The Role of Feeling Known for Team Member Outcomes in Project Teams

Small Group Research

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 298-331

  Purvanova, Radostina K ^a  

^a DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

computer mediated communication; feeling known; hybrid teams; perceived learning; project satisfaction; team member outcomes; virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877819450     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496413480244     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Adams S. J.,Roch S. G.,Ayman R.Communication medium and member familiarity: The effects on decision time, accuracy, and satisfaction.Small Group Research. 2005;36:321-353.
2. Anderson J. C.,Gerbing D. W.Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103:411-423.
3. Balkundi P.,Harrison D. A.Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:49-68.
4. Baltes B. B.,Dickson M. W.,Sherman M. P.,Bauer C. C.,LaGanke J. S.Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2002;87:156-179.
5. Barkhi R.,Jacob V. S.,Pirkul H.An experimental analysis of face-to-face versus computer mediated communication channels.Group Decision and Negotiation. 1999;8:325-347.
6. Baumeister R. F.,Leary M. R.The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological Bulletin. 1995;117:497-529.
7. Bell B. S.,Kozlowski S. J.A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership.Group and Organizational Management. 2002;21:14-49.
8. Berger P. L.,Luckmann T.The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday; 1967:.
9. Bliese P. D.Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. Klein K. L.Kozlowski S. W., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:349-381.
10. Breaux D. M.,Munyon T. P.,Hochwarter W. A.,Ferris G. R.Politics as a moderator of the accountability-job satisfaction relationship: Evidence across three studies.Journal of Management. 2009;35:307-326.
11. Brief A. P.,Weiss H. M.Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace.Annual Review of Psychology. 2002;53:279-307.
12. Burke K.,Chidambaram L.How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes.MIS Quarterly. 1999;23:557-580.
13. Burke P. J.,Stets J. E.Trust and commitment through self-verification.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1999;62:347-360.
14. Carlson E. N.,Furr R. M.Evidence of differential meta-accuracy: People understand the different impressions they make.Psychological Science. 2009;20:1033-1039.
15. Cascio W. F.Managing a virtual workplace.Academy of Management Executive. 2000;14:81-90.
16. Creed W. E.,Scully M. A.Songs of ourselves: Employees' deployment of social identity in workplace encounters.Journal of Management Inquiry. 2000;9:391-412.
17. De La Ronde C.,Swann W. B.Partner verification: Restoring shattered images of our intimates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75:374-382.
18. DeRosa D. M.,Hantula D. A.,Kock N.,D'Arcy J.Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective.Human Resource Management. 2004;43:219-232.
19. DuFrene D. D.,Lehman G. M.Managing virtual teams. New York, NY: Business Expert Press; 2012:.
20. Dunlap J. C.,Lowenthal P. R.Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence.Journal of Information Systems Education. 2009;20:129-135.
21. Dutton J. E.,Heaphy E. D.Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. Cameron K. S.Dutton J. E.Quinn R. E., ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 2003:263-278.
22. Edmondson A. C.Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999;44:350-383.
23. Edmondson A. C.Trust and distrust across organizational contexts: Dilemmas and approaches. Kramer R. M.Cook K. S., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2004:239-273.
24. Elfenbein H. A.,Eisenkraft N.,Ding W. W.Do we know who values us? Dyadic meta-accuracy in the perception of professional relationships.Psychological Science. 2009;20:1081-1083.
25. Ferris G. R.,Adams G.,Kolodinsky R. W.,Hochwarter W. A.,Ammeter A. P.Research in multi-level issues: The many face of multi-level issues. Yammarino F. J.Dansereau F., ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science; 2002:179-254.
26. Fjermestad J.An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research.Decision Support Systems. 2004;37:239-263.
27. Fiol C. M.,O'Connor E. J.Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions.Organization Science. 2005;16:19-32.
28. Garrison D. R.E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. 2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.London, UK: Routledge; 2011:.
29. Garrison D. R.,Anderson T.,Archer W.Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education.; 2000; 2000. 87.
30. George G.,Sleeth R. G.Leadership in computer-mediated communication: Implications and research directions.Journal of Business and Psychology. 2000;15:287-310.
31. Gergen K.Realities and relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994:.
32. Goffman E.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday; 1959:.
33. Gruenfeld D. H.,Mannix E. A.,Williams K. Y.,Neale M A.Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1996;67:1-15.
34. Hackman J. R.,Wageman R.A theory of team coaching.Academy of Management Review. 2005;30:269-287.
35. Harrison D. A.,Mohammed S.,McGrath J. E.,Florey A. T.,Vanderstoep S. W.Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality.Personnel Psychology. 2003;56:633-669.
36. Hogg M. A.Individual self, relational self, collective self. Sedikides C.Brewer M. B., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis; 2001:123-143.
37. Hu L.,Bentler P. M.Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Hoyle R. H., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1995:76-99.
38. Ibarra H.Working identity: Unconventional strategies for reinventing your career. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003:.
39. Jones G. R.,George J. M.The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork.Academy of Management Review. 1998;23:531-548.
40. Jowett S.,Clark-Carter D.Perceptions of empathic accuracy and assumed similarity in the coach-athlete relationship.British Journal of Social Psychology. 2006;45:617-637.
41. Jöreskog K.,Söbrom D.LISREL 8: User reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software; 1993:.
42. Kahn W. A.Research in organizational behavior. Staw B. M.Cummings L. L., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI; 1998:39-76.
43. Katz J.,Beach S. R. H.,Anderson P.Self-enhancement versus self-verification: Does spousal support always help?.Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1996;20:345-360.
