Team Effectiveness and Team Development in CSCL

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 9-24

  Fransen, Jos ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^b   Kirschner, Paul A ^c  

^a INHOLLAND UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873871985     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2012.747947     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Akkerman, S., Van den Bossche, P., Admiraal, W., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Simons, R. and Kirschner, P. 2007. Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives?. Educational Research Review, 2: 39-63. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.02.001
2. Alfonseca, E., Carro, R., Martín, E., Ortigosa, A. and Paredes, P. 2006. The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: A case study. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16: 377-401. doi:10.1007/s11257-006-9012-7
3. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. and Alban-Metcalfe, R. J. 2001. The development of a new Transformational Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74: 1-27. doi:10.1348/096317901167208
4. Arrow, H., Poole, M., Henry, K., Wheelan, S. and Moreland, R. 2004. Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35: 73-105. doi:10.1177/1046496403259757
5. Bachmann, A. 2006. Melting pot or tossed salad? Implications for designing effective multicultural workgroups. Management International Review, 46: 721-748. doi:10.1007/s11575-006-0124-4
6. Bacon, D., Stewart, K. and Silver, W. 1999. Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23: 467-488. doi:10.1177/ 105256299902300503
7. Barron, B. 2003. When smart groups fail. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 12: 307-359. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
8. Beers, P., Boshuizen, H., Kirschner, P. A. and Gijselaers, W. 2006. Common ground, complex problems and decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15: 529-556. doi:10.1007/s10726-006-9030-1
9. Bereiter, C. 2002. Education and mind in the knowledge age, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M. and Palincsar, A. 1991. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26: 369-398. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
11. Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Sampson, J. 1999. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24: 413-426. doi:10.1080/0260293990240405
12. Bruffee, K. 1993. Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependency, and the authority of knowledge, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. doi:10.2307/358879
13. Campion, M., Papper, E. and Medsker, G. 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49: 429-452.
14. Cannon-Bowers, J., Salas, E. and Converse, S. 1993. "Shared mental models in expert team decision making". In Individual and group decision making, Edited by: Castellan, N. 221-246. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Chinn, C. A., O'Donnell, A. M. and Jinks, T. S. 2000. The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69: 77-97. doi:10.1080/00220970009600650
16. Chiocchio, F. and Essiembre, H. 2009. Cohesion and performance. Small Group Research, 40: 382-420. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00239.x
17. Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B. and Ingraffea, A. 2007. Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49: 309-329. doi:10.1016/ j.compedu.2005.07.003
18. Cohen, S. and Bailey, D. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
19. Cummings, J. and Cross, R. 2003. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25: 197-210. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00049-7
20. Dembo, M. and McAuliffe, T. 1987. Effects of perceived ability and grade status on social interaction and influence in cooperative groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79: 415-423.
21. Derry, S., DuRussel, L. and O'Donnell, A. 1998. Individual and distributed cognitions in interdisciplinary teamwork: A developing case study and emerging theory. Educational Psychology Review, 10: 25-56.
22. Dillenbourg, P. 1999. "What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'?". In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, Edited by: Dillenbourg, P. 1-19. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
23. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A. and O'Malley, C. 1996. "The evolution of research on collaborative learning". In Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, Edited by: Spada, E. and Reiman, P. 189-211. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
24. Driskell, J., Goodwin, G., Salas, E. and O'Shea, P. 2006. What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness. Group Dynamics, 10: 249-271. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249
25. Durham, C., Knight, D. and Locke, E. 1997. Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72: 203-231. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2739
26. Eby, L. and Dobbins, G. 1997. Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 275-295. doi:10.2307/3100145
27. Felder, R. and Brent, R. 2001. Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching, 10: 69-75.
28. Feldman Barr, T., Dixon, A. and Gassenheimer, B. 2005. Exploring the 'lone wolf' phenomenon in student teams. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1): 81-90.
29. Ferrante, C., Green, S. and Forster, W. 2006. Getting more out of team projects: Incentivizing leadership to enhance performance. Journal of Management Education, 30: 788-797. doi:10.1177/1052562906287968
30. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H. and Haake, J. 2007. Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge. Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives, New York, NY: Springer.
