An evolving framework for describing student engagement in classroom activities

Journal of Mathematical Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 270-289

  Azevedo, Flávio S ^a   diSessa, Andrea A ^b   Sherin, Bruce L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain specific conceptual competence; Mathematics; Participation; Science; Student engagement; Tools for teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856764023     PISSN: 07323123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ames C. Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 1992, 84:261-271.
2. Azevedo, F. S. (1998). Inventing Mapping: Meta-representational competence for spatially distributed data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.
3. Azevedo F.S. Designing representations of terrain: A study in meta-representational competence. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2000, 19(4):443-480.
4. Azevedo F.S. Personal excursions: Investigating the dynamics of student engagement. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 2006, 11:57-98.
5. Ball D.L., Bass H. Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. Yearbook of the National Society for the study of education, constructivism in education 2000, 193-224. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. D. Phillips (Ed.).
6. Blumenfeld P.C., Kempler T.M., Krajcik J.S. Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2006, 475-486. R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.).
7. Blumenfeld P.C., Soloway E., Marx R.W., Krajcik J.S., Guzdial M., Palincsar A.S. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 1991, 26:369-398.
8. Brown A.L., Campione J.C. Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. Innovations in learning: New environments for education 1996, 289-325. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. L. Schauble, R. Glaser (Eds.).
9. Cobb P., Stephan M., McClain K., Gravemeijer K. Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2001, 10(1):113-163.
10. Collins A. Design issues for learning environments. International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments 1995, 347-361. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Vosniadou, E. de Corte, H. Mandl (Eds.).
11. Csikszentmihalyi M. The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness 1988, 15-35. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. M. Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.).
12. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow-The psychology of optimal experience 1990, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
13. diSessa A.A. Students' criteria for representational adequacy. Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education 2002, 105-129. Kluwer, Dordrecht. K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, L. Verschaffel (Eds.).
14. diSessa A.A. Meta-representation: Native competence and targets for instruction. The development of notational representations. 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford. S. Strauss (Ed.).
15. diSessa A.A., Hammer D., Sherin B., Kolpakowski T. Inventing Graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 1991, 10:117-160.
16. diSessa A.A., Minstrell J. Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. Thinking Practices 1998, 155-187. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J.G. Greeno (Ed.).
17. diSessa A., Sherin B. Meta-representation: An introduction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2000, 19(4):385-398.
18. Dweck C.S. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development 1999, Psychology Press, Philadelphia. PA.
19. Edelson D., Joseph D. The interest-driven learning design framework: Motivating learning through usefulness. Proceedings of the sixth international conference of the learning sciences 2004, June, 166-173. Y.B. Kafai, W.A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A.S. Nixon, F. Herrera (Eds.).
20. Engeström Y. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on activity theory 1999, 19-38. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, R. Punamäki (Eds.).
21. Engle R.A., Conant F.C. Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction 2002, 20(4):399-483.
22. Friedman J.S., diSessa A.A. What students should know about technology: The case of scientific visualization. Journal of Science Education and Technology 1999, 8(3).
23. Granados R. Constructing intersubjectivity in representational design activities. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2000, 19(4):503-530.
24. Greeno J.G., Hall R.P. Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan 1997, 78(5):361-368.
25. Greeno J.G. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist 1998, 53(1):5-26. the Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group (MMAP).
26. Gresalfi M.S. Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2009, 18(3):327-369.
27. Hall R., Stevens R. Making space: A comparison of mathematical work in school and professional design practice. The cultures of computing 1995, 118-145. Basil Blackwell, London, UK. S.L. Star (Ed.).
28. st century. Review of Educational Research 2000, 70(2):151-179.
29. Hidi S., Renninger K.A. The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist 2006, 4(2):111-127.
30. Hoffmann L. Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction 2002, 12:447-465.
31. Janvier C. Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics 1987, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
32. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts 1986, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
33. Lepper M.R., Cordova D.I. A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion 1992, 16:187-208.
34. Madanes, R. (1997). Teaching through discussion: Using critical moves and support moves. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
35. Maher C.A., Powell A., Uptegrove E. Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying and building isomorphisms 2009, Springer, New York, NY.
36. Maher C.A., Yankelewitz D. Representations as tools for building arguments. Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying and building isomorphisms 2009, Springer, New York, NY. C.A. Maher, A.B. Powell, E. Uptegrove (Eds.).
37. Meira L. The microevolution of mathematical representations in children's activities. Cognition and Instruction 1995, 13(2):269-313.
38. Minstrell J. Teaching science for understanding. Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research 1989, 129-149. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA. L.B. Resnick, L.E. Klopfer (Eds.).
39. Newman F.M., Wehlage G.G., Lamborn S. The significance and sources of student engagement. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools 1992, 11-39. Teachers College Press, New York, NY. F. Newman (Ed.).
40. Puntambekar S., Kolodner J.L. Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science through design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2005, 42(2):185-217.
41. Renninger K.A., Shumar W. The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with the Math Forum. Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning 2004, 181-209. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. S.A. Barab, R. Kling, J.H. Gray (Eds.).
42. Resnick M. Toward a practice of constructional design. Innovations in learning: New environments for education 1996, 161-174. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. L. Schauble, R. Glaser (Eds.).
43. Rigby C.S., Deci E.L., Patrick B.C., Ryan R.M. Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion 1992, 16(3):165-185.
44. Schoenfeld A.H. Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1989, 20(4):338-355.
45. Sherin, B. (1997). The elements of representational design. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Educational Research, Chicago, IL.
46. Sherin B. How students invent representations of motion: A genetic account. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2000, 19(4):399-441.
47. Sherin B.L., Azevedo F.S., diSessa A.A. Exploration zones: A framework for describing the emergent structure of learning activities. Everyday matters in science and mathematics 2005, 329-366. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. A. Rosebery, B. Warren, R. Nemirovsky, J. Solomon (Eds.).
48. Speiser B., Walter C., Maher C.A. Representing motion: An experiment in learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2009, 22:1-35.
49. Stein M.K., Engle R.A., Smith M.S., Hughes E.K. Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2008, 10:313-340.
50. Tufte E.R. Envisioning information 1990, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
51. Willats J. Drawing systems revisited: The role of denotation systems in children's figure drawings. Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation 1985, 374-384. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. N.H. Freeman, M.V. Cox (Eds.).
52. Willats J. Art and representation: New principles in the analysis of pictures 1997, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
53. Yackel E., Cobb P. Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1996, 27:458-477.
54. Yankelewitz D., Mueller M., Maher C.A. A task that elicits reasoning: A dual analysis. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2010, 29:76-85.