Self-regulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with metacognitive tools

New Science of Learning: Cognition, Computers and Collaboration in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 225-247

  Azevedo, Roger ^a   Johnson, Amy ^a   Chauncey, Amber ^a   Burkett, Candice ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895247496     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Ainsworth S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education 33 131-152
2. Ainsworth S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 16 183-198
3. Aleven V. Stahl E. Schworm S. Fischer F. & Wallace R. M. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research 73(2) 277-320
4. Azevedo R. (2002). Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: Computers as MetaCognitive tools to enhance learning? Instructional Science 30(1) 31-45
5. Azevedo R. (2005a). Computers as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist 40(4) 193-197
6. Azevedo R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist. Special Issue: Computers as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Student Learning 40(4) 199-209
7. Azevedo R. (2007). Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: An introduction. Metacognition and Learning 2(2/3) 57-66
8. Azevedo R. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.) Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 127-156). Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing
9. Azevedo R. (2009). Theoretical methodological and analytical challenges in the research on metacognition and self-regulation: A commentary. Metacognition and Learning 4(1) 87-95
10. Azevedo R. & Hadwin A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science 33 367-379
11. Azevedo R. & Jacobson M. (2008). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: A summary and critical analysis. Educational Technology Research & Development 56 (1) 93-100
12. Azevedo R. & Witherspoon A. M. (2009). Self-regulated use of hypermedia. In D. J. Hacker J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.) Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 319-339). New York NY: Routledge
13. Azevedo R. Greene J. A.,&Moos D. C. (2007). The effect of a human agent's external regulation upon college students' hypermedia learning. Metacognition and Learning 2(2/3) 67-87
14. Azevedo R. Cromley J. G. Winters F. I. Moos D. C. & Greene J. A. (2006). Using computers as metacognitive tools to foster students' self-regulated learning. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning Journal 3 97-104
15. Azevedo R. Witherspoon A. Chauncey A. Burkett C. & Fike A. (2009). MetaTutor: A MetaCognitive tool for enhancing self-regulated learning. In R. Pirrone R. Azevedo & G. Biswas (Eds.) Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems (pp. 14-19). Menlo Park CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Press
16. Azevedo R. Witherspoon A. M. Graesser A. McNamara D. Rus V. Cai Z. et al. (2008). MetaTutor: An adaptive hypermedia system for training and fostering self-regulated learning about complex science topics. Paper to be presented at a Symposium on ITSs with Agents at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Computers in Psychology Chicago
17. Baker L. & Cerro L. (2000). Assessing metacognition in children and adults. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.) Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 99-145). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
18. Biswas G. Leelawong K. Schwartz D. & the Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt. (2005). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19 363-392
19. Boekaerts M. Pintrich P. & Zeidner M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego CA: Academic Press
20. Borkowski J. Chan L. & Muthukrishna N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.) Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1-42). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
21. Brusilovsky P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11 87-110
22. Chi M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14(2) 161-199
23. Chi M. T. H. Siler S. & Jeong H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction 22 363-387
24. Cox R. (1999). Representation construction externalized cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction 9 343-363
25. Derry S. J. & Lajoie S. P. (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum
26. Dunlosky J. & Bjork R. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of metamemory and memory. New York: Taylor & Francis
27. Dunlosky J. & Metcalfe J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications Inc
28. Dunlosky J. Hertzog C. Kennedy M. & Thiede K. (2005). The self-monitoring approach for effective learning. Cognitive Technology 9 4-11
29. Dunlosky J. Rawson K. A. & McDonald S. L. (2002). Influence of practice tests on the accuracy of predicting memory performance for paired associates sentences and text material. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.) Applied metacognition (pp. 68-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. Dunlosky J. Rawson K. A. & Middleton E. L. (2005). What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate- monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language. Special Issue: Metamemory 52 551-565
31. Goldman S. (2003). Learning in complex domains: When and why do multiple representations help? Learning and Instruction 13 239-244
32. Graesser A. C. Jeon M. & Dufty D. (2008). Agent technologies designed to facilitate interactive knowledge construction. Discourse Processes 45 298-322
33. Greene J. A. & Azevedo R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34(1) 18-29
34. Hacker D. J. Dunlosky J. & Graesser A. C. (Eds.) (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
35. Hacker D. Dunlosky J. & Graesser A. (2009) (Eds.) Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York NY: Routledge
36. Jacobson M. (2008). A design framework for educational hypermedia systems: Theory research and learning emerging scientific conceptual perspectives. Educational Technology Research & Development 56 5-28
37. Jonassen D. H. & Land S. M. (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
38. Jonassen D. & Reeves T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 694-719). New York: Macmillan
39. Koedinger K. & Corbett A. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61-77). New York: Cambridge University Press
40. Kozma R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction 13(2) 205-226
41. Lajoie S. P. (1993). Computer environments as cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S. Derry & S. P. Lajoie (Eds.) Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 261-288). Hillside NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc
42. Lajoie S. P. (Ed.) (2000). Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls: Theory change paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
43. Lajoie S. P. & Azevedo R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed. pp. 803-821). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
44. Leelawong K. & Biswas G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 18(3) 181-208
45. Lockl K. & Schneider W. (2002). Developmental trends in children's feeling-of-knowing judgments. International Journal of Behavioral Development 26 327-333
46. Mayer R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press
47. Mayer R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press
48. Metcalfe J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 159-163
