A discipline-based teaching and learning center: A model for professional development

A Discipline-Based Teaching and Learning Center: A Model for Professional Development

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-226

  Marbach Ad, Gili ^a   Egan, Laura C ^a   Thompson, Katerina V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955688264     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01652-8     Document Type: Book

References (371)

1. Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 394-405.
2. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Association of American Universities (AAU). (2011). Five year initiative for improving undergraduate STEM education. http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=12590.
4. Austin, A. E. (1994). Understanding and assessing faculty cultures and climates. In M. K. Kinnick (Ed.), Providing useful information for deans and department chairs (New Directions for Institutional Research, pp. 47-63). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Austin, A. E. (1996). Institutional and departmental cultures and the relationship between teaching and research. In J. Braxton (Ed.), Faculty teaching and research: Is there a conflict? (New Directions for Institutional Research, pp. 57-66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94-122.
7. Austin, A. E. (2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. A paper commissioned by the National Academies National Research Council Board on Science Education. http://dev.tidemarkinstitute.org/sites/default/files/documents/Use %20of%20Evidence%20in%20Changinge%20Undergraduate%20Science%20Education%20%28Austin%29.pdf.
8. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Rinehart & Winston.
9. Bensimon, E. M., Ward, K., & Sanders, R. (2000). The department chair’s role in developing new faculty into teacher and scholars. Bolton, MA: Anker.
10. Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman.
11. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Chu, D. (2006). The department chair primer: Leading and managing academic departments. Bolton, MA: Anker.
13. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowledge: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272.
14. Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogical creed. School Journal, 54, 77-80.
15. Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279.
16. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London, UK: Falmer Press.
17. Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: A status report for the National Academies National Research Council Board on Science Education. Commissioned paper for the national academies workshop: Evidence on promising practices in undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education.
19. Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293-306.
20. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of National Academic Science U S A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
21. Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011). Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 175-186.
22. Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D, Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 132-139.
23. Gates, S. J., & Mirkin, C. (2012). Engage to excel. Science, 335(6076), 1545.
24. Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6), 575-591.
25. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and its impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
26. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from www.phd-survey.org.
27. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan R, Wood, W B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.
29. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching: W.H. Freeman & Company in collaboration with Roberts & Company Publishers.
30. Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273-292.
31. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984.
32. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics, 76(1), 70-91.
33. Injaian, L., Smith, A. C., German Shipley, J., Marbach-Ad, G., & Fredericksen, B. (2011). Antiviral drug research proposal activity. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12, 18-28.
34. Jensen, J. L., & Lawson, A. (2011). Effects of collaborative group composition and inquiry instruction on reasoning gains and achievement in undergraduate biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 64-73.
35. Kitchen, E., Bell, J. D., Reeve, S., Sudweeks, R. R., & Bradshaw, W. S. (2003). Teaching cell biology in the large-enrollment classroom: Methods to promote analytical thinking and assessment of their effectiveness. CBE Life Sciences Education, 2, 180-194.
36. Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. CBE Life Sciences Education, 4, 298-310.
37. Leaming, D. R. (1998). Academic leadership: A practical guide to chairing the academic department. Bolton, MA: Anker.
38. Lederman, N. G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Reconceptualizing secondary science teacher education. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht, The Nether-lands: Kluwer.
39. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
40. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
41. Massy, W., Wilger, A., & Colbeck, C. (1994). Department cultures and teaching quality: Overcoming “hallowed” collegiality. Change, 26, 11-20.
42. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies.
43. Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284.
44. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Routledge.
45. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf.
46. Senkevitch, E., Marbach-Ad, G., Smith, A. C., & Song, S. (2011). Using primary literature to engage student learning in scientific research and writing. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 12, 144-151.
47. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
48. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 3-36). York, UK: Macmillan.
49. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
50. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.
51. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 55-63.
52. Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (Vol. 49). Berlin, Germany/New York, NY: Springer.
53. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 99-110.
54. Udovic, D., Morris, D., Dickman, A., Postlethwait, J., & Wetherwax, P. (2002). Workshop biology: Demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. Bioscience, 52, 272-281.
55. van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695.
56. Walker, J. D., Cotner, S. H., Baepler, P. M., & Decker, M. D. (2008). A delicate balance: Integrating active learning into a large lecture course. CBE Life Sciences Education, 7, 361-367.
57. Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change. http://www. changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202007/index.html.
58. Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities: A case study in progress. Change. http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back %20Issues/March-April%202010/transforming-science-full.html.
59. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
60. Angelo, T., & Cross, P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
62. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Rinehart & Winston.
63. Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: Teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 207-225.
64. Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17, 48-62.
65. Birenbaum, M. E., & Dochy, F. J. (1996). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
66. Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-73.
67. Blackmore, J. A. (2005). A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 19, 218-232.
68. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
69. Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman.
70. Brandwein, P. F. (1977). What is curriculum? National Elementary Principal, 57(1), 10-11.
71. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Bush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2008). Science faculty with education specialties. Science, 322, 1795-1796.
73. Cathcart, L. A., Stieff, M., Marbach-Ad, G., Smith, A. C., & Frauwirth, K. A. (2010). Using knowledge space theory to analyze concept maps. Paper presented at the 9th international conference of the learning sciences.
74. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69, 145-186.
75. Duncan, R. G., & Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science education. Science learning progressions. Science, 339(6118), 396-397. doi:10.1126/science.1228692.
76. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
77. Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., & Jardeleza, S. E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. Biosciene, 61(7), 550-558.
78. Ebert-May, D., & Hodder, J. (2008). Pathways to scientific teaching. Sunderland, CT: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
79. Egan, K. (2003). What is curriculum? Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 9-16.
80. Fisher, K. M. (1983). Amino acids and translation: a misconception in biology. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
81. Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Curriculum coherence and learning progressions. In B. J. Fraser, K. T. Kenneth, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 783-798). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
82. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of National Academic Science U S A 111(23), 8410-8415. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.1319030111.
83. Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D, Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 132-139.
84. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
85. Graff, N. (2011). An effective and agonizing way to learn: Backwards design and new teachers’ preparation for planning curriculum. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 151-168.
86. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.
87. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. New York, NY/Englewood, CO: W.H. Freeman & Company in collaboration with Roberts & Company Publishers.
88. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984.
89. Hutchings, P. (1996). The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects. InnovativeHigher Education, 20, 221-234.
90. Kauffman, D., Moore, J. S., Kardos, S., Liu, E., & Peske, H. (2002). Lost at sea: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. The Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273-300.
91. Kember, D., & Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28(5), 469-490.
92. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ/Cambridge, UK: Prentice Hall.
93. Kohut, G. F., Burnap, C., & Yon, M. G. (2007). Peer observation of teaching: Perceptions of the observer and the observed. College Teaching, 55(1), 19-25.
94. Krause, S. J., Kelly, A., Tasooji, J., Corkins, B. D., & Purzer, S. (2010). Effect of pedagogy on conceptual change in an introductory materials science course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 869-879.
95. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
96. Marbach-Ad, G. (2009). From misconceptions to concept inventories. Focus on MicrobiologyEducation, 15(2), 4-6.
97. Marbach-Ad, G., Briken, V., El-Sayed, N., Frauwirth, K., Fredericksen, B, Hutcheson, S, Smith, A. C. (2009). Assessing student understanding of host pathogen interactions using a concept inventory. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 10, 43-50.
98. Marbach-Ad, G., Briken, V., Frauwirth, K., Gao, L. Y., Hutcheson, S. W., Joseph, S W, Smith, A. C. (2007). A faculty team works to create content linkages among various courses to increase meaningful learning of targeted concepts of microbiology. CBE life sciences education, 6(2), 155-162.
99. Marbach-Ad, G., McAdams, K., Benson, S., Briken, V., Cathcart, L., Chase, M, Smith, A. (2010). A model for using a concept inventory as a tool for students’ assessment and faculty professional development. CBE Life Science Education, 9, 408-436.
100. Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 854-870.
101. Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200-205.
102. Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic achievement: Research on what works in schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
103. Middle States Commission on Higher Education. (2007). Student learning assessment: Options and resources (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
104. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2005). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press: An Elsevier Imprint.
105. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. London, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress.
106. NRC. (2003). National Research Council, Bio 2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
107. Paulson, M. B. (2002). Evaluating teaching performance. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 5-18.
108. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Routledge.
109. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional strategies. InstructionalScience, 18, 119-144.
110. Schneps, M. H., & Sadler, P. M. (Writers). (2003). A private universe. Minds of our own. Available in the form of DVD, an electronic source.
111. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-31.
112. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10, 55-63.
113. Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-) understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules. New York, NY: Teachers College.
114. Stieff, M. (2005). Connected chemistry-A novel modeling environment for the chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(3), 489-493.
115. Suskie, L. (2010). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
116. Thijs, G. D., & van den Berg, E. (1993, August 1-4). Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions. Paper presented at the third international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
117. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37-54.
118. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
119. Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (2010). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in college (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
120. Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change. http://www. changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202007/index.html.
121. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
122. Wyse, S. A., Long, T. M., & Ebert-May, D. (2014). Teaching assistant professional development in biology: Designed for and driven by multidimensional data. CBE Life Science Education, 13, 212-223.
123. Yon, M., Burnap, C., & Kohut, G. (2002). Evidence of effective teaching perceptions of peer reviewers. College Teaching, 50, 104-110.
124. AAMC-HHMI Committee. (2009). Scientific foundations for future physicians. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Scientific %20Foundations%20for%20Future%20Physicians%20%20Report2%202009.pdf.
125. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
126. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94-122.
127. Austin, A. E. (2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. A paper commissioned by the National Academies National Research Council Board on Science Education. http://dev.tidemarkinstitute.org/sites/default/files/documents/Use %20of%20Evidence%20in%20Changinge%20Undergraduate%20Science%20Education%20%28Austin%29.pdf.
128. Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research. New York, NY: Springer.
129. Austin, A. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & McDaniels, M. (2007). Understanding new faculty: Background, aspirations, challenges, and growth. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 39-89). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
130. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Rinehart & Winston.
131. Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman Inc.
132. Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil Nimus. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
133. Boice, R. (2011, June.). Improving teaching and writing by mastering basic imagination skills. Paper presented at the Lilly conference on College & University Teaching, Washington, DC.
134. Bouwma-Gearhart, J. L., & Schmid, S. E. (2012, April). Mixed-methods study investigating research university STEM faculty motivation to engage in teaching professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
135. Boyer Commission on Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
136. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). The design of learning environments: Assessment-centered environments. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
137. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
138. BWF, & HHMI. (2006). Making the right moves. A practical guide to scientific management for postdocs and new faculty (2nd ed.). Research Triangle Park, NC: Burroughs Welcome Fund and Howard Hughes Medical Institution.
139. Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205.
140. Cole, N. (1991). The impact of science assessment on classroom practice. In G. Kulm & S. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 97-106). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
141. Cox, M. D. (1995). The development of new and junior faculty. In W. A. Wright (Ed.), Teaching improvement practices: Successful strategies for higher education. Bolton, MA: Anker.
142. Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogical creed. School Journal, 54, 77-80.
143. Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123-182.
144. Felder, R. M. (1993). Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.
145. Fisher, K. M. (1983). Amino acids and translation: A misconception in biology. Paper presented at the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
146. Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011). Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10, 175-186.
147. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
148. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from www. phd-survey.org.
149. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.
150. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Company in collaboration with Roberts & Company Publishers.
151. Injaian, L., Smith, A. C., German Shipley, J., Marbach-Ad, G., & Fredericksen, B. (2011). Antiviral drug research proposal activity. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12, 18-28.
152. Luft, J. A., Kurdziel, J. P., Roehrig, G. H., & Turner, J. (2004). Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science laboratories at a doctoral/research university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 211-233.
153. Marbach-Ad, G., Schaefer, K. L., & Thompson, K. V. (2012). Faculty teaching philosophies, reported practices, and concerns inform the design of professional development activities of a disciplinary teaching and learning center. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 4, 119-137.
154. Marbach-Ad, G., Schaefer Ziemer, K. L., Thompson, K. V., & Orgler, M. (2013). New instructor teaching experience in a research-intensive university. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 5, 49-90.
155. Marbach-Ad, G., Shaefer-Ziemer, K., Orgler, M., & Thompson, K. (2014). Science teaching beliefs and reported approaches within a research university: Perspectives from faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(2).
156. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 226-232.
157. Nyquist, J. D., Manning, L., Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Sprague, J., Fraser, P. K., Woodford, B. (1999). On the road to becoming a professor: The graduate student experience. Change, 31(3), 18-27.
158. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Routledge.
159. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf.
160. Quimby, B. B., McIver, K. S., Marbach-Ad, G., & Smith, A. C. (2011). Investigating how microbes respond to their environment: Bringing current research into pathogenic microbiology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12, 176-184.
161. Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments (pp. 37-76). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
162. Reybold, L. E. (2003). Pathways to the professorate: The development of faculty identity in education. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 235-252.
163. Senkevitch, E., Marbach-Ad, G., Smith, A. C., & Song, S. (2011). Using primary literature to engage student learning in scientific research and writing. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 12, 144-151.
164. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
165. Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 4, 1-98.
166. Svinicki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2010). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
167. Szu, E., Nandagopal, K., Shavelson, R. J., Lopez, E. J., Penn, J. H., Scharberg, M., & Hill, G. W. (2011). Understanding academic performance in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(9), 1238-1242.
168. Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2002). Approaches to cell biology teaching: A primer on standards. Cell Biology Education, 1(4), 95-100. doi:10.1187/cbe.02-09-0046.
169. Thijs, G. D., & van den Berg, E. (1993, August 1-4). Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions. Paper presented at the third international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
170. van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
171. Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (2010). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in college (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
172. Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change. http://www. changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202007/index.html.
173. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
174. Wood, W. B. (2009). Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 25, 93-112. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio. 24.110707.175306.
175. Allen, M. J. (2003). Assessing academic programs in higher education. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
176. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
177. Ash, D., Brown, C., Kluger-Bell, B., & Hunter, L. (2009). Creating hybrid communities using inquiry as professional development for college science faculty. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(6), 68-76.
178. Austin, A. E. (2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. A paper commissioned by the National Academies National Research Council Board on Science Education. http://dev.tidemarkinstitute.org/sites/default/files/documents/Use %20of%20Evidence%20in%20Changinge%20Undergraduate%20Science%20Education%20%28Austin%29.pdf.
179. Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2013). The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 133, 85-97.
180. Austin, A. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & McDaniels, M. (2007). Understanding new faculty: Background, aspirations, challenges, and growth. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 39-89). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
181. Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2012). Engaging STEM faculty while attending to professional realities: An exploration of successful postsecondary STEM education reform at five SMTI institutions. APLU/SMTI paper 5. Washington, DC.
182. Cathcart, L. A., Stieff, M., Marbach-Ad, G., Smith, A. C., & Frauwirth, K. A. (2010). Using knowledge space theory to analyze concept maps. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
183. Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 5-23.
184. Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2008). Barriers and promises in STEM reform. Paper presented at the commissioned paper for National Academies of Science Workshop on linking evidence and promising practices in STEM undergraduate education, Washington, DC.
