. (2008) MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 24, 529–538.
33. Miyamoto, K., Suzuki, K.T., Suzuki, M., Sakane, Y., Sakuma, T., Herberg, S., Simeone, A., Simpson, D., Jullien, J., Yamamoto, T. & Gurdon, J.B. (2015) The expression of TALEN before fertilization provides a rapid knock-out phenotype in Xenopus laevis founder embryos. PLoS One 10, e0142946.
34. Moreno-Mateos, M.A., Vejnar, C.E., Beaudoin, J.D., Fernandez, J.P., Mis, E.K., Khokha, M.K. & Giraldez, A.J. (2015) CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nat. Methods 12, 982–988.
35. Naito, Y., Hino, K., Bono, H. & Ui-Tei, K. (2015) CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics 31, 1120–1123.
36. Nakayama, T., Blitz, I.L., Fish, M.B., Odeleye, A.O., Manohar, S., Cho, K.W. & Grainger, R.M. (2014) Cas9-based genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Methods Enzymol. 546, 355–375.
37. Nakayama, T., Fish, M.B., Fisher, M., Oomen-Hajagos, J., Thomsen, G.H. & Grainger, R.M. (2013) Simple and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Xenopus tropicalis. Genesis 51, 835–843.
38. Nieuwkoop, P. & Faber, J. (1994) Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). New York: Garland Publishing Inc.
39. Ota, S., Hisano, Y., Ikawa, Y. & Kawahara, A. (2014) Multiple genome modifications by the CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish. Genes Cells 19, 555–564.
40. Ota, S., Hisano, Y., Muraki, M., Hoshijima, K., Dahlem, T.J., Grunwald, D.J., Okada, Y. & Kawahara, A. (2013) Efficient identification of TALEN-mediated genome modifications using heteroduplex mobility assays. Genes Cells 18, 450–458.
41. Paix, A., Folkmann, A., Rasoloson, D. & Seydoux, G. (2015) High efficiency, homology-directed genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Genetics 201, 47–54.
42. Peng, Y., Clark, K.J., Campbell, J.M., Panetta, M.R., Guo, Y. & Ekker, S.C. (2014) Making designer mutants in model organisms. Development 141, 4042–4054.
43. Ran, F.A., Hsu, P.D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D.A. & Zhang, F. (2013) Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308.
44. Reversade, B., Kuroda, H., Lee, H., Mays, A. & De Robertis, E.M. (2005) Depletion of Bmp2, Bmp4, Bmp7 and Spemann organizer signals induces massive brain formation in Xenopus embryos. Development 132, 3381–3392.
45. Schmitt, S.M., Gull, M. & Brandli, A.W. (2014) Engineering Xenopus embryos for phenotypic drug discovery screening. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 69, 225–246.
46. Sedlak, R.H., Liang, S., Niyonzima, N., Feelixge, H.S.D., Roychoudhury, P., Greninger, A.L., Weber, N.D., Boissel, S., Scharenberg, A.M., Cheng, A., Magaret, A., Bumgarner, R., Stone, D. & Jerome, K.R. (2016) Digital detection of endonuclease mediated gene disruption in the HIV provirus. Sci. Rep. 6, 20064.
47. Sung, Y.H., Kim, J.M., Kim, H.T., Lee, J., Jeon, J., Jin, Y., Choi, J.H., Ban, Y.H., Ha, S.J., Kim, C.H., Lee, H.W. & Kim, J.S. (2014) Highly efficient gene knockout in mice and zebrafish with RNA-guided endonucleases. Genome Res. 24, 125–131.
48. Suzuki, K.T. & Hayashi, T. (2015) Genome editing using site-specific nucleases in Amphibians. In: Targeted Genome Editing Using Site-Specific Nucleases ZFNs, TALENs, and the CRISPR/Cas9 System (ed. T. Yamamoto), pp. 133–149. Tokyo: Springer Japan Press.
49. Suzuki, K.T., Isoyama, Y., Kashiwagi, K., Sakuma, T., Ochiai, H., Sakamoto, N., Furuno, N., Kashiwagi, A. & Yamamoto, T. (2013) High efficiency TALENs enable F0 functional analysis by targeted gene disruption in Xenopus laevis embryos. Biol. Open 2, 448–452.
50. Tsai, S.Q., Zheng, Z., Nguyen, N.T., Liebers, M., Topkar, V.V., Thapar, V., Wyvekens, N., Khayter, C., Iafrate, A.J., Le, L.P., Aryee, M.J. & Joung, J.K. (2015) GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197.
51. Urnov, F.D., Miller, J.C., Lee, Y.L., Beausejour, C.M., Rock, J.M., Augustus, S., Jamieson, A.C., Porteus, M.H., Gregory, P.D. & Holmes, M.C. (2005) Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 435, 646–651.
52. Varshney, G.K., Pei, W.H., LaFave, M.C. et al. (2015) High-throughput gene targeting and phenotyping in zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9. Genome Res. 25, 1030–1042.
53. Vouillot, L., Thelie, A. & Pollet, N. (2015) Comparison of T7E1 and surveyor mismatch cleavage assays to detect mutations triggered by engineered nucleases. G3 (Bethesda) 5, 407–415.
54. Wang, H.Y., Yang, H., Shivalila, C.S., Dawlaty, M.M., Cheng, A.W., Zhang, F. & Jaenisch, R. (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153, 910–918.
55. Zhang, X.H., Tee, L.Y., Wang, X.G., Huang, Q.S. & Yang, S.H. (2015) Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 4, e264.
56. Zhu, X.X., Xu, Y.J., Yu, S.S., Lu, L., Ding, M.Q., Cheng, J., Song, G.X., Gao, X., Yao, L.M., Fan, D.D., Meng, S., Zhang, X.W., Hu, S.D. & Tian, Y. (2014) An efficient genotyping method for genome-modified animals and human cells generated with CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 4, 6420.