Team coordination in basketball: Description of the cognitive connections among teammates

Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 150-166

  Bourbousson, Jerome ^a   Poizat, Germain ^b   Saury, Jacques ^a   Seve, Carole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951891945     PISSN: 10413200     EISSN: 15331571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10413201003664657     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arripe-Longueville, F. (d'), Saury, J., Fournier, J., & Durand, M. (2001). Coach-athlete interaction during elite archery competitions: An application of methodological frameworks used in ergonomics research to sport psychology. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 275-299.
2. Autrey, P., & Moss, J. (2006). High-reliability teams and situation awareness: Implementing a hospital emergency incident command system. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 36, 67-72.
3. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Bowers, C. (2006) Applying work team results to sports teams: Opportunities and cautions. International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 4, 363-369.
4. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert decision making teams. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Carron, A. V., & Hausenblas, H. A. (1998). Group dynamics in sport (2nd ed.). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
6. Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., & L.Winner, J. (2007). Team cognition. In F. Durso, R. Nickerson, S. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, & T. Perfect (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 239-268). New York: Wiley.
7. Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Kiekel, P. A., & Bell, B. (2004). Advances in measuring team cognition. In E. Salas (Ed.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 83-106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Cranach (von), M., & Harre, R. (Eds.). (1982). The analysis of action: Recent theoretical and empirical advances. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cratty, B. J. (1983). Psychology in contemporary sport: Guidelines for coaches and athletes (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Eccles, D. W., & Johnson, M. B. (2009). Letting the social and cognitive merge: New concepts for an understanding of group functioning in sport. In S. D. Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.), Applied sport psychology advances: A review (pp. 281-316). London: Routledge.
11. Eccles, D. W. & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social- cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal ofSport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 542-560.
12. Eccles, D. W. & Tenenbaum, G. (2005). Ten top tips for team building in the pre-season. Insight: The Football Coaches Association Online Journal. August Edition.
13. Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2007). A social cognitive perspective on team functioning in sport. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 264-283). New York: Wiley.
14. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215 251.
15. Evans III, A. W., Harper, M. E., & Jentsch, F. (2004). I know what you are thinking: Eliciting. mental models about familiar teammates. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the First International conference on Concept Mapping (pp. 191-198). Pamplona, Spain.
16. Eys, M. A., Carron, A. V, Bray, S. R., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2003). Role ambiguity in sport teams. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25, 534-550.
17. Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2006). Team cognition and expert teams: Developing insights from cross-disciplinary analysis of exceptional teams. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 369-375.
18. Gernigon, C., Arripe-Longueville, F. (d'), Delignieres, D., & Ninot, G. (2004). A dynamical systems perspective on goal involvement states in sport. Journal ofSport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 572-596.
19. Gilbert, W. D., Trudel, P., & Haughian, L. P. (1999). Interactive decision making factors considered by coaches of youth ice hockey during games. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 290-311.
20. Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of seeing-Visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. Van Leeuwen, & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157-182). London: Sage.
21. Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassel & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195-212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Gouju, J. L., Vermersch, P., & Bouthier, D. (2007). A psycho-phenomenological approach to sport psychology: The presence of the opponents in hurdle races. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19, 173-186.
23. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 69-94.
24. Heath, C., Sanchez Svensson, M., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., & Lehn (vom), D. (2002). Configuring awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Special issue on Awareness, 11, 317-347.
25. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
26. Hoc, J. M. (2001). Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 509-540.
27. Jackson, B., Beauchamp, M. R., & Knapp, P. (2007). Relational efficacy beliefs in athlete dyads: an investigation using actor-partner interdependence models. Journal ofSport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 170-89.
28. Jones, M. B. (1974). Regressing group on individual effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 426-451.
29. Lausic, D., Tennenbaum, G., Eccles, D., Jeong, A., & Johnson, T. (2009). Intrateam communication and performance in doubles tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 281-290.
30. Lebed, F. (2007). A dolphin only looks like a fish: Players' behaviour analysis is not enough for game understanding in the light of the systems approach-a response to the reply by McGarry and Franks. European Journal of Sport Science, 7, 55-62.
31. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861-878.
32. MacMillan, J., Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (2004). Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. In E. Salas, & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 61-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., Baron, R. M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2006). Contrasting approaches to perceiving and acting with others. Ecological Psychology, 18, 1-38.
34. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston: New Science Library.
35. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36. Poizat, G., Bourbousson, J., Saury, J., & Seve, C. (2009). Analysis of contextual information sharing during table tennis matches: An empirical study of coordination in sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.
37. Poizat, G., Seve, C., & Rossard, C. (2006). Influencer les jugements de l'adversaire au cours des interactions sportives competitives: Un exemple en tennis de table [Influencing the opponent's judgments during competitive sports interactions: an example from table tennis]. European Review ofApplied Psychology, 56, 167-178.
38. Reimer, T., Park, E. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2006). Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: An information-processing perspective for team sports. International Journal ofSport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 376-400.
39. Rognin, L., Salembier, P., & Zouinar, M. (2000). Cooperation, reliability of socio-technical systems and allocation of function. International Journal ofHuman-Computer Studies, 52, 357-379.
40. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task performing groups. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
41. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey, & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L. B. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors, 37, 123-136.
43. Salembier, P., & Zouinar, M. (2000). Analysing and assessing mutual awareness in cooperative work settings. Retrieved January 10, 2005 from http://www-sv.cict.fr/cotcos/pjs/ComplexityandModelling/Modelling/ModellingSalembier.html.
44. Schmidt, K. (1998, March). Some notes on mutual awareness. Paper presented at the COTCOS Awareness SIG Workshop, Paris.
45. Seve, C., & Poizat, G. (2005). Table tennis scoring systems and expert players' exploration activity. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 320-336.
46. Seve, C., Poizat, G., Saury, J., & Durand, M. (2006). A grounded theory of elite male table tennis players' activity during matches. The Sport Psychologist, 20, 58-73.
47. Seve, C., Ria, L., Poizat, G., Saury, J., & Durand, M. (2007). Performance-induced emotions experienced during high-stakes table tennis matches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 25-46.
48. Seve, C., Saury, J., Ria, L., & Durand, M. (2003). Structure of expert players' activity during competitive interaction in table tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 71-83.
49. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
50. Stout, R., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1996). The role of shared mental models in developing team situation awareness: Implications for training. Training Research Journal, 2, 85-116.
51. Theureau, J. (2003). Course-of-action analysis and course-of-action centered design. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 55-81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Theureau, J. (2006). Cours d'action: Methode developpee [Course of action: Developments inmethods]. Toulouse, France: Octares.
53. Trudel, P., Haughian, L., & Gilbert, W. (1996). L'utilisation de la technique du rappel stimule pour mieux comprendre le processus d'intervention de l'entralneur en sport [Use of the stimulated recall technique to better understand the intervention process in sport coaching]. Revue des Sciences de l'Education, 22, 503-522.
54. Ward, P., & Eccles, D. W. (2006). A commentary on team cognition and expert teams: Emerging insights into learning and performance for exceptional teams. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 463-483.
55. Wellens, A. R. (1993). Group situation awareness and distributed decision making from military to civilian applications. In J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Wellens, A. R., & Ergener, D. (1988). The C.I.T.I.E.S. game: A computer-based simulation assessment task for studying dictributed decision making. Simulation and Games, 19, 304 327.