The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1109-1136

  Coffey, Janet E ^a   Hammer, David ^b   Levin, Daniel M ^a   Grant, Terrance ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c St Paul School   (United States)

Author keywords

formative assessment; science education; teaching

Indexed keywords

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; HIGH SCHOOL; SCIENCE EDUCATION; SCIENCE TEACHING; STATE OF RESEARCH; STUDENT REASONING;

TEACHING;

RATING;

EID: 81055156922     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20440     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Alonzo, A., &, Gotwals, A. W., (Eds.). (in press). Learning progressions in science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
2. Alonzo, A., &, Steedle, J. T., (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education 93, 389-421.
3. Ames, C., (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261-271.
4. Ball, D. L., (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93 (4), 373-397.
5. Ball, D. L., &, Forzani, F. M., (2011). Teaching skillful teaching. The Effective Educator, 68 (4), 40-45.
6. Ball, D. L., Thames, M., &, Phelps, G., (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389-407.
7. Bell, B., &, Cowie, B., (2001a). Formative assessment and science education. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Bell, B., &, Cowie, B., (2001b). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553.
9. Bennett, R. E., (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 18 (1), 5-25.
10. Black, P. J., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., &, Wiliam, D., (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. London: Open University Press.
11. Black, P. J., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., &, Wiliam, D., (2004a). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: Kings College.
12. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., &, Wiliam, D., (2004b). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (1), 8-21. (Pubitemid 39299963)
13. Black, P., &, Wiliam, D., (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7-74.
14. Black, P., &, Wiliam, D., (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139-148. (Pubitemid 128463581)
15. Butler, R., (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79 (4), 474-482.
16. Butler, R., &, Neuman, O., (1995). Effects of task and ego-achievement goals on help-seeking behaviours and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (2), 261-271.
17. Coffey, J. E., (2003a). Making connections: Engaging students in assessment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
18. Coffey, J. E., (2003b). Involving students in assessment. In, J. M. Atkin, &, J. E. Coffey, (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
19. Coffey, J. E., &, Hammer, D., (in preparation). Engaging Students in Disciplinary Assessment.
20. Coffey, J. E., Edwards, A. R., &, Finkelstein, C., (2010). Dynamics of disciplinary understandings and practices of attending to student thinking in elementary teacher education. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
21. diSessa, A. A., (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (2-3), 105-225.
22. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., &, Scott, P., (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
23. Duschl, R., (2008). Science education in three part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 28 (1), 268-291.
24. Dweck, C. S., (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist Special issue. Psychological Science and Education, 41 (10), 1040-1048.
25. Erickson, F., (2007). Some thoughts on "proximal" formative assessment of student learning. In, G. D. Fenstermacher, (Ed.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 186-216). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
26. Franke, M. L., &, Kazemi, E., (2004). Learning to teach mathematics: Focus on student thinking. Theory into Practice, 40 (2), 102-109.
27. Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shemwell, J. T., Ayala, C., Brandon, P. R., Shavelson, R. J., &, Yin, Y., (2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessment and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21 (4), 360-389.
28. Galileo, G., (1632). Dialog on the two chief systems of the world. Translated by Drake, Stillman (2001). New York: Modern Library.
29. Gipps, C., (1994). Beyond testing: Toward a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press.
30. Goffman, E., (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
31. Hammer, D., (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183.
32. Hammer, D., (1997). Discovery teaching, discovery learning. Cognition and Instruction, 15 (4), 485-529.
33. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., &, Redish, E. F., (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In, J. Mestre, (Ed.), Transfer of Learning: Research and Perspectives (pp. 89-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
34. Hattie, J., &, Timperley, H., (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-112.
35. Heritage, M., (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA. Corwin Press.
36. Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., &, Herman, J., (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment Educational Measurement: Issues Practice, 28 (3), 24-31.
37. Hogan, K., (2000). Exploring a process view of student knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84 (1), 51-70.
38. Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., &, Battey, D., (2007). Professional development focused on children's algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38 (3), 258-288.
39. Jimenez-Alexiandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., &, Duschl, R., (2000). " Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792.
40. Jos, E., (1985). The right question at the right time. In, H. Wynne, (Ed.), Primary scienceâ Taking the plunge. Oxford: Heinemann.
41. Kazemi, E., Franke, M., &, Lampert, M., (2009). Developing Pedagogies in Teacher Education to Support Novice Teachers' Ability to Enact Ambitious Instruction. In, R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, &, T. Burgess, (Eds.), Crossing Divides, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Vol 1, pp. 11-29. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
42. Keeley, P., (2008). Science formative assessment: 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and student learning. Arlington, VA: National Science Teacher Association.
43. Kluger, A. N., &, DeNisi, A., (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254-284. (Pubitemid 126042646)
44. Lampert, M., (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
45. Lemke, J., (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
46. Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., &, Coffey, J. E., (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (2), 142-154.
47. Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., Elby, A., &, Coffey, J. E., (in press). Educating the responsive practitioner: Case studies in secondary science teaching. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