49. Newman R. S. (2002). What do I need to do to succeed . . . When I don't understand what I'm doing!?: Developmental influences on students' adaptive help seeking. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.) Development of achievement motivation (pp. 285-306). San Diego CA: Academic Press
50. Niederhauser D. (2008). Educational hypertext. In M. Spector D. Merrill J. van Merriënboer & M. Driscoll (Eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 199-209). New York: Taylor & Francis
51. Paris S. G. & Paris A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 36(2) 89-101
52. Pashler H. Bain P. Bottge B. Graesser A. Koedinger K. McDaniel M. et al. (2007). Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. Washington DC: National Center for Education Research Institute of Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education
53. NCER 2007-2004. Retrieved September 10 2008 from http://ncer.ed.gov
54. Pea R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist 20 167-182
55. Pea R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning education and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(3) 423-451
56. Perkins D. N. (1985). Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology 77(5) 562-571
57. Pintrich P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego CA: Academic Press
58. Pintrich P.,Wolters C. & Baxter G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.) Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
59. Pintrich P. & Zusho A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A.Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.) Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249-284). San Diego CA: Academic Press
60. Pressley M. (2000). Development of grounded theories of complex cognitive processing: Exhaustive within- and between study analyses of think-aloud data. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.) Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 261-296). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
61. Pressley M. & Hilden K. (2006). Cognitive strategies. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.) Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition perception and language (6th ed. pp. 511-556). Hoboken NJ: Wiley
62. Puntambekar S. & Hübscher R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist 40 (1) 1-12
63. Roll I. Aleven V. McLaren B. & Koedinger K. (2007). Designing for metacognition- Applying cognitive tutor principles to metacognitive tutoring. Metacognition and Learning 2(2-3) 125-140
64. Rus V. Lintean M. & Azevedo R. (2009). Automatic detection of student models during prior knowledge activation with MetaTutor. Paper submitted for presentation at the Biennial Meeting on Artificial Intelligence and Education Brighton UK.
65. Schneider W. & Lockl K. (2002). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. In T. J. Perfect & L. B. Schwartz (Eds.) Applied metacognition (pp. 224-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
66. Schneider W. & Lockl K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & R. Bjork (Eds.) Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 391-409). New York: Taylor & Francis
67. Schnotz W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press
68. Schnotz W. & Bannert M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction 13 141-156
69. Schraw G. (2006). Knowledge: Structures and processes. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 245-263). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
70. Schraw G. & Moshman D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review 7 351-371
71. Schunk D. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist 40(2) 85-94
72. Schunk D. (2008). Attributions as motivators of self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.) Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory research and applications (pp. 245-266). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
73. Schunk D. & Zimmerman B. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
74. Schunk D. & Zimmerman B. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory research and applications. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
75. Schwartz D. L. Chase C. Wagster J. Okita S. Roscoe R. Chin D. & Biswas G. (2009). Interactive metacognition: Monitoring and regulating a teachable agent. In D. J.Hacker J.Dunlosky and A. C. Graesser (Eds.) Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 340-359). New York: Routledge
76. Seufert T. Janen I. & Brünken R. (2007). The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation. Computers in Human Behavior 23 1055-1071
77. Shapiro A. (2008). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research & Development 56(1) 29-44
78. Shute V. & Psotka J. (1996). Intelligent tutoring systems: Past present and future. In D. Jonassen (Ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 570-600). New York: Macmillan
79. Shute V. J. & Zapata-Rivera D. (2008). Adaptive technologies. In J. M. Spector D. Merrill J. van Merriënboer & M. Driscoll (Eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed. pp. 277-294). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Taylor & Francis Group
80. Siegler R. S. (2005). Children's learning. American Psychologist 60 769-778
81. Sweller J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction 16(2) 165-169
82. Van Meter P. & Garner J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review 17(4) 285-325
83. VanLehn K. Graesser A. C. Jackson G. T. Jordan P. Olney A. & Rose C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science 31(1) 3-62
84. Veenman M. Van Hout-Wolters B. & Afflerbach P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning 1 3-14
85. Wigfield A. Eccles J. Schiefele U. Roeser R. & Davis-Kean P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon R. Lerner & N. Eisenberg (Eds.) Handbook of child psychology (vol. 3). New York: Wiley
86. Winne P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
87. Winne P. (2005). Key issues on modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review 54(2) 232-238
88. Winne P. H. & Hadwin A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum
89. Winne P. & Hadwin A. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.) Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory research and applications (pp. 297-314). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
90. Winne P. H. & Nesbit J. C. (2009). Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In D. J. Hacker J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.) Handbook of metacognition in Education. (pp. 259-277). New York NY: Routledge
91. Witherspoon A. Azevedo R. & D'Mello S. (2008). The dynamics of self-regulatory processes within self- and externally-regulated learning episodes. In B.Woolf E. Aimeur R. Nkambou,& S. Lajoie (Eds.) Proceedings of the International conference on intelligent tutoring systems: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 5091 pp. 260-269). Berlin: Springer
92. Witherspoon A. Azevedo R. & Cai Z. (2009). Learners' exploratory behavior within MetaTutor. Poster presented at the 14th international conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Brighton UK.
93. Woolf B. (2009). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier
94. Zimmerman B. (2006). Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In K. Ericsson N. Charness P. Feltovich & R. Hoffman (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 705-722). New York: Cambridge University Press
95. Zimmerman B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal 45(1) 166-183
96. Zimmerman B. & Schunk D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
97. Zimmerman B. & Schunk D. (Eds.) (in press). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge