Discovery learning and discovery teaching

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 485-529

  Hammer, David ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000542709     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci1504_2     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Ball, D. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
2. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Davenport, L. R., & Sassi, A. (1996). Transforming mathematics teaching in grades K-8: How narrative structures in resource materials help support teacher change. In B. S. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry and the development of teaching (pp. 37-46). Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Center for the Development of Teaching.
6. diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
7. Feldman, A. (1996). Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 513-540.
8. Feyerabend, P. K. (1988). Against method. New York: Verso.
9. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The psychological bases of science - A process approach Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
10. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183.
11. Hammer, D. (1995a). Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics Science Education, 79, 393-413.
12. Hammer, D. (1995b). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 401-430.
13. Hammer, D. (1996a). Misconceptions or p-prims. How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 97-127.
14. Hammer, D. (1996b). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316-1325.
15. Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. A. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72, 597-614.
16. Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72, 19-40.
17. Knapp, N., & Peterson, P. L. (1995). Teachers' interpretations of "CGI" after four years: Meanings and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 40-65.
18. Lampert, M. (1989). Choosing and using mathematical tools in classroom discourse. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (pp. 223-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
19. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
20. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lockett, G. (1996). Penumbra. In M. Shinohara, R. Wenn, & A. Sussman (Eds.), Tales from the electronic frontier (pp. 14-20). San Francisco: WestEd.
23. McDermott, L. C. (1990). A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers. American Journal of Physics, 58, 734-742.
24. McDonald, J. P. (1986). Raising the teacher's voice and the ironic role of theory. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 355-378.
25. McDonald, J. P. (1992). Teaching: Making sense of an uncertain craft. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Meira, L. (1991). Explorations of mathematical sense-making: An activity-oriented view of children's use and design of material displays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
27. Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28. Morse, R. A. (1991). Electrostatics activities for students. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.
29. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Using children's mathematical knowledge. In B. Means, C. Chelemer, & M. S. Knapp (Eds.), Teaching advanced skills to at-risk children (pp. 68-111). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5-10.
32. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings form language minority classrooms (TERC Working Papers). Cambridge, MA: TERC.
33. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else - The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79, 475-502.
34. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 127-152.
35. Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet - Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Sassi, A. M., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1996, April). Beyond recipes and behind the magic: Mathematics teaching as improvisation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York.
37. Schifter, D. (1996). What's happening in math class? Vol. 1. Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
39. Shulman, J. H. (1992). Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
41. Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211-231). New York: Academic.
43. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1996). "This question is just too, too easy!" Perspectives from the classroom on accountability in science. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 97-126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). "150 different ways" of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell.
45. Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessments to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 729-769.
46. Wineburg, S. S., & Wilson, S. M. (1988, September). Models of wisdom in the teaching of history. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 50-58.