Defining dyslexia

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 229-243

  Tunmer, William ^a   Greaney, Keith ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Dyslexia; Reading difficulties; Reading intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; DYSLEXIA; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; READING; SEMANTICS; DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DISORDER; PSYCHOLOGY;

COGNITION; DYSLEXIA; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 77951584646     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219409345009     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Aaron, P.G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502.
2. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, R.M., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K.E. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67-84.
3. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, R.M., & Quatroche, D. (2008). Becoming a professional reading teacher. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
4. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, R.M., & Williams, K.A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 120-127.
5. Akamatsu, N. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Japanese-English bilinguals. In M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 481-496). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 414-431.
7. Aylward, E., Richards, T., Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Field, K., Grimme, A.,et al.(2003). Instructional treatment associated with changes in brain activation in children with dyslexia. Neurology, 61, 212-219.
8. Berkeley, S., Bender, W.N., Peaster, L.G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85-95.
9. Blaiklock, K.E. (2004). A critique of running records of children's oral reading. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 241-253.
10. Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D., & Mencl, W.E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226-243.
11. Calfee, R.C. (1977). Assessment of independent reading skills: Basic research and practical applications. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading (pp. 289-323). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Carroll, J.M., Snowling, M.J., Hulme, C., & Stevenson, J. (2003). The development of phonological awareness in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 913-923.
13. Catts, H., Kamhi, A. (2005). Language and reading disabilities. Boston: Pearson.
14. Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
15. Chapman, J.W., Tunmer, W.E., & Prochnow, J.E. (2001). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141-176.
16. Chard, D.C., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2008). Introduction to the special series on systematic, multitier instructional models: Emerging research on factors that support prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 99-100.
17. Clay, M.M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
18. Clay, M.M. (1998). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
19. Clay, M.M. (2000). Running records for classroom teachers. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
20. Clay, M. (2005a). Literacy lessons designed for individuals. Part One: Why? When? and How? Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
21. Clay, M. (2005b). Literacy lessons designed for individuals. Part Two: Teaching procedures. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
22. Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., & Francis, D.J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447-466.
23. Denton, C.A., & Mathes, P.G. (2003). Intervention for struggling readers: Possibilities and challenges. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 229-251). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
24. Deshler, D.D., Mellard, D.F., Tollefson, J.M., & Byrd, S.E. (2005). Research topics in responsiveness to intervention: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 483-484.
25. Dyslexia Foundation of New Zealand. (2008). Dealing with dyslexia: The way forward for New Zealand educators. Christchurch, New Zealand: Author.
26. Eden, G.R., Van Meter, J.W., Rumsey, J.M., Maisog, J.M., Woods, R.P., & Zeffiro, T.A. (1996). Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66-69.
27. Ehri, L.C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135-154). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28. Fletcher, J.M., Denton, C., & Francis, D. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 545-552.
29. Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K.,et al.(1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 1-18.
30. Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Steubing, K.K., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, B.A., & Shaywitz, S.E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98-108.
31. Fuchs, D., Compton, D.K., Fuchs, L.S., Bryant, J., & Davis, G.N. (2008). Making secondary intervention work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21, 413-436.
32. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
33. Fuchs, D., & Young, C.L. (2006). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction. Exceptional Children, 73, 8-30.
34. Georgiou, G.K., Das, J.P., & Hayward, D. (2009). Revisiting the "Simple View of Reading" in a group of children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 76-84.
35. Gersten, R., & Dimino, J.A. (2006). RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99-108.
36. Goodman, K.S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126-135.
37. Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
38. Hatcher, P.J., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonemes, rhymes, and intelligence as predictors of children's responsiveness to remedial reading instruction: Evidence from a longitudinal intervention study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 130-153.
39. Hulme, C. (1988). The implausibility of low-level visual deficits as a cause of children's reading difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 369-374.
40. Iversen, S., Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2005). The effects of varying group size on the Reading Recovery approach to preventive early intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 456-472.
41. Joshi, R.M. (2004). Diagnosis and remediation of reading disabilities: A pragmatic solution. In R. M. Joshi (Ed.), Dyslexia: Myths, misconceptions, and some practical applications (pp. 63-82). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
42. Kirby, J.R., & Savage, R.S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42, 75-82.
43. Leach, J.M., Scarborough, H.S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211-224.
44. Lovegrove, W., Garzia, R.P., & Nicholson, S.B. (1990). Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 61, 137-146.
45. Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1-14.
46. McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Compton, D. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445-463.
47. Nation, K. (2005). Children's reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248-265). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
48. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85-101.
49. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2003). Effective literacy practice in years 1 to 4. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
50. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2008). Development of dyslexia working definition. Retrieved September 17, 2008, from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/literacy_numeracy/lit.dyslexia_working_definition.e.php.
51. O'Connor, R.E., Fulmer, D., Harty, K.R., & Bell, K.M. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and student outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 440-455.
52. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.
53. Prochnow, J.E., Tunmer, W.E., Chapman, J.W., & Greaney, K.T. (2001). A longitudinal study of early literacy achievement and gender. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 36, 221-236.
