When is female leadership an advantage? Coordination requirements, team cohesion, and team interaction norms

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1153-1175

  Post, Corinne ^a  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohesion; Cooperative learning; Functional diversity; Gender; Geographic dispersion; Interaction norms; Leadership; Participative communication; Size; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945448087     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.2031     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter? Management Science, 58, 219-235.
2. Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: the knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215-234.
3. Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. R., & Pearce, C. L. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94-107.
4. Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495-516.
5. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.
6. Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Bart, C., & McQueen, G. (2013). Why women make better decisions. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 8, 93-99.
8. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.
9. Biemann, T., & Kearney, E. (2010). Size does matter: How varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 582-599.
10. Birenbaum, A., & Sagarin, E. (1976). Norms and human behavior. New York: Praeger.
11. Blau, F. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
12. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp.349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: a conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69, 479-504.
14. Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K.-K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp.213-266). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this" We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83.
16. Brower, H. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Tan, H. H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: the integration of trust and leader-member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 227-250.
17. Burke, C. S., Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2003). The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability. In C. L. Pearce, & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp.103-122). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
18. Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288-307.
19. Butterfield, D. A., & Grinnell, J. P. (1999). "Re-viewing" gender, leadership, and managerial behavior. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender & work (pp.223-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
21. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452.
22. Carmeli, A., Ben-Hador, B., Waldman, D. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor: implications for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1553-1561.
23. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
24. Carron, A. V. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 168-188.
25. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217-1234.
26. Castaño, N., Watts, T., & Tekleab, A. G. (2013). A reexamination of the cohesion-performance relationship meta-analyses: a comprehensive approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17, 207.
27. Cavallo, K., & Brienza, D. (2006). Emotional competence and leadership excellence at Johnson & Johnson. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2.
28. Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956-974.
29. Conlin, M. (2003). The new gender gap: from kindergarten to grad school, boys are becoming the second sex, Business Week.
30. Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32, 761-773.
31. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
32. Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791.
33. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1154-1191.
34. Cundiff, N. L., & Komarraju, M. (2008). Gender differences in ethnocultural empathy and attitudes toward men and women in authority. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 5-15.
35. Dimberg, U., & Lundquist, L.-O. (1990). Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 30, 151-159.
36. Dion, K. L. (2000). Group cohesion: from" field of forces" to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 7.
37. Druskat, V. U., & Pescosolido, A. T. (2006). The impact of emergent leader's emotionally competent behavior on team trust, communication, engagement, and effectiveness. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 2, 25-55.
38. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
39. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
40. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
41. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities. In T. Eckes, & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp.123-174). Mahwam, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781-797.
43. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
44. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: an evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-434.
45. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
46. Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1-12.
47. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 63-71.
48. Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644-658.
49. Elsesser, K. M., & Lever, J. (2011). Does gender bias against female leaders persist? Quantitative and qualitative data from a large-scale survey. Human Relations, 64, 1555-1578.
50. Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., Kraut, R. E., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2007). Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science, 18, 613-630.
51. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
52. Fletcher, J. K. (1998). Relational practice: a feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7, 163-186.
53. Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: gender, power, and relational practices at work. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
54. Fletcher, J. K., & Kaeufer, K. (2002). Shared leadership: paradox and possibility. In C. L. Pearce, & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp.21-47). Thousand Oacks, CA: Sage Publications.
55. Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: an essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 647-661.
56. Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review, 22, 257-282.
57. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489-505.
58. Fukushima, H., & Hiraki, K. (2006). Perceiving an opponent's loss: gender-related differences in the medial-frontal negativity. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 1, 149-157.
59. Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Pscyhology, 77, 642-655.
60. Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in globally distributed teams: the role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1252-1261.
61. Gerzema, J., & D'Antonio, M. (2013). The Athena doctrine: how women (and the men who think like them) will rule the future. San Francisco: Joseey-Bass.
62. Grant, J. (1988). Women as managers: what can they offer to organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 56-63.
63. Griffith, J. (1988). Measurement of group cohesion in US Army units. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 149-171.
64. Groves, K. S. (2005). Gender differences in social and emotional skills and charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11, 30-46.
65. Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
66. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
67. Heffernan, M. (2002). The female CEO ca. 2002. Fast Company, 61, 58-66.
68. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.
69. Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 615-632.
70. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
71. Holt, J. L., & DeVore, C. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 165-196.
72. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: an integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
73. Hu, L.-T. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
74. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145.
75. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Judith, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: from input-process-outcome models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
76. Janz, B. D., & Prasarnphanich, P. (2003). Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: the importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Science, 34, 351-384.
77. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
78. Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (2002). Cultures that support product innovation processes. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 42-54.
79. Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (2006). Collaboration in cross-functional product innovation teams. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 12, 1-25.
80. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Anderson, D. (1983). Social interdependence and classroom climate. The Journal of Psychology, 114, 135-142.
81. Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: the role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20, 240-252.
82. Kanter, R. M., & Zolner, J. P. (1986). What the 'new' coaches can teach managers. Management Review, 75, 10-11.
83. Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547-555.