31. Foels, R., Driskell, J., Mullen, B. and Salas, E. 2000. The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction. Small Group Research, 31: 676-701. doi:10.1177/104649640003100603
32. Fransen, J., Kirschner, P. A. and Erkens, G. 2011. Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 1103-1113. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017
33. Furst, S., Blackburn, R. and Rosen, B. 1999. Virtual team effectiveness: A proposed research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 9: 249-269.
34. Garrison, D. and Cleveland-Innes, M. 2005. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19: 133-148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
35. Gersick, C. 1988. Time and transition in work teams: Towards a new model of group development. The Academy of Management Journal, 31: 9-41. doi:10.2307/256496
36. Gillard, S. and Johansen, J. 2004. Project management communication: A systems approach. Journal of Information Science, 30: 23-29. doi:10.1177/0165551504041675
37. Greenberg, P., Greenberg, R. and Antonucci, Y. 2007. Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams. Business Horizons, 50: 325-333. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2007.02.005
38. Hackman, J. 1990. Groups that work [and those that don't]; Creating conditions for effective teamwork, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39. Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W. and Nielsen, T. 2005. Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research, 36: 83-105. doi:10.1177/1046496404268538
40. Hannah, S., Uhl-Bien, M., Avolio, B. and Cavarretta, F. 2009. A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 897-919. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.006
41. Heckman, R., Crowston, K. and Misiolek, N. 2007. "A structurational perspective on leadership in virtual teams". In Virtuality and virtualization, Edited by: Crowston, K., Sieber, S. and Wynn, E. Vol. 236, 151-168. Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7
42. Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D. and Littig, P. 2010. University students' attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11: 9-20. doi:10.1177/1469787409355867
43. Hinsz, V. 1995. Mental models of groups as social systems. Small Group Research, 26: 200-233. doi:10.1177/1046496495262003
44. Hirokawa, R., Cathcart, R., Samovar, L. and Henman, L. 2003. Small group communication: Theory and practice (8th ed.), Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
45. Hogg, M., Abrams, D., Otten, S. and Hinkle, S. 2004. The social identity perspective. Small Group Research, 35: 246-276. doi:10.4135/9781412990165
46. Hsu, J., Chang, J., Klein, G. and Jiang, J. 2011. Exploring the impact of team mental models on information utilization and project performance in system development. International Journal of Project Management, 29: 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.12.001
47. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. and Kanselaar, G. 2009. Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25: 161-170.
48. Jarvenpaa, S. and Leidner, D. 1999. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organzation Science, 10: 791-815.
49. Johnson, S., Suriya, C., Won Yoon, S., Berrett, J. and La Fleur, J. 2002. Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers & Education, 39: 379-393. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00074-X
50. Kanawattanachai, P. and Yoo, Y. 2002. Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11: 187-213. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00019-7
51. Kaplan, F., Do-Lenh, S., Bachour, K., Kao, G. Y., Gault, C. and Dillenbourg, P. 2009. "Interpersonal computers for higher education". In Interactive artifacts and furniture supporting collaborative work and learning, Edited by: Dillenbourg, P., Huang, J. and Cherubini, M. Vol. 10, 129-145. New York, NY: Springer.
52. Kapur, M., Voiklis, J. and Kinzer, C. 2008. Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers & Education, 51: 54-66.
53. Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H. and Contractor, N. 2004. Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35: 307-332. doi:10.1177/1046496404264941
54. Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K. and Reimann, P. 2006. "The Big Five and visualisations of team work activity". In Intelligent tutoring systems, Edited by: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K. and Chan, T. Vol. 4053, 197-206. Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/11774303_20
55. Kayes, A., Kayes, D. and Kolb, D. 2005. Experiential learning in teams. Simulation Gaming, 36: 330-354. doi:10.1177/1046878105279012
56. Kellermanns, F., Floyd, S., Pearson, A. and Spencer, B. 2008. The contingent effect of constructive confrontation on the relationship between shared mental models and decision quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 119-137. doi:10.1002/job.497
57. Kerr, N. and Bruun, S. 1983. Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44: 78-94.
58. Kiesler, S. and Cummings, J. 2002. "What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research". In Distributed work, Edited by: Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. 57-82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. and McGuire, T. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39: 1123-1134.
