The Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale: Development and validation

Psychiatric Services

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1108-1117

  Wholey, Douglas R ^a   Zhu, Xi ^b   Knoke, David ^c   Shah, Pri ^c   Zellmer Bruhn, Mary ^c   Witheridge, Thomas F ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d Minnesota Department of Human Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; TEAMWORK IN ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT SCALE;

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84870030910     PISSN: 10752730     EISSN: 15579700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100338     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Stein LI, Santos AB: Assertive Community Treatment of Persons With Severe Mental Illness. New York, Norton, 1998
2. Monroe-DeVita M, Teague GB, Moser LL: The TMACT: a new tool for measuring fidelity to assertive community treatment. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 17:17-29, 2011
3. Teague GB, Bond GR, Drake RE: Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 68:216-232, 1998 (Pubitemid 28215538)
4. McGrew JH, Bond GR, Dietzen L, et al: Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62: 670-678, 1994 (Pubitemid 24268709)
5. McHugo GJ, Drake RE, Teague GB, et al: Fidelity to assertive community treatment and client outcomes in the New Hampshire dual disorders study. Psychiatric Services 50:818-824, 1999 (Pubitemid 29258959)
6. Drake RE, Mercer-McFadden C, Mueser KT, et al: Review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 24:589-608, 1998 (Pubitemid 28524628)
7. Salyers MP, Bond GR, Teague GB, et al: Is it ACT yet? Real-world examples of evaluating the degree of implementation for assertive community treatment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 30:304-320, 2003 (Pubitemid 36859089)
8. Mueser KT, Bond GR, Drake RE, et al: Models of community care for severe mental illness: a review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin 24: 37-74, 1998 (Pubitemid 28128489)
9. Fidelity to the ACT Model. Brighton, Mich, Assertive Community Treatment Association, 2006. Available at http://www.actassociation.org/fidelity
10. Monroe-DeVita M, Morse G, Bond GR: Program fidelity and beyond: multiple strategies and criteria for ensuring quality of assertive community treatment. Psychiatric Services 63:743-750, 2012
11. Spear S, Bowen HK: Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Business Review 77:96-106, 1999
12. Wageman R: How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science 12:559-577, 2001
13. Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR: Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7:77-124, 2006
14. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, et al: Teams in organizations: from inputprocess-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology 56:517-543, 2005 (Pubitemid 40300795)
15. Cohen SG, Bailey DE: What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management 23:239-290, 1997 (Pubitemid 127173449)
16. Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R: Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science 49:571-582, 2003
17. Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA: Coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective; in Academy of Management Annals. Edited by Walsh JP, Brief AP. London, Routledge, 2009
18. Bond GR, Salyers MP, Rollins AL, et al: Future Developments in Assertive Community Treatment. Indianapolis, Indiana University-Purdue University, ACT Center of Indiana, 2008
19. Edmondson AC: Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:350-383, 1999
20. Edmondson AC: Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies 40: 1419-1452, 2003
21. Levitt B, March JG: Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319-340, 1988
22. Tucker AL, Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC: Implementing new practices: an empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science 53:894-907, 2007 (Pubitemid 351159622)
23. McHugo GJ, Drake RE, Whitley R, et al: Fidelity outcomes in the National Implementing Evidence-Based Practices Project. Psychiatric Services 58:1279-1284, 2007 (Pubitemid 350043577)
24. Zohar D: A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology 85:587-596, 2000
25. Jehn KA: A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:256-282, 1995
26. Shah PP, Dirks KT, Chervany N: The multiple pathways of high performing groups: the interaction of social networks and group processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27:299-317, 2006 (Pubitemid 44743559)
27. Shah R, Ward PT: Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management 25:785-805, 2007 (Pubitemid 46764439)
28. Endsley MR: Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review; in Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Edited by Endsley MR, Garland DJ. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, 2000
29. DeVellis RF: Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, Calif, Sage, 2003
30. Willis GB: Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, Calif, Sage, 2005
31. Witheridge TF: Monitoring ACT Fidelity on a Routine Basis: One State's Experience. St Paul, Minnesota Department of Human Services, 2010
32. Assertive Community Treatment (ACT): Technical Assistance Resources. St Paul, Minnesota Department of Human Services, 2009. Available at http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET-DYNAMIC- CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=id-027849
33. Bond GR, Salyers MP: Prediction of outcome from the Dartmouth Assertive Community Treatment Fidelity Scale. CNS Spectrums 9:937-942, 2004 (Pubitemid 40052424)
34. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP: Maslach Burnout Inventory: Manual, 3rd ed. Palo Alto, Calif, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1996
35. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, et al: Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods 4:272-299, 1999
36. Cohen A, Doveh E, Nahum-Shani I: Testing agreement for multi-item scales with the indices rwg(J) and ad M(J). Organizational Research Methods 12:148-164, 2009
37. Cohen A: Rwg Macros SAS. Technion City, Israel, William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2009. Available at http://ie.technion.ac.il/Labs/Stat/RWG-Macros.sas
38. Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC: When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin 81:358-361, 1974
39. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH: Psychometric Therapy. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994
40. SAS/Stat tcalis, 9.2 TS Level 2M2 ed. Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 2008
41. Thompson B: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2004
42. Yung Y-F: Structural Equation Modeling and Path Analysis Using proc tcalis in SAS
43. Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 2008. Available at http://www2.sas.com/ proceedings/forum2008/384-2008.pdf
44. Kenny DA: Measuring model fit. Available at http://davidakenny.net/cm/ fit.htm. Accessed Nov 18, 2011
45. Bliese PD: Within-group agreement, nonindependence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis; in Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. Edited by Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2000
46. James LR: Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 67:219-229, 1982
47. Finnerty MT, Rapp CA, Bond GR, et al: The state health authority yardstick (SHAY). Community Mental Health Journal 45: 228-236, 2009
48. Aarons GA: Transformational and transactional leadership: association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services 57:1162-1169, 2006
49. Zohar D: The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23: 75-92, 2002