New insights into the mechanism for chromosome alignment in metaphase

International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology

Volumn 303, Issue , 2013, Pages 237-262

  Guo, Yige ^a   Kim, Christine ^a   Mao, Yinghui ^a  

^a College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosome segregation; Kinetochore; Metaphase chromosome alignment; Mitosis; Mitotic spindle

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; MICROTUBULE PROTEIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASE; RAN PROTEIN;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CANCER GROWTH; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMAL PARAMETERS; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; DAUGHTER CELL; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; HUMAN; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MICROTUBULE; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SISTER CHROMATID; SPINDLE CELL;

EID: 84874257686     PISSN: 19376448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407697-6.00006-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (152)

1. Adams R.R., Maiato H., Earnshaw W.C., Carmena M. Essential roles of Drosophila inner centromere protein (INCENP) and Aurora B in histone H3 phosphorylation, metaphase chromosome alignment, kinetochore disjunction, and chromosome segregation. J. Cell. Biol. 2001, 153:865-880.
2. Afshar K., Barton N.R., Hawley R.S., Goldstein L.S. DNA binding and meiotic chromosomal localization of the Drosophila nod kinesin-like protein. Cell 1995, 81:129-138.
3. Akhmanova A., Steinmetz M.O. Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 9:309-322.
4. Akiyoshi B., Nelson C.R., Ranish J.A., Biggins S. Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2887-2899.
5. Akiyoshi B., Sarangapani K.K., Powers A.F., Nelson C.R., Reichow S.L., Arellano-Santoyo H., Gonen T., Ranish J.A., Asbury C.L., Biggins S. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 2010, 468:576-579.
6. Alushin G.M., Ramey V.H., Pasqualato S., Ball D.A., Grigorieff N., Musacchio A., Nogales E. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature 2010, 467:805-U868.
7. Amaro A.C., Samora C.P., Holtackers R., Wang E., Kingston I.J., Alonso M., Lampson M., McAinsh A.D., Meraldi P. Molecular control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and chromosome oscillations. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2010, 12:319-329.
8. Andrews P.D., Ovechkina Y., Morrice N., Wagenbach M., Duncan K., Wordeman L., Swedlow J.R. Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev. Cell. 2004, 6:253-268.
9. Antonio C., Ferby I., Wilhelm H., Jones M., Karsenti E., Nebreda A.R., Vernos I. Xkid, a chromokinesin required for chromosome alignment on the metaphase plate [see comments]. Cell 2000, 102:425-435.
10. Askham J.M., Vaughan K.T., Goodson H.V., Morrison E.E. Evidence that an interaction between EB1 and p.150(Glued) is required for the formation and maintenance of a radial microtubule array anchored at the centrosome. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2002, 13:3627-3645.
11. Bartolini F., Moseley J.B., Schmoranzer J., Cassimeris L., Goode B.L., Gundersen G.G. The formin mDia2 stabilizes microtubules independently of its actin nucleation activity. J. Cell. Biol. 2008, 181:523-536.
12. Basto R., Scaerou F., Mische S., Wojcik E., Lefebvre C., Gomes R., Hays T., Karess R. In vivo dynamics of the rough deal checkpoint protein during Drosophila mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:56-61.
13. Berrueta L., Kraeft S.K., Tirnauer J.S., Schuyler S.C., Chen L.B., Hill D.E., Pellman D., Bierer B.E. The adenomatous polyposis coli-binding protein EB1 is associated with cytoplasmic and spindle microtubules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:10596-10601.
14. Berrueta L., Tirnauer J.S., Schuyler S.C., Pellman D., Bierer B.E. The APC-associated protein EB1 associates with components of the dynactin complex and cytoplasmic dynein intermediate chain. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:425-428.
15. Bieling P., Laan L., Schek H., Munteanu E.L., Sandblad L., Dogterom M., Brunner D., Surrey T. Reconstitution of a microtubule plus-end tracking system in vitro. Nature 2007, 450:1100-1105.
16. Bishop J.D., Schumacher J.M. Phosphorylation of the carboxyl terminus of inner centromere protein (INCENP) by the Aurora B Kinase stimulates Aurora B kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:27577-27580.
