Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 125-142

  Järvelä, Sanna ^a   Kirschner, Paul A ^b   Panadero, Ernesto ^a   Malmberg, Jonna ^a   Phielix, Chris ^c   Jaspers, Jos ^c   Koivuniemi, Marika ^a   Järvenoja, Hanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Computer supported collaborative learning; Self regulated learning; Socially shared regulation of learning; Technological tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961291114     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science,33(5–6), 367–379. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9.
2. Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., & Burkett, C. (2010). Self-regulated Learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with metacognitive tools. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New Science of Learning (pp. 225–247). New York: Springer.
3. Baker, M. J. (1994). A Model for Negotiation in Teaching-Learning Dialogues. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,5(2), 199–254.
4. Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,87(1), 156–179.
5. Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science,40(1), 193–211. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9167-4.
6. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences,12(3), 307–359. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1.
7. Belland, B. R., Kim, C. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist,48(4), 243–270. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.838920.
8. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unraveling basic components and dimensions. (Advances in Learning and Instruction Series) (pp. 55–68). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
9. Blaye, A., & Light, P. (1990). Computer-based learning: The social dimensions. In H. C. Foot, M. J. Morgan, & R. H. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 135–150). Chichester: Wiley.
10. Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher,25(8), 37–40.
11. Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior,27(3), 1043–1045.
12. Bradner, E., Kellogg, W. A., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of ‘BABBLE’: A field study of chat in the workplace. In S. Bødker, M. Kyng, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW’99 (pp. 139–158). Netherlands: Springer.
13. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research,64(1), 1–35. doi:10.3102/00346543064001001.
14. Devolder, A., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 557–573.
15. Dieberger, A. (2000). Where did all the people go? A collaborative Web space with social navigation information. Poster presented at the 9th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW9), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Accessed from the World Wide Web on June 8, 2002 at http://juggle5.50megs.com/WORK/publications/SwikiWriteup.html.
16. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning,3, 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029.
17. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
18. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
19. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist,48(1), 56–66. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005.
20. Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decision Support Systems,37, 239–263.
21. Fransen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior,27(3), 1103–1113. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017.
22. Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., & Kirschner, P. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist,48, 9–24. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.747947.
23. Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology,8(2), 111–129. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0802_2.
24. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,15(3), 42–57.
26. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.
27. Hadwin, A. F., Oshige, M., Gress, C. L. Z., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Innovative ways for using gStudy to orchestrate and research social aspects of self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior,26, 794–805.
28. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Bar-Natan, I. (2002). Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC). Computers & Education,39(1), 19–36.
29. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction,26(1), 48–94. doi:10.1080/07370000701798495.
30. Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research,33, 439–465.
31. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education,49, 1037–1065.
32. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Group awareness tools: It’s what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior,27(3), 1046–1058. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002.
33. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist,48(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.74800.
34. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Malmberg, J. (2012). How elementary school students’ regulation of motivation is connected to self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation,18(1), 65–84.
35. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. (2013). Exploring socially-shared regulation in the context of collaboration. The Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,12(3), 267–286. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.267.
36. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008a). Understanding dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research,47(1), 122–135.
37. Järvelä, S. & Renniger, K. R. (2014, in press). Designing for learning: Engagement, interest, and motivation. Sawyer, K. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences.
38. Järvelä, S., Veermans, M., & Leinonen, P. (2008b). Investigating students’ engagement in a computer-supported inquiry - a process-oriented analysis. Social Psychology in Education,11, 299–322.
39. Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on Motivation in Collaborative Learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist,45(1), 15–27.
40. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
41. Kempler Rogat, T. K., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Motivation in collaborative groups. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 250–267). New York: Routledge.
42. Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction,12(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7.
43. Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior,24(2), 403–420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.028.
44. Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educational Psychologist,48(1), 1–8. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.750227.
45. Kirschner, P. A., Kirschner, F., & Janssen, J. (2014). The collaboration principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 547–575). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Kirschner, P. A., Kreijns, K., Phielix, C., & Fransen, J. Awareness of cognitive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (accepted).
47. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. A., & Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction,21(4), 587–599. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.001.
48. Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,52(3), 47–66. doi:10.1007/BF02504675.
49. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist,41(2), 75–86.
50. Kirschner, P. A., & van Merrinboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist,48(3), 169–183. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.804395.
51. Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable CSCL environments: Social affordances, sociability, and social presence. Unpublished PhD thesis. Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands. Available at http://dspace.learningnetworks.org/bitstream/1820/1030/1/Dissertation%20Kreijns%202004.pdf.
52. Kreijns, K., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Determining sociability, social space and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborating teams. Cyberpsychology and Behavior,7(2), 155–172.
53. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior,19, 335–353.
54. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior,19, 335–353.
55. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist,48(4), 229–242. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.750225.
56. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction,13, 487–509.
57. Mäkitalo, K., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Leinonen, P. (2002). Mechanisms of common ground in case-based web discussions in teacher education. The Internet and Higher Education,5(3), 247–265.
58. Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2014, manuscript). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Patterns of socially shared regulation of learning between high – and low performing student groups.
59. Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S. & Kirschner, P. (2014, in press). Elementary school students’ strategic activity and quality of strategy use: Does task-type matter? Metacognition and Learning.
60. Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2010). Tracing elementary school students’ study tactic use in gStudy by examing a strategic and self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior,26(5), 1034–1042.
61. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist,44(2), 137–146.
62. Miller, M., Malmberg, J. Hadwin, A., & Järvelä, S. (2014, submitted). Tracing university students´ construction of shared task perceptions in on-line collaboration.
63. Mulder, I., Swaak, J., & Kessels, J. (2002). Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology mediated interaction. Educational Technology & Society,5(1), 35–47.
64. Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
65. Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2006). Learning from learning kits: gStudy traces of student’ self-regulated engagements using software. Psychology of Education Review,18, 211–228.
66. Phielix, C. (2012). Enhancing collaboration through assessment & reflection. Unpublished PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Available at http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/255570/phielix.pdf?sequence=2.
67. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 151–161. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.011.
68. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior,27(3), 1087–1102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024.
69. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
70. Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex environment: What we have gained and what we have missed? Educational Psychologist,40(1), 1–12.
71. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin: Springer.
72. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and selfregulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
73. Stahl, G. (2004). Groupware goes to school: Adapting BSCW to the classroom. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology,19(3/4), 1–13.
74. Straus, S. G. (1997). Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction,12, 227–266.
75. Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology,79(1), 87–97.
76. Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (Eds.). (2004). What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
77. Thompson, L. F., & Coovert, M. D. (2003). Teamwork online: the effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction and post discussion accuracy. Group Dynamics,7(2), 135–151.
78. Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review,3, 278–302.
79. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research,37(5), 490–521.
80. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Ten steps to complex learning (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
81. Volet, S. E., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist,44(4), 215–226.
82. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction,17(4), 416–426.
83. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Er.
84. Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Gress, C. L. Z. (2010). The learning kit project: Software tools for supporting and researching regulation of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 787–793.
85. Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O’Donnell, C. Chan, & C. Chinn (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462–479). New York: Taylor & Francis.
86. Winne, P. H., Zhou, R., & Egan, R. (2011). Designing assessments of self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & D. R. Robinson (Eds.), Assessment of higher order thinking skills (pp. 89–120). Charlotte, NC: IAP-Information Age Publishing.
87. Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research,33(2), 189–215.
88. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of nine- and ten-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(2), 117–145. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9019-0.
89. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.