185. Dawkins, P. W. (2006). Faculty development opportunities and learning communities. In N. Simpson & J. Layne (Eds.), Student learning communities, faculty learning communities, & faculty development (pp. 63-80). Stillwater, OK: New Forum.
186. Diamond, R. M. (2004). The usefulness of structured mid-term feedback as a catalyst for change in higher education classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(3), 217-231.
187. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: A status report for the National Academies National Research Council Board on Science Education. Commissioned paper for the National Academies Workshop: Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education.
188. Finelli, C. J., Daly, S. R., & Richardson, K. M. (2014). Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence. Journal of Engineering Education - Special Issue on the Complexities of Transforming Engineering Higher Education, 103(2), 331-361.
189. Finelli, C. J., Pinder-Grover, T., & Wright, M. C. (2011). Consultations on teaching. Using student feedback for instructional improvement. In C. Cook & M. Kaplan (Eds.), Advancing the culture of teaching at a research university: How a teaching center can make a difference (pp. 65-79). Herndon, VA: Stylus.
190. Finkelstein, N. D., & Pollock, S. J. (2005). Replicating and understanding successful innovations: Implementing tutorials in introductory physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1(1), 010101.
191. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87-100.
192. Graham, R. (2012). Achieving excellence in engineering education: The ingredients of successful change. London, UK: The Royal Academy of Engineering.
193. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching: W.H. Freeman & Company in collaboration with Roberts & Company Publishers.
194. Hativa, N. (1995). The department-wide approach to improving faculty instruction in higher-education: Qualitative evaluation. Research in Higher Education, 36(4), 377-413.
195. Henderson, C., Beach, A., Finkelstein, N., & Larson, R. S. (2008). Preliminary categorization of literature on promoting change in undergraduate STEM. Paper presented at the Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM symposium, Augusta, MI.
196. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2011, February 7-8). Increasing the impact and diffusion of STEM education innovations. Paper presented at the National Academy of Engineering Forum - The impact and diffusion of transformative engineering education innovations, New Orleans, LA.
197. Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). The use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020104.
198. Hora, M. T. (2012). Organizational factors and instructional decision-making: A cognitive perspective. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 207-235.
199. Hunt, N. (2003). Does mid-semester feedback make a difference? The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 13-20.
200. Injaian, L., Smith, A. C., German Shipley, J., Marbach-Ad, G., & Fredericksen, B. (2011). Antiviral drug research proposal activity. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12, 18-28.
201. Knapper, C., & Piccinin, S. (1999). Consulting about teaching: An overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 79, 3-7.
202. Kressel, K., Bailey, J. R., & Forman, S. G. (1999). Psychological consultation in higher education: Lessons from a university faculty development center. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 10(1), 51-82.
203. Lakshamanan, A., Heath, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 534-551.
204. Layne, J., & Froyd, J. (2006). Faculty learning communities: Engaging faculty on the topic of learning. In N. Simpson & J. Layne (Eds.), Student learning communities, Faculty learning communities, & faculty development (pp. 81-102). Stillwater, OK: New Forum.
205. Lazerson, M., Wagener, U., & Shumanis, N. (2000). Teaching and learning in higher education, 1980-2000. Change, 32, 12-19.
206. Marbach-Ad, G., Briken, V., El-Sayed, N., Frauwirth, K., Fredericksen, B., Hutcheson, S.,::: Smith, A. C. (2009). Assessing student understanding of host pathogen interactions using a concept inventory. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 10, 43-50.
207. Marbach-Ad, G., Briken, V., Frauwirth, K., Gao, L. Y., Hutcheson, S. W., Joseph, S. W., Smith, A. C. (2007). A faculty team works to create content linkages among various courses to increase meaningful learning of targeted concepts of microbiology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 155-162.
208. Marbach-Ad, G., McAdams, K., Benson, S., Briken, V., Cathcart, L., Chase, M., Smith, A. (2010). A model for using a concept inventory as a tool for students’ assessment and faculty professional development. CBE Life Science Education, 9, 408-416.
209. Marbach-Ad, G., Schaefer Ziemer, K. L., Thompson, K. V., & Orgler, M. (2013). New instructor teaching experience in a research-intensive university. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 5, 49-90.
210. Marbach-Ad, G., Shaefer-Ziemer, K., Orgler, M., & Thompson, K. (2014). Science teaching beliefs and reported approaches within a research university: Perspectives from faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(2).
211. McKenna, A. F., Froyd, J., King, C. J., Litzinger, T., & Seymour, E. (2011, February 7-8). The complexities of transforming engineering higher education. Paper presented at the National Academy of Engineering Forum - The impact and diffusion of transformative engineering education innovations, New Orleans, LA.
212. McShannon, J., Hynes, P., Nirmalakhandan, N., Venkataramana, G., Ricketts, C., Ulery, A., & Steiner, R. (2006). Gaining retention and achievement for students program: A faculty development program. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132, 204-208.
213. Nelson, K. C., Marbach-Ad, G., Thompson, K. V., Shields, P., & Fagan, W. F. (2009). MathBench biology modules: Web-based math for all biology undergraduates. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38, 34-39.
