When feeling safe isn’t enough: Contextualizing models of safety and learning in teams

Organizational Psychology Review

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 224-243

  Sanner, Bret ^a   Bunderson, J Stuart ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity innovation; Groups teams; Job attitudes beliefs values; Psychological safety; Team learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940109333     PISSN: 20413866     EISSN: 20413874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2041386614565145     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258. doi:0894-3796/98/030235-21
2. Argote, L. (2012). Organizational learning. New York, NY: Springer.
3. Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing. Science, 247, 920-924. doi: 10.1126/science.247.4945.921
4. Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 569-586. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00052-3
5. Bain, P. G., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2001). The innovation imperative: The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams. SmallGroup Research, 32(1), 55-73. doi:10.1177/104649640103200101
6. Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49-68. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500
7. Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151-158. doi: 10.1037/a0024200
8. Brav, A., Andersson, K., & Lantz, A. (2009). Group initiative and self-organizational activities in industrial work groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(3), 347-377. doi:10.1080/13594320801960482
9. Bresman, H., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2013). The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organization Science, 24(4), 1120-1139. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0781
10. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
11. Brueller, D., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Linking capacities of high-quality relationships to team learning and performance in service organizations. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 455-477. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20435
12. Bstieler, L., & Hemmert, M. (2010). Increasing learning and time efficiency in interorganizational new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 485-499. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00731.x
13. Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why ‘‘bureaucratic’’ teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21(3), 609-624. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0483
14. Burris, E. R., Rodgers, M. S., Mannix, E. A., Hendron, M. G., & Oldroyd, J. B. (2009). Playing favorites: The influence of leaders’ inner circle on group processes and performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(9), 1244-1257. doi:10.1177/0146167209338741
15. Cain, P. S., & Treiman, D. J. (1981). The Dictionary of Occupational Titles as a source of occupational data. American Sociological Review, 46(3), 253-278. doi:10.2307/2095059
16. Carmeli, A. (2007). Social capital, psychological safety and learning behaviors from failure in organizations. Long Range Planning, 40(1), 30-44. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2006.12.002
17. Carmeli, A. (2013). [Correlations between measures of team learning, team creative performance, and team psychological safety]. Unpublished raw data.
18. Carmeli, A., & Hirak, R. (2013). [When groups enjoy a favorable status in organizations: Implications for psychological safety, experiential learning and creativity in a healthcare setting]. Unpublished raw data.
19. Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do coworkers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of lateral social influences in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082-1103. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
20. Choo, A. S., Linderman, K. W., & Schroeder, R. G. (2007). Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 918-931. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.001
21. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
22. Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., Zapata, C. P., & Wild, R. E. (2011). Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: Building and reacting to trust among firefighters. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 999-1015. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.0241
23. Cronin, M. A., & Bendersky, C. (2012). The supply chain for producing quality organizational knowledge. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(1), 54-70.
24. Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571-612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
25. Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledgeintensivework. The Academy ofManagement Journal, 47(6), 928-937. doi:10.2307/20159631
26. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
27. DeLia, E. (2011). Complexity leadership in industrial innovation teams: A field study of leading, learning and innovating in heterogeneous teams. Piscataway Township: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
28. Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of selfcensorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967921
29. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Indianapolis, Indiana: Collier Books.
30. Drach-Zahavy, A. (2004). Exploring team support: The role of team’s design, values, and leader’s support. Group Dynamics: Theory,Research, and Practice, 8(4), 235-252. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.235
31. Dufresne, R. L. (2007). Learning from critical incidents by ad hoc teams: The impacts of team debriefing leader behaviors and psychological safety. Boston MA: Boston College.
32. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. doi:10.2307/2666991
33. Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), International handbook of organizational teamwork (pp. 255-277). London, UK: Blackwell.
34. Edmondson, A. C., Dillon, J. R., & Roloff, K. S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 269-314. doi:10.1080/078559811
35. Faraj, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 604-617. doi:10.1037/a0014361
36. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Vracheva, V., & Pezeshkan, A. (2012, August). A meta-analytic examination of the antecedents and consequences of psychological safety. Paper presented at the Seventy-second Annual Academy of Management, Boston, MA.
37. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
38. Gardner, H. K., Staats, B. R., & Gino, F. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 998-1022. 10.5465/amj.2010.0601
39. Gersick, C. J., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 65-97. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-D
40. Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451-495. doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
41. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499-517. doi:10.2307/2392931
42. Goodman, P. (1986). Impact of task and technology on group performance. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 120-167). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43. Haas, M. R. (2010). The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 989-1008. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533181
44. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individuallevel innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-105. doi:10.1037/a0018551
45. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
46. Herold, D. M. (1978). Improving the performance effectiveness of groups through a taskcontingent selection of intervention strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 3(2), 315-325. doi:10.2307/257671
47. Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.001
48. Hong, Y., Liao, H., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. (2013). Missing link in the service profit chain: A metaanalytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 237-267. doi:10.1037/a0031661
49. Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443-503. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.904141
50. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of metaanalysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Johnson, P. D. (2010). Entrepreneurial success: An integrative study of team climate for innovation, group regulatory focus, innovation performance, and success. Stillwater:Oklahoma State University.
53. Kayes, D. C. (2006). From climbing stairs to riding waves: Group critical thinking and its development. Small Group Research, 37(6), 612-630. doi:10.1177/1046496406294321