17. Blake-Hodek K.A., Cassimeris L., Huffaker T.C. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by Bim1 and Bik1, the budding yeast members of the EB1 and CLIP-170 families of plus-end tracking proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2010, 21:2013-2023.
18. Burrack L.S., Applen S.E., Berman J. The requirement for the Dam1 complex is dependent upon the number of kinetochore proteins and microtubules. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:889-896.
19. Carazo-Salas R.E., Guarguaglini G., Gruss O.J., Segref A., Karsenti E., Mattaj I.W. Generation of GTP-bound Ran by RCC1 is required for chromatin-induced mitotic spindle formation. Nature 1999, 400:178-181.
20. Cassimeris L., Gard D., Tran P.T., Erickson H.P. XMAP215 is a long thin molecule that does not increase microtubule stiffness. J. Cell. Sci. 2001, 114:3025-3033.
21. Caudron M., Bunt G., Bastiaens P., Karsenti E. Spatial coordination of spindle assembly by chromosome-mediated signaling gradients. Science 2005, 309:1373-1376.
22. Chan Y.W., Jeyaprakash A.A., Nigg E.A., Santamaria A. Aurora B controls kinetochore-microtubule attachments by inhibiting Ska complex-KMN network interaction. J. Cell. Biol. 2012, 196:563-571.
23. Cheeseman I.M., Anderson S., Jwa M., Green E.M., Kang J., Yates J.R., Chan C.S., Drubin D.G., Barnes G. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 2002, 111:163-172.
24. Cheeseman I.M., Chappie J.S., Wilson-Kubalek E.M., Desai A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 2006, 127:983-997.
25. Cheeseman I.M., Hori T., Fukagawa T., Desai A. KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19:587-594.
26. Chen J., Jin S., Tahir S.K., Zhang H., Liu X., Sarthy A.V., McGonigal T.P., Liu Z., Rosenberg S.H., Ng S.C. Survivin enhances Aurora-B kinase activity and localizes Aurora-B in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:486-490.
27. Cheng L., Zhang J., Ahmad S., Rozier L., Yu H., Deng H., Mao Y. Aurora B regulates formin mDia3 in achieving metaphase chromosome alignment. Dev. Cell 2011, 20:342-352.
28. Ciferri C., Pasqualato S., Screpanti E., Varetti G., Santaguida S., Dos Reis G., Maiolica A., Polka J., De Luca J.G., De Wulf P., Salek M., Rappsilber J., Moores C.A., Salmon E.D., Musacchio A. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 2008, 133:427-439.
29. Cimini D., Wan X., Hirel C.B., Salmon E.D. Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1711-1718.
30. Civelekoglu-Scholey G., Sharp D.J., Mogilner A., Scholey J.M. Model of chromosome motility in Drosophila embryos: adaptation of a general mechanism for rapid mitosis. Biophysical J. 2006, 90:3966-3982.
31. Cleveland D.W., Mao Y., Sullivan K.F. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 2003, 112:407-421.
32. Cooper J.R., Wordeman L. The diffusive interaction of microtubule binding proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2009, 21:68-73.
33. DeLuca J.G., Gall W.E., Ciferri C., Cimini D., Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 2006, 127:969-982.
34. DeLuca K.F., Lens S.M., DeLuca J.G. Temporal changes in Hec1 phosphorylation control kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability during mitosis. J. Cell. Sci. 2011, 124:622-634.
35. Desai A., Verma S., Mitchison T.J., Walczak C.E. Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes. Cell 1999, 96:69-78.
36. Ditchfield C., Johnson V.L., Tighe A., Ellston R., Haworth C., Johnson T., Mortlock A., Keen N., Taylor S.S. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell. Biol. 2003, 161:267-280.
37. Dixit R., Barnett B., Lazarus J.E., Tokito M., Goldman Y.E., Holzbaur E.L. Microtubule plus-end tracking by CLIP-170 requires EB1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:492-497.
38. Domnitz S.B., Wagenbach M., Decarreau J., Wordeman L. MCAK activity at microtubule tips regulates spindle microtubule length to promote robust kinetochore attachment. J. Cell. Biol. 2012, 197:231-237.
39. Draviam V.M., Shapiro I., Aldridge B., Sorger P.K. Misorientation and reduced stretching of aligned sister kinetochores promote chromosome missegregation in EB1- or APC-depleted cells. EMBO J. 2006, 25:2814-2827.