214. Penny, A. R., & Coe, R. (2004). Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 215-253.
215. Quimby, B. B., McIver, K. S., Marbach-Ad, G., & Smith, A. C. (2011). Investigating how microbes respond to their environment: Bringing current research into pathogenic microbiology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12, 176-184.
216. Redish, E. F., Bauer, C., Carleton, K. L., Cooke, T. J., Cooper, M., Crouch, C. H., Zia, Z. (2014). NEXUS/Physics: An interdisciplinary repurposing of physics for biologists. American Journal of Physics, 82, 368-377.
217. Senkevitch, E., Marbach-Ad, G., Smith, A. C., & Song, S. (2011). Using primary literature to engage student learning in scientific research and writing. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 12, 144-151.
218. Silverthorn, D. U., Thorn, P. M., & Svinicki, M. D. (2006). It’s difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the integrative themes in physiology curriculum module project. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 204-214.
219. Singer, S. (2008, June 30). Linking evidence and learning goals. Paper presented at the National Academies of Sciences. Workshop - Evidence on promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Education, workshop 1, Washington, DC.
220. Sirum, K., Madigan, D. L., & Klionsky, D. (2009). Enabling a culture of change: A life sciences faculty learning community promotes scientific teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38, 38-44.
221. Sorcinelli, M. D. (1988). Satisfaction and concerns of new university teachers. In J. D. Kurfiss (Ed.), To improve the academy (pp. 121-131). Stillwater, OK: POD/New Forums Press.
222. Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Addy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker.
223. Tagg, J. (2010). Teachers as students: Changing the cognitive economy through professional development. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 2, 7-35.
224. Thompson, K. V., Chmielewski, J. A., Gaines, M. S., Hrycyna, C. A., LaCourse, W. R., & Bauerle, C. (2013). Competency-based reforms of the undergraduate biology curriculum: Integrating the physical and biological sciences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12, 162-167.
225. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91.
226. Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (2010). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in college (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
227. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
228. Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities: A case study in progress. Change.http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back %20Issues/March-April%202010/transforming-science-full.html.
229. AAMC-HHMI Committee. (2009). Scientific foundations for future physicians. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges. members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Scientific %20Foundations%20for%20Future%20Physicians%20%20Report2%202009.pdf.
230. Addy, T. M., & Blanchard, M. R. (2010). The problem with reform from the bottom up: Instructional practices and teacher beliefs of graduate teaching assistants following a reform-minded university teacher certificate programme. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1045-1071.
231. Alvine, A., Judson, T. W., Schein, M., & Yoshida, T. (2007). What graduate students (and the rest of us) can learn from lesson study. College Teaching, 55(3), 109-113.
232. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
233. Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Oxford, England: Sage.
234. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94-122.
235. Austin, A. E. (2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. A paper commissioned by the National Academies National Research Council Board on Science Education. dev.tidemarkinstitute.org/sites/default/files/documents/Use%20of%20Evidence %20in%20Changinge%20Undergraduate%20Science%20Education%20%28Austin%29.pdf.
236. Austin, A. E., Campa, H., Pfund, C., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Mathieu, R., & Stoddart, J. (2009). Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 117, 83-95.
237. Austin, A. E., Connolly, M. R., & Colbeck, C. L. (2008). Strategies for preparing integrated faculty: The center for the integration of research, teaching, and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 113, 69-81.
238. Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research. New York, NY: Springer.
239. Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Enhancing higher order thinking skills among inservice teachers via embedded assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 459-474.
240. Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman Inc.
241. Bond-Robinson, J., & Rodriques, R. (2006). Catalyzing graduate teaching assistants’ laboratory teaching through research. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(2), 313-323.
242. Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Millar, S., Barger, S., & Connolly, M. (2007). Doctoral and postdoctoral STEM teaching-related professional development: Effects on training and early career periods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from www.cirtl.net/files/Bouwma-Gearhart_Doctoral%20and %20Postdoctoral%20STEM_2007.pdf.
243. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
244. Bretz, L. S. (2005). All students are not created equal: Learning styles in the chemistry classroom. In N. Pienta, M. Cooper, & T. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemist’s guide to effective teaching (pp.28-40). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
245. Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and::: tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sciences Education, 11, 339-346.
246. Caserio, M., Coppola, B. P., Lichter, R. L., Bentley, A. K., Bowman, M. D., Mangham, A. N.,::: Seeman, J. I. (2004). Responses to changing needs in U.S. doctoral education. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 1698-1703.
247. Cloud-Hansen, K. A., Kuehner, J. N., Tong, L. L., Miller, S., & Handelsman, J. (2008). Money, sex, and drugs: A case study to teach the genetics of antibiotic resistance. Cbe-Life Sciences Education, 7(3), 302-309. doi:10.1187/cbe.07-12-0099.
248. DeChenne, S. E., Enochs, L. G., & Needham, M. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduate teaching assistants teaching self-Efficacy. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(4), 102-123.
249. Dotger, S. (2011). Exploring and developing graduate teaching assistants’ pedagogies via lesson study. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 157-169.