54. Knight, A. P. (2009). Positive affect and project team development and effectiveness. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
55. Kolb, D. A. (1983). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Kostopoulos, K. C., & Bozionelos, N. (2011). Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 385-415. doi:10.1177/1059601111405981
57. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310
58. Lantz, A. (2011). Teamwork on the line can pay off down the line. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(2), 75-96. doi:10.1108/13665621111108765
59. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645-659. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.178 43941
60. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
61. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779-793. doi: 10.2307/3069411
63. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356-376.
64. Marrone, J. A., Gardner, S., Tesluk, P. E., & Carson, J. B. (2008, April). A study of shared mental models of team expertise. Paper presented at the Twenty-third Annual Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
65. Mathisen, G. E., Einarsen, S., Jørstad, K., & Brønnick, K. S. (2004).Climate for work group creativity and innovation: Norwegian validation of the team climate inventory (TCI). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,45(5), 383-392.
66. Mathisen, G. E., Martinsen, Ø., & Einarsen, S. (2008). The relationship between creative personality composition, innovative team climate, and team innovativeness: An input-process-output perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 13-31. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01078.x
67. McGrath, J. E. (1984). A typology of tasks. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), Groups: Interaction and performance (pp. 53-66). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
68. Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-levelstudy of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183-191.
69. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966. doi: 10.1002/job.411
70. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Psychological safety: A foundation for speaking up, collaboration and experimentation. In K. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 490-503). New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
71. Cognitive Abilities, ONET. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.onetonline.org/find/descriptor/browse/Abilities/1.A.1/
72. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. doi:10.2307/256657
73. Owens, B. P., & Mccornack, D. (2010, August). The influence of humility on team psychological safety, cohesion, task allocation effectiveness, efficacy, and performance. Paper presented at the Seventieth Annual Academy of Management Conference, Montréal, Canada.
74. Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
75. Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Richard, P., & Fleishman, E. A. (1999). An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of ONET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
76. Pirola-Merlo, A. (2010). Agile innovation: The role of team climate in rapid research and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 1075-1084. doi:10.1348/096317909X480653
77. Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. (2002). How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 561-581. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00144-3
78. Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 235-257. doi:10.1002/job.240
79. Rousseau, V., Aubé, C., & Savoie, A. (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37(5), 540-570. doi:10.1177/1046496406293121
80. Sawyer, K. (2008). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.
81. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863-871. doi:10.1037/a0022621
82. Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach., New York, NY: Wiley.
83. Shadish, W. R. (1996). Meta-analysis and the exploration of causal mediating processes: A primer of examples, methods, and issues. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 47. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.41
84. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 215-223. doi:10.2307/1556371
85. Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1991). Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 46-53. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.46
86. Stalmeijer, R. E., Gijselaers, W. H., Wolfhagen, I. H., Harendza, S., & Scherpbier, A. J. (2007). How interdisciplinary teams can createmulti-disciplinary education: The interplay between team processes and educational quality. Medical Education, 41(11), 1059-1066. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02898.x
87. Stevens, J. P. (1984). Outliers and influential data points in regression analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95(2), 334-344. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.331
88. Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediatingrole of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 135-148. doi:10.2307/1556371
89. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative selfefficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. doi: 10.2307/3069421
90. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative selfefficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293. doi:10.1037/a0020951
91. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. New York, NY: Personnel Press.
92. Tucker, A. L. (2007). An empirical study of system improvement by frontline employees in hospital units. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(4), 492-505. doi:10.1287/msom.106 0.0156
93. Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007). Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science, 53(6), 894-907. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0691
94. Tumasjan, A., Strobel, M., Portele, C., & Welpe, I. M. (2012, August). The influence of team climate for innovation on team performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Seventy-second Annual Academy of Management Conference, Boston, MA.
95. Tushman, M. L. (1978). Technical communication in R & D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), 624-645. doi:10.2307/255704
96. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490-521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292931
97. Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., & Erez, M. (2013). Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 945-971. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0501
98. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865-885. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x
99. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421.
100. West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309-333). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
101. Wholey, D. R., Zhu, X., Knoke, D., Shah, P., Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Witheridge, T. F. (2012). The teamwork in assertive community treatment (TACT) scale: Development and validation. Psychiatric Services, 63(11), 1108-1117. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100338
102. Wilkens, R., & London, M. (2006). Relationships between climate, process, and performance in continuous quality improvement groups. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 510-523. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.001
103. Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1041-1059. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26585724
104. Wong, A., Tjosvold, D., & Lu, J. (2010). Leadership values and learning in China: The mediating role of psychological safety. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 86-107. doi: 10.1177/1038411109355374
105. Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686-688. doi:10.1177/1038411109355374
106. Xiang, C., & Long, L. (2011, August). The influence of intragroup conflict on promotive voice: A multilevel study from China. Paper presented at the Seventy-first Annual Academy of Management Conference, San Antonio, TX.
107. Xie, J. L., & Johns, G. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1288-1309. doi:10.2307/256858
108. Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Gibson, C. (2006). Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 501-518. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794668
109. Zhu, J., Gong, Y., Kim, Y. T., & Lee, D. R. (2011, August). A multilevel model of functional diversity and creativity: The role of team psychological safety and individual intrinsic motivation. Paper presented at the Seventy-first Annual Academy of Management Conference, San Antonio, TX.