Evolutionary rescue from extinction is contingent on a lower rate of environmental change

Nature

Volumn 494, Issue 7438, 2013, Pages 463-467

  Lindsey, Haley A ^a   Gallie, Jenna ^a,b,c   Taylor, Susan ^a   Kerr, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental Microbiology ^*  (Switzerland)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIFAMPICIN;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; EXTINCTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MUTATION; POPULATION SIZE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EVOLUTION; EXTINCTION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANTIBIOTICS, ANTITUBERCULAR; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; GENES, BACTERIAL; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION; POPULATION DENSITY; RIFAMPIN; TIME FACTORS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 84874346133     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature11879     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bell, G. & Collins, S. Adaptation, extinction and global change. Evol. Appl. 1, 3-16 (2008).
2. Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. & Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 15, 365-377 (2012).
3. Gomulkiewicz, R. & Holt, R. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 49, 201-207 (1995).
4. Bell, G. & Gonzalez, A. Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction following environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 12, 942-948 (2009).
5. Bell, G. & Gonzalez, A. Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. Science 332, 1327-1330 (2011).
6. Collins, S. & de Meaux, J. Adaptation to different rates of environmental change in Chlamydomonas. Evolution 63, 2952-2965 (2009).
7. Dallinger, W. H. The President's Address. J. R. Microsc. Soc. 7, 185-199 (1887).
8. Perron, G. G., Gonzalez, A. & Buckling, A. The rate of environmental change drives adaptation to an antibiotic sink. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1724-1731 (2008).
9. Huey, R., Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. Thermal sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster responds rapidly to laboratory natural selection. Evolution 45, 751-756 (1991).
10. Gullberg, E. et al. Selection of resistant bacteria at very low antibiotic concentrations. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002158 (2011).
11. Reynolds, M. G. Compensatory evolution in rifampin-resistant Escherichia coli. Genetics 156, 1471-1481 (2000).
12. MacLean, R. C., Perron, G. G. & Gardner, A. Diminishing returns from beneficial mutations and pervasive epistasis shape the fitness landscape for rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genetics 186, 1345-1354 (2010).
13. Hall, A. R. & MacLean, R. C. Epistasis buffers the fitness effects of rifampicin resistance mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Evolution 65, 2370-2379 (2011).
14. Nei, M. & Li, W. H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5269-5273 (1979).
15. Gillespie, J. H. A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 23, 202-215 (1983).
16. Weinreich, D. M., Watson, R. A. & Chao, L. Perspective: sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 59, 1165-1174 (2005).
17. Remold, S. K. & Lenski, R. E. Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli. Nature Genet. 36, 423-426 (2004).
18. Weinreich, D. M., Delaney, N. F., DePristo, M. A. & Hartl, D. L. Darwinian evolution can follow only very fewmutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312, 111-114 (2006).
19. Trindade, S. et al. Positive epistasis drives the acquisition of multidrug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000578 (2009).
20. Lalić, J.&Elena, S. F.Magnitude andsign epistasisamong deleteriousmutations in a positive-sense plant RNA virus. Heredity 109, 71-77 (2012).
21. Kvitek, D. J. & Sherlock, G. Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002056 (2011).
22. Lalić, J. & Elena, S. F. Epistasis between mutations is host-dependent for an RNA virus. Biol. Lett. 9, 20120396 (2013).
23. Comas, I. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains identifies compensatorymutations in RNA polymerase genes. Nature Genet. 44, 106-110 (2012).
24. Martinez, J. L. Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. Environ. Pollut. 157, 2893-2902 (2009).
25. Gagneux, S. et al. The competitive cost of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 312, 1944-1946 (2006).
26. Sandgren, A. et al. Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Mutation Database. PLoS Med. 6, e1000002 (2009).
27. Bodbyl Roels, S. A. & Kelly, J. K. Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 65, 2541-2552 (2011).
28. Skelly, D. K. et al. Evolutionary responses to climate change. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1353-1355 (2007).
29. Klironomos, J. N. et al. Abrupt rise in atmospheric CO2 overestimates community response in a model plant-soil system. Nature 433, 621-624 (2005).
30. Link, A. J., Phillips, D.&Church, G. M.Methods for generating precise deletions and insertions in the genome of wild-type Escherichia coli: application to open reading frame characterization. J. Bacteriol. 179, 6228-6237 (1997).