250. Felder, R. M. (1993). Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of CollegeScience Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.
251. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
252. Feldon, D. F., Peugh, J., Timmerman, B. E., Maher, M. A., Hurst, M., Strickland, D., Stiegelmeyer, C. (2011). Graduate students’ teaching experiences improve their methodological research skills. Science, 333(6045), 1037-1039. doi:10.1126/science.1204109.
253. Fisher, K. M. (1983). Amino acids and translation: a misconception in biology. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
254. French, D., & Russell, C. (2002). Do graduate teaching assistants benefit from teaching inquiry-based laboratories? Bioscience, 52(11), 1036-1041.
255. Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2011). Pedagogical preparation of the science graduate teaching assistant: Challenges and Implications. Science Educator, 20(2), 31-41.
256. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic books.
257. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83-97.
258. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from www.phd-survey.org.
259. Greenler, R., & Barnicle, K. (2011). Building an online professional learning community. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI. Retrieved from www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/46079_2011. pdf.
260. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Wood, W. B.(2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.
261. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching: W.H. Freeman & Company in collaboration with Roberts & Company Publishers.
262. Hardré, P. L., & Burris, A. O. (2012). What contributes to teaching assistant development: Differential responses to key design features. Instructional Science, 40(1), 93-118.
263. Herrington, D. G., & Nakhleh, M. B. (2003). What defines effective chemistry laboratory instruction? Teaching assistant and student perspectives. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(10), 1197-1205.
264. Hollar, K., Carlson, V., & Spencer, P. (2000). 1 C 1 D 3: Unanticipated benefits of a co-facilitation model for training teaching assistants. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 7(3), 173-181.
265. Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Educational psychology interactive, 3(2).
266. Injaian, L., Smith, A. C., German Shipley, J., Marbach-Ad, G., & Fredericksen, B. (2011). Antiviral drug research proposal activity. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12, 18-28.
267. Kendall, K. D., Niemiller, M. L., Dittrich-Reed, D., Chick, L. D., WIlmoth, L., Milt, A., Schussler, E. E. (2013). Departments can develop teaching identities of graduate students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(12), 316-317.
268. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
269. Lawrence, G. D. (2009). People types & tiger stripes: Using psychological type to help students discover their unique potential (4th ed.). Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
270. Leman, T., & Acar, S. B. (2012). Jigsaw cooperative learning: Acid-base theories. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 307-313.
271. Lombardi, S. A., Hicks, R. E., Thompson, K. V., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2014). Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. Advances in Physiology Education, 38(1),80-86. doi:10.1152/advan.00154.2012.
272. Luft, J. A., Kurdziel, J. P., Roehrig, G. H., & Turner, J. (2004). Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science laboratories at a doctoral/research university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 211-233.
273. Luo, J., Bellows, L., & Grady, M. (2000). Classroom management issues for teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 353-383.
274. Marbach-Ad, G. (2009). From misconceptions to concept inventories. Focus on Microbiology Education, 15(2), 4-6.
275. Marbach-Ad, G., McAdams, K., Benson, S., Briken, V., Cathcart, L., Chase, M., et al. (2010). A model for using a concept inventory as a tool for students’ assessment and faculty professional development. CBE Life Science Education, 9(408-436).
276. Marbach-Ad, G., Rotbain, Y., & Stavy, R. (2005). Using a bead model to teach high-school molecular biology. School Science Review, 87, 39-52.
277. Marbach-Ad, G., Rotbain, Y., & Stavy, R. (2008). Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 273-292. doi:10.1002/tea.20222.
278. Marbach-Ad, G., Schaefer, K. L., Kumi, B. C., Friedman, L. A., Thompson, K. V., & Doyle, M. P. (2012). Development and evaluation of a prep course for chemistry graduate teaching assistants at a research university. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 865-872.
279. Marbach-Ad, G., Shields, P. A., Kent, B. W., Higgins, B., & Thompson, K. V. (2010). Team teaching of a prep course for graduate teaching assistants. Studies in Graduate and Professional Students Development, 13, 44-58.
280. Marbach-Ad, G., Schussler, E. E., Miller, K., Ferzli, M., & Read, Q. D. (2015, April). Professional development for biology graduate teaching assistants: Status, challenges and needs. Poster presented in the National Association for Research in Science Teaching [NARST] annual meeting, Chicago, IL.
281. Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000a). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 854-870.
282. Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000b). Good science begins with good questions: Answering the need for high-level questions in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(3), 192-195.
283. Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200-205.
284. Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2001). The use of E-mail and in-class writing to facilitate student-instructor interaction in large-enrolment traditional and active learning classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 109-119.
285. Marbach-Ad, G., Yarden, H., & Gershoni, J. M. (2007). Using the concept map technique as diagnostic and instructional tool in introductory cell biology to college freshmen. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 3(3), 163-177.
286. Marbach-Ad, G., Katz, P., & Thompson, K. V. (in press). A disciplinary teaching certificate program for science graduate students. Journal of Teaching and Learning Centers.
287. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 226-232.
288. McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. D. (2014). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (14th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
289. Micomonaco, J. P. (2011). CIRTL: Impacting STEM education through graduate student professional development. Paper presented at the 118th Annual American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia. Retrieved from tinyurl.com/8xcflgc.
290. Novak, G. N., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning and web technology. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
291. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. London, England: CambridgeUniversity Press.
292. Nyquist, J. D., Manning, L., Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Sprague, J., Fraser, P. K., Woodford, B (1999). On the road to becoming a professor: The graduate student experience. Change, 31(3), 18-27.
293. Phillips, A. R., Robertson, A. L., Batzli, J., Harris, M., & Miller, S. (2008). Aligning goals, assessments, and activities: An approach to teaching PCR and gel electrophoresis. CBE Life Sciences Education, 7(1), 96-106. doi:10.1187/cbe.07-07-0052.
294. Poundstone, W. (1989). Labyrinths of reason: Paradox, puzzles, and the frailty of knowledge. NewYork, NY: Anchor.
295. Prieto, L. R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1994). The relationship of prior training and previous teaching experience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 35(4), 481-497.
296. Prieto, L. R., Yamokoski, C. A., & Meyers, S. A. (2007). Teaching assistant training and supervision: An examination of optimal delivery modes and skill emphases. The Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1), 33-43.
297. Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2005). Understanding molecular genetics through a drawing-based activity. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4), 174-178.
298. Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2006). Effect of bead and illustrations models on high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 500-529. doi:10.1002/tea.20144.
299. Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2008). Using a computer animation to teach high school molecular biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 49-58. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9080-4.
300. Rotbain, Y., Stavy, R., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2008). The effect of different molecular models on high school students’ conceptions of molecular genetics. The Science Education Review, 7(2), 59-64.
301. Rushin, J. W., De Saix, J., Lumsden, A., Streubel, D. P., Summers, G., & Bernson, C. (1997). Graduate teaching assistant training: A basis for improvement of college biology teaching and faculty development. Journal of American Biology Teacher, 59(2), 86-90.
302. Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PloS One, 7(5), e36307.
303. Schonborn, K. J., & Anderson, T. R. (2008). Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap - Conceptual understanding, part 2: Assessing and developing student knowledge. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(5), 372-379. doi:10.1002/Bmb.20230.
304. Schussler, E. E., Torres, L. E., Rybczynski, S., Gerald, G. W., Sarkar, P., Shahi, D., Osman, M. A. (2008). Transforming the teaching of science graduate students through reflection. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 32-36.
305. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
306. hulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-31.
307. Singh, S. (1997). Fermat’s Enigma: The epic quest to solve the world’s greatest mathematical problem. New York, NY: Walker and Company.
308. Sinnott, C., Marbach-Ad, G., Orgler, M., & Thompson, K. V. (2011). Educational goals and insight from classroom experiences reported by graduating seniors in science majors. Paper presented at the Annual Lilly Conference on College and University Teaching, Washington DC.
309. Smith, M. K. (2008). Howard Gardner theory, multiple intelligences and education. Retrieved March 15, 2014.
310. Sokolove, P. G., & Marbach-Ad, G. (1999). The benefits of out-of-class group study for improving student performance on exams: A comparison of outcomes in active-learning and traditional college biology classes. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 10, 49-68.
311. Stavy, R., Strauss, S., Orpaz, N., & Carmi, G. (1982). U-shaped behavioral growth in ratio comparisons. In R. Stavy (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth (pp. 11-36). Oxford, UK: Elsevier, INC.
312. Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-) understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules. New York, NY: Teachers College.
313. Stavy, R., & Wax, N. (1989). Children’s conceptions of plants as living things. Human Development, 32(2), 88-94.
314. Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2006). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 5(1), 1-6.
315. Thijs, G. D., & van den Berg, E. (1993, August 1-4). Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions. Paper presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
316. Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Aboulafia, M. (1998). Is it possible to confine the application of the intuitive rule: Subdivision processes can always be repeated? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(6), 813-825.
317. Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change.www. changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202007/index.html.
318. Yarden, H., Marbach-Ad, G., & Gershoni, J. M. (2004). Using the concept map technique in teaching introductory cell biology to college freshmen. Bioscene, 30, 3-13.
319. Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High-school graduates beliefs about science-technology-society. 1. Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71(2), 145-161.
320. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument-Views on science-technology-society (Vosts). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
321. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
322. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
323. Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978. doi:10.1002/Tea.10053.
324. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
325. Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2013). The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 133, 85-97.
326. Austin, A. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & McDaniels, M. (2007). Understanding new faculty: Background, aspirations, challenges, and growth. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 39-89). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
327. Boyer Commission on Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America-s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
328. Boyle, M. A., & Crosby, R. (1997). Academic program evaluation: Lessons from business and industry. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(3), 81-85.
329. Chen, W., Kelley, B., & Haggar, F. (2013). Assessing faculty development programs: Outcome-based evaluation. Journal Centers for Teaching and Learning, 5, 107-119.
330. Colbeck, C. L. (2003). Measures of success: An evaluator’s perspective. Paper presented at the CIRTL Forum, Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.
331. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688. doi:10.1080/0950069032000076652.
332. Fink, L. (2013). Innovative ways of assessing faculty development. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(133), 47-59.
