Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC)

Computers and Education

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 19-36

  Hertz Lazarowitz, Rachel ^a   Bar Natan, Irit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication (CMC); Cooperative learning (CL); Jews and arabs; Students perception on writing (SPWC); Writing development

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COOPERATIVE COMMUNICATION; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ALPHA COEFFICIENTS; COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE LEARNING; JEWS AND ARABS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PEER INTERACTIONS; PORTFOLIO EVALUATION; REPEATED MEASURES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 31244435416     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00019-2     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Almog, T., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1999). Teachers as peer learners: investigation in an advanced technological learning environment. In A. M. O'Donnell, & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bar-Natan, I. (1996). Writing in Computer Communication as an Inter-Cultural Bridge. Paper presented at the 10th Conference of SCRIPT-Special Committee for Research in Processing of Text, Ma'ale Hahamisha, Israel.
3. Bar-Natan, I. (1998). Writing in Learning Environment that Integrate Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) and Literacy Development in Cooperative Learning (ALASH). Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements the M.A. degree. University of Haifa, Israel.
4. Bar-Natan, I., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1996). Computer network between 4th-grade students in the kibbutz and the city: contribution to writing. The Impact of Information Technology-from Practice to Curriculum. An anthology of selected papers presented at the IFIP TC3 WG3.2, Israel, March 1996. 88-95.
5. Bar-Natan, I., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1997). Introducing Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) in ALASH: The case of Jews and Arabs Schools. Paper presented at the 11th Conference of SCRIPT-Special Committee for Research in Processing of Text, Ma'ale Hahamisha, Israel.
6. Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and structure in higher education (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1986). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Berg, Z. L., & Collins, M. P. (1998). The online classroom in K-12. NJ: Hampton Press Inc.
9. Breese, C. (1996). Promise in Impermanence: Children Writing with Unlimited Access to Word Processors. Early Child Development and Care, 118, 67-91. (Pubitemid 126089475)
10. Bresler, L. (1990). Student perceptions of C.M.C.: Roles and experiences. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 9(3), 291- 307.
11. Bruce, B. C., & Rubin, A. (1993). Electronic quills, a situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Bureau, W. E. (1993). Seeing supervision differently: The processes of facilitating change in a veteran teacher's beliefs. Clearinghouse no. EA 024848.
13. Calderon, M. E., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Slavin, R. (1998). Effects of bilingual cooperative integrated reading and composition on student transition from Spanish to English. Elementary School Journal, 99(2), 153-165. (Pubitemid 128460217)
14. Christie, A. (1998). Using Technology to Enhance Literacy in Elementary School Children. In: ECC '98: Proceedings of the National Educating Computing Conference. 19th, San Diego, CA, June 22-24.
15. Cohen, M. S., & Miyake, N. (1986). An intercultural learning network: Coming of age in electronic messaging. Instructional Science, 15, 257-263.
16. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London & New York: Routledge.
17. Curties, P. M., & Curties, K. E. (1995). What 2nd graders taught college students and vice versa. Education Leadership, 53(2), 60-64.
18. Daiute, C. A. (1985). Issues in Using Computers to Socialize the Writing Process. ECT, 33(1), 41-50.
19. Daly, J., & Miller, M. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(1), 249-256.
20. Ezer, H., Mor, N., & Meirav, N. (1996). A Context of literacy and computers for in-service and pre- service teachers: pedagogical content and self-aspects. Paper presented at the 10th Conference of SCRIPT-Special Committee for Research in Processing of Text, Ma'ale Hahamisha, Israel.
21. Fabos, B., & Young, M. D. (1999). Telecommunication in the classroom: rhetoric versus reality. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 217-259.
22. Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57, 481-506.
23. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg, & R. E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Grejda, G. (1992). The effect of word processing and revision patterns on the writing quality of sixth-grade students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50.
25. Gruber, S. (1995). Re: Ways we contribute: students, instructors, and pedagogues in the computer-mediated writing classroom. Computer & Composition, 12, 61-78.
26. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1989). Cooperation and helping in the classroom: A contextual approach. International Journal of Research in Education, 13(1), 113-119.
27. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1992). Understanding students' interactive behavior: Looking at six mirrors of the classroom. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The anatomy of group learning (pp. 71- 102). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1999). Cooperative learning and group-investigation in Israel's' Jewish and Arabs schools: A community approach. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 105-113.
29. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2001). Success For All (SFA) in Israel: A community research and evaluation model. In R. E. Slavin, & N. A. Madden (Eds.), Success for all: research and reform in elementary education (pp. 149-177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Baird, H., Webb, C., & Lazarowitz, R. (1984). Student interaction in science classrooms: The naturalistic study. Science Education, 68(5), 603-619.
31. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Lerner, M., & Schaedel, B. (1996). Learning in the ALASH classroom: Jewish and Arab stu- dents in cooperative-literacy based classroom. Paper presented at the 10th conference of SCRIPT-Special Committee for Research in Processing of Text, Ma'ale Hahamisha, Israel.
32. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Schaedel, B., & Lerner, M. (1996). ALASH-Cooperative learning in literacy: Achievements in reading and writing. Helkat Lashon. The Israeli Journal of Linguistic Education, 22, 85-113 (Hebrew).
33. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Schaedel, B., & Tovly E. (1997). Success For All (SFA) in Acre-Israel. Effects of Hebrew and Arabic Reading and Writing: Initial findings. In: B. Slavin (symposium organizer), International Adaptation of Success For All. The American Educational Research Association meeting. Chicago, March 24-28.
34. Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35. Kerlitz-Nisim, T. (1998). Effect of Peer-Feedback on Writing in Literacy-Oriented classrooms. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements the M.A. Degree. University of Haifa, Israel.
36. Lam, F. S., & Pennington, M. C. (1995). The Computer vs. the Pen: A comparative study of word- processing in the Hong-Kong secondary classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(1), 75-92.
37. Lenk, C. (1989). Connecting Kids: Telecommunications in the Science Classroom. In B. Feinstein, & B. Kurshan (Eds.), Proceeding of the International Symposium on Telecommunications in Education: Learners in the Global Village, Jerusalem, Israel. Oregon: International Society for Technology in Education.
38. Levin, J. A., Reil, M., Brown, R. D., & Boruta, M. J. (1983). Mukutuk meets jacuzzi, computer networks and elementry school writers.. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language, revision and response (pp. 48- 65). Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.
39. Linstone, H. A. (1994). The challenge of the 21st century: managing technology and ourselves in a shrinking world. New York: State University of New York Press.
40. Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response: conversations of high- And low- Apprehensive Writers. Written Communication, 8(4), 509-532.
41. Madden, N., Farnish, A. M., Slavin, R., & Stevens, R. (1993). CIRC Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition- Teacher's Manual Writing. Center for Social Organization of Schools. The Johns Hopkins University.
42. Marom, A. (1997). Use of Strategies in the Writing Process. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements the M.A. degree. University of Haifa, Israel.
43. Matzko, M. (1996). Feminist approaches to the study of women and communications technologies. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA).
44. Miller, L., & Olson, J. (1994). Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(2), 121-141.
45. Mills, S. (1999). Integrating computer technology in classrooms: Teachers' concerns when implementing an integrated learning system. SITE 99': Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 10th, San Antonio, TX February 28-March 4.
46. Pan, A. C., & Zibikowski, J. M. (1997). Emerging technology for writing instruction: New direction for teachers. Computers in the Schools, 13(3-4), 103-117.
47. Peled, N. (Ed.) (1996). From speech to writing. Jerusalem Carmel Publication (Hebrew).
48. Pope, C. (1999). Technology in language arts teacher education. Clearing House, 72(4), 196-197.
49. Sanaoui, R., & Lapkin, S. (1992). A case study of an FSL senior secondary course integrating computer networking. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 48(3), 525-552.
50. Schonman, S. (1995). Theatre of the classroom. Tel Aviv: Cherikover (Hebrew).
51. Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 91-100.
52. Singhal, M. (1998). Computer-mediated communication (CMC): Technology for enhancing foreign language/culture education. On-Call, 12(1), 10-15.
53. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2001). Success for all: research and reform in elementary education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Solomon, G. (1996). Learning with technology. In: Mevarech, Z. & Hativa, N. (Eds). The Computer at School. Schocken publication. (Hebrew).
55. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in C.M.C.. Communication Research, 21(4), 427-459.
56. Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433-454.
57. Volman, M. (1997). Gender-related effects of computer and information literacy education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(3), 315-328.
58. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
59. Zimmerman, B., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862.