54. Reynolds, M., & Wheldall, K. (2007). Reading Recovery 20 years down the track: Looking forward, looking back. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 199-223.
55. Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D.V.M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235-257.
56. Ryder, J.F., Tunmer, W.E., & Greaney, K.T. (2008). Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically-based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing, 21, 349-369.
57. Scarborough, H. (2005). Developmental relationships between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 3-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Shankweiler, D., & Fowler, A.E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing, 17, 483-515.
59. Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Blachman, B., Pugh, K.R., Fulbright, R.K., Skudlarski, P.,et al.(2004). Development of left occipito-temporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 926-933.
60. Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
61. Simos, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., Bergman, E., Breier, J.I., Foorman, B.R., Castillo, E.M.,et al.(2002). Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58, 1203-1213.
62. Simos, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., Sarkari, S., Billingsley-Marshall, R., Denton, C.A., & Papanicolaou, A.C. (2007). Intensive instruction affects brain magnetic activity associated with oral word reading in children with persistent reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 37-48.
63. Smith, J.W.A., & Elley, W.B. (1994). Learning to read in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Longman Paul.
64. Snow, C.E., & Juel, C. (2005). Teaching children to read: What do we know about how to do it? In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 501-520). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
65. Snowling, M. (2000). Dyslexia. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
66. Snowling, M.J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: Individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Development, 74, 358-373.
67. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 340-406.
68. Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
69. Stanovich, K.E. (1996). Toward a more inclusive definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 2, 154-166.
70. Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile for children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 1-30.
71. Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., LeDoux, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2002). Validity of IQdiscrepancy classification of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469-518.
72. Torgesen, J.K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In R. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355-382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
73. Torgesen, J.K. (2005). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521-537). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
74. Tunmer, W.E. (2008). Recent developments in reading intervention research: Introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing, 21, 299-316.
75. Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (1996). A developmental model of dyslexia: Can the construct be saved? Dyslexia, 2, 179-189.
76. Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (1998). Language prediction skill, phonological recoding ability and beginning reading. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorder (pp. 33-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2004). Reading Recovery: Distinguishing myth from reality. In R. M. Joshi (Ed.), Dyslexia: Myths, misconceptions, and some practical applications (pp. 99-114). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
78. Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2006). Metalinguistic abilities, phonological recoding skills, and the use of sentence context in beginning reading development: A longitudinal study. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 617-635). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
79. Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2007). Language-related differences between discrepancy-defined and non-discrepancy-defined poor readers: A longitudinal study of dyslexia in New Zealand. Dyslexia, 13, 42-66.
80. Tunmer, W.E., Chapman, J.W., & Prochnow, J.E. (2003). Preventing negative Matthew effects in at-risk readers: A retrospective study. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 121-163). Timonium, MD: York Press.
81. Tunmer, W.E., Chapman, J.W., & Prochnow, J.E. (2004). Why the reading achievement gap in New Zealand won't go away: Evidence from the PIRLS 2001 international study of reading achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 127-145.
82. Tunmer, W.E., Chapman, J.W., & Prochnow, J.E. (2006). Literate cultural capital at school entry predicts later reading achievement: A seven year longitudinal study. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 41, 183-204.
83. Tunmer, W.E., & Greaney, K.T. (2008). Reading intervention research: An integrative framework. In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 241-267). London: Sage.
84. Tunmer, W.E., & Hoover, W.A. (1992). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 175-214). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. Tunmer, W.E., & Nicholson, T. (in press). The development and teaching of word recognition skill. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
86. Tunmer, W.E., Nicholson, T., Greaney, K.T., Prochnow, J.E., Chapman, J.W., & Arrow, A.W. (2008). PIRLS before swine: A critique of New Zealand's National Literacy Strategy. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 43, 105-119.
87. Tunmer, W.E., & Prochnow, J.E. (2009). Cultural relativism and literacy education: Explicit teaching based on specific learning needs is not deficit theory. In R. Openshaw & E. Rata (Eds.), The politics of conformity in New Zealand (pp. 154-190). Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson.
88. Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). Group size and time allocated to intervention: Effects for students with reading difficulties. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 299-324). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
89. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/ learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
90. Vellutino, F.R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Vellutino, F.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (2005). Developmental dyslexia. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 362-378). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
92. Vellutino, F.R., Fletcher, J.M., Snowling, M.J., & Scanlon, D.M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2-40.
93. Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D. (1982). Verbal processes in poor and normal readers. In C. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal processes in children (pp. 189-264). New York: Springer-Verlag.
94. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Jaccard, J. (2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two year follow-up of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 73-120). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
95. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
96. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R.S.,et al.(1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to- remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
97. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D.P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157-169.
98. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437.
99. Vellutino, F.R., Tunmer, W.E., Jaccard, J., & Chen, S. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3-32.
100. Wagner, R.K. (2008). Rediscovering dyslexia: New approaches for identification and classification. In G. Reid, A. J. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 174-191). London: Sage.
101. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126-142.