Think crisis-think female: The glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 470-484

  Ryan, Michelle K ^a,b   Haslam, S Alexander ^a   Hersby, Mette D ^a   Bongiorno, Renata ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Gender; Glass cliff; Leadership; Stereotypes; Women

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MANPOWER; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; WORKPLACE;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; COMMERCE; DATA COLLECTION; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEX FACTORS; STEREOTYPING; WORKPLACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79956324117     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022133     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adams S.M., Gupta A., Leeth J.D. Are female executives over-represented in precarious leadership positions?. British Journal of Management 2009, 20:1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00549.x.
2. Agars M.D. Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2004, 28:103-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00127.x.
3. Antal A.B., Izraeli D.N. A global comparison of women in management: Women managers in their homelands and as expatriates. Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity 1993, 52-96. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. E.A. Fagenson (Ed.).
4. Ashby J., Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A. Legal work and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to lead problematic cases. Journal of Women and the Law 2007, 13:775-794.
5. Ayres A. The wit and wisdom of Eleanor Roosevelt 1996, Plume, New York, NY.
6. Bass B.M. Leadership and performance beyond expectation 1985, Free Press, New York, NY.
7. Bass B., Avolio B., Atwater L. The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology 1996, 45:5-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1996.tb00847.x.
8. Beyer J.M., Browning L.D. Transforming an industry in crisis: Charisma, routinization, and supportive cultural leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 1999, 10:483-520. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00026-0.
9. Birnbaum M.H. Methodological and ethical issues in conducting social psychology research via the Internet. Handbook of methods in social psychology 2004, 359-382. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. C. Sansone, C.C. Morf, A.T. Panter (Eds.).
10. Brenner O.C., Tomkiewicz J., Schein V.E. The relationship between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal 1989, 32:662-669. doi: 10.2307/256439.
11. Bruckmüller S., Branscombe N.R. The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology 2010, 49:433-451. doi: 10.1348/014466609X466594.
12. Statistical overview of women in the workplace 2009, Catalyst, Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/file/172/qt_statistical_overview_of_women_in_the_workplace.pdf.
13. Women in U.S. management 2009, Catalyst, Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/206/women-in-us-management.
14. Deal J.J., Stevenson M.A. Perceptions of female and male managers in the 1990s: Plus ça change.... Sex Roles 1998, 38:287-300. doi: 10.1023/A:1018741318216.
15. Deaux K., Lewis L.L. Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46:991-1004. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991.
16. Duehr E.E., Bono J.E. Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?. Personnel Psychology 2006, 59:815-846. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00055.x.
17. Eagly A.H. Prejudice: Toward a more inclusive understanding. The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice 2004, 45-64. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1037/10683-003. A.H. Eagly, R.M. Baron, V.L. Hamilton (Eds.).
18. Eagly A.H., Carli L.L. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly 2003, 14:807-834. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004.
19. Eagly A.H., Carli L.L. Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders 2007, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
20. Eagly A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt M.C., van Engen M. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129:569-591. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569.
21. Eagly A.H., Karau S.J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 2002, 109:573-598. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.
22. Eagly A.H., Makhijani M.G., Klonsky B.G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 111:3-22. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3.
23. Eagly A.H., Sczesny S. Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed?. The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality 2009, 21-47. American Psychological Association Books, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1037/11863-002. M. Barreto, M.K. Ryan, M.T. Schmitt (Eds.).
24. Eagly A.H., Steffen V.J. Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46:735-754. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735.
25. Eisenback R., Watson K., Pillai R. Transformational leadership in the context of organizational change. Journal of Change Management 1999, 12:80-88.
26. Emrich C.G. Context effects in leadership perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1999, 25:991-1006. doi: 10.1177/01461672992511007.
27. Women and men in Britain: Management 2002, Equal Opportunities Commission, Author, Manchester, England.
28. Social values, science and technology 2005, European Commission, Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf.
29. Haslam S.A. Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach 2004, Sage, London, England. 2nd ed.
30. Haslam S.A., Platow M.J., Turner J.C., Reynolds K.J., McGarty C., Oakes P.J., Veenstra K. Social identity and the romance of leadership: The importance of being seen to be " doing it for us." Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2001, 4:191-205. doi: 10.1177/1368430201004003002.
31. Haslam S.A., Reicher S.D., Platow M.J. The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power 2010, Psychology Press, London, England.
32. Haslam S.A., Ryan M.K. The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. The Leadership Quarterly 2008, 19:530-546. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.011.
33. Heilman M.E. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in organizational behavior 1983, 5:269-298. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. B. Staw, L. Cummings (Eds.).
34. Heilman M.E. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:657-674. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00234.
35. Heilman M.E., Block C.J., Martell R.F. Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers?. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1995, 10:237-252.
36. Heilman M.E., Block C.J., Martell R.F., Simon M.C. Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:935-942. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.935.
