Advancing Multilevel Research Design: Capturing the Dynamics of Emergence

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 581-615

  Kozlowski, Steve W J ^a   Chao, Georgia T ^a   Grand, James A ^b   Braun, Michael T ^c   Kuljanin, Goran ^d  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

computational modeling; multilevel research; quantitative research; research design; time series

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883431059     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428113493119     Document Type: Article

References (181)

1. Aguinis H.,Boyd B. K.,Pierce C. A.,Short J. C.Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains.Journal of Management. 2011;37:395-403.
2. Allport F. H.The structuring of events: Outline of a general theory with applications to psychology.Psychological Review. 1954;61:281-303.
3. Austin J. T.,Scherbaum C. A.,Mahlman R. A.Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Rogelberg S. G., ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2002:3-33.
4. Axelrod R.Effective choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1980a;24:3-25.
5. Axelrod R.More effective choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1980b;24:379-403.
6. Axelrod R.The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1997:.
7. Balliet D.,Mulder L. B.,van Lange P. A. M.Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 2011;137:594-615.
8. Balliet D.,Parks C.,Joireman J.Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2009;12:533-547.
9. Barabási A.-L.The origins of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics.Nature. 2005;435:207-211.
10. Barley S.Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1986;31:78-108.
11. Bedwell W. L.,Wildman J. L.,Diaz-Granados D.,Salazar M.,Kramer W. S.,Salas E.Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization.Human Resource Management Review. 2012;22:128-145.
12. Bell B. S.,Kozlowski S. W. J.,Blawath S.The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology. Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012:859-909.
13. Bell S. T.Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92:595-615.
14. Blau P. M.Social exchange theory. Cooke K. S., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1987:83-100.
15. Bliese P. D.Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. Klein K. J.Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:349-381.
16. Bliese P. D.,Chan D.,Ployhart R. E.Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes.Organizational Research Methods. 2007;10:551-563.
17. Bliese P. D.,Halverson R. R.Group consensus and psychological well-being: A large field study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1998;28:563-580.
18. Blitz D.Emergent evolution: Qualitative novelty and the levels of reality. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer; 1992:.
19. Boles T. L.,Le H.,Nguyen H.Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethnical judgments. Kramer R. M.Tenbrunsel A. E.Bazerman M. H., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:171-204.
20. Bourbousson J.,Poizat G.,Saury J.,Seve C.Team coordination in basketball: Description of the cognitive connections among teammates.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2010;22:150-166.
21. Brown K. G.,Kozlowski S. W. J.,Hattrup K.Theory, issues, and recommendations in conceptualizing agreement as a construct in organizational research: The search for consensus regarding consensus. Symposium presented at the 56th Annual Convention of the Academy of Management Association; 1996, AugustCincinnati, OH; 1996, August.
22. Bryk A. S.,Raudenbush S. W.Methodology for cross level organizational research.Research in Sociology of Organizations. 1989;7:233-273.
23. Bryk A. S.,Raudenbush S. W.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992:.
24. Burns T.,Stalker G. M.The management of innovation. London, England: Tavistock; 1961:.
25. Burstein L.The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation.Review of Research in Education. 1980;8:158-233.
26. Busemeyer J. R.,Townsend J. T.Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.Psychological Review. 1993;100:432-459.
27. Cannon-Bowers J. A.,Salas E.,Converse S.Individual and group decision making: Current issues. Castellan N. J., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.; 1993:221-246.
28. Chalmers D. J.The re-emergence of emergence: The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion. Clayton P.Davies P., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006:244-256.
29. Chan D.Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1998;83:234-246.
30. Chen G.,Bliese P. D.,Mathieu J. E.Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology.Organizational Research Methods. 2005;8:375-409.
31. Chen G.,Mathieu J. E.,Bliese P. D.Research in multi-level issues, Volume 3: Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes. Dansereau F.Yammarino F. J., ed. Oxford, England: Elsevier; 2004:273-303.
32. Coleman J. S.Social theory, social research, and a theory of action.American Journal of Sociology. 1986;91:1309-1335.
33. Coleman J. S.The micro-macro link. Alexander J. C.Giesen B.Munch R.Smelser M. J., ed. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1987:153-176.