40. Emanuele M.J., McCleland M.L., Satinover D.L., Stukenberg P.T. Measuring the stoichiometry and physical interactions between components elucidates the architecture of the vertebrate kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005, 16:4882-4892.
41. Feng J., Huang H., Yen T.J. CENP-F is a novel microtubule-binding protein that is essential for kinetochore attachments and affects the duration of the mitotic checkpoint delay. Chromosoma 2006, 115:320-329.
42. Funabiki H., Murray A.W. The Xenopus chromokinesin Xkid is essential for metaphase chromosome alignment and must be degraded to allow anaphase chromosome movement [see comments]. Cell 2000, 102:411-424.
43. Gaitanos T.N., Santamaria A., Jeyaprakash A.A., Wang B., Conti E., Nigg E.A. Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J. 2009, 28:1442-1452.
44. Gardner M.K., Odde D.J. Modeling of chromosome motility during mitosis. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2006, 18:639-647.
45. Gassmann R., Essex A., Hu J.S., Maddox P.S., Motegi F., Sugimoto A., O'Rourke S.M., Bowerman B., McLeod I., Yates J.R., Oegema K., Cheeseman I.M., Desai A. A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:2385-2399.
46. Goodson H.V., Skube S.B., Stalder R., Valetti C., Kreis T.E., Morrison E.E., Schroer T.A. CLIP-170 interacts with dynactin complex and the APC-binding protein EB1 by different mechanisms. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2003, 55:156-173.
47. Green R.A., Wollman R., Kaplan K.B. APC and EB1 function together in mitosis to regulate spindle dynamics and chromosome alignment. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005, 16:4609-4622.
48. Griffis E.R., Stuurman N., Vale R.D. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell. Biol. 2007, 177:1005-1015.
49. Guimaraes G.J., Deluca J.G. Connecting with Ska, a key complex at the kinetochore-microtubule interface. EMBO J. 2009, 28:1375-1377.
50. Guo Y., Kim C., Ahmad S., Zhang J., Mao Y. CENP-E-dependent BubR1 autophosphorylation enhances chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell. Biol. 2012, 198:205-217.
51. Hanisch A., Sillje H.H., Nigg E.A. Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2. EMBO J. 2006, 25:5504-5515.
52. Hauf S., Cole R.W., LaTerra S., Zimmer C., Schnapp G., Walter R., Heckel A., van Meel J., Rieder C.L., Peters J.M. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell. Biol. 2003, 161:281-294.
53. Hayashi I., Wilde A., Mal T.K., Ikura M. Structural basis for the activation of microtubule assembly by the EB1 and p.150Glued complex. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:449-460.
54. Hayden J.H., Bowser S.S., Rieder C.L. Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J. Cell. Biol. 1990, 111:1039-1045.
55. Heald R., Tournebize R., Blank T., Sandaltzopoulos R., Becker P., Hyman A., Karsenti E. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature 1996, 382:420-425.
56. Hill T.L. Theoretical problems related to the attachment of microtubules to kinetochores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985, 82:4404-4408.
57. Honda R., Korner R., Nigg E.A. Exploring the functional interactions between Aurora B, INCENP, and survivin in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003, 14:3325-3341.
58. Honnappa S., John C.M., Kostrewa D., Winkler F.K., Steinmetz M.O. Structural insights into the EB1-APC interaction. EMBO J. 2005, 24:261-269.
59. Hyman A.A., Mitchison T.J. Modulation of microtubule stability by kinetochores in vitro. J. Cell. Biol. 1990, 110:1607-1616.
60. Jeyaprakash A.A., Klein U.R., Lindner D., Ebert J., Nigg E.A., Conti E. Structure of a Survivin-Borealin-INCENP core complex reveals how chromosomal passengers travel together. Cell 2007, 131:271-285.
61. Jeyaprakash A.A., Santamaria A., Jayachandran U., Chan Y.W., Benda C., Nigg E.A., Conti E. Structural and functional organization of the ska complex, a key component of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell. 2012, 46:274-286.
62. Joglekar A.P., Bloom K.S., Salmon E.D. Mechanisms of force generation by end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2010, 22:57-67.
