A Meta-Analysis of the Long-Term Effects of Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension Interventions

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 77-96

  Suggate, Sebastian P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

comprehension; decoding; fluency; long term; phonemic awareness; phonics; reading intervention

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; EFFECT SIZE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HUMAN; KINDERGARTEN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; SKILL; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); READING;

EID: 84948823500     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219414528540     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. F.*AntoniouE.Souvignier (2007). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: An intervention study for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5, 41–57.
2. S.M.BellS.McCallumE.A.Cox (2003). Toward a research-based assessment of dyslexia: Using cognitive measures to identify reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 505–516.
3. B.A.*BlachmanE.W.BallR.S.BlackD.M.Tangel (1994). Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–18.
4. B.A.*BlachmanC.SchatschneiderJ.M.FletcherD.J.FrancisS.M.ClonanB.A.ShaywitzS.E.Shaywitz (2004). Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third graders and a 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 444–461.
5. B.A.BlachmanC.SchatschneiderJ.M.FletcherM.S.MurrayK.A.MungerM.G.Vaughn (2014). Intensive reading remediation in grade 2 or 3: Are there effects a decade later?Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 46–57. doi:10.1037/a0033663
6. B.A.*BlachmanD.M.TangelE.W.BallR.BlackC.K.McGraw (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 239–273.
7. S.*BradyA.FowlerA.StoneN.Winbury (1994). Training phonological awareness: A study with inner-city kindergarten children. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 26–59.
8. M.T.*BrannickL.YangG.Cafri (2011). Comparison of weights for meta-analysis or r and d under realistic conditions. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 587–607. doi:10.1177/1094428110368725
9. J.BuckinghamK.WheldallR.Beaman (2012). A randomised control trial of a Tier-2 small-group intervention (“MiniLit”) for young struggling readers. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17, 79–99. doi:10.1080/19404158.2012.717537
10. M.K.*BurnsB.J.SenesacB.Silberglitt (2008). Longitudinal effect of a volunteer tutoring program on reading skills of students identified as at-risk for reading failure: A two-year follow-up study. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 27–37.
11. A.G.BusM.H.van Ijzendoorn (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–414.
12. S.*Büyüktaşkapu (2012). Effect of family supported pre-reading training program given to children in preschool education period on reading success in primary school. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12, 309–316.
13. Y.*CenterK.WheldallL.FreemanL.OuthredM.McNaught (1995). An evaluation of reading recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240–263.
14. J.Chall (1976, April). The great debate: Ten years later, with a modest proposal for reading stages. Paper presented at the Conference on Theory and Practice of Beginning Reading Instruction, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED155617.pdf
15. A.C.CheungR.E.Slavin (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
16. P.T.*CirinoS.VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonE.Cardenas-HaganJ.M.FletcherD.J.Francis (2009). One-year follow-up outcomes of Spanish and English interventions for English language learners at risk for reading problems. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 744–781.
17. P.J.*ClarkeM.J.SnowlingE.TrueloveC.Hulme (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading comprehension difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Science, 21, 1106–1116. doi:10.1177/0956797610375449
18. M.M.Clay (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
19. M.ColtheartB.CurtisP.AtkinsM.Haller (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.
20. C.M.ConnorF.J.MorrisonL.E.Katch (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 305–336. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_1
21. C.M.ConnorS.B.PiastaB.FishmanS.GlasneyC.SchnatscheiderE.CroweF.J.. Morrison (2009). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Child × instruction interactions on first graders’ literacy development. Child Development, 80, 77–100.
22. M.D.CoyneE.Kame’enuiD.C.SimmonsB.A.Harn (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90–104.
23. C.DignathG.Buttner (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
24. E.*DionM.BrodeurC.GosselinM.CampeauD.Fuchs (2010). Implementing research-based instruction to prevent reading problems among low-income students: Is earlier better?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 87–96.
25. R.Dollase (2007). Bildung im Kindergarten und Früheinschulung: Ein Fall von Ignoranz und Forschungsamnesie [Learning in kindergarten and preschool: A case of ignorance and forgotten results]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 5–10.
26. D.Durkin (1974–1975). A six year study of children who learned to read in school at the age of four. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 9–61.