84. Kim, M. S., Hunter, J. E., Miyahara, A., Horvath, A. M., Bresnahan, M., & Yoon, H. J. (1996). Individual-vs. Culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: effects on preferred conversational styles. Communications Monographs, 63, 29-49.
85. Kirkman, B., Li, N., & Porter, C. (2014). Toward a model of work team altruism. Academy of Management Review, 39, 541-565.
86. Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., Smith, D. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 3.
87. Klotz, F. (2011). Why women make better leaders, Forbes.
88. Kozlowski, S. W., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161.
89. LaVine, L. (2014). The case for women on boards, FastCompany.com: http://www.fastcompany.com/3041604/strong-female-lead/the-case-for-women-on-boards: FastCompany. Accessed on January 30, 2015
90. Liden, R., & Antonakis, J. (2009). Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human Relations, 62, 1587-1605.
91. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854.
92. Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-309.
93. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779-793.
94. Luxen, M. F. (2005). Gender differences in dominance and affiliation during a demanding interaction. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 139, 331-347.
95. Mandell, B., & Pherwani, S. (2003). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership style: a gender comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 387-404.
96. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
97. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
98. McInerney-Lacombe, N., Bilimoria, D., & Salipante, P. F. (2008). Championing the discussion of tough issues: how women corporate directors contribute to board deliberations. In S. Vinnicombe, V. Singh, R. J. Burke, D. Bilimoria, & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: international research and practice (pp.123-139). Cheltenham: Edward Edgar.
99. Montoya, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Lockwood, N. S. (2011). 3D collaborative virtual environments: exploring the link between collaborative behaviors and team performance. Decision Sciences, 42, 451-476.
100. Mullen, B., Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25, 189-204.
101. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210.
102. Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27, 392-413.
103. Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators.
104. Pearce, C. L., & Herbik, P. A. (2004). Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: the effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived team support, and team size. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 293-310.
105. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
106. Pescosolido, A. T., & Saavedra, R. (2012). Cohesion and sports teams: a review. Small Group Research, 43, 744-758.
107. Polzer, J. T., Crisp, C. B., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Kim, J. W. (2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: how colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 679-692.
108. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2003). Probing interactions in multiple linear regression, latent curve analysis, and hierarchical linear modeling: Interactive calculation tools for establishing simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org
109. Purvanova, R. K. (2013). The role of feeling known for team member outcomes in project teams. Small Group Research, 44, 298-332.
110. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5: hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
111. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
112. Richardson, D. R., Green, L. R., & Lago, T. S. (1998). The relationship between perspective taking and non-aggressive responding in the face of an attack. Journal of Personality, 66, 235-256.
113. Rispens, S., Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2011). Not so bad after all: how relational closeness buffers the association between relationship conflict and helpful and deviant group behaviors. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 277-296.
114. Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68, 119-125.
115. Rosette, A. S., & Tost, L. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 221-235.
116. Ryan, M., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: exploring dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549-572.
117. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 81-90.
118. Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2011). Think crisis-think female: the glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 470-484.
119. Savelsbergh, C., Gevers, J. M. P., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Poell, R. F. (2012). Team role stress: relationships with team learning and performance in project teams. Group & Organization Management, 37, 67-100.
120. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
121. Sharpe, R. (2000). As leaders, women rule; http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_47/b3708145.htm; October 28, 2003.
122. Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349-356.
123. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
124. Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32, 132-157.
125. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120.
126. Taggar, S., & Ellis, R. (2007). The role of leaders in shaping formal team norms. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 105-120.
127. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
128. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.
129. Taylor, S. N., & Hood, J. N. (2011). It may not be what you think: gender differences in predicting emotional and social competence. Human Relations, 64, 627-652.
130. Tzabbar, D., & Vestal, A. (In press). Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R&D teams: the moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organization Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0969 Published Online: April 3, 2015.
131. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676.
132. Van de Ven, A. H., & Polley, D. (1992). Learning while innovating. Organization Science, 3, 92.
133. van Emmerik, H., Gardner, W. L., Wendt, H., & Fischer, D. (2010). Associations of culture and personality with McClelland's motives: a cross-cultural study of managers in 24 countries. Group & Organization Management, 35, 329-367.
134. Van Vugt, M., & Spisak, B. R. (2008). Sex differences in the emergence of leadership during competitions within and between groups. Psychological Science, 19, 854-858.
135. Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643-671.
136. Vecchio, R. P. (2003). In search of gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 835-850.
137. Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-173.
138. White, J., Mcmillen, M. C., & Baker, A. C. (2001). Challenging traditional models: toward an inclusive model of group development. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 40-57.
139. Williams, H. M., Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2007). Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking within work teams. Group & Organization Management, 32, 569-597.
140. Woolley, A. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686-688.
141. Zaccaro, S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 387-399.
142. Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2002). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451-483.
143. Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2012). Are women better leaders than men?, Harvard business review blog, Vol. 2014. http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/03/a-study-in-leadership-women-do/. Accessed on November 15, 2014