The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 221-234

  Hutchings, Patricia ^a  

^a Amer Assoc for Marriage and Fam   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009414979     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01185797     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bernstein, D. J. (1995, September). Personal communication.
2. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
3. Cerbin, W. (1992). How to improve teaching with learner centered evaluation. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 1(6), 6-8.
4. Cohen, P. A. & McKeachie, W. J. (1980). The role of colleagues in the evaluation of college teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 28(4), 147-154.
5. Cross, K. P. (1987). Feedback in the classroom: Making assessment matter. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
6. Engineering education: Designing an adaptive system. (1995, April). Report of the Board on Engineering Education (pre-publication draft), National Research Council.
7. French-Lazovik, G. (1976). Evaluation of college teaching: Guidelines for summative and formative procedures. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
8. From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching (a project workbook). (1995). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
9. Gillespie, D. (1989, July/August). Claiming ourselves as teachers. Change, 21, 56-58.
10. Kahn, S. (1993). Better teaching through better evaluation: A guide for faculty and institutions. To Improve the Academy, 12, pp. 111-126. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
11. Recognition and rewards in the mathematical sciences. (1994). A report of the Joint Policy Board for Mathematics Committee on Professional Recognition and Rewards.
12. Report of the task force on faculty rewards. (1990). Report of the University of California System.
13. Shulman, L. S. (1993, November/December). Teaching as community property. Change, 25, 6-7.
14. Teaching growth and effectiveness: An issues paper. (1994). Report of the Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Research Council.
15. Weimer, M. (1990). Improving College Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.