37. Heilman M.E., Wallen A.S., Fuchs D., Tamkins M.M. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004, 89:416-427. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416.
38. Hunt J.G., Boal K.B., Dodge G.E. The effects of visionary and crisis-responsive charisma on followers: An experimental examination of two kinds of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 1999, 10:423-448. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00027-2.
39. Kanter R.M. Men and women of the corporation 1977, Basic Books, New York, NY.
40. Kent R.L., Moss S.E. Effects of sex and gender role on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal 1994, 37:1335-1346. doi: 10.2307/256675.
41. Kulich C., Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A. Where is the romance for women leaders? The effects of gender on leadership attributions and performance-based pay. Applied Psychology 2007, 56:582-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00305.x.
42. Lalonde C. In search of archetypes in crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 2004, 12:76-88. doi: 10.1111/j.0966-0879.2004.00437.x.
43. Lord R.G., Brown D.J., Harvey J.L., Hall R.J. Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multi-level consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly 2001, 12:311-338. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00081-9.
44. Lord R.G., Foti R., DeVader C.L. A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1984, 34:343-378. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6.
45. Mano-Negrin R., Sheaffer Z. Are women " cooler" than men during crises? Exploring gender differences in perceiving organisational crisis preparedness proneness. Women in Management Review 2004, 19:109-122. doi: 10.1108/09649420410525315.
46. McGarty C., Yzerbyt V.Y., Spears R. Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489877.
47. Meindl J.R. Reinventing leadership: A radical social psychological approach. Social psychology in organizations 1993, 89-118. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. J.K. Murnighan (Ed.).
48. Pearson C.M., Claire J.A. Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23:59-76. doi: 10.2307/259099.
49. Pearson C.M., Mitroff I.I. From crisis prone to crisis prepared: A framework for crisis management. Academy of Management Executive 1993, 7:48-59.
50. Pfeffer J. The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review 1977, 2:104-112. doi: 10.2307/257611.
51. Pillai R., Meindl J.R. Context and charisma: A " meso" level approach to the relationship of organic structure, collectivism and crisis to charismatic leadership. Journal of Management 1998, 24:643-671.
52. Powell G.N., Butterfield D.A., Parent J.D. Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?. Journal of Management 2002, 28:177-193. doi: 10.1177/014920630202800203.
53. Probst G., Raisch S. Organizational crisis: The logic of failure. Academy of Management Executive 2005, 19:90-105.
54. Reicher S.D., Hopkins N. Self-category constructions in political rhetoric: An analysis of Thatcher's and Kinnock's speeches concerning the British Miners' Strike (1984-5). European Journal of Social Psychology 1996, 26:353-371. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<353::AID-EJSP757>3.0.CO;2-O.
55. Rudman L.A., Glick P. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:743-762. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
56. Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A. The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management 2005, 16:81-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x.
57. Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A. The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding women's appointment to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32:549-572.
58. Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A. Glass cliffs are not so easily scaled: On the precariousness of female CEOs' positions. British Journal of Management 2009, 20:13-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00598.x.
59. Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A., Kulich C. Politics and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2010, 34:56-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01541.x.
60. Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A., Postmes T. Reactions to the glass cliff: Gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women's leadership positions. Journal of Organizational Change Management 2007, 20:182-197. doi: 10.1108/09534810710724748.
61. Schein V.E. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology 1973, 57:95-100. doi: 10.1037/h0037128.
62. Schein V.E. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology 1975, 60:340-344. doi: 10.1037/h0076637.
63. Schein V.E. A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:675-688. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00235.
64. Schein V.E., Mueller R., Jacobson C. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles 1989, 20:103-110. doi: 10.1007/BF00288030.
65. Sczesny S. A closer look beneath the surface: Various facets of the think-manager-think-male stereotype. Sex Roles 2003, 49:353-363. doi: 10.1023/A:1025112204526.
66. Sczesny S., Bosak J., Neff D., Schyns B. Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles 2004, 51:631-645. doi: 10.1007/s11199-004-0715-0.
67. Singh V., Vinnicombe S. The 2003 Female FTSE Index: Women pass a milestone. 101 directorships on the FTSE 100 boards 2003, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, England.
68. Turner J.C., Haslam S.A. Social identity, organizations and leadership. Groups at work: Advances in theory and research 2001, 25-65. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.E. Turner (Ed.).
69. Capacity development: Empowering people and institutions 2008, United Nations Development Program, Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/publications/annualreport2008/pdf/IAR2008_ENG_low.pdf.
70. Vecchio R.P. Leadership and gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly 2002, 13:643-671. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00156-X.
71. Vecchio R.P. In search of gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly 2003, 14:835-850. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.005.
72. Vinnicombe S., Singh V. Sex role stereotyping and requisites of successful top managers. Women in Management Review 2002, 17:120-130. doi: 10.1108/09649420210425264.
73. Wellington W., Kropf M.B., Gerkovich P.R. What's holding women back?. Harvard Business Review 2003, 81:18-19.