Evolutionary constraints in variable environments, from proteins to networks

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 192-198

  Taute, Katja M ^a   Gude, Sebastian ^a   Nghe, Philippe ^a   Tans, Sander J ^a  

^a FOM INSTITUTE AMOLF   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Evolution; Genetic interactions; Regulatory networks; Variable environments

Indexed keywords

REGULATOR PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

CYTOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; EPISTASIS; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; REVIEW; ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; PROTEINS;

EID: 84899918744     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.04.003     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Dill K.A., et al. Physical limits of cells and proteomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:17876-17882.
2. Wright S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc. Sixth Cong. Genet. 1932, 1:356-366.
3. Elena S.F., Lenski R.E. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:457-469.
4. Weinreich D.M., et al. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 2006, 312:111-114.
5. Poelwijk F.J., et al. Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 2007, 445:383-386.
6. Weinreich D.M., et al. Perspective: sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 2005, 59:1165-1174.
7. Bridgham J.T., et al. Evolution of hormone-receptor complexity by molecular exploitation. Science 2006, 312:97-101.
8. Pigliucci M. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture 2001, John Hopkins University Press.
9. Gottesman S. Bacterial regulation: global regulatory networks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1984, 18:415-441.
10. Kern D., Zuiderweg E.R.P. The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003, 13:748-757.
11. Rosenfeld S. Mathematical descriptions of biochemical networks: stability, stochasticity, evolution. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2011, 106:400-409.
12. Riechmann J.L., et al. Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 2000, 290:2105-2110.
13. Atchley W.R., Fitch W.M. A natural classification of the basic helix-loop-helix class of transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:5172-5176.
14. Babu M.M., et al. Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14:283-291.
15. Lusk R.W., Eisen M.B. Evolutionary mirages: selection on binding site composition creates the illusion of conserved grammars in Drosophila enhancers. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000829.
16. Wittkopp P.J., Kalay G. Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:59-69.
17. Richards F.M. Areas, volumes, packing, and protein structure. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 1977, 6:151-176.
18. Kirby D.A., et al. Maintenance of pre-mRNA secondary structure by epistatic selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:9047-9051.
19. DePristo M.A., et al. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:678-687.
20. Phillips P.C. Waiting for a compensatory mutation: phase zero of the shifting-balance process. Genet. Res. 1996, 67:271-283.
21. Poelwijk F.J., et al. Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 272:141-144.
22. Kvitek D.J., Sherlock G. Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002056.
23. de Visser J.A.G.M., et al. Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes. Am. Nat. 2009, 174(Suppl. 1):S15-S30.
24. Remold S.K., Lenski R.E. Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:423-426.
25. Kubinak J.L., et al. Experimental viral evolution to specific host MHC genotypes reveals fitness and virulence trade-offs in alternative MHC types. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:3422-3427.
26. Bataillon T., et al. Cost of adaptation and fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Genetics 2011, 189:939-949.
27. Remold S. Understanding specialism when the Jack of all trades can be the master of all. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:4861-4869.
28. Tan L., et al. Hidden randomness between fitness landscapes limits reverse evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106:198102.
29. Lindsey H.A., et al. Evolutionary rescue from extinction is contingent on a lower rate of environmental change. Nature 2013, 494:463-467.
30. Hall A.R., et al. The fitness cost of rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa depends on demand for RNA polymerase. Genetics 2011, 187:817-822.
31. de Vos M.G.J., et al. Environmental dependence of genetic constraint. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003580.
32. Poelwijk F.J., et al. Tradeoffs and optimality in the evolution of gene regulation. Cell 2011, 146:462-470.
33. Chen P., Shakhnovich E.I. Lethal mutagenesis in viruses and bacteria. Genetics 2009, 183:639-650.
34. Tokuriki N., et al. How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4:e1000002.
35. Wylie C.S., Shakhnovich E.I. A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:9916-9921.
36. Flynn T.C., et al. Allosteric transition pathways in the lactose repressor protein core domains: asymmetric motions in a homodimer. Protein Sci. 2003, 12:2523-2541.
37. Zhan H., et al. Positions 94-98 of the lactose repressor N-subdomain monomer-monomer interface are critical for allosteric communication. Biochemistry 2010, 49:8636-8645.
38. Lewis M., et al. Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer. Science 1996, 271:1247-1254.
39. Lenski R.E., Travisano M. Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91:6808-6814.
40. Cooper T.F., Lenski R.E. Experimental evolution with E. coli in diverse resource environments. I. Fluctuating environments promote divergence of replicate populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:10.
41. Poelwijk F.J., et al. Optimality and evolution of transcriptionally regulated gene expression. BMC Syst. Biol. 2011, 5:128.
42. Balaban N.Q. Persistence: mechanisms for triggering and enhancing phenotypic variability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2011, 21:768-775.
43. van der Woude M.W., Baumler A.J. Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17:581-611.
44. Beaumont H.J., et al. Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 2009, 462:90-93.
45. Perron G.G., et al. The rate of environmental change drives adaptation to an antibiotic sink. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:1724-1731.
46. Bell G., Gonzalez A. Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction following environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:942-948.
47. Collins S., de Meaux J. Adaptation to different rates of environmental change in Chlamydomonas. Evolution 2009, 63:2952-2965.
48. Bell G., Gonzalez A. Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. Science 2011, 332:1327-1330.
49. Lehner B. Molecular mechanisms of epistasis within and between genes. Trends Genet. 2011, 27:323-331.
50. Segrè D., et al. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:77-83.
51. Baryshnikova A., et al. Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:1017-1024.
52. Costanzo M., et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010, 327:425-431.
53. Tenaillon O., et al. The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science 2012, 335:457-461.
54. Khan A.I., et al. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 2011, 332:1193-1196.
55. Chou H-H., et al. Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 2011, 332:1190-1192.
56. Woods R.J., et al. Second-order selection for evolvability in a large Escherichia coli population. Science 2011, 331:1433-1436.
57. Damkiær S., et al. Evolutionary remodeling of global regulatory networks during long-term bacterial adaptation to human hosts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:7766-7771.
58. Gjuvsland A.B., et al. Statistical epistasis is a generic feature of gene regulatory networks. Genetics 2007, 175:411-420.
59. Macía J., et al. The causes of epistasis in genetic networks. Evolution 2012, 66:586-596.
60. DeWitt T.J., Scheiner S.M. Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches 2004, Oxford University Press.
61. Chiu H-C., et al. Epistasis from functional dependence of fitness on underlying traits. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:4156-4164.
62. Pumir A., Shraiman B. Epistasis in a model of molecular signal transduction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1001134.
63. Cotterell J., Sharpe J. Mechanistic explanations for restricted evolutionary paths that emerge from gene regulatory networks. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e61178.
64. Carter G.W., et al. Prediction of phenotype and gene expression for combinations of mutations. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3:96.