Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale

Nature Methods

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1017-1024

  Baryshnikova, Anastasia ^a   Costanzo, Michael ^a   Kim, Yungil ^b   Ding, Huiming ^a   Koh, Judice ^a   Toufighi, Kiana ^a   Youn, Ji Young ^a   Ou, Jiongwen ^a   San Luis, Bryan Joseph ^a   Bandyopadhyay, Sunayan ^b   Hibbs, Matthew ^c   Hess, David ^d   Gingras, Anne Claude ^e   Bader, Gary D ^a   Troyanskaya, Olga G ^f   Brown, Grant W ^a   Andrews, Brenda ^a   Boone, Charles ^a   Myers, Chad L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^d SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^f Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FITNESS; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE INTERACTION; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; YEAST;

ALGORITHMS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; YEASTS;

EID: 78649705725     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1534     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baryshnikova, A. et al. Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 470, 146-180 (2010).
2. Dixon, S.J., Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Andrews, B. & Boone, C. Systematic mapping of genetic interaction networks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 470, 145-179 (2009).
3. Collins, S.R., Schuldiner, M., Krogan, N.J. & Weissman, J.S. A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol. 7, R63 (2006).
4. Breslow, D.K. et al. A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome. Nat Methods 5, 711-718 (2008).
5. St Onge, R.P. et al. Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution ftness profling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nat Genet. 39, 199-206 (2007).
6. Avery, L. & Wasserman, S. OrDering gene function: the interpretation of epistasis in regulatory hierarchies. Trends Genet. 8, 312-316 (1992).
7. Costanzo, M. et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327, 425-431 (2010).
8. Drees, B.L. et al. Derivation of genetic interaction networks from quantitative phenotype data. Genome Biol. 6, R38 (2005).
9. Tong, A.H. et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303, 808-813 (2004).
10. Deutschbauer, A.M. et al. Mechanisms of haploinsuffciency revealed by genome-wide profling in yeast. Genetics 169, 1915-1925 (2005).
11. Breitkreutz, B.J. et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D637-D640 (2008).
12. Myers, C.L., Barrett, D.R., Hibbs, M.A., Huttenhower, C. & Troyanskaya, O.G. Finding function: evaluation methods for functional genomic data. BMC Genomics 7, 187 (2006).
13. Bandyopadhyay, S., Kelley, R., Krogan, N.J. & Ideker, T. Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000065 (2008).
14. Segre, D., Deluna, A., Church, G.M. & Kishony, R. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet. 37, 77-83 (2005).
15. Ungar, D., Oka, T., Krieger, M. & Hughson, F.M. Retrograde transport on the COG railway. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 113-120 (2006).
16. Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104-110 (2008).
17. Tarassov, K. et al. An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 320, 1465-1470 (2008).
18. Gavin, A.C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
19. Krogan, N.J. et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
20. Mitchell, A.P.A. VAST staging area for regulatory proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7111-7112 (2008).
21. Hayashi, M., Fukuzawa, T., Sorimachi, H. & Maeda, T. Constitutive activation of the pH-responsive Rim101 pathway in yeast mutants defective in late steps of the MVB/ESCRT pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 9478-9490 (2005).
22. Barwell, K.J., Boysen, J.H., Xu, W. & Mitchell, A.P. Relationship of DFG16 to the Rim101p pH response pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 4, 890-899 (2005).
23. Rothfels, K. et al. Components of the ESCRT pathway, DFG16, and YGR122w are required for Rim101 to act as a corepressor with Nrg1 at the negative regulatory element of the DIT1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 6772-6788 (2005).
24. Kemp, H.A. & Sprague, G.F. Jr. Far3 and fve interacting proteins prevent premature recovery from pheromone arrest in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1750-1763 (2003).
25. Goudreault, M. et al. A PP2A phosphatase high density interaction network identifes a novel striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase complex linked to the cerebral cavernous malformation 3 (CCM3) protein. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 157-171 (2009).
26. Posas, F. et al. The gene PPG encodes a novel yeast protein phosphatase involved in glycogen accumulation. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 1349-1354 (1993).
27. Van Driessche, N. et al. Epistasis analysis with global transcriptional phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 37, 471-477 (2005).
28. Dixon, S.J. et al. Signifcant conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks between distantly related eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16653-16658 (2008).
29. Roguev, A. et al. Conservation and rewiring of functional modules revealed by an epistasis map in fssion yeast. Science 322, 405-410 (2008).
30. Babu, M. et al. Systems-level approaches for identifying and analyzing genetic interaction networks in Escherichia coli and extensions to other prokaryotes. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1439-1455 (2009).
31. Leek, J.T. et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev. Genet. 11, 733-739 (2010).
32. He, X., Qian, W., Wang, Z., Li, Y. & Zhang, J. Prevalent positive epistasis in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic networks. Nat Genet. 42, 272-276 (2010).
33. Hughes, T.R. et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profles. Cell 102, 109-126 (2000).
34. Jasnos, L. & Korona, R. Epistatic buffering of ftness loss in yeast double deletion strains. Nat Genet. 39, 550-554 (2007).
35. Warringer, J., Ericson, E., Fernandez, L., Nerman, O. & Blomberg, A. High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15724-15729 (2003).
36. Brauer, M.J. et al. Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 352-367 (2008).
37. Hartman, J.L.t. & Tippery, N.P. Systematic quantifcation of gene interactions by phenotypic array analysis. Genome Biol. 5, R49 (2004).
38. Friesen, H. et al. Characterization of the yeast amphiphysins Rvs161p and Rvs167p reveals roles for the Rvs heterodimer in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 1306-1321 (2006).
39. Bellaoui, M. et al. Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity. EMBO J. 22, 4304-4313 (2003).
40. Stark, C. et al. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D535-D539 (2006).