63. Joglekar A.P., Bouck D., Finley K., Liu X., Wan Y., Berman J., He X., Salmon E.D., Bloom K.S. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is conserved between point and regional centromeres. J. Cell. Biol. 2008, 181:587-594.
64. Kalab P., Pralle A., Isacoff E.Y., Heald R., Weis K. Analysis of a RanGTP-regulated gradient in mitotic somatic cells. Nature 2006, 440:697-701.
65. Kaplan K.B., Burds A.A., Swedlow J.R., Bekir S.S., Sorger P.K., Nathke I.S. A role for the adenomatous polyposis coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2001, 3:429-432.
66. Kapoor T.M., Lampson M.A., Hergert P., Cameron L., Cimini D., Salmon E.D., McEwen B.F., Khodjakov A. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 2006, 311:388-391.
67. Keating P., Rachidi N., Tanaka T.U., Stark M.J. Ipl1-dependent phosphorylation of Dam1 is reduced by tension applied on kinetochores. J. Cell. Sci. 2009, 122:4375-4382.
68. Khodjakov A., Cole R.W., Bajer A.S., Rieder C.L. The force for poleward chromosome motion in Haemanthus cells acts along the length of the chromosome during metaphase but only at the kinetochore during anaphase. J. Cell. Biol. 1996, 132:1093-1104.
69. Khodjakov A., Copenagle L., Gordon M.B., Compton D.A., Kapoor T.M. Minus-end capture of preformed kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle morphogenesis. J. Cell. Biol. 2003, 160:671-683.
70. Khodjakov A., Rieder C.L. Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome. J. Cell. Biol. 1996, 135:315-327.
71. Kim Y., Heuser J.E., Waterman C.M., Cleveland D.W. CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J. Cell. Biol. 2008, 181:411-419.
72. Kim Y., Holland A.J., Lan W., Cleveland D.W. Aurora kinases and protein phosphatase 1 mediate chromosome congression through regulation of CENP-E. Cell 2010, 142:444-455.
73. Kimura M., Kotani S., Hattori T., Sumi N., Yoshioka T., Todokoro K., Okano Y. Cell cycle-dependent expression and spindle pole localization of a novel human protein kinase, Aik, related to Aurora of Drosophila and yeast Ipl1. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:13766-13771.
74. King J.M., Hays T.S., Nicklas R.B. Dynein is a transient kinetochore component whose binding is regulated by microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell. Biol. 2000, 151:739-748.
75. Kirschner M.W., Mitchison T. Microtubule dynamics. Nature 1986, 324:621.
76. Kline-Smith S.L., Khodjakov A., Hergert P., Walczak C.E. Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004, 15:1146-1159.
77. Knowlton A.L., Lan W., Stukenberg P.T. Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1705-1710.
78. Kronja I., Kruljac-Letunic A., Caudron-Herger M., Bieling P., Karsenti E. XMAP215-EB1 interaction is required for proper spindle assembly and chromosome segregation in Xenopus egg extract. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009, 20:2684-2696.
79. Lampert F., Hornung P., Westermann S. The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:641-649.
80. Lampson M.A., Cheeseman I.M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:133-140.
81. Lampson M.A., Kapoor T.M. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2005, 7:93-98.
82. Lan W., Zhang X., Kline-Smith S.L., Rosasco S.E., Barrett-Wilt G.A., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F., Walczak C.E., Stukenberg P.T. Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:273-286.
83. Levesque A.A., Compton D.A. The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles. J. Cell. Biol. 2001, 154:1135-1146.
84. Li H.Y., Wirtz D., Zheng Y. A mechanism of coupling RCC1 mobility to RanGTP production on the chromatin in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:635-644.
85. Liu D., Vader G., Vromans M.J., Lampson M.A., Lens S.M. Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of Aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 2009, 323:1350-1353.
86. Liu D., Vleugel M., Backer C.B., Hori T., Fukagawa T., Cheeseman I.M., Lampson M.A. Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J. Cell. Biol. 2010, 188:809-820.
87. Lombillo V.A., Nislow C., Yen T.J., Gelfand V.I., McIntosh J.R. Antibodies to the kinesin motor domain and CENP-E inhibit microtubule depolymerization-dependent motion of chromosomes in vitro. J. Cell. Biol. 1995, 128:107-115.
