Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 595-615

  Bell, Suzanne T ^a  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Team composition; Team design; Team performance; Teams and workgroups

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COOPERATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; META ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PERSONALITY;

EID: 34248377791     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595     Document Type: Article

References (172)

1. Alavi, S. B., & McCormick, J. (2004). Theoretical and measurement issues for studies of collective orientation in team context. Small Group Research, 35, 111-127.
2. Alper, S. J. (1993). Goal interdependence, interaction, and work outcomes in self-directed work teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
3. Amundson, S. J. (2003). An exploratory study of emotional intelligence, group emotional competence, and effectiveness of healthcare and human services team. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gonzaga University.
4. Arciniega, L., Allen, G. C., Poling, T., & Woehr, D. (2006, May). The impact of personality and value diversity on team performance. Poster session presented at the 21st annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Dallas, TX.
5. Arthur, W., Jr., Bell, S. T., & Edwards, B. D. (2007). A longitudinal examination of the comparative criterion-related validity of additive and referent-shift consensus operationalizations of team efficacy. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 35-58.
6. Arthur, W., Jr., Bennett, W., Jr., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2001). Conducting meta-analysis using SAS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bachoo, D. (2002). The impact of dimensions of culture on team efficacy and its related multilevel outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
8. Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. (1997). Principles and measuring teamwork: A summary and look toward the future. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 331-355). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Balthazard, P., Polter, R. E., & Warren, J. (2004). Expertise, extraversion, and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35, 41-64.
10. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
11. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team process and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
12. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
13. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.
14. Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 572-590.
15. Bell, B. G., & Cooke, N. J. (2003). Cognitive ability correlates of performance on a team task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1087-1091). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). When member heterogeneity is needed in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 305-327.
17. Brannick, M. T., & Prince, C. (1997). An overview of team performance measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity on management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875-893.
19. Burchfield, M. (1997). Personality composition as it relates to team performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.
20. Butts, M. M., Eby, L. T., & McCleese, C. S. (2005, April). The role of emotional stability in hierarchical decision-making teams. Poster session presented at the 20th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Los Angeles.
21. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
22. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Cheung, Y. H., & Roberts, C. (2006, May). Conscientiousness and creative task performance: Does thinking style matter? Poster session presented at the 21st annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Dallas, TX.
24. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
25. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
26. Colarelli, S. M., & Boos, A. L. (1992). Sociometric and ability-based assignment to work groups: Some implications for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 187-196.
27. Colquitt, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., llgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Sheppard, L. (2002). Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: The moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 402-410.
28. Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109.
29. Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2004). Using an ability-based measure of emotional intelligence to predict individual performance, group performance, and group citizenship behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1443-1458.
30. Day, E. A., Arthur, W., Jr., Bell, S. T., Edwards, B. D., Bennett, W., Jr., Tubre, T. C., & Mendoza, J. L. (2005). Ability-based pairing strategies in the team-based training of a complex skill: Does the cognitive ability of your training partner matter? Intelligence, 33, 39-65.
31. Day, E. A., Arthur, W., Jr., Edwards, B. D., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Relating ability and personality to the efficacy and performance of dyadic teams. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1063-1067). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
32. Day, E. A., Arthur, W., Jr., Miyashiro, B., Edwards, B. D., Tubre, T. C., & Tubre, A. H. (2004). Criterion-related validity of statistical operationalizations of group general cognitive ability as a function of task type: Comparing the mean, maximum, and minimum. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1521-1549.
33. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
34. Demko, B. S. (2001). Measuring team personality: Problems and pitfalls (Doctoral dissertation, Central Michigan University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 1626.
35. DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechman, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1035-1056.
36. Devine, D. J. (1999). Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 608-634.
37. Devine, D. J. (2002). A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations. Group Dynamics, 6, 291-310.
38. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Meiner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678-711.
39. Devine, D. J., & Phillips, J. L. (2001). Do smarter teams do better? A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32, 507-532.
40. Dipboye, R. L., & Flanagan, M. F. (1979). Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? American Psychologist, 34, 141-150.
41. Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., & Salas, E. (1987). Personality and group performance. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-112). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (1999). The antecedents of team competence: Toward a fine-grained model of self-managing team effectiveness. In M. Neale & E. Mannix (Eds.), Research in managing groups and teams: Context (Vol. 2, pp. 201-231). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
43. Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2000). The Salieri syndrome: Consequences of envy in groups. Small Group Research, 31, 3-23.
44. Earley, P. C. (1999). Playing follow the leader: Status-determining trait in relation to collective efficacy across cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 192-212.
45. Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265-304.
46. Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams and individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275-295.
47. Edwards, B. D., Day, E. A., Arthur, W., Jr., & Bell, S. T. (2006). Relationship among team ability composition, team knowledge structures, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 727-736.
48. Ellis, P. J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Porter, C. O. L. H., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 821-835.
49. English, A., Griffith, R. L., & Steelman, L. A. (2004). Team performance: The effect of team conscientiousness and task type. Small Group Research, 35, 643-665.
50. Feyerherm, A. E., & Rice, C. L. (2002). Emotional intelligence and team performance: The good, the bad, and the ugly. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10, 343-362.
51. Foushee, H. C., & Helmreich, R. L. (1988). Group interaction and flight crew performance. In E. L. Weiner & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 189-228). San Diego: Academic Press.
52. Futrell, D. A. (1992). Cognitive ability and Myers-Briggs type indicator preferences as predictors of group performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3819.
53. George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
54. Gettman, D. J. (2001). An investigation of the shared mental model construct in the context of a complex team task (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 2101.
55. Giambatista, R. C. (1999). Reaping the fruits: Dimensions of diversity, communication technology, and team effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International 60, 3432.
56. Gibson, C. B., & Saxton, T. (2005). Thinking outside the black box: Outcomes of team decisions with third-party intervention. Small Group Research, 36, 208-236.
57. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
58. Gonzalez, C., Thomas, R. P., & Vanyukov, P. (2005). The relationships between cognitive and dynamic decision making. Intelligence, 33, 169-186.
59. Goodwin, G. F. (1999). Predicting performance in U.S. Army Special Forces teams: Staffing and composition issues (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 3605.
60. Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediated the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1394-1408.
61. Griffith, B., & Hesketh, B. (2004). Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 243-251.
62. Gully, S. M. (1997). The influences of self-regulatory processes on learning and performance in a team training context (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 5175.
63. Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
64. Hacker, M. (2000). The impact of top performers on project teams. Team Performance Management, 6, 85.
65. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
66. Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 199-267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
67. Halfhill, T. R. (2001). Personality composition, group norms, and group effectiveness in military work teams (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 5037.
68. Halfhill, T., Nielson, T. M., Sundstrom, E., & Weilbaecher, A. (2005). Group personality composition and performance in military service teams. Military Psychology, 17, 41-54.
69. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
70. Haythorn, W. (1953). The influence of individual members on the characteristics of small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 276-284.
71. Hecht, T. D. (1997). Team performance: Does personality play a role? Unpublished master's thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
72. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Hogan, R., Raza, S., & Driskell, J. E. (1988). Personality, team performance, and organizational context. In P. Whitney & R. B. Ochsman (Eds.), Psychology and productivity (pp. 93-103). New York: Plenum Press.
74. Hollenbeck, J. R., DeRue, D. S., & Guzzo, R. (2004). Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training, and team task design. Human Resource Management, 43, 353-366.
75. Hough, L. M. (1992). The "Big Five" personality variables - Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
76. Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W., Jr. (1995). Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 327-344.
77. Humphrey, S. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., Meyer, C. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003, April). Personality configurations in self-managed teams: A natural experiment on the effects of maximizing and minimizing variance in factors. Poster session presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
78. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
79. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
80. Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in a social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 675-702.
81. Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
82. Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
83. Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, work group context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 703-729.
84. Jordan, M. H. (2001). The relationship of individual difference and group process variables with self-managed team performance: A field investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.
85. Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human Performance, 17, 195-218.
86. Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). Effects of group characteristics on work group performance: A longitudinal investigation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 279-290.
87. Jung, D. I., Sosik, J. J., & Baik, K. B. (2002). Investigating work group characteristics and performance over time: A replication and cross-cultural extension. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 153-171.
88. Katz, T. Y. (1999). Self-construal as a moderator of the effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
89. Kichuck, S. L., & Weisner, W. H. (1997). The Big Five personality factors and team performance: Implications for selecting successful product design. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 195-221.
90. Kickul, G. H. (2000). Antecedents of self-managed work team performance in a computerized business simulation: Personality and group interaction (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 2270.
91. Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The impact of team members' cultural values on productivity, cooperation, and empowerment in self-managing work teams. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 597-617.
92. Kline, T. J. B. (2001). Predicting team performance: Testing a model in a field setting. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 26, 185-197.
93. Ko, J. (2005). Impact of leadership and team members' individualism-collectivism on team processes and outcomes: A leader-member exchange perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
94. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman & D. R. Ilgen (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley.
95. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
96. Kristof-Brown, A., Barrick, M. R., & Stevens, C. K. (2005). When opposites attract: A multi-sample demonstration of complementary person-team fit on extraversion. Journal of Personality, 73, 935-958.
97. Lam, L. T. (1998). Emotional intelligence: Implications for individual performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
98. Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385-399.
99. LePine, J. A. (1998). An integrative model of team adaptation. (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 3882.
100. LePine, J. A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: The effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 27-39.
101. LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
102. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
103. Lim, B. (2004). Do the leaders and members make the team? The role of personality and cognitive ability (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 5829.
104. Lin, Z., Yang, H., Arya, B., Huang, Z., & Li, D. (2005). Structural versus individual perspectives on the dynamics of group performance: Theoretical exploration and empirical investigation. Journal of Management, 31, 354-380.
105. Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. K. (2003). The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualist work groups: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 979-1001.
106. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
107. McAleer, G. R. (1988). A "collective" Myers-Briggs type indicator and its relationship to small groups: A descriptive-exploratory study of senior military managers at the National Defense University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
108. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
109. McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
110. McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. Krout, & C. C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Prentice Hall.
111. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time interaction and performance (TIP): A theory of small groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
112. Mehart, S. F. (1998). Emotional intelligence: An alternative explanation of career success. Development of a multi-componential theory of emotional intelligence and its related interview outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 2, 34.
113. Miller, D. L. (2001). Reexamining teamwork KSAs and team performance. Small Group Research, 32, 745-766.
114. Miyashiro, B. A. (2002). Comparative validity of different statistical operationalizations of team ability as a function of task type (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 3408.
115. Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: What differences make a difference in team performance? Small Group Research, 34, 651-677.
116. Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1015-1039.
117. Mohammed, S. N., Mathieu, J. E., & Bartlett, A. L. (2002). Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team- and task-related composition variables. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 795-814.
118. Moon, H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., West, B., Ellis, A. P. J., & Porter, C. O. L. H. (2004). Asymmetric adaptability: Dynamic team structures as one-way streets. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 681-695.
119. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
120. Morgan, F. P., & Lassiter, D. L. (1992). Team composition and staffing. In R. W. Sweezy & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 75-100). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
121. Moss, M. C. (1998). Group motivation and performance on tasks of varying cognitive complexity: Effects of collective efficacy and group personality composition. Unpublished master's thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
122. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interaction. Human Performance, 11, 145-165.
123. Moye, N. A., & Langfred, C. W. (2004). Information sharing and group conflict: Going beyond decision making to understand the effects of information sharing on group performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 381-410.
124. Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
125. Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group and Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
126. Neuman, G. A., & Wright, J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376-389.
127. Nicholls, C. E. (2000). The role of personality in organizational groups: A theoretical integration and empirical study in two task contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
128. O'Connell, M. S., Doverspike, D., Cober, A. B., & Phillips, J. L. (2001). Forging work-teams: Effects of the distribution of cognitive ability on team performance. Applied Human Resource Management Research, 6, 115-128.