34. Collins L. M.,Graham J. W.The effect of the timing and spacing of observations in longitudinal studies of tobacco and other drug use: temporal design considerations.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2002;68:S85-S96.
35. Corley K. G.,Gioia D. A.Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2004;49:173-208.
36. Corning P. A.The re-emergence of emergence: A venerable concept in search of a theory.Complexity. 2002;7:18-30.
37. Cronbach L. J.The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist. 1957;12:671-684.
38. Cronin M. A.,Weingart L. R.,Todorova G.Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet?.Academy of Management Annals. 2011;5:571-612.
39. Croon M. A.,van Veldhoven M. J. P. M.Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: A latent variable multilevel model.Psychological Methods. 2007;12:45-57.
40. Crutchfield J. P.The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics and induction.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 1994;75:11-54.
41. Davis J. H.Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups. Witte E.Davis J. H., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996:35-60.
42. Davis J. H.Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline. Ilgen D. R.Hulin C. L., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000:217-220.
43. Davis J. P.,Eisenhardt K. M.,Bingham C. B.Developing theory through simulation methods.Academy of Management Review. 2007;32:480-499.
44. Dawes R. M.Social dilemmas.Annual Review of Psychology. 1980;31:169-193.
45. DeChurch L. A.,Marks M. A.Leadership in multiteam systems.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91:311-329.
46. DeChurch L. A.,Mesmer-Magnus J. R.The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010a;95:32-53.
47. DeChurch L. A.,Mesmer-Magnus J. R.Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2010b;14:1-14.
48. De Dreu C. K. W.,Weingart L. R.Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88:741-749.
49. DeShon R. P.The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology. Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012:117-142.
50. DeShon R. P.,Kozlowski S. W. J.,Schmidt A. M.,Milner K. R.,Wiechmann D.A multiple goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004;89:1035-1056.
51. de Wit F. R. C.,Greer L. L.,Jehn K. A.The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012;97:360-390.
52. Dionne S. D.,Sayama H.,Hao C.,Bush B. J.The role of leadership in shared mental model convergence and team performance improvement: An agent-based computational model.Leadership Quarterly. 2010;21:1035-1049.
53. Durkheim E.The rules of the sociological method. New York, NY: Free Press; 1964:.
54. Edwards B. D.,Day E. A.,Arthur W.,Bell S. T.Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91:727-736.
55. Eguíluz V. M.,Zimmermann M. G.,Cela-Conde C. J.,San Miguel M.Cooperation and the emergence of role differentiation in the dynamics of social networks.American Journal of Sociology. 2005;110:977-1008.
56. Emery F. E.,Trist E. L.Management science, models and techniques. Churchman C. W.Verhurst M., ed. London, England: Pergamon Press; 1960:83-97.
57. Epstein J. M.Agent-based computational models and generative social science.Complexity. 1999;4:41-60.
58. Fiore S. M.,Rosen M. A.,Smith-Jentsch K. A.,Salas E.,Letsky M.,Warner N.Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: Predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts.Human Factors. 2010;52:203-224.
59. Fischer I.The emergence of reactive strategies in simulated heterogeneous populations.Theory and Decision. 2003;55:289-314.
60. Flake G. W.The computational beauty of nature: Computer explorations of fractals, chaos, complex systems, and adaptation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:.
61. Foddy M.,Dawes R.New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas. Biel A.Eek D.Gärling T.Gustafsson M., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2008:57-71.
62. Gersick C. J. G.Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development.Academy of Management Journal. 1988;31:9-41.
63. Gersick C. J. G.Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups.Academy of Management Journal. 1989;32:274-309.
64. Giddens A.Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1979:.
65. Goldstein H.Multilevel statistical models. London, England: Arnold; 2003:.
66. Gonsalez-Roma V.,Peiro J. M.,Tordera N.An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87:465-473.
67. Gotts N. M.,Polhill J. G.,Law A. N. R.Agent-based simulation in the study of social dilemmas.Artificial Intelligence Review. 2003;19:3-92.
68. Graham J. R.,Barter K.Collaboration: A social work practice method.Families in Society. 1999;80:6-13.
69. Gray B.Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1989:.
70. Greve J.Emergence in sociology.Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2012;42:188-223.
71. Griffin M. A.Interaction between individuals and situations: Using HLM procedures to estimate reciprocal relationships.Journal of Management. 1997;23:759-773.