88. Loncarek J., Kisurina-Evgenieva O., Vinogradova T., Hergert P., La Terra S., Kapoor T.M., Khodjakov A. The centromere geometry essential for keeping mitosis error free is controlled by spindle forces. Nature 2007, 450:745-749.
89. Maiato H., DeLuca J., Salmon E.D., Earnshaw W.C. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J. Cell. Sci. 2004, 117:5461-5477.
90. Mao Y. FORMIN a link between kinetochores and microtubule ends. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:625-629.
91. Mao Y., Abrieu A., Cleveland D.W. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell 2003, 114:87-98.
92. Mao Y., Desai A., Cleveland D.W. Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Cell. Biol. 2005, 170:873-880.
93. Mao Y., Varma D., Vallee R. Emerging functions of force-producing kinetochore motors. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:715-719.
94. McEwen B.F., Chan G.K., Zubrowski B., Savoian M.S., Sauer M.T., Yen T.J. CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001, 12:2776-2789.
95. McIntosh J.R., Grishchuk E.L., Morphew M.K., Efremov A.K., Zhudenkov K., Volkov V.A., Cheeseman I.M., Desai A., Mastronarde D.N., Ataullakhanov F.I. Fibrils connect microtubule tips with kinetochores: a mechanism to couple tubulin dynamics to chromosome motion. Cell 2008, 135:322-333.
96. McKim K.S., Hawley R.S. Chromosomal control of meiotic cell division. Science 1995, 270:1595-1601.
97. Mimori-Kiyosue Y., Grigoriev I., Lansbergen G., Sasaki H., Matsui C., Severin F., Galjart N., Grosveld F., Vorobjev I., Tsukita S., Akhmanova A. CLASP1 and CLASP2 bind to EB1 and regulate microtubule plus-end dynamics at the cell cortex. J. Cell. Biol. 2005, 168:141-153.
98. Mimori-Kiyosue Y., Shiina N., Tsukita S. The dynamic behavior of the APC-binding protein EB1 on the distal ends of microtubules. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:865-868.
99. Miranda J.J., De Wulf P., Sorger P.K., Harrison S.C. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:138-143.
100. Montenegro Gouveia S., Leslie K., Kapitein L.C., Buey R.M., Grigoriev I., Wagenbach M., Smal I., Meijering E., Hoogenraad C.C., Wordeman L., Steinmetz M.O., Akhmanova A. In vitro reconstitution of the functional interplay between MCAK and EB3 at microtubule plus ends. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1717-1722.
101. Morrison E.E., Wardleworth B.N., Askham J.M., Markham A.F., Meredith D.M. EB1, a protein which interacts with the APC tumour suppressor, is associated with the microtubule cytoskeleton throughout the cell cycle. Oncogene 1998, 17:3471-3477.
102. Musacchio A. Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366:3595-3604.
103. Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 8:379-393.
104. Nicklas R.B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 1997, 275:632-637.
105. O'Connell C.B., Loncarek J., Kalab P., Khodjakov A. Relative contributions of chromatin and kinetochores to mitotic spindle assembly. J. Cell. Biol. 2009, 187:43-51.
106. Ohba T., Nakamura M., Nishitani H., Nishimoto T. Self-organization of microtubule asters induced in Xenopus egg extracts by GTP-bound Ran. Science 1999, 284:1356-1358.
107. Ohi R., Sapra T., Howard J., Mitchison T.J. Differentiation of cytoplasmic and meiotic spindle assembly MCAK functions by Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004, 15:2895-2906.
108. Powers A.F., Franck A.D., Gestaut D.R., Cooper J., Gracyzk B., Wei R.R., Wordeman L., Davis T.N., Asbury C.L. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell 2009, 136:865-875.
109. Putkey F.R., Cramer T., Morphew M.K., Silk A.D., Johnson R.S., McIntosh J.R., Cleveland D.W. Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev. Cell. 2002, 3:351-365.
110. Raaijmakers J.A., Tanenbaum M.E., Maia A.F., Medema R.H. RAMA1 is a novel kinetochore protein involved in kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J. Cell. Sci. 2009, 122:2436-2445.