129. Offerman, L. R., Bailey, J. R., Vasilopoulous, N. L., Seal, C., & Sass, M. (2004). The relative contribution of emotional competence and cognitive ability to individual and team performance. Human Performance, 17, 219-243.
130. O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.
131. Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
132. Panzer, F. J. (2003). The influence of gender and ethnic diversity on team effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation, Florida International University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 1534.
133. Pauly, J. S. C. (2001). Types of KS As and levels of task interdependence: Their effects on internal processes and outcomes of teams performing a production task (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 578.
134. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
135. Polzer, J. T., Milton, L. P., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324.
136. Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and the legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 391-403.
137. Prewett, M. S., Willis, T. J., Jagusztyn, N., Gray, A. A., Klein, R. H., Stilson, F. R. B., et al. (2006, May). Personality antecedents to virtual team member performance. Poster session presented at the 21st annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Dallas, TX.
138. Putney, D. M. (2004). SWAT team composition and effectiveness. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 5263.
139. Rapisarda, B. A. (2002). The impact of emotional intelligence on work team cohesiveness and performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10, 363-379.
140. Reilly, R. R., Lynn, G. S., & Aronson, Z. H. (2002). The role of personality in new product development team performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 39-58.
141. Reilly, R. R., Lynn, G. S., & Aronson, Z. H. (2003, August). New product development and team performance: The role of team member personality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, Washington.
142. Resick, C. J. (2004). An investigation of the antecedents and consequences of shared mental models in teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.
143. Ringseis, E. L. (1999). Lending a helping hand: The multilevel effects of diversity on performance. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
144. Robert, C., Cheng, Y., & Trembath, J. (2004, April). Conscientiousness and performance: Negative relationships with a creative group task. Poster presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
145. Roberts, R., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. M. (2001). Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for intelligence? Some new data and conclusions. Emotions, 1, 196-231.
146. Rodriguez, R. A. (1998). Challenging demographic reductionism: A pilot study investigating diversity in group composition. Small Group Research, 29, 744-759.
147. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
148. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211.
149. Schmidt, F. L. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187-210.
150. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego: Academic Press.
151. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilski, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure on human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
152. Sosik, J. J., & Jung, D. I. (2002). Work-group performance characteristics and performance in collectivistic and individualistic cultures. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 5-23.
153. Steel, P. D., & Kammeyer-Muller, J. D. (2002). Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 96-111.
154. Steiner, I. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
155. Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-54.
156. Stewart, G. L., Fulmer, I. S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 343-365.
157. Taggar, S. (2000). Personality, cognitive ability and behaviour: The antecedents of effective autonomous work teams (Doctoral dissertation, McMaster University, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 3438.
158. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper's Magazine, 140, 227-235.
159. Tjosvold, D., Law, K. S., & Sun, H. F. (2003). Collectivistic and individualistic values: Their effects on group dynamics and productivity in China. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 243-263.
160. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
161. Triandis, H. C. (2000). Allocentrism-idiocentrism. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 118-119). New York: Oxford University Press.
162. Tziner, A., & Eden, D. (1985). Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts'? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 85-93.
163. Tziner, A., & Vardi, Y. (1983). Ability as a moderator between cohesiveness and tank crew performance. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 4, 137-143.
164. van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 97-120.
165. Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-172.
166. Wagner, J. A., & Moch, M. K. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: Concept and measure. Group and Organization Studies, 11, 280-303.
167. Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Davidson, R. A. (2004). The role of individualism and the five-factor model in the prediction of performance in a leaderless group discussion. Journal of Personality, 72, 1-28.
168. Walker, R. E., & Foley, J. M. (1973). Social intelligence: Its history and measurement. Psychological Reports, 33, 839-864.
169. Wanous, J. P., Sullivan, S. E., & Malinak, J. (1989). The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 259-264.
170. Warren, J. (2003). A comparison of the effects of extroversion and expertise on virtual team and face-to-face team interaction and performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago.
171. Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-162.
172. Whitener, E. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 315-321.