The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 235-257

  Pirola Merlo, Andrew ^a,c   Mann, Leon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c Insight SRC   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10944221925     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.240     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1994). The team climate inventory (TCI) and group innovation: a psychometric test on a Swedish sample of work groups. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 143-151.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
3. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of organizational innovation. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations. California Management Review, 40(1), 22-26.
5. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
6. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.
7. Bailin, S. (1988). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Bain, P., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2001). The innovation imperative: the relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams. Small Group Research, 52(1), 55-73.
9. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Burningham, C., & West, M. A. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26(1), 106-117.
11. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
12. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
13. Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 467-511). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: an assessment of within-group inter-rater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306-309.
15. Kickul, J., & Neuman, G. (2000). Emergent leadership behaviors: the function of personality and cognitive ability in determining teamwork performance and KSAS. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(1), 27-51.
16. Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
17. Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Mohrman, S., Cohen, S., & Mohrman, A. (1995). Designing team based organizations: New forum for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration, application and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43.
20. Pirola-Merlo, A. (2000). Innovation in R&D project teams: Modelling the effects of individual, team and organizational factors. Doctoral thesis submitted to Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne.
21. Schneider, B., & Chung, B. (1996). Service quality. In C. L. Cooper, & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (pp. 233-262). New York: Wiley.
22. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
23. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Smithson, M. (2003). Confidence intervals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
26. Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill and ability requirements for teamwork: implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503-530.
27. Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1999). Staffing work teams: development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25(2), 207-228.
28. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
29. West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 101-122). Chichester: Wiley.
30. West, M. A., Borrill, C. S., & Unsworth, K. L. (1998). Team effectiveness in organizations. In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial organizational psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
31. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3-14). Chichester: Wiley.