44. Kirkman B. L.,Rosen B.,Gibson C. B.,Tesluk P. E.,McPherson S. O.Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc.Academy of Management Executive. 2002;16 (3): 67-79.
45. Knowles M. S.The adult learners: A neglected species. 1990). The adult learners: A neglected species (4th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.Houston, TX: Gulf; 1990:.
46. Kock N.Evolution and media naturalness: A look at e-communication through a Darwinian theoretical lens. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on information systems; 2002; 2002. 373.
47. Kouzes J. M.,Posner B. Z.The leadership challenge. 2007). The leadership challenge. (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:.
48. Lount R. B.The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;98:420-433.
49. Majchrzak A.,Malhotra A.,Stamps J.,Lipnack J.Can absence make a team grow stronger?.Harvard Business Review. 2004;82 (5): 131-137.
50. Malhotra A.,Majchrzak A.,Rosen B.Leading virtual teams.Academy of Management Perspectives. 2007;21:60-70.
51. Maruyama G. M.Basics of Structural Equation Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998:.
52. Mayer R. C.,Davis J. H.,Schoorman F. D.An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review. 1995;20:709-734.
53. McAllister D. J.Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations.Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:24-59.
54. McAllister D. J.,Bigley G. A.,Tan H. H.,Kamdar D. A.Differential self-regulatory effects of two major forms of trust. Singapore: National University of Singapore; 2005:.
55. Mesmer-Magnus J. R.,DeChurch L. A.,Jimenez-Rodriguez M.,Wildman J.,Shuffler M.A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2011;115:214-225.
56. Polzer J. T.,Milton L. P.,Swann W. B.Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small workgroups.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2002;47:296-324.
57. Preacher K. J.,Rucker D. D.,Hayes A. F.Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007;42:185-227.
58. Purvanova R. K.,Bono J. E.Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams.Leadership Quarterly. 2009;20:343-357.
59. Reicher S. D.,Spears R.,Postmes T.A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena.European Review of Social Psychology. 1995;6:161-198.
60. Richardson J. C.,Swan K.Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2003;7:68-88.
61. Rosen B.,Furst S.,Blackburn R.Training for virtual teams: An investigation of current practices and future needs.Human Resources Management. 2006;45:229-247.
62. RourkeL.AndersonT. (2002). Using peer teams to lead online discussion. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk./.
63. Rousseau D. M.,Sitkin S. B.,Burt R. S.,Camerer C.Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust.Academy of Management Review. 1998;23:393-404.
64. Salancik G. R.,Pfeffer J.A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1978;23:224-253.
65. Saunders C.,Ahuja M.Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams.Small Groups Research. 2006;37:661-700.
66. Schoorman F. D.,Mayer R. C.,Davis J. H. Paper presented at the 11th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology; San Diego, CA;.
67. Schumacker R. E.,Lomax R. G.A beginner's guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 2004). A beginner's guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004:.
68. Seyle D. C.,Swann W. B.Identity and the modern organization. Bartel C. A.Blader S.Wrzesniewski A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2007:201-222.
69. Short J.,Williams E.,Christie B.The social psychology of telecommunication. London, UK: John Wiley; 1976:.
70. Spears R.,Lea M.Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication.Communication Research. 1994;21:427-459.
71. Stryker S.,Statham A.Handbook of social psychology. Lindzey G.Aronson E., ed. New York, NY: Random House; 1985:311-378.
72. Swann W. B.Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics.Psychological Review. 1984;91:457-477.
73. Swann W. B.Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior. Higgins E. T.Sorrentino R. M., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1990:408-448.
74. Swann W. B.Handbook of theories of social psychology. Van Lang P. A. M.Kruglanski A. W.Higgins E. T., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:23-42.
75. Swann W. B.,De La Ronde C.,Hixon J. G.Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66:857-869.
76. Swann W. B.,Ely R. J.A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984;46:1287-1302.
77. Swann W. B.,Gill M. J.Confidence and accuracy in person perception: Do we know what we think we know about our relationship partners?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;73:747-757.
78. Swann W. B.,Kwan V. S. Y.,Polzer J. T.,Milton L. P.Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003;29:1396-1406.
79. Swann W. B.,Milton L. P.,Polzer J. T.Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;79:238-250.
80. Swann W. B.,Pelham B.Who wants out when the going gets good? Psychological investment and preference for self-verifying college roommates.Self and Identity. 2002;1:219-233.
81. Swann W. B.,Polzer J. T.,Seyle D. C.,Ko S. J.Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups.Academy of Management Review. 2004;29:9-27.
82. Swann W. B.,Read S. J.Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1981;17:351-372.
83. Swann W. B.,Stein-Seroussi A.,Giesler R. B.Why people self-verify?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;62:392-401.
84. Thornton B.,Lovley A.,Ryckman R. M.,Gold J. A.Playing dumb and knowing it all: Competitive orientation and impression management strategies.Individual Differences Research. 2009;7:265-271.
85. TurmelW. (2010). Three reasons why virtual teams fails. Maas 360. Retrieved from http://magazine.maas360.com/article/669-three-reasons-why-virtual-teams-fail/-.
86. Walther J. B.Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective.Communication Research. 1992;19:52-90.
87. Walther J. B.,Burgoon J. K.Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction.Human Communication Research. 1992;19:50-88.
88. Wang X.,Howell J. M.Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;95:1134-1144.
89. Wiesenfeld B. M.,Raghuram S.,Garud R.Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization.Organization Science. 1999;10:777-790.
90. Williams M.In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development.Academy of Management Review. 2001;26:377-396.