Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third graders and a 1-year foliow-up

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 444-461

  Blachman, Benita A ^a   Schatschneider, Christopher ^b   Fletcher, Jack M ^c   Francis, David J ^d   Clonan, Sheila M ^a   Shaywitz, Bennett A ^e   Shaywitz, Sally E ^e  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544279595     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.444     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Birman, B. F., Orland, M. E., Jung, R. K., Anson, R. J., Garcia, G. N., Moore, M. T., et al. (1987). The current operation of the Chapter 1 program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
3. Blachman, B. A. (1987). An alternative classroom reading program for learning disabled and other low achieving children. In R. Bowler (Ed.), Intimacy with language: A forgotten basic in teacher education (pp. 49-55). Baltimore: Orton Dyslexia Society.
4. Blachman, B. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483-502). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Blachman, B. A., Tangel, D. M., Ball, E. W., Black, R., & McGraw, C. K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 239-273.
6. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1995). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 488-503.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-945.
10. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid "automatized" naming (R. A. N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471-479.
11. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
12. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Learning to read and spell words. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 57-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal readers and dyslexies. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 163-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
15. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-on-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
16. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Lynn, A. (1996). Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level-match designs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 639-652.
17. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
18. Francis, D. J., Schatschneider, C., & Carlson, C. D. (2000). Introduction to individual growth curve analysis. In D. Drotar (Ed.), Handbook of research in pediatric and clinical child psychology: Practical strategies and methods (Vol. 8, pp. 51-73). New York; Plenum Press.
19. Fry, E. B., Kress, J. E., & Fountoukidis, D. L. (1993). The reading teacher's book of lists (3rd ed.). Paramus, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Gough, P. B., & Juel, C. (1991). The first stages of word recognition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 47-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hiebert, E. H., & Taylor, B. M. (2000). Beginning reading instruction: Research on early interventions. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 455-482). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Holland, B. S., & Copenhaver, M. (1988). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 145-149.
23. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
24. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Kennedy, M. M., Birman, B. F., & Demaline, R. E. (1986). The effectiveness of Chapter 1 services: An interim report from the national assessment of Chapter 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
26. Levy, B. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 357-379). Timonium, MD: York Press.
27. Liberman, I. Y., & Liberman, A. M. (1990). Whole language vs. code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 51-76.
28. Lyon, G. R. (2001, March 8). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise student achievement (Statement to the Committee on Education and the Workforce). Retrieved July 28, 2002, from http://edworkforce. house.gov/hearings/107th/edr/account3801/lyon.htm
29. Lyon, G. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2001, Summer). Early warning systems. Education Matters, 1(2), 22-29. Retrieved July 28, 2002 from http://www.educationnext.org/20012/22.html
30. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wood, F. B., et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In C. E. Finn, Jr., R. A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson, Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259-287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and Progressive Policy Institute.
31. Makar, B. W. (1995). Primary phonics. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
32. Maxwell, S. E. (1998). Longitudinal designs in randomized group comparisons: When will intermediate observations increase statistical power? Psychological Methods, 3, 275-290.
33. Moody, S. W., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Fischer, M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66, 305-316.
34. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidencebased assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
35. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
37. Puma, M. J., Karweit, N., Price, C., Ricciuti, A., Thompson, W., & Vaden-Kiernan, M. (1997). Prospects: Final report on student outcomes. Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED413411)
38. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
39. Rashotte, C. A., MacPhee, K., & Torgesen, J. K. (2001). The effectiveness of a group reading instruction program with poor readers in multiple grades. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 119-134.
40. SAS Institute. (2001). SAS OnlineDoc (Version 8.1) [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
41. Seaman, M. A., Levin, K. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 577-586.
42. Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education 1, 1-57.
43. Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, R. (Eds,). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44. Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachrnan, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., et al. (2004). Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 926-933.
45. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1996). Unlocking learning disabilities: The neurological basis. In S. C. Cramer & W. Ellis (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Lifelong issues (pp. 255-260). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
46. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
48. Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., LeDoux, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469-518.
49. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 75, 55-64.
50. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58, 78.
51. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
52. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
53. Uitenbroek, D. G. (1997). SISA binomial. Southampton, England: Author. Retrieved January 1, 2004, from http://home.clara.net/sisa/binomial.htm
54. Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). Group size and time allotted to intervention: Effects for students with reading difficulties. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 299-324). Baltimore: York Press.
55. Vellutino, F. R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 437-443.
56. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R. S., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 607-638.
57. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279-332). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
58. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processes (CTOPP), Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
59. Wainer, H., & Robinson, D. H. (2003). Shaping up the practice of null hypothesis significance testing. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 22-30.
60. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
61. Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (1992). Gray Oral Reading Tests - Third Edition (GORT-3). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
62. Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test 3 (WRAT3). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
63. Williams, J. P. (1994). Twenty years of research on reading: Answers and questions. In F. Lehr & J. Osborn (Eds.), Reading, language, and literacy: Instruction for the twenty-first century (pp. 59-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Williams, J. P., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., Lord, K. M., Gugga, S. S., Bak, S., et al. (2002). Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 235-248.
65. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests - Revised (WRMT-R). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
66. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery - Revised (WJ-R). Chicago; Riverside.
67. Woodcock, R. W., & Mather, N. (1989). WJ-R Tests of Achievement: Examiner's manual. In R. W. Woodcock & M. B. Johnson, Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery - Revised (WJ-R). Chicago: Riverside.