111. Rattner J.B., Rao A., Fritzler M.J., Valencia D.W., Yen T.J. CENP-F is a.ca 400kDa kinetochore protein that exhibits a cell-cycle dependent localization. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 1993, 26:214-226.
112. Rieder C.L., Alexander S.P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell. Biol. 1990, 110:81-95.
113. Rosasco-Nitcher S.E., Lan W., Khorasanizadeh S., Stukenberg P.T. Centromeric Aurora-B activation requires TD-60, microtubules, and substrate priming phosphorylation. Science 2008, 319:469-472.
114. Rosenberg J.S., Cross F.R., Funabiki H. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. CB 2011, 21:942-947.
115. Sampath S.C., Ohi R., Leismann O., Salic A., Pozniakovski A., Funabiki H. The chromosomal passenger complex is required for chromatin-induced microtubule stabilization and spindle assembly. Cell 2004, 118:187-202.
116. Sanchez-Perez I., Renwick S.J., Crawley K., Karig I., Buck V., Meadows J.C., Franco-Sanchez A., Fleig U., Toda T., Millar J.B. The DASH complex and Klp5/Klp6 kinesin coordinate bipolar chromosome attachment in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2005, 24:2931-2943.
117. Sandall S., Severin F., McLeod I.X., Yates J.R., Oegema K., Hyman A., Desai A. A Bir1-Sli15 complex connects centromeres to microtubules and is required to sense kinetochore tension. Cell 2006, 127:1179-1191.
118. Santaguida S., Musacchio A. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2511-2531.
119. Sassoon I., Severin F.F., Andrews P.D., Taba M.R., Kaplan K.B., Ashford A.J., Stark M.J., Sorger P.K., Hyman A.A. Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores by the type 1 phosphatase Glc7p. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:545-555.
120. Schmit A.C., Stoppin V., Chevrier V., Job D., Lambert A.M. Cell cycle dependent distribution of a centrosomal antigen at the perinuclear MTOC or at the kinetochores of higher plant cells. Chromosoma 1994, 103:343-351.
121. Sessa F., Mapelli M., Ciferri C., Tarricone C., Areces L.B., Schneider T.R., Stukenberg P.T., Musacchio A. Mechanism of Aurora B activation by INCENP and inhibition by hesperadin. Mol. Cell 2005, 18:379-391.
122. Skibbens R.V., Skeen V.P., Salmon E.D. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell. Biol. 1993, 122:859-875.
123. Slep K.C., Vale R.D. Structural basis of microtubule plus end tracking by XMAP215, CLIP-170, and EB1. Mol. Cell. 2007, 27:976-991.
124. Stumpff J., von Dassow G., Wagenbach M., Asbury C., Wordeman L. The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment. Dev. Cell. 2008, 14:252-262.
125. Su L.K., Burrell M., Hill D.E., Gyuris J., Brent R., Wiltshire R., Trent J., Vogelstein B., Kinzler K.W. APC binds to the novel protein EB1. Cancer Res. 1995, 55:2972-2977.
126. Tanaka T.U., Rachidi N., Janke C., Pereira G., Galova M., Schiebel E., Stark M.J., Nasmyth K. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 2002, 108:317-329.
127. Tirnauer J.S., Canman J.C., Salmon E.D., Mitchison T.J. EB1 targets to kinetochores with attached, polymerizing microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2002, 13:4308-4316.
128. Trinkle-Mulcahy L., Andrews P.D., Wickramasinghe S., Sleeman J., Prescott A., Lam Y.W., Lyon C., Swedlow J.R., Lamond A.I. Time-lapse imaging reveals dynamic relocalization of PP1gamma throughout the mammalian cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003, 14:107-117.
129. Tulu U.S., Fagerstrom C., Ferenz N.P., Wadsworth P. Molecular requirements for kinetochore-associated microtubule formation in mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:536-541.
130. Varma D., Monzo P., Stehman S.A., Vallee R.B. Direct role of dynein motor in stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment, orientation, and alignment. J. Cell. Biol. 2008, 182:1045-1054.
131. Walczak C.E., Heald R. Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly and function. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2008, 265:111-158.
132. Walczak C.E., Mitchison T.J., Desai A. XKCM1: a Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 1996, 84:37-47.
