Students' interest and engagement in classroom activities

Handbook of Research on Student Engagement

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 283-302

  Ainley, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878682631     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Ainley, M. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 395-405.
2. Ainley, M. (2007). Being and feeling interested: Transient state, mood, and disposition. In P. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions and education (pp. 147-163). Burlington, MA: Academic.
3. Ainley, M. (2010). Interest in the dynamics of task behavior: Processes that link person and task in effective learning. In T. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Vol. 16A, pp. 235-264). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
4. Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011a). Interest in science: Part of the complex structure of student motivation in science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51-71.
5. Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011b). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students' continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12.
6. Ainley, M., Buckley, S., & Chan, J. (2009). Interest and efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning: Does the task make a difference? In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to localperspectives (pp. 207-227). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
7. Ainley, M., Corrigan, M., & Richardson, N. (2005). Students, tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students' reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 433-447.
8. Ainley, M., Flowers, D., & Patrick, L. (2005). The impact of mood on learning - The impact of task on mood. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Nicosia, Cyprus.
9. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561.
10. Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411-428.
11. Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 267-286.
12. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445.
13. Arbuckle, J. (2005). AMOS 6. 0 user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
14. Asakawa, K., & Csikszentimihalyi, M. (1998). The quality of experience of Asian American adolescents in academic activities: An exploration of educational achievement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(2), 241-262.
15. Boekaerts, M., de Koning, E., & Vedder, P. (2006). Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 33-51.
16. Boydston, J. A. (Ed.). (1979). John Dewey: The middle works 1899-1924 (Vol. 7: 1912-1914). London: Southern Illinois University Press.
17. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasra (Ed.), Six theories of child development (pp. 187-249). London: Jessica Kingsley Publications.
18. th ed., Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development, pp. 535-584). New York: Wiley.
19. Buckley, S., Hasen, G., & Ainley, M. (2004, November). Affective engagement: A person-centred approach to understanding the structure of subjective learning experiences. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE), Melbourne, Australia.
20. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Chen, A., & Ennis, C. D. (2004). Goal, interest, and learning in physical education. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 329-338.
22. Dekker, S., & Fischer, R. (2008). Cultural differences in academic motivation goals: A meta-analysis across 13 societies. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 99-110.
23. Ely, R., Ainley, M., & Pearce, J. (2010). A new method for identifying dimensions of interest: MINE. Paper presented at the International Conference on Motivation (ICM), Porto, Portugal.
24. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). Student engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
25. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
26. Frenzel, A., Dicke, A.-L., Goetz, T., & Pekrun, R. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative insights into the development of interest in adolescence. Paper presented at the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
27. Fullarton, S. (2002). Student engagement with school: Individual and school level influences (LSAY Research Report No. 27). Camberwell, Australia: ACER.
28. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (3), 562-575.
29. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105-122.
30. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 549-571.
31. Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82.
32. Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2007). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77-109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 465-483.
34. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
35. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
36. Hulleman, C. S., & Senko, C. (2010). Up and around the bend: Forecasts for achievement goal theory and research in 2020. In T. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Vol. 16A, pp. 71-104). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
37. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51.
38. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349-366.
40. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
41. Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 260-280.
42. Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 3(1), 7-27.
43. Jörg, T., Davis, B., & Nickmans, G. (2007). Towards a new, complexity science of learning and education. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 145-156.
44. Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and human development: An educational-psychological perspective. Development and Motivation, BJEP Monograph Series, II(2), 57-84.
45. Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381-395.
46. Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701-736.
47. Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (Eds.). (2000). Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Linnakylä, P., & Malin, A. (2008). Finnish students' school engagement profiles in the light of PISA 2003. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 583-602.
49. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
50. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-436.
51. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 3-53.
52. OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
53. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world (Vol. 1: Analysis). Paris: OECD.
54. OECD. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: OECD.
55. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
56. Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). Undivided interest and the growth of talent: A longitudinal study of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22 (4), 385-405.
57. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2006). Prediction of dropouts among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27 (5), 276-292.
58. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58-67. doi: 10. 1016/j. learninstruc. 2009. 1011. 1001.
59. Russell, J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). Schooling issues digest: Student motivation and engagement. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Department of Education Science and Training.
60. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10(3), 175-186.
61. Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 379-390.
62. Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52.
63. Sideridis, G. D. (2009). Normative vs. non-normative performance goals: Effects on behavioral and emotional regulation in achievement situations. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to localperspectives (pp. 321-338). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
64. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781.
65. Sun, H., Chen, A., Ennis, C. D., Martin, R., & Shen, B. (2008). An examination of the multidimensionality of situational interest in elementary school physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(1), 62-70.
66. Tapola, A., Dayez, J.-B., & Veermans, M. (2009). Students' experience in a simulation-based science learning task: The role of individual and situational factors. Paper presented at the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The Australian Oxford Paperback Dictionary. (1999). (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
67. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 258-312). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
68. Turner, J. C. (2010). Unfinishedbusiness: Putting motivation theory to the "classroom test". In T. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: The decade ahead: Applications and contexts of motivation and achievement (Vol. 16B, pp. 109-138). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
69. Turner, J. E., & Waugh, R. M. (2007). A dynamical systems perspective regarding students' learning processes: Shame reactions and emergent self-organizations. In P. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions and education (pp. 125-145). Burlington, MA: Academic.
70. Wade, S. E. (2001). Research on importance and interest: Implications for curriculum development and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (3), 243-261.
71. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). Emotions, moods, traits and temperaments: Conceptual distinctions and empirical findings. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 89-93). New York: Oxford University Press.
72. Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
73. Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2009). A framework for personal goals in collaborative learning contexts. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 49-67). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.