Mechanisms of common ground in case-based web discussions in teacher education

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 247-265

  Mäkitalo, Kati ^a   Häkkinen, Päivi ^a   Leinonen, Piritta ^b   Järvelä, Sanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Common ground; Electronic discussion; Feedback; Grounding; Question; Teacher education; Web based interaction

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

COMMON GROUND; ELECTRONIC DISCUSSION; GROUNDING; QUESTION; TEACHER EDUCATION; WEB-BASED INTERACTION;

INTERNET;

EID: 0142082568     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00112-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allwood J., Nivre J., Ahlsén E. On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Gothenburg papers in theoretical linguistics. vol. 64:1991;Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
2. Baker M., Hansen T., Joiner R., Traum D. The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. Dillenbourg P. Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. 1999;31-63 Pergamon, Amsterdam.
3. Brennan S.E. The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. Fussell S.R., Kreuz R.J. Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication. 1998;201-225 Erlbaum, Mahwal, NJ.
4. Clark H.H., Schaefer F.S. Collaborating on contributions to conversation. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2:1987;1-23.
5. Clark H.H., Schaefer F.S. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science. 13:1989;259-294.
6. Crook C. Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. 1994;Routledge, London.
7. Crook C. Computers in the community of classrooms. Littleton K., Light P. Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction. 1999;102-117 Routledge, London.
8. Cutler R.H. Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Communication and Technology: A Journal for the 21st Century. 3(2):1995;12-32.
9. Dillenbourg P. Introduction: what do you mean by "collaborative learning"? Dillenbourg P. Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. 1999;1-19 Pergamon, Amsterdam.
10. Dillenbourg P., Traum D. Does a shared screen make a shared solution? Hoadly C., Roschelle J. Proceedings of the third conference on computer supported collaborative learning. 1999;127-135 Stanford University, California.
11. Häkkinen P., Arvaja M. Kollaboratiivinen oppiminen teknologiaympäristöissä. [Collaborative learning in technology-supported environments]. Eteläpelto A., Tynjälä P. Oppiminen ja asiantuntijuus. Työelämän ja koulutuksen näkökulmia [Learning and expertise. Aspects of work and education]. 1999;206-221 WSOY, Porvoo.
12. Hara N., Bonk C.J., Angeli C. Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science. 28:2000;115-152.
13. Järvelä S., Hakkarainen K., Lipponen L., Lehtinen E. Creating computer supported collaborative learning in Finnish schools: research perspectives on sociocognitive effects. Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning. 10(2):2000;1-10.
14. Järvelä S., Häkkinen P. The levels of web-based discussions - using perspective-taking theory as an analysis tool. Van Oostendorp H. Cognition in a digital world. 2002;Lawrence Erlbaum. in press.
15. Järvelä S., Häkkinen P. Web-based cases in teaching and learning the quality of discussion and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments. 10(1):2002;1-22.
16. Koschmann T. Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: an introduction. Koschmann T.D. CSCL: theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. 1996;1-24 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
17. McMillan D.W. Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology. 24(4):1996;315-325.
18. Roschelle J., Pea R. Trajectories from today's WWW to a powerful educational infrastructure. Educational Researcher. 28(5):1999;22-25.
19. Rovai A.P. Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education. 3(4):2000;285-297.
20. Saarenkunnas M., Järvelä S., Häkkinen P., Kuure L., Taalas P., Kunelius E. NINTER - networked interaction: theory-based cases in teaching and learning. Learning Environments Research. 3:2000;35-50.
21. Säljö R. Oppimiskäytännöt. Sosiokulttuurinen näkökulma [Practices of learning. Socio-cultural aspect]. 2001;WSOY, Helsinki.
22. Stahl G. Contributions to a theoretical framework of CSCL. Stahl G. Proceedings of computer supported for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community (CSCL 2002). 2002;62-71 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Available at http://www.cscl2002.org/docs/CSCL2002_Proceedings.pdf . Retrieved January 3, 2002.
23. Veerman A. Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation. 2000;Interuniversity Center for Educational Research, Utrecht.
24. Wegerif R. The Social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2(1):1998;34-49.