72. Gully S. M.,Devine D. J.,Whitney D. J.A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of levels of analysis and task interdependence.Small Group Research. 1995;26:497-520.
73. Gully S. M.,Incalcaterra K. A.,Joshi A.,Beaubien J. M.A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87 (5): 819-832.
74. Hanisch K. A.,Hulin C. L.,Seitz S. T.Mathematical/computational modeling of organizational withdrawal processes: Benefits, methods, and results.Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. 1996;14:91-142.
75. Harrison J. R.,Lin Z.,Carroll G. R.,Carley K. M.Simulation modeling in organizational and management research.Academy of Management Review. 2007;32:1229-1245.
76. Hayek F. A.Scientism and the study of society, part 1.Economica. 1942;9:267-291.
77. Heck R. H.,Thomas S. L.An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:.
78. Helbing D.,Yu W.,Rauhut H.Self-organization and emergence in social systems: Modeling the coevolution of social environments and cooperative behavior.Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 2011;35:177-208.
79. Henneman E. A.,Lee J. L.,Cohen J. I.Collaboration: A concept analysis.Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995;21:103-109.
80. Hertel G.Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects. Foddy M.Smithson M.Schneider S.Hogg M., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 1999:227-244.
81. Hofmann D. A.,Griffin M. A.,Gavin M. B.Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Klein K. J.Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:467-511.
82. Homans G. C.Social behavior as exchange.American Journal of Sociology. 1958;65:597-606.
83. House R.,Rousseau D. M.,Thomas M.Research in organizational behavior. Cummings L. L.Staw B., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI; 1995:71-114.
84. Hulin C. L.,Ilgen D. R.Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline. Ilgen D. R.Hulin C. L., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000:3-18.
85. Ilgen D. R.,Hollenbeck J. R.,Johnson M.,Jundt D.Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models.Annual Review of Psychology. 2005;56:517-543.
86. Ilgen D. R.,Hulin C. L.Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline. Ilgen D. R.Hulin C. L., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000:269-289.
87. James L. R.Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1982;67:219-229.
88. James L. R.,Demaree R. G.,Wolf G.Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1984;69:85-98.
89. Joireman J. A.,Van Lange P. A. M.,Van Vugt M.,Wood A.,Leest T. V.,Lambert C.Structural solutions to social dilemmas: A field study on commuters' willingness to fund improvements in public transit.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2001;31:504-526.
90. Jones G. T.Heterogeneity of degree and the emergence of cooperation in complex social networks.Emergence: Complexity and Organization. 2008;10:46-54.
91. Katz D.,Kahn R. L.The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1966:.
92. Keyton J.,Ford D. J.,Smith F. I.A mesolevel communicative model of collaboration.Communication Theory. 2008;18:376-406.
93. Klein K. J.,Dansereau F.,Hall R. J.Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis.Academy of Management Review. 1994;19:195-229.
94. Kleingeld A.,van Mierlo H.,Arends L.The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011;96:1289-1304.
95. Kline R. B.Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.New York, NY: Guilford; 2005:.
96. Kollock P."An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind": Cooperation and accounting systems.American Sociological Review. 1993;58:768-786.
97. Kollock P.Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation.Annual Review of Sociology. 1998;24:183-214.
98. Kozlowski S. W. J.Methods for studying small groups: A behind-the-scenes guide. Hollingshead A. B.Poole M. S., ed. New York, NY: Routledge Academic; 2012:260-283.
99. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Chao G. T.The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams.Managerial and Decision Economics. 2012a;33:335-354.
100. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Chao G. T.Theories of team cognition: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Salas E.Fiore S.Letsky M., ed. New York, NY: Routledge Academic; 2012b:19-48.
101. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Chao G. T.,Grand J. A.,Braun M. T.,Kuljanin G.Boids, droids, and noids: Description and implications of an integrative research paradigm on macrocognition. Symposium presented at the 27th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology; 2012, AprilSan Diego, CA; 2012, April.
102. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Chao G. T.,Jensen J. M.Learning, training, and development in organizations. Kozlowski S. W. J.Salas E., ed. New York, NY: Routledge Academic; 2010:361-400.
103. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Gully S. M.,Nason E. R.,Smith E. M.The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development. Ilgen D. R.Pulakos E. D., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1999:240-292.
104. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Hattrup K.A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1992;77:161-167.
105. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Ilgen D. R.Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams [Monograph].Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2006;7:77-124.
106. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Klein K. J.Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Klein K. J.Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:3-90.
107. Kramer R. M.Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethnical judgments. Kramer R. M.Tenbrunsel A. E.Bazerman M. H., ed. New York, NY: Routledge Academic; 2010:117-143.
108. Kuhn T.,Corman S. R.The emergence of homogeneity and heterogeneity in knowledge structures during a planned organizational change.Communication Monographs. 2003;70:198-229.
109. Kuljanin G.A computational study of team collaboration and performance. East Lansing: Michigan State University; 2011:.
110. LeBreton J. M.,Senter J. L.Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement.Organizational Research Methods. 2008;11:815-852.
111. LePine J. A.,Piccolo R. F.,Jackson C. L.,Mathieu J. E.,Saul J. R.A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria.Personnel Psychology. 2008;61:273-307.
112. Levine S. S.,Prietula M. J.How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multilevel model of benefits and liabilities.Organization Science. 2012;23:1748-1766.
113. Lewis K.Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88:587-604.
114. Lewis K.Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems.Management Science. 2004;50:1519-1533.
115. Lewis L. K.Communication yearbook. Beck C. S., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006:197-247.
116. Liang D. W.,Moreland R. L.,Argote L.Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995;21:384-393.
117. Liebrand W. B. G.,Messick D. M.Frontiers in social dilemmas research. New York, NY: Springer; 1996:.
118. Longoria R. A.Is inter-organizational collaboration always a good thing?.Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 2005;32:123-138.
119. Losada M.The complex dynamics of high performance teams.Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 1999;30:179-192.
120. Luce R. D.,Raiffa H.Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1957:.
121. Marks M. A.,Mathieu J. E.,Zaccaro S. J.A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes.Academy of Management Review. 2001;26:356-376.
122. Marks M. A.,Sabella M. J.,Burke C. S.,Zaccaro S.The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87:3-13.
123. Marks M. A.,Zaccaro S. J.,Mathieu J. E.Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85:971-986.
124. Mathieu J. E.,Chen G.The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research.Journal of Management. 2011;37:610-641.
125. Mathieu J. E.,Heffner T. S.,Goodwin G. F.,Salas E.,Cannon-Bowers J. A.The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85:273-283.
126. McComb S. A.Research in multi-level issues. Dansereau F.Yammarino F. J., ed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 2007:95-147.
127. McGrath J. E.Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1964:.
128. Mill J. S.A system of logic, ratiocinative, and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. London, England: J. W. Parker; 1843:.
129. Miller J. H.,Page S. E.Complex adaptive systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
130. Min B.,Goh K.-I.,Kim I.-M.Waiting time dynamics of priority-queue networks.Physical Review E. 2009;79 (056110):.
131. Morgeson F. P.,Hofmann D. A.The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:249-265.
132. Muthen B.Multilevel covariance structure analysis.Sociological Methods and Research. 1994;22:376-398.
133. Nowak M. A.,May R. M.Evolutionary games and spatial chaos.Nature. 1992;359:826-829.
134. Oliveira J. G.,Vazquez A.Impact of interactions on human dynamics.Physica A. 2009;388:187-192.
135. Orbell J. M.,van de Kragt A. J. C.,Dawes R. M.Explaining discussion-induced cooperation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;54:811-819.
136. Orlikowski W. J.The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations.Organization Science. 1992;3:398-427.
137. Orlikowski W. J.Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing.Organization Science. 2002;13:249-273.
138. Orlikowski W. J.,Yates J.It's about time: Temporal structure in organizations.Organization Science. 2002;13:684-700.
139. Oskamp S.Effects of programmed strategies on cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma and other mixed-motive games.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1971;15:225-259.
140. Passos P.,Davids K.,Araújo D.,Paz N.,Minguéns J.,Mendes J.Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems.Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2011;14:170-176.
141. Pinder C. C.,Moore L. F.Middle range theory and the study of organizations. New York, NY: Springer; 1980:.
142. Ployhart R. E.,Moliterno T. P.Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:127-150.
143. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2002:.