27. J.*EcalleA.MagnanC.Calmus (2009). Lasting effects on literacy skills with a computer-assisted learning using syllabic units in low progress readers. Computers and Education, 52, 554–561.
28. L.C.EhriS.R.NunesS.A.StahlD.M.Willows (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.
29. L.C.EhriS.R.NunesD.M.WillowsB.V.SchusterZ.Yaghoub-ZadehT.Shanahan (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
30. B.ElbaumS.VaughnM.T.HughesS.W.Moody (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 605–619.
31. C.*ElbroD.K.Peterson (2004). Long-term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training: An intervention study with children at risk for dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 660–670.
32. W.B.Elley (1992). How in the world do students read? IEA study of reading literacy. The Hague, Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
33. L.*FälthS.GustafsonT.TjusM.HeimannI.Svensson (2013). Computer-assisted interventions targeting reading skills of children with reading disabilities—A longitudinal study. Dyslexia, 19, 37–53.
34. A.J.*FawcettR.I.NicolsonH.MossM.K.Nicolson (2001). Effective reading intervention in junior school. Educational Psychology, 21, 299–312.
35. E.FerrerB.A.ShaywitzJ.M.HolahanK.MarchioneS.E.Shaywitz (2010). Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: Empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 21, 93–101.
36. D.FuchsL.S.Fuchs (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. Journal of Special Education, 39, 34–44.
37. R.*GittelmanI.Feingold (1983). Children with reading disorders: Efficacy of reading remediation. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 24, 167–191.
38. R.H.GoodR.A.Kaminski (2003). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills: Administration and scoring guide (6th ed.). Longmont, CA: Sopris West.
39. R.H.GoodD.C.SimmonsS.B.Smith (1998). Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. School Psychology Review, 27, 45–56.
40. P.B.GoughW.E.Tunmer (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial & Special Education, 7, 6–10.
41. B.*GunnK.SmolkowskiA.BiglanC.BlackJ.Blair (2005). Fostering the development of reading skill through supplemental instruction: Results for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students. Journal of Special Education, 39, 66–85.
42. B.*GunnK.SmolkowskiP.Vadasy (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of Read Well Kindergarten. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 53–86.
43. M.W.HarmM.S.Seidenberg (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
44. P.J.*HatcherC.HulmeA.W.Ellis (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41–57.
45. P.J.*HatcherC.HulmeM.J.Snowling (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 45, 338–358.
46. P.E.*HookP.MacarusoS.Jones (2001). Efficacy of fast forward training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties—A longitudinal study. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 75–96.
47. T.*HoutveenW.van de Grift (2012). Improving reading achievements of struggling learners. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(1), 71–93. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.600534
48. J.J.Hox (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
49. J.E.HunterF.L.Schmidt (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. A.R.JadadA.MooreD.CarrollC.JenkinsonD.J.M.ReynoldsD.J.GavaghanH.J.McQuay (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 17, 1-12.
51. S.JastakG.S.Wilkinson (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test–Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Assessment Systems.
52. A.S.KaufmanN.L.Kaufman (1985). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
53. A.-C.*KjeldsenP.NiemiA.Olofsson (2003). Training phonological awareness in kindergarten level children: Consistency is more important than quantity. Learning and Instruction, 13, 349–365.
54. L.*KozminskyE.Kozminsky (1995). The effects of early phonological awareness training on reading success. Learning and Instruction, 5, 187–201.
55. F.*KyleJ.KujalaU.RichardsonH.LyytinenU.Goswami (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of two theoretically motivated computer-assisted reading interventions in the United Kingdom: GG rime and GG phoneme. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 61–76.
56. A.*Lie (1991). Effects of a training program for stimulating skills in word analysis in first-grade children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 234–250.
57. D.F.*LoebR.B.GillamL.HoffmanJ.BrandelJ.Marquis (2009). The effects of Fast ForWord language on the phonemic awareness and reading skills of school-age children with language impairments and poor reading skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 376–387.
58. S.H.*Lyster (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 261–294.
59. W.H.MacGinitie (1978). Gates–MacGinitie Reading Test: Canadian edition. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Nelson.
60. P.*MantzicopoulosD.MorrisonE.StoneW.Setrakian (1992). Use of SEARCH/TEACH tutoring approach with middle-class students at risk for reading failure. Elementary School Journal, 92, 573–586.
61. L.M.MarulisS.B.Neuman (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children’s word learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 300–335. doi:10.3102/0034654310377087
62. R.D.*MorrisM.W.LovettM.WolfR.A.SevcikK.A.SteinbachJ.C.FrijtersM.B.Shapiro (2012). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 99–127. doi:10.1177/0022219409355472
63. A.*NancollisB.LawrieB.Dodd (2005). Phonological awareness intervention and the acquisition of literacy skills in children from deprived backgrounds. Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 325–335.
64. K.NationJ.Coxsey (2009). The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children’s word reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 296–308.
65. National Early Literacy Panel. (Ed.). (2008). Developing early literacy: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. Denver, CO: National Institute for Literacy & Partnership for Reading.
66. National Reading Panel. (Ed.). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Development. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/report.htm
67. R.E.*O’ConnorA.Notari-SyversonP.Vadasy (1998). First-grade effects of teacher-led phonological activities in kindergarten for children with mild disabilities: A follow-up study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 43–52.
68. S.G.Paris (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202.
69. M.PfostJ.HattieT.DorflerC.Artelt (2013). Individual differences in reading development: A review of 25 years of empirical research on Matthew effects in reading. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.3102/0034654313509492
70. L.M.*PhillipsS.P.NorrisJ.M.Mason (1996). Longitudinal effects of early literacy concepts on reading achievement: A kindergarten intervention and five-year follow-up. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 173–195.
71. A.G.F.M.*RegtvoortA.van der Leij (2007). Early intervention with children of dyslexic parents: Effects of computer-based reading instruction at home on literacy acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 35–53.
72. P.*ReitsmaR.Wesseling (1998). Effects of computer-assisted training of blending skills in kindergarteners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 301–320.
73. E.*RotheC.GrunlingM.LiggesJ.FackelmannB.Blanz (2004). Erste Auswirkungen eines Trainings der phonologischen Bewusstheit bei zwei unterschiedlichen Altersgruppen im Kindergarten [First effects of training phonological awareness in two age cohorts of kindergarten children]. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatre und Psychotherapie, 32, 167–176.
74. J.F.*RyderW.E.TunmerK.T.Greaney (2008). Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 349–369.
75. J.*SchachterB.Jo (2005). Learning when school is not in session: A reading summer day-camp intervention to improve the achievement of exiting first-grade students who are economically disadvantaged. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 158–169.
76. H.Schmerkotte (1978). Ergebnisse eines Vergleichs von Modellkindergärten und Vorklassen in Nordrhein-Westfalen [Results from a comparison of typical kindergartens and preschools in North Rhine-Westphalia]. Bildung und Erziehung, 31, 401–411.
77. S.ScholinM.K.Burns (2012). Relationship between pre-intervention data and post-intervention reading fluency and growth: A meta-analysis of assessment data for individual students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 385–398.
78. E.*SegersL.Verhoeven (2005). Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 17–27.
79. P.H.K.SeymourM.AroJ.M.Erskine, & COST Action Network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.
80. N.*SpörerJ.C.BrunsteinU.Kieschke (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19, 272–286.
81. R.StainthorpD.Hughes (2004). What happens to precocious readers’ performance by the age of eleven?Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 357–372.
82. Stanford Achievement Test series: Technical data report (8th ed.). (1990). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
83. K.E.Stanovich (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
84. S.P.Suggate (2009). School entry age and reading achievement in the 2006 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 151–161.
85. S.P.Suggate (2010). Why “what” we teach depends on “when”: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1556–1579. doi:10.1037/a0020612
86. S.P.Suggate (in press). The parable of the sower and the long-term effects of early reading. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal.
87. S.P.SuggateE.A.SchaughencyE.Reese (2013). Children who learn to read later catch up to children who learn to read early. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 33–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.04.004
88. H.L.SwansonM.HoskynC.Lee (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
89. E.TalbottL.WillsM.Tankersley (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 223–232.
90. W.J.Therrien (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252–261.
91. G.B.ThompsonM.F.McKayC.M.Fletcher-FlinnV.ConnellyR.T.KaaJ.Ewing (2008). Do children who acquire word reading without explicit phonics employ compensatory learning? Issues of phonological recoding, lexical orthography, and fluency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 505–537.
