Toward a Research-Based Assessment of Dyslexia: Using Cognitive Measures to Identify Reading Disabilities

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 505-516

  Bell, Sherry Mee ^a   McCallum, R Steve ^a   Cox, Elizabeth A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242711390     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194030360060201     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Adams, M. J., & Treadway, J. (2000, March). Informing reading/ writing instruction in grades K-3 through assessment. Paper presented to the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, New Orleans, LA.
3. Badian, N. A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 472-481.
4. Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kinder-garten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49-66.
5. Bell, N., & Worthington, P. (2002, November). The double deficit hypothesis: Is symbol imagery a factor? Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Dyslexia Assocation, Atlanta, GA.
6. Berninger, V. A. (2001). Understanding the "lexia" in dyslexia: A multidisciplinary team approach to learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 23-48.
7. Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Universal nonverbal intelligence test. Chicago: Riverside.
8. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1996). Comprehensive test of basic skills. Monterrey, CA: Author.
9. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). The case for early intervention. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243-264). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Ganske, K. (1993). Developmental spelling analysis. Barboursville, VA: Author.
11. Hammill, D. D., Mather, N., & Roberts, R. (2001). Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12. Henry, M., Ganschow, L., & Miles, T. R. (2000). The issue of definition: Some problems. Perspectives: The International Dyslexia Association, 26(4), 38-43.
13. International Dyslexia Association. (2002, January). Response to OSEP summit on learning disabilities: The nature of learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Learning Disabilities Roundtable. (2002, July). Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Division of Research to Practice.
15. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2001). Qualitative reading inventory-3. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
16. Lindamood, C. H., & Lindamood, P. C. (1979). Lindamood auditory conceptualization test. Chicago: Riverside.
17. Lyon, G. R. (1996). Learning disabilities. In K. L. Freiberg (Ed.), Annual editions: Educating exceptional children (pp. 49-71). Guilford, CT: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill.
18. Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325-333.
19. Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Peabody individual achievement test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
20. Mather, N. (1999). Interpretation of the WJ-R cognitive and achievement batteries. Work-shop presented at the Knox County Schools, Knoxville, TN.
21. McCallum, R. S., & Bell, S. M. (2001). Test of dyslexia. Unpublished manuscript, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
22. McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23. McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson-III technical manual. Chicago: Riverside.
24. Padget, S. Y., Knight, D. F., & Sawyer, D. J. (1996). Tennessee meets the challenge of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 51-72.
25. Psychological Corp. (2002). Wechsler individual achievement test (2nd ed.). New York: Author.
26. Sawyer, D. J. (1987). Test of awareness of language segments. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27. Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245-256.
28. Shaywitz, S. E. (1996). Dyslexia. Scientific American, 275, 78-84.
29. Shaywitz, S. E. (1998). Dyslexia. Current Concepts, 338, 307-312.
30. Siegel, L. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304-319.
31. Speece, D. & Shekitka, L. (2002). How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of experts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 118-123.
32. Stone, B., & Brady, S. (1995). Evidence for phonological processing deficits in less-skilled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 51-77.
33. Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T., & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364-370.
34. Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1998). Alternative diagnostic approach for specific developmental reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 220-232.
35. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
36. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing, Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
37. Watson, C., & Willows, D. M. (1993). Evidence for a visual-processing-deficit subtype among disabled readers. In D. M. Willows, R. S. Kruk, & E. Corcos (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities (pp. 287-310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming-speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia - Implications for early intervention (pp. 67-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Wolf, M. (1999). What time may tell: Towards a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 3-28.
40. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (2000). Naming-speed deficits in developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the special series on the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322-324.
41. Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
42. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
43. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of cognitive abilities and tests of achievement (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Riverside.