144. Reynolds C.SIGGRAPH '87: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 1987:25-34.
145. Roberts K. H.,Hulin C. L.,Rousseau D. M.Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1978:.
146. Roca C. P.,Sánchez A.,Cuesta J. A.Individual strategy update and emergence of cooperation in social networks.Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 2012;36:1-21.
147. Rousseau D. M.Research in organizational behavior. Cummings L. L.Staw B., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI; 1985:1-37.
148. Roy D. F."Banana time" job satisfaction and informal interaction.Human Organization. 1958;18:158-168.
149. Saavedra R.,Earley C. P.,Van Dyne L.Complex interdependence in task-performing groups.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993;78:61-72.
150. Salas E.,Sims D. E.,Burke C. S.Is there a "big five" in teamwork?.Small Group Research. 2005;36:555-599.
151. Sampson R. J.Socioeconomic position and health: The independent contribution of community socioeconomic context.Annual Review of Sociology. 2003;25:489-516.
152. Samuelson C. D.,Watrous-Rodriguez K. M.Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethnical judgments. Kramer R. M.Tenbrunsel A. E.Bazerman M. H., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:13-46.
153. Sawyer R. K.Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory.American Journal of Sociology. 2001;107:551-585.
154. Sayama H.,Farrell D. L.,Dionne S. D.The effects of mental model formation on group decision making: An agent-based simulation.Wiley Periodicals. 2011;16:49-57.
155. Schneider B.,Salvaggio A. N.,Subirats M.Climate strength: A new direction for climate research.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87:220-229.
156. Singer J. D.,Willet J. B.Applied longitudinal data analysis modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
157. Smithson M.,Foddy M.Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects. Foddy M.Smithson M.Schneider S.Hogg M., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 1999:1-14.
158. Snijders T.,Bosker R.Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999:.
159. Stasser G.Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A "thought experiment.".Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1992;52:156-181.
160. Stasser G.Shared cognition in organizations. Levine J.Messick D., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:49-69.
161. Stasser G.,Titus W.Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985;48:1467-1478.
162. Steiner I. D.Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1972:.
163. Steyvers M.,Tenenbaum J. B.The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth.Cognitive Science. 2005;29:41-78.
164. Stout R. J.,Cannon-Bowers J. A.,Salas E.,Milanovich D. M.Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established.Human Factors. 1999;41:61-71.
165. Stout R. J.,Salas E.,Fowlkes J. E.Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1997;1:169-182.
166. Tucker J. B.Partners and rivals: A model of international collaboration in advanced technology.International Organization. 1991;45:83-120.
167. Vancouver J. B.,Tamanini K. B.,Yoder R. J.Using dynamic computational models to reconnect theory and research: Socialization by the proactive newcomer as example.Journal of Management. 2010;36:764-793.
168. Vancouver J. B.,Weinhardt J. M.,Schmidt A. M.A formal, computational theory of multiple-goal pursuit: Integrating goal-choice and goal-striving processes.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;95:985-1008.
169. van Dijk E.,De Cremer D.,Mulder L. B.,Stouten J.New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas. Biel A.Eek D.Gärling T.Gustafsson M., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2008:43-56.
170. Van Lange P. A. M.,Joireman J.,Parks C. D.,van Dijk E.The psychology of social dilemmas: A review.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2013;120:125-141.
171. Van Lange P. A. M.,Ouwerkerk J. W.,Tazelaar M. J. A.How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82:768-780.
172. von Bertalanffy L.General system theory. New York, NY: Braziller; 1968:.
173. Wagner J. A.Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups.Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:152-172.
174. Walls T. A.,Schafer J. L.Models for intensive longitudinal data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
175. Walters A. E.,Stuhlmacher A. F.,Meyer L. L.Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1998;76:1-29.
176. Weber J. M.,Murnighan J. K.Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;95:1340-1353.
177. Wegner D. M.A computer network model of human transactive memory.Social Cognition. 1995;13:319-339.
178. Wegner D. M.,Giuliano T.,Hertel P.Compatible and incompatible relationships. Ickes W. J., ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1985:253-276.
179. Weinhardt J. M.,Vancouver J. B.Computational models and organizational psychology: Opportunities abound.Organizational Psychology Review. 2012;2 (4): 267-292.
180. Wood D. J.,Gray B.Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1991;27:139-162.
181. Zohar D. M.,Hofmann D. A.The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology. Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012:643-666.