92. J.K.*TorgesenR.K.WagnerC.A.RashotteJ.HerronP.Lindamood (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 40–56.
93. W.E.TunmerJ.W.ChapmanJ.E.Prochnow (2004). Why the reading achievement gap in New Zealand won’t go away: Evidence from the PIRLS 2001 International Study of Reading Achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 127–145.
94. W.TunmerK.Greaney (2009). Defining dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 229–243. doi:10.1177/0022219409345009
95. P.F.*VadasyJ.R.JenkinsK.Pool (2000). Effects of tutoring in phonological and early reading skills on students at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 579–590.
96. P.F.*VadasyE.A.Sanders (2010). Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled kindergarteners in the context of language minority status and classroom phonics instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 786–803. doi:10.1037/a0019639
97. P.F.*VadasyE.A.Sanders (2011). Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled first graders: How language minority status and pretest characteristics moderate treatment response. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 471–497.
98. P.F.*VadasyE.A.Sanders (2012). Two-year follow-up of a kindergarten phonics intervention for English learners and native English speakers: Contextualizing treatment impacts by classroom literacy instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 987–1005. doi:10.1037/a0028163
99. P.F.*VadasyE.A.Sanders (2013). Two-year follow-up of a code-oriented intervention for lower-skilled first-graders: The influence of language status and word reading skills on third-grade literacy outcomes. Reading and Writing, 26, 821–843. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9393-4
100. P.F.*VadasyE.A.SandersJ.A.Peyton (2006). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized field trial with paraeducator implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 508–528.
101. V.A.C.*van der Kooy-HoflandJ.van der KooyA.G.BusM.H.van IJzendoornG.J.Bonsel. (2012). Differential susceptibility to early literacy intervention in children with mild perinatal adversities: Short- and long-term effects of a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 337–349. doi:10.1037/a0026984
102. H.*van Keer. (2004). Fostering reading comprehension in fifth grade by explicit instruction in reading strategies and peer tutoring. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 37–70.
103. S.*VaughnP.T.CirinoS.Linan-ThompsonP.G.MathesC.D.CarlsonE.C.HaganD.J.. Francis (2006). Effectiveness of a Spanish intervention and an English intervention for English-language learners at risk for reading problems. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 449–487.
104. S.*VaughnP.T.CirinoT.TolarJ.M.FletcherE.Cardenas-HaganC.D.CarlsonD.J.Francis (2008). Long-term follow-up of Spanish and English interventions for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 179–214.
105. S.*VaughnS.Linian-ThompsonP.G.MathesP.T.CirinoC.D.CarlsonS.D.Pollard-DurodolaD.J.. Francis (2006). Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 56–73.
106. S.*VaughnP.MathesS.Linian-ThompsonP.CirinoC.CarlsonS.D.Pollard-DurodolaD.J.. Francis (2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Elementary School Journal, 107, 153–180.
107. N.J.Waddington (1988). Diagnostic reading and spelling tests: A book of tests and diagnostic procedures for children with learning difficulties. Modbury, Australia: Waddington Educational Resources.
108. R.K.WagnerJ.K.TorgesenC.A.Rashotte (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
109. J.WanzekS.VaughnA.KimC.L.Cavanaugh (2006). The effects of reading interventions on social outcomes for elementary students with reading difficulties. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 121–138.
110. N.*WarrickH.RubinS.Rowe-Walsh (1993). Phoneme awareness in language-delayed children: Comparative studies and intervention. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 153–173.
111. J.L.WiederholtB.R.Bryant (1992). Gray Oral Reading Test–3. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
112. J.P.*Williams (1980). Teaching decoding with an emphasis on phoneme analysis and phoneme blending. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 1–15.
113. U.*Wolff (2011). Effects of a randomised reading intervention study: An application of structural equation modelling. Dyslexia, 17, 295–311. doi:10.1002/dys.438
114. R.W.Woodcock (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised normative update Forms G and H examiners manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.