333. Gibbs, G., Knapper, C., & Piccinin, S. (2008). Disciplinary and contextually appropriate approaches to leadership of teaching in research-intensive academic departments in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 416-436.
334. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
335. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A, DeHaan R Wood, W B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.
336. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984.
337. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.
338. Hines, S. R. (2009). Investigating faculty development program assessment practices: What’s being done and how can it be improved. Journal of Faculty Development, 23(3), 5-19.
339. Hora, M., & Ferrare, J. (2014). The teaching dimensions observation protocol (TDOP) 2.0. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
340. Hurtado, S., Eagan, K., Pryor, J. H., Whang, H., & Tran, S. (2012). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2010-2011 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.
341. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
342. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
343. Kucsera, J. V., & Svinicki, M. (2010). Rigorous evaluations of faculty development programs. Journal of Faculty Development, 24(2), 5-18.
344. Levinson-Rose, J., & Menges, R. J. (1981). Improving college teaching: A critical review of research. Review of Educational Research, 51(3), 403-434.
345. Marbach-Ad, G., McAdams, K., Benson, S., Briken, V., Cathcart, L., Chase, M, Smith, A. (2010). A model for using a concept inventory as a tool for students’ assessment and faculty professional development. CBE Life Science Education, 9, 408-436.
346. Marbach-Ad, G., McGinnis, J. R., Pease, R., Dai, A., Schalk, K. A., & Benson, S. (2009). Promoting science for all by way of student interest in an undergraduate microbiology course for non-majors. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10, 58-67.
347. Marbach-Ad, G., Schaefer, K. L., Kumi, B. C., Friedman, L. A., Thompson, K. V., & Doyle, M. P. (2012). Development and evaluation of a prep course for chemistry graduate teaching assistants at a research university. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 865-872.
348. Marbach-Ad, G., Schaefer, K. L., & Thompson, K. V. (2012). Faculty teaching philosophies, reported practices, and concerns inform the design of professional development activities of a disciplinary teaching and learning center. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 4, 119-137.
349. Marbach-Ad, G., Schaefer Ziemer, K. L., Thompson, K. V., & Orgler, M. (2013). New instructor teaching experience in a research-intensive university. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 5, 49-90.
350. Marbach-Ad, G., Shields, P. A., Kent, B. W., Higgins, B., & Thompson, K. V. (2010). Team teaching of a prep course for graduate teaching assistants. Studies in Graduate and Professional Students Development, 13, 44-58.
351. Marbach-Ad, G., Shaefer-Ziemer, K., Orgler, M., & Thompson, K. (2014, in press). Science teaching beliefs and reported approaches within a research university: Perspectives from faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(2).
352. NRC. (2003). National Research Council, Bio 2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
353. National Science Foundation (NSF). (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation (NSF).
354. Plank, K. M., & Kalish, A. (2010). Program assessment for faculty development. In K. J. Gillespie & D. L. Robertson (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (2nd ed., pp. 135-150). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
355. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf.
356. Quardokus, K., & Henderson, C. (2014). Using department-level social networks to inform instructional change initiatives. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) annual meeting, Pittsburg, PA.
357. Robertson, D. L. (2010). Establishing an educational development program. In K. J. Gillespie & D. L. Robertson (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (2nd ed., pp. 35-52). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
358. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323.
359. Senkevitch, E., Marbach-Ad, G., Smith, A. C., & Song, S. (2011). Using primary literature to engage student learning in scientific research and writing. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 12, 144-151.
360. Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618-627. doi:10.1187/cbe. 13-08-0154.
361. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2008). The genetics concept assessment: A new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE Life Science Education, 7(4), 422-430.
362. Sorcinelli, M. D. (2002). Ten principles of good practice in creating and sustaining teaching and learning centers. In K. H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen, & E. C. Wadsworth (Eds.), A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources (pp. 9-23). Bolton, MA: Anker.
363. Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Addy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker.
364. Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (Vol. 49). Berlin, Germany/New York, NY: Springer.
365. Taylor, A. (2011). Top 10 reasons students dislike working in groups and why I do it anyway. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39 (2), 219-220, 39(2), 219-220.
366. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37-54.
367. Travis, J. E., Hursh, D., Lankewicz, G., & Tang, L. (1996). Monitoring the pulse of the faculty: Needs assessment in faculty development programs. In L. Richlin (Ed.), To improve the academy (Vol. 15, pp. 95-113). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
368. University of Maryland Office of the Provost. (2011). In Mission and Goals Statement University of Maryland, College Park. Retrieved from http://www.provost.umd.edu/Documents/UMCP-Mission-Statement-Final-2011.pdf. (Ed.).
369. Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change. http://www. changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202007/index.html.
370. Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities: A case study in progress. Change. http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back %20Issues/March-April%202010/transforming-science-full.html.
371. Wright, M. C. (2011). Measuring a teaching center’s effectiveness measuring a teaching center’s effectiveness. In C. E. Cook & M. Kaplan (Eds.), Advancing the culture of teaching on campus: How a teaching center can make a difference (pp. 38-49). Sterling, VA: Stylus.