133. Wan X., O'Quinn R.P., Pierce H.L., Joglekar A.P., Gall W.E., DeLuca J.G., Carroll C.W., Liu S.T., Yen T.J., McEwen B.F., Stukenberg P.T., Desai A., Salmon E.D. Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell 2009, 137:672-684.
134. Wang H.W., Long S., Ciferri C., Westermann S., Drubin D., Barnes G., Nogales E. Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 383:894-903.
135. Wang H.W., Ramey V.H., Westermann S., Leschziner A.E., Welburn J.P., Nakajima Y., Drubin D.G., Barnes G., Nogales E. Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:721-726.
136. Weaver B.A., Bonday Z.Q., Putkey F.R., Kops G.J., Silk A.D., Cleveland D.W. Centromere-associated protein-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J. Cell. Biol. 2003, 162:551-563.
137. Wei R.R., Sorger P.K., Harrison S.C. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005.
138. Welburn J.P., Grishchuk E.L., Backer C.B., Wilson-Kubalek E.M., Yates J.R., Cheeseman I.M. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell. 2009, 16:374-385.
139. Welburn J.P., Vleugel M., Liu D., Yates J.R., Lampson M.A., Fukagawa T., Cheeseman I.M. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:383-392.
140. Wen Y., Eng C.H., Schmoranzer J., Cabrera-Poch N., Morris E.J., Chen M., Wallar B.J., Alberts A.S., Gundersen G.G. EB1 and APC bind to mDia to stabilize microtubules downstream of Rho and promote cell migration. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2004, 6:820-830.
141. Westermann S., Avila-Sakar A., Wang H.W., Niederstrasser H., Wong J., Drubin D.G., Nogales E., Barnes G. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore- microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell. 2005, 17:277-290.
142. Wheatley S.P., Kandels-Lewis S.E., Adams R.R., Ainsztein A.M., Earnshaw W.C. INCENP binds directly to tubulin and requires dynamic microtubules to target to the cleavage furrow. Exp. Cell. Res. 2001, 262:122-127.
143. Whyte J., Bader J.R., Tauhata S.B., Raycroft M., Hornick J., Pfister K.K., Lane W.S., Chan G.K., Hinchcliffe E.H., Vaughan P.S., Vaughan K.T. Phosphorylation regulates targeting of cytoplasmic dynein to kinetochores during mitosis. J. Cell. Biol. 2008, 183:819-834.
144. Wilde A., Zheng Y. Stimulation of microtubule aster formation and spindle assembly by the small GTPase Ran. Science 1999, 284:1359-1362.
145. Wollman R., Cytrynbaum E.N., Jones J.T., Meyer T., Scholey J.M., Mogilner A. Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the 'search-and-capture' process during mitotic-spindle assembly. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:828-832.
146. Wordeman L., Mitchison T.J. Identification and partial characterization of mitotic centromere-associated kinesin, a kinesin-related protein that associates with centromeres during mitosis. J. Cell. Biol. 1995, 128:95-104.
147. Yardimci H., van Duffelen M., Mao Y., Rosenfeld S.S., Selvin P.R. The mitotic kinesin CENP-E is a processive transport motor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:6016-6021.
148. Yasuda S., Oceguera-Yanez F., Kato T., Okamoto M., Yonemura S., Terada Y., Ishizaki T., Narumiya S. Cdc42 and mDia3 regulate microtubule attachment to kinetochores. Nature 2004, 428:767-771.
149. Zhai Y., Kronebusch P.J., Borisy G.G. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J. Cell. Biol. 1995, 131:721-734.
150. Zhang G., Kelstrup C.D., Hu X.W., Hansen M.J., Singleton M.R., Olsen J.V., Nilsson J. The Ndc80 internal loop is required for recruitment of the Ska complex to establish end-on microtubule attachment to kinetochores. J. Cell. Sci 2012.
151. Zhang J., Ahmad S., Mao Y. BubR1 and APC/EB1 cooperate to maintain metaphase chromosome alignment. J. Cell. Biol. 2007, 178:773-784.
152. Zhang P., Knowles B.A., Goldstein L.S., Hawley R.S. A kinesin-like protein required for distributive chromosome segregation in Drosophila. Cell 1990, 62:1053-1062.