48. Levin, D. M., &, Richards, J., (2010). Exploring how novice teachers learn to attend to students' thinking in analyzing case studies of classroom teaching and learning. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
49. Mehan, H., (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Minstrell, J., &, van Zee, E. H., (Eds.). (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
51. Minstrell, J., &, van Zee, E., (2003). Using questioning to assess and foster student thinking. In, J. M. Atkin, &, J. E. Coffey, (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
52. Morrison, J. A., &, Lederman, N. G., (2003). Science teachers' diagnosis and understandings of students' preconceptions. Science Education, 87, 849-867. (Pubitemid 38614482)
53. National Research Council. (2001a). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
54. National Research Council. (2001b). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
55. Nobes, G., Moore, D. G., Martin, A. E., Clifford, B. R., Butterworth, G., Panagiotaki, G, Siegal, M, et al. (2003). Children's understanding of the earth in a multicultural community: Mental models or fragments of knowledge Developmental Science, 6 (1), 72-85. (Pubitemid 36357354)
56. Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeisler, S., &, Long, D. A., (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and discourse. Discourse Processes, 35 (2), 135-198.
57. Pierson, J., (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
58. Pope, D., (2001). " Doing School": How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic and miseducated students. Yale: Yale University Press.
59. Popham, W. J., (2006). Phony formative assessments: Buyer beware. Educational Leadership, 64 (3), 86-87.
60. Popham, J. W., (2008) Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
61. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., &, Gertzog, W. A., (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211-227.
62. Ramaprasad, A., (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28 (1), 4-13.
63. Redish, E. F., (2004). A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. In, E. F. Redish, C. Tarsitani, &, M. Vincentini, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 1-63). Bologna: Italian Physical Society.
64. Rowe, M. B., (1974). Reflections on wait-time: Some methodological questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11 (3), 263-279.
65. Sadler, R., (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
66. Sandoval, W. A., (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89 (4), 345-372.
67. Saxe, G., Gearhart, M., &, Seltzer, M., (1999). Relations between classroom practices and student learning in the domain of fractions. Cognition and Instruction, 17 (1), 1-24.
68. Settlage, J., &, Meadows, L., (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (2), 114-127.
69. Shavelson, R. J., (2003). On The Integration of Formative Assessment in Teaching And Learning with Implications for Teacher Education. For the Stanford Education Assessment Laboratory and the University of Hawaii Curriculum Research and Development Group.
70. Shavelson, R. J., (2006). On the integration of formative assessment in teaching and learning with implications for teacher education. Paper prepared for the Stanford Education Assessment Laboratory and the University of Hawaii Curriculum Research and Development Group.
71. Shavelson, R. J., (Guest Ed.). (2008). Applied Measurement in Education, 21 (4), 293-403.
72. Shavelson, R. J., &, Ruiz-Primo, M. A., (1999). On the psychometrics of assessing science understanding. In, J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wamhersee, &, J. D. Novak, (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view. New York: Academic Press.
73. Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Yin, Y., (2008). On the Impact of Curriculum-Embedded Formative Assessment on Learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21 (4), 295-314.
74. Shepard, L. A., (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.
75. Shepard, L. A., (2009). Commentary: Evaluating the validity of formative and interim assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues Practice, 28 (3), 32-37.
76. Sherin, M. G., &, Han, S. Y., (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teacher and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183. (Pubitemid 38341314)
77. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., &, Philipp, R. A., (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York: Routledge.
78. Sikorski, T. R., &, Hammer, D., (2010). A critique of how learning progressions research conceptualizes sophistication and progress. In, K. Gomez, L. Lyons, &, J. Radinsky, (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010)-Volume 1, Full Papers. Chicago IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
79. Singer-Gabella, M., Cartier, J., Forman, E., Knapp, N., Kannan, P., Shahan, E., Barrick, N., (2009). Contextualizing learning progressions for prospective elementary teachers of mathematics and science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
80. Smith, J., diSessa, A., &, Roschelle, J., (1993 /1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (2), 115-163.
81. Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., &, Hennessey, M. G., (2000). Sixth graders' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (3), 349-422.
82. Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., &, Krajcik, J., (2006). Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14, 1-98.
83. Strike, K. A., &, Posner, G. J., (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In, R. A. Duschl, &, R. J. Hamilton, (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
84. Taber, K. S., (2000). Multiple frameworks: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (4), 399-417.
85. Tobias, S., (1993). Overcoming math anxiety. New York: Norton Company.
86. Torrance, H., &, Pryor, J., (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
87. Tunstall, P., &, Gipps, C., (1996). 'How dos your teacher help you make your work better' Children's understanding of formative assessment. The Curriculum Journal, 7 (2), 185-203.
88. Valli, L., Croninger, R. G., Chambliss, M. H., Graeber, A. O., &, Buese, D., (2008). Test-driven: High stakes accountability in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
89. Van Sledright, B. A., (2010). The Challenge of rethinking history education: On practice, theory, and policies. New York: Routledge.
90. van Zee, E., &, Minstrell, J., (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6 (2), 227-269.
91. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., &, Hudicourt-Barnes, J., (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (5), 529-552. (Pubitemid 33655579)
92. Warren, B., &, Rosebery, A. S., (1995). " This question is just too, too easy!" Perspectives from the classroom on accountability in science. Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
93. White, B. Y., &, Frederiksen, J. R., (1998). Inquiry, modeling and meta-cognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (1), 3-118. (Pubitemid 128343737)
94. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., &, Braaten, M., (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why. Teachers College Record, 113 (7), 1311-1360.