60. Kirschner, F., Paas, F. and Kirschner, P. 2009a. A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21: 31-42. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2
61. Kirschner, F., Paas, F. and Kirschner, P. 2009b. Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25: 306-314. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008
62. Kirschner, F., Paas, F. and Kirschner, P. 2011a. Superiority of collaborative learning with complex tasks: A research note on an alternative affective explanation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 53-57. doi:10.1016/ j.chb.2010.05.012
63. Kirschner, F., Paas, F. and Kirschner, P. 2011b. Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25: 615-624. doi:10.1002/acp.1730
64. Kirschner, P. 2002. Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12: 1-10. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7
65. Kirschner, P., Beers, P., Boshuizen, H. and Gijselaers, W. 2008. Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24: 403-420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.028
66. Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J., Kreijns, K. and Beers, P. 2004. Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(3): 47-66. doi:10.1007/BF02504675
67. Klimoski, R. and Mohammed, S. 1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?. Journal of Management, 20: 403-437.
68. Krebs, S., Hobman, E. and Bordia, P. 2006. Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity. Small Group Research, 37: 721-741. doi:10.1177/1046496406294886
69. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. and Jochems, W. 2003. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19: 335-353. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
70. Lea, M., Rogers, P. and Postmes, T. 2002. SIDE-VIEW: Evaluation of a system to develop team players and improve productivity in Internet collaborative learning groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33: 53 doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00238
71. Lea, M., Spears, R. and De Groot, D. 2001. Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 526-537. doi:10.1177/0146167201275002
72. Leavitt, H. 1951. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46: 38-50. doi:10.1037/h0057189
73. Lewicki, R. and Bunker, B. 1996. "Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline". In Trust in organizations, Edited by: Kramer, R. and Tyler, T. 114-139. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Marks, M., Mathieu, J. and Zaccaro, S. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-367.
75. Mathieu, J., Heffner, T., Goodwin, G., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 273-283.
76. McAllister, D. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24-59. doi:10.2307/256727
77. Mehra, A., Smith, B., Dixon, A. and Robertson, B. 2006. Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 232-245. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003
78. Mennecke, B., Hoffer, J. and Wynee, B. 1992. The implications of group development and history for group support system theory and practice. Small Group Research, 23: 524-572. doi:10.1177/1046496492234005
79. Miller, B., Sun, J., Wu, X. and Anderson, R. in press. Child leaders in collaborative groups, Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for Study of Reading.
80. Mohammed, S. and Dumville, B. 2001. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 89-106. doi:10.1002/job.86
81. Molleman, E. 2005. Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning?. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14: 173-193. doi:10.1007/s10726-005-6490-7
82. Morgan, B., Salas, E. and Glickman, A. 2001. An analysis of team evolution and maturation. The Journal of General Psychology, 120: 277-291. doi:10.1080/00221309.1993.9711148
83. Mu, S. and Gnyawali, D. R. 2003. Developing synergistic knowledge in student groups. Journal of Higher Education, 74: 689 doi:10.1353/jhe.2003.0040
84. Nembhard, I. and Edmondson, A. 2006. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 941-966. doi:10.1002/job.413
85. Newell, S. and Swan, J. 2000. Trust and inter-organizational networking. Human Relations, 53: 1287-1328.
86. Peterson, R. and Behfar, K. 2003. The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92: 102-112. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6
87. Poole, M. 1983. Decision development in small groups: A multiple sequence model of group decision development. Communication Monographs, 50: 321-341. doi:10.1080/03637758309390173
88. Porter, C., Gogus, C. and Chien-Feng Yu, R. 2010. When does teamwork translate into improved team performance? A resource allocation perspective. Small Group Research, 41: 221-248. doi:10.1177/1046496409356319
89. Porter, C., Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., Ellis, A., West, B. and Moon, H. 2003. Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 391-403. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.391
90. Remedios, L., Clarke, D. and Hawthorne, L. 2008. The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9: 201-216. doi:10.1177/1469787408095846
91. Rentsch, J., Heffner, T. and Duffy, L. 1994. What you know is what you get from experience. Group & Organization Management, 19: 450-474. doi:10.1177/1059601194194004
92. Roberts, A. and Nason, R. 2004, November-December. Quality not quantity: Comparing interaction patterns of a balanced and non-balanced team engaged in model-building within a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, Melbourne, Australia
93. Roschelle, J. 1992. Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2: 235-276. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1
94. Roschelle, J. and Teasly, S. 1995. "The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving". In Knowledge creation diffusion utilization, Edited by: O'Malley, C. 69-97. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1
95. Salas, E., Sims, D. and Burke, C. 2005. Is there a 'Big Five' in teamwork?. Small Group Research, 36: 555-599. doi:10.1177/1046496405277134
96. Salomon, G. and Globerson, T. 1989. When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13: 89-99. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90018-9
97. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Nüssli, M. and Dillenbourg, P. 2011. Facilitating peer knowledge modeling: Effects of a knowledge awareness tool on collaborative learning outcomes and processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 1059-1067. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.032
98. Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B. and Valcke, M. 2007. Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2: 225-246. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9016-2
99. Sessa, V. and London, M. 2007. Work group learning: Understanding, improving & assessing how groups learn in organizations, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Shaw, M. 1954. Some effects of problem complexity upon problem solution efficiency in different communication nets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48: 211-217. doi:10.1037/h0054191
101. Sheppard, B. and Sherman, D. 1998. The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. The Academy of Management Review, 23: 422-437.
