Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training

Group Dynamics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 169-182

  Stout, Renée J ^a   Salas, Eduardo ^a   Fowlkes, Jennifer E ^b  

^a Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division   (United States)

^b Summit Technologies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; AIRCRAFT; ARTICLE; ASSERTIVENESS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AVIATION; AWARENESS; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOLDIER; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES;

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; AIRCRAFT; ASSERTIVENESS; AVIATION; AWARENESS; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION STUDIES; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MALE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031151157     PISSN: 10892699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.169     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Boguslaw, R., & Porter, E. H. (1962). Team functions and training. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Psychological principles on systems development (pp. 337-416). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2. Brannick, M. T., Roach, R. M., & Salas, E. (1991, April). Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
3. Brannick, M. T., Roach, R. M., & Salas, E. (1993). Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 6, 287-308.
4. Briggs, G. E., & Naylor, J. C. (1954). Experiments on team training in a CIC-type task environment (NAVTRADEVCEN Tech. Rep. No. 1327-1). Port Washington, NY: United States Naval Training Device Center.
5. Briggs, G. E., & Naylor, J. C. (1965). Team versus individual training, training task fidelity, and task organization effects on transfer performance by three-man teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 387-392.
6. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Prince, C., Salas, E., Owens, J. M., Morgan, B. B., Jr., & Gonos, G. H. (1989). Determining aircrew coordination effectiveness. Proceedings of the 11th Interservice/Industry Training Systems Conference, Washington, DC, 1, 128-136.
7. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
9. Dyer, J. L. (1984). Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review. In F. A. Muckler (Ed.), Human factors review: 1984 (pp. 285-323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
10. Dynamics Research Corporation. (1990). Development of measures of crew coordination (Tech. Rep. DAHC35-89-D-0030, Del. Order 0001). Ft. Rucker, AL: Army Research Institute.
11. Federman, P. J., & Siegel, A. I. (1965). Communications as a measurable index of team behavior (NAVTRADEVCEN Tech. Rep. No. 1537-1). Wayne, PA: Applied Psychological Services Science Center.