102. Smith, G. 2001. Group development: A review of the literature and a commentary on future research directions. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 3: 14-46.
103. Smith-Jentsch, K., Cannon-Bowers, J., Tannenbaum, S. and Salas, E. 2008. Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39: 303-327.
104. Stewart, G. and Barrick, M. 2000. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. The Academy of Management Journal, 43: 135-148. doi:10.2307/1556372
105. Stout, R., Cannon-Bowers, J., Salas, E. and Milanovich, D. 1999. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41: 61-71. doi:10.1518/001872099779577273
106. Strijbos, J. and Fischer, F. 2007. Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research. Learning and Instruction, 17: 389-393. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.004
107. Strijbos, J., Martens, R., Jochems, W. and Broers, N. 2004. The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35: 195-229. doi:10.1177/1046496403260843
108. Strijbos, J., Martens, R., Jochems, W. and Broers, N. 2007. The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning: A matter of triangulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 353-380. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.016
109. Teasley, S. 1997. "Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration?". In Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essay on situated cognition, Edited by: Resnick, L., Säljö, R., Pontecorvo, C. and Burge, B. 361-384. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
110. Tolmie, A. and Boyle, J. 2000. Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: A review and case study. Computers & Education, 34: 119-140. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00008-7
111. Tuckman, B. and Jensen, M. 1977. Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2: 419-427. doi:10.1177/105960117700200404
112. Underwood, J. 2003. Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. British Journal of Psychology, 94: 319-337. doi:10.1348/000712603767876253
113. Van den Bossche, P. 2006. Minds in teams; The influence of social and cognitive factors on team learning, Maastricht, Germany: Maastricht University.
114. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaars, W., Segers, M. and Kirschner, P. A. 2006. Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research, 37: 490-521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938
115. Wang, S. and Lin, S. 2007. The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 2256-2268. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005
116. Webb, N. and Palincsar, A. 1996. "Group processes in the classroom". In Handbook of educational psychology, Edited by: Berliner, D. and Calfee, M. 841-873. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
117. Wecker, C. and Fischer, F. 2011. From guided to self-regulated performance of domain-general skills: The role of peer monitoring during the fading of instructional scripts. Learning and Instruction, 21: 746-756. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.001
118. Wegerif, R. 1998. The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2: 34-49.
119. Weinberger, A. 2011. Principles of transactive computer-supported collaboration scripts. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6: 189-202.
120. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F. and Mandl, H. 2005. Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33: 1-30. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
121. Weinberger, A. and Fischer, F. 2006. A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46: 71-95. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
122. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K. and Fischer, F. 2007. Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17: 416-426. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
123. Willcoxson, L. 2010. "It's not fair": Assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork. Journal of Management Education, 30: 798-808. doi:10.1177/1052562906287964
124. Wilson, J., Strauss, S. and McEvily, B. 2006. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 99: 16-33. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001
125. Wilson, K., Burke, C., Priest, H. and Salas, E. 2005. Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. BJM Quality & Safety in Health Care, 14: 303-309. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.010090
126. Ying, Z. and Erping, W. 2010. Shared mental models as moderators of team process-performance relationships. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 38: 433-444.
127. Yoo, Y. and Kanawattanachai, P. 1993. Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9: 187-208. doi:10.1108/eb028933
128. Yoon, S. 2006. Two group development patterns of virtual learning teams. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7: 297-312.
129. Zhou, Y. and Wang, E. 2010. Shared mental models as moderators of team process-performance relationships. Social Behavior and Personality